简体中文
EnglishDoes Square Insider Cover Games Outside of Square Enix?
Updated
Based on the site's own description and its published articles, Square Insider is focused on Square Enix. Its tagline is "Square Enix News, Previews, Reviews and Discussion," and every article visible on the homepage covers a Square Enix title or studio. There is no stated coverage of other publishers, and no non-Square Enix games appear in the available page evidence. If you are looking for coverage of Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft, or third-party studios outside Square Enix, this site is not positioned as a general gaming outlet.
What the site says it covers
The site's own description is the clearest signal:
"Square Enix News, Previews, Reviews and Discussion"
That scope is narrow by design. It names one publisher and four content types — news, previews, reviews, and discussion — rather than claiming broad industry coverage.
What the published articles actually cover
The homepage articles all sit inside the Square Enix catalog:
| Article | Square Enix connection |
|---|---|
| Final Fantasy Tactics: The Ivalice Chronicles remaster | Square Enix title; interview with director Kazutoyo Maehiro |
| Bravely Default: Flying Fairy HD Remaster | Square Enix and developer Cattle Call |
| Final Fantasy XVI on Xbox Series X|S and PC | Square Enix title |
| Kingdom Hearts: Missing-Link cancellation | Square Enix mobile title |
Every headline, developer credit, and platform note in the evidence ties back to Square Enix. The Final Fantasy XVI story does mention Xbox and PC platforms, but that is a Square Enix game arriving on those platforms — not coverage of another publisher's games.
What this means for you
- If you want Square Enix news, previews, reviews, and discussion: the site matches that intent directly.
- If you want coverage of other publishers or the wider games industry: nothing in the site description or the visible articles supports that. You would need a general gaming site instead.
- If you want to confirm current coverage: check the Articles Archive, since the homepage only shows a snapshot of recent posts. The archive is the best place to see whether any non-Square Enix content has been published.
A caveat on the evidence
The available page evidence shows the homepage and a handful of recent articles. It does not include the full archive, so it cannot prove that zero non-Square Enix articles exist. What it does show is that the site's stated identity and its visible output are both Square Enix–centric. Treat "Square Enix only" as the working assumption and verify against the archive if the distinction matters to you.