How Should I Study for the IB?
Updated
Studying for the IB effectively means matching each task to the right resource and working in short, active cycles rather than long passive reading sessions. The core loop is: practise real exam-style questions by topic, mark your answers honestly, review only the notes or videos covering what you got wrong, then re-test that topic a few days later. This works for any subject because IB assessment rewards applying knowledge under time pressure, not recognising it. The method below assumes you have your subject list and exam dates; if you are still choosing subjects, sort that out first.
Start With the Syllabus, Not the Textbook
Every IB subject has a published syllabus with numbered sub-topics and assessment objectives. Use it as your checklist:
- Print or copy the syllabus points for one subject.
- Mark each point as "can explain", "can apply to a question", or "not yet".
- Study only the "not yet" and shaky points first — this alone can cut your revision time significantly.
The reason this matters: IB exam questions are written against syllabus statements, so anything outside them is unlikely to be tested directly.
Use the Right Resource for Each Job
| Job | Best resource type | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Learning a topic for the first time | Notes, cheatsheets, videos | Builds the base understanding |
| Checking you actually understand | Question bank by topic | Immediate application, reveals gaps |
| Exam timing and stamina | Full past papers, predicted papers | Trains pacing under real conditions |
| Memorising definitions, formulas, case studies | Flashcards | Fast, repeatable recall practice |
| Improving written work (essays, IAs) | AI feedback tools | Fast turnaround on structure and clarity |
RevisionDojo organises its material this way — exam-style questions, notes, cheatsheets, videos, a question bank, predicted papers, past paper videos, and an exam builder — which is useful because it means you don't have to assemble these from five different sites. Its question bank is categorised, which one student specifically credited with saving study time.
Practise by Topic Before You Practise by Paper
Doing full past papers too early is a common mistake: you burn through the most valuable material while still weak on individual topics.
- Weeks 1–N: one sub-topic at a time. Answer 5–10 questions on it, mark them, and note the exact reason for each error (misread, forgot formula, didn't know concept).
- Later: move to mixed-topic sets so you have to identify which method applies — this is what exams actually demand.
- Final phase: full papers under timed conditions, then predicted papers for topics with less past-paper coverage.
Keep an error log. Three or four lines per mistake is enough: topic, what went wrong, the correct approach. Re-read it before each practice session.
Use AI Feedback as a Second Reader, Not a Grader
AI tools are most reliable for written work — checking whether an argument is clear, whether a paragraph answers the question, or whether your IA structure is logical. Student reports on RevisionDojo describe using the AI tools for exam and IA preparation and getting feedback that helped fix mistakes in their writing.
Two cautions:
- Treat AI comments as suggestions to evaluate, not final marks. Your teacher and the official mark scheme are the authority.
- Never submit AI-written text as your own. IB has academic honesty rules, and examiners know your normal writing style.
Build a Weekly Schedule You Can Actually Keep
A workable pattern for a normal school week:
- 3–4 short sessions (30–45 min) on weak topics, each ending with 5 questions.
- 1 longer session (60–90 min) on a full section or past paper question set.
- 1 review session going back over your error log and flashcards.
- Rest days. Cramming seven days a week reduces retention and increases careless errors.
Track progress per subject, not overall. "Biology: 4 topics weak → 1 topic weak" tells you something; "studied 6 hours" does not.
What Actually Moves Grades
The testimonials on RevisionDojo describe grade jumps in specific subjects — Biology 4 to 6, Math AA HL 4 to 7, Computer Science HL and Business Management SL 5 to 7 — and the site claims students improve by one point per subject on average. These are self-reported results, not guarantees, but the pattern behind them is consistent: categorised practice, honest marking, and repetition until questions feel routine. The students who improve are the ones who test themselves early and often, not the ones who read the most.
If you want a single starting point, pick your weakest subject, open its syllabus, and answer ten questions on the first weak sub-topic today. That is the whole method in miniature.