How to Contribute Feedback or Corrections to sensor.fyi
Updated
sensor.fyi accepts corrections and additions through two channels: email and its community Discord. The site's own welcome text says that if you believe any information is incorrect or incomplete, you can "send me an email or join our community Discord and let me know." There is no form, account, or moderation queue described on the site, so those two routes are the ones to use.
What kind of feedback the site asks for
The request is specifically about accuracy and completeness of the mouse information, not general suggestions. The welcome text frames it as: if you believe any of the information on this site is incorrect or incomplete, tell the author. That covers things like:
- A sensor listed on the Sensors page that you think is mischaracterized
- A mouse missing from the Flawless Mice curated list
- An explanation on the Info page that you think is wrong or out of date
Because the site describes itself as a resource built from the author's own experience with many mice — gaming mice, vertical mice, trackballs — corrections that come with concrete detail (which mouse, which sensor, what you observed) fit the stated purpose better than broad disagreement.
The two feedback channels
| Channel | Best for | What the site says |
|---|---|---|
| Detailed corrections, links, or evidence you want to keep private | "send me an email" | |
| Community Discord | Discussion, quick questions, comparing notes with other readers | "join our community Discord and let me know" |
The site does not publish a specific email address or Discord invite link in the text provided here, so you will need to find those on the site itself. If you cannot locate them, that is worth noting — the invitation to contribute only works if the contact points are visible.
A practical way to send a useful correction
- Identify the exact page and claim. The site is organized into an Info page (explains aspects of mice), a Flawless Mice page (a curated list of mice the author considers flawless), and a Sensors page (a listing of potentially flawless sensors plus further reading).
- State what you think is wrong or missing, and why. Reference the specific mouse or sensor.
- Include what you observed or where the information comes from, if you have it. The site's whole premise is informed purchasing, so sourcing matters.
- Send it by email if it is a one-way correction, or raise it in Discord if you want it discussed.
What to expect
The site does not describe a review process, response time, or guarantee that submissions will be published. Treat feedback as a suggestion to the author rather than an edit you control. The Discord route is the one that gives you a reply and a conversation; email is the quieter option.
One more thing the site asks: if the resource has been useful, share it with friends. That is a separate ask from corrections, but it is part of how the author wants the site to spread.
Before you write
Check whether your point is already covered. The site separates "flawless mice" from "potentially flawless sensors," so a mouse missing from the flawless list may simply not have met that bar rather than being an oversight. Reading the Info page first will tell you which category your correction belongs to and make your message easier to act on.