How to Find the Leaderboard, Papers, and Code on LLM Evaluation

Updated

The LLM Evaluation site (llm-eval.github.io) puts its three main resources—Leaderboard, Papers, and Code—directly on the homepage as navigation links. Open the site's home page and use those three entries to reach evaluation results, the underlying research, or implementation resources. The site describes itself as original research on LLM evaluation by Microsoft Research and collaborating institutes, with content updated as of October 2023.

What each entry point gives you

Entry point What you'll find Best for
Leaderboard Comparative evaluation results for LLMs Checking how models rank on the site's benchmarks
Papers The published research behind the evaluations Understanding methodology and findings
Code Implementation resources Reproducing or building on the evaluations

How to use the site

  1. Go to the homepage. The three links appear as the site's primary navigation, alongside a short description of the research and a contact reference (Jindong Wang) plus a pointer to related LLM enhancement projects.
  2. Pick your entry point based on your goal. If you want rankings, start with Leaderboard; if you want to read the research, start with Papers; if you want to run or adapt the evaluation, start with Code.
  3. Check the date before relying on results. The homepage states the content was updated in October 2023, so treat leaderboard positions and paper coverage as a snapshot from that time rather than a live, continuously refreshed record.

Common sticking points

  • Expecting a searchable database. The homepage presents these as simple links, not a query interface; navigate through the linked sections rather than looking for filters on the landing page.
  • Assuming current rankings. Because the stated update is October 2023, newer models may not appear. Verify against the paper dates in the Papers section if recency matters for your decision.
  • Looking for pricing or access tiers. The available site information doesn't describe pricing or login requirements, so don't assume either free access or gated content—check each linked section directly.

If you need the evaluation methodology before trusting a ranking, read the Papers section first, then return to the Leaderboard with that context.