Is xicons a good choice compared to other icon libraries?
Updated
xicons is a good fit if your project uses Vue or React and you want one icon source that covers both frameworks. Its positioning is narrow and clear: it packages icon sets for Vue and React rather than trying to be a universal, framework-agnostic library. If you need icons for Svelte, Angular, or plain HTML, xicons is not the right tool. If you work across Vue and React (or expect to), the shared source is the main reason to pick it.
What xicons is actually for
xicons describes itself as "Icons for Vue & React." That single line carries most of the decision:
- Framework scope: Vue and React only. No other frameworks are advertised.
- Delivery model: Icons are consumed as components/packages inside those frameworks, not as a generic SVG sprite or font you drop into any page.
- Role: It acts as a distribution layer over icon sets, giving Vue and React developers a consistent way to pull them in.
So the real question isn't "is xicons the biggest icon library?" It's "do I need Vue + React coverage from one place?"
How to compare it against other icon libraries
Use the same dimensions for every candidate, and check the specifics on each site since details change.
| Dimension | What to check | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Framework support | Vue, React, or both | xicons' whole value is the Vue + React pairing |
| Icon count | Total icons available | Determines whether your needed glyphs exist |
| Styles/variants | Outline, filled, etc. | Affects visual consistency with your UI |
| Integration | Component import vs. raw SVG | Changes how much setup work you do |
| License | Terms for commercial use | A blocker if it doesn't fit your project |
| Maintenance | Update frequency | Stale sets miss new icons |
For xicons specifically, the framework column is its strongest differentiator. For icon count, style coverage, and licensing, the source material here doesn't provide numbers or terms — verify those directly on xicons.org before committing.
When xicons is the better choice
- You maintain both a Vue and a React app and want a single icon source to keep them visually aligned.
- You want icons delivered as framework components, not hand-managed SVG files.
- You're fine with a focused library and don't need dozens of stylistic variants.
When another library fits better
- Your stack is not Vue or React — pick a framework-agnostic set or one native to your framework.
- You need a very large or highly specialized icon catalog, or specific styles xicons doesn't cover.
- You need guaranteed license terms up front and can't confirm them — choose a library with clearly stated licensing.
Practical check before you adopt
- Open xicons.org and confirm the Vue and React packages exist for the icons you need.
- Verify the icon count and styles cover your design.
- Read the license for your use case (commercial, redistribution).
- Install in a small test component in each framework and confirm imports resolve as expected.
If steps 1–3 pass and you're on Vue or React, xicons is a reasonable choice. If any fail, a broader or framework-native library will serve you better.