VTResources Listing Guidelines for Resources and Commissions

VTResources accepts recommendations for resources and commissions, but not everything submitted gets listed. The page states that redundant items are judged by coverage and recency, entries from the same creator may be combined, severely outdated resources and inactive commissions are removed, commission suggestions without enough information may be denied, and questionable resources or creators may be removed. If you are submitting something, the practical takeaway is: put your work in one place, keep it current, and include enough detail for a reviewer to evaluate it.

How VTResources decides what stays listed

The guidelines on the site are short, but they define a clear editorial filter. They apply both to general resources and to commission listings.

Redundancy and coverage

• If some resources or guides are found to be redundant, the item with more coverage and recency will be considered and listed.
• Some items can be combined instead of listed separately.
• Redundant entries from the same creator may be combined.

This means a newer or more complete version of a resource can take precedence over an older or narrower one. It also means submitting the same asset, guide, or tool multiple times does not increase the chance of being listed.

One place per creator

The page explicitly recommends that asset and resource creators put all their stuff in one place. For creators, that reduces the chance of separate entries being merged or dropped as duplicates, and it gives a reviewer a single, complete view of what you offer.

Freshness and activity

• Resources that are severely out of date will be removed or denied.
• Inactive commissions will also be removed periodically.

A listing is not permanent. If a resource stops being maintained or a commission stops being active, it can be taken down even if it was previously accepted.

Information quality for commissions

• Commission suggestions that lack enough information may be denied.
• Having commissions information in a website or Twitter bio/pin is appreciated.

For commission submissions, the site favors a clear, self-contained source of truth — a website or a pinned bio — over scattered or incomplete details.

Questionable entries

• Questionable resources or creators may be removed or denied.

The page does not define "questionable" in detail, but the feedback section lists plagiarism, breach of TOS, scamming, and bad practices as issues that can be reported.

What you can submit and how

The page collects VTuber and streaming-related resources, including useful software and apps, guides, free or low-cost assets (PNGs, graphics, music, and similar), and helpful tips. It also maintains commission listings for art, graphics, models, music/audio, and video work.

Submissions and feedback go through the linked document, the alternative document, or the submission form, or by tagging or DMing @VTResources on Twitter. Self-recommendation is allowed.

The feedback channel is also used for:

• Resource or commission recommendations
• Corrections, broken or incorrect links, and spotted typos
• Issues with listed people or items, such as plagiarism, breach of TOS, scamming, or bad practices
• Requests to edit or remove your own information if you are listed

Practical checklist before submitting

Notes on contacting VTResources

The site notes that the Twitter account does not respond to vague or conversational DMs. Send a message with details rather than opening with just "Hi," "Hello," or "I need help." It also warns that Twitter may automatically filter out DMs, so a detailed message is more likely to get through than a short opener.