What Did Maige’s Pricing Plans Include?

Updated

Maige listed a Standard Plan at $30.00 USD per month, with the first 30 issues free, and an Enterprise plan for large teams marked “coming soon.” However, Maige has been sunset: new signups are closed, and the service remains on GitHub as a public archive. The pricing details below describe what was advertised, not a currently purchasable plan.

Standard Plan: $30.00 USD per month

The Standard Plan was the only published paid tier. Its listed features were:

Feature What it covered
Auto-labelling Applying labels to issues automatically
Auto-assignment Assigning issues, such as routing UI-related issues to a named user
Auto-comments Posting comments on issues and pull requests
Custom instructions Writing rules in plain text for how Maige should respond
Code review Reviewing incoming pull requests against project guidance
Code generation Running simple code snippets in a sandbox environment

The page described the model as “Try Maige for free, then pay by usage,” with the first 30 issues free on the Standard Plan. The published material does not specify what usage costs beyond those 30 issues, so the per-issue rate after the free allowance is not documented here.

Enterprise Plan

An Enterprise plan was listed as “Best for large teams” and “Coming soon.” No price, feature list, or availability date was published. Treat it as an announced intention rather than a plan anyone could buy.

What the plan actually bought

Pricing is easier to judge alongside how the product worked. Connecting a repository created three things: a webhook, embeddings of the entire codebase, and a sandbox environment. Users then wrote rules in plain language, such as assigning UI issues to a specific username, labelling .env pull requests as “needs-approval” unless opened by a maintainer, or reviewing pull requests against a CONTRIBUTING.md file. The dashboard was used to monitor runs and give feedback.

So the $30 monthly fee covered a natural-language workflow layer on top of the GitHub API—labelling, assigning, commenting, reviewing, and light code execution—rather than a standalone editor or hosting service.

Can you still sign up?

No. The site states that new signups are closed and that existing users can still sign in. The project is described as open-source infrastructure, now kept as a public archive on GitHub. If you want to evaluate the approach today, the archive is the practical route; the paid plans are historical information.

Choosing based on these details

  • If you were comparing it as a paid tool: the only concrete figure was $30/month with 30 free issues, and that offer is no longer open to new users.
  • If you want the functionality: the open-source archive is the available path, though it comes without the hosted signup flow.
  • If you needed enterprise terms: none were published, so there is nothing to compare against other vendors.