What Example Projects Has Green Mountain System Works Delivered?

Updated

Green Mountain System Works (gmsw.com) publicly describes two named field-safety projects in the energy sector, plus a broader set of user groups its apps are built for. Because much of its client work is confidential, the site presents these as representative examples rather than a full portfolio. If you are evaluating the firm's fit for a complex mobile project, the two case descriptions below are the most concrete evidence available.

The two detailed example projects

Energy Hazard Assessment Tool (field safety, energy sector)

A mobile app for utility workers to identify, assess, and mitigate energy hazards before starting a job. According to the site, it covers five hazard categories — gravity, electrical, pressure, motion, and mechanical — and includes:

  • GPS logging of assessments
  • Severity calculations
  • Exportable assessment reports

The source is credited to the Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. and used with permission, which suggests the tool was developed in a research/utility context rather than as a generic commercial product.

Field Safety Briefing App (major Northeast utility)

A "tailboard briefing" app — the pre-job safety conversation crews hold before work begins. The site describes a two-stage delivery:

  1. A proof-of-concept built with a task force of seven utilities
  2. A production app built and successfully piloted with a major Northeast utility

This is the clearest illustration of how the firm works: start with a multi-stakeholder prototype, then harden it into a piloted production system.

What these examples tell you about fit

Dimension What the examples show
Problem type Regulated, safety-critical field workflows where mistakes carry real consequences
Users Non-technical field staff who need the app to work without training or a manual
Technical features GPS, calculations, report export, and (per the site) hardware integration
Delivery style Iterative: proof of concept with stakeholders, then production pilot
Disclosure limits Client names are often withheld; details are descriptive, not a reference list

Beyond energy: the user groups the firm cites

The site names a wider set of users its software is built for — home health nurses, motorsport scoring crews, field workers, and medical students — and lists specializations in mobile (iOS/Android), hardware integration, cloud and web services, and systems architecture. It also states it has delivered "hundreds" of apps and solutions over 30+ years, with roughly five active client relationships at any time. Those broader claims are not backed by individual case write-ups on the page, so treat them as positioning rather than verifiable examples.

How to use this when deciding

  • If your project resembles the examples — field safety, regulated workflows, hardware-connected data collection, or users who won't read a manual — the case descriptions are directly relevant and worth discussing in detail.
  • If you need references or named clients, the site itself notes it can't always name clients. Ask directly whether comparable references can be shared under NDA.
  • If you want to see more work, the site's "See our work" section is the entry point; the two projects above are what it currently details.

For a project-specific conversation, the site's "Let's talk about your project" contact path is the stated next step.