简体中文
EnglishWhat Is Bias-Free and Inclusive Language in APA Style?
Updated
Bias-free and inclusive language in APA Style means choosing words that describe people accurately and respectfully, without implying that any group is inferior, abnormal, or less worthy of consideration. The APA Style website (apastyle.apa.org) treats this as a core writing guideline, not an optional courtesy: the goal is precision about who you studied and what you found, so readers can evaluate your claims without wading through stereotypes. It applies to any scholarly writing that mentions people or groups, including research papers, literature reviews, and classroom assignments.
Why APA Style Treats This as a Writing Rule
In scholarly writing, vague or loaded wording creates two problems at once. It can offend or exclude readers, and it can distort your findings by implying a cause or a norm that your data do not support. APA's guidance on bias-free and inclusive language is designed to fix both: describe people using the terms they use for themselves, and keep the focus on the research question rather than on group membership as a defining trait.
A useful test: if you can remove the reference to a group characteristic and your sentence still says what you mean, the reference was probably doing no analytical work.
Core Principles You Can Apply Immediately
- Be specific about the group you actually studied. "Participants" is more accurate than a broad label if your sample was narrow.
- Put people first, not labels. Describe the person or the condition rather than using a condition as a noun for the person.
- Avoid implying a default or a deviation. Wording that treats one group as the standard and others as variations introduces bias.
- Match the terms used in your source material and by the communities you write about. Terminology shifts over time, so check current usage rather than relying on older publications.
Applying It Across Common Categories
APA Style organizes its guidance by the kinds of characteristics authors most often write about. The categories below reflect the topics the site covers; the examples show the direction of the change rather than a fixed phrasebook.
| Category | What to watch for | Direction of the fix |
|---|---|---|
| Age | Grouping all older or younger people under one label | State the actual age range or life stage you studied |
| Disability | Treating a condition as the whole person | Describe the person and the condition separately |
| Gender | Assuming a binary or a default gender | Use the terms participants reported; avoid gendered generics |
| Race and ethnicity | Using broad pan-ethnic labels for specific groups | Name the specific group and capitalize as appropriate |
| Sexual orientation | Framing one orientation as the norm | Describe orientation neutrally, without judgment |
| Socioeconomic status | Using status as a stand-in for ability or character | Describe the relevant material condition instead |
Because terminology changes, treat this table as a set of questions to ask about your draft, not as a list of banned words.
A Worked Example
Suppose you are reporting a study of memory in adults aged 65 to 80.
- Biased framing: "The elderly performed worse than normal adults on the recall task."
- Bias-free framing: "Adults aged 65 to 80 recalled fewer items than adults aged 20 to 35."
The second version does three things: it names the actual age ranges, it avoids treating younger adults as the default, and it states the comparison without implying decline is a defining trait of the older group. The same rewrite pattern works for disability, gender, and other categories.
Common Pitfalls
- Overcorrecting into vagueness. Replacing a precise group label with a euphemism can hide who was studied and weaken your methods section.
- Assuming one community's preferred term fits another. Preferences differ across regions, generations, and individuals; when in doubt, follow your participants' own wording.
- Changing terminology mid-paper. Pick terms in your methods section and use them consistently.
- Treating the guideline as cosmetic. If a phrase implies a judgment your data do not support, the fix is analytical, not just stylistic.
Where to Go on apastyle.apa.org
The site lists bias-free and inclusive language among its popular style guidelines, alongside formatting and citation help. Start there for the category-by-category guidance, then check the APA Style Blog for discussions of terminology that has changed. If you are formatting a full paper, the same site covers the 7th edition rules you will need for the rest of the document. Note that the site uses cookies and offers a newsletter and merchandise; none of that affects access to the style guidance itself.