What Is CICR's Third-Party Neutral Approach?
Updated
Third-Party Neutral (TPN) is the Canadian Institute for Conflict Resolution's (CICR) core method for both training and intervention work. It positions the conflict practitioner as a neutral party who does not take sides, judge outcomes, or impose solutions, but instead helps the people in conflict work through it themselves. CICR has built its reputation on this approach since 1988, and it runs through everything from its 160-hour certificate program to its mediation, facilitation, and coaching services. If you are deciding whether CICR's training fits how you or your organization think about handling conflict, understanding TPN is the place to start.
What "Third-Party Neutral" actually means
A third-party neutral is someone outside the dispute who supports the process without advocating for any side. In CICR's framing, the practitioner:
- Does not decide who is right or wrong
- Does not push a preferred resolution
- Focuses on the process, communication, and understanding rather than the verdict
- Helps participants build their own constructive path forward
This is different from a manager who arbitrates, a consultant who recommends a fix, or an advisor who represents one party. The neutrality is about the role, not about being detached or passive — the practitioner actively guides the conversation.
Where the approach is applied
CICR applies TPN across two broad areas, and the same philosophy carries into both.
Training
CICR's programs are described as experiential, transformative, and recognized, led by expert practitioners. The method shapes how participants learn to show up in conflict — not as someone who resolves it for others, but as someone who can hold a neutral, constructive space.
Intervention services
For organizations, CICR offers practitioner-led services including:
- Coaching
- Mediation
- Group and workplace facilitation
- Customized training
Community mediation, facilitation, and coaching in the National Capital Region are delivered through Community Conflict Resolution Ottawa (CCRO) volunteers.
Why the method matters when choosing training
If your goal is to learn how to decide conflicts or represent a party, a neutral-based program may not match that aim. If your goal is to facilitate, mediate, or help teams work through conflict together, TPN is directly relevant. CICR states it is trusted by governments, unions, and frontline teams across Canada and abroad, which suggests the approach is designed for workplace, institutional, and community settings rather than adversarial advocacy.
Programs built on TPN
CICR's conflict resolution programs include:
| Program | Format |
|---|---|
| Third-Party Neutral 160-Hour Certificate Program | English & French |
| Transforming Conflict: Cultivating Peace | — |
| Essential Skill-Building Workshop | English & French |
| Dealing with Conflict: A One-Day Immersion | One day |
| Identity-Based Conflict Seminar | 3-day reflective seminar, English & French |
The 160-hour certificate is the most substantial commitment and the clearest expression of the TPN method. The one-day immersion and shorter workshops are entry points if you want to test the approach before committing further.
How to judge the fit
Ask yourself:
- Do I want to facilitate others' resolution, or decide it for them?
- Does my organization value neutral process over top-down answers?
- Am I looking for experiential, practitioner-led learning rather than theory-only instruction?
If those align with TPN, CICR's programs are worth exploring. If you need arbitration or advocacy skills, look elsewhere.