What Is DeployHub and What Does Its Post-Deployment Vulnerability Detection Platform Do?

Updated

DeployHub is a post-deployment vulnerability detection platform: it monitors software that has already been released, uses SBOMs and deployment evidence to detect newly disclosed CVEs, and shows where vulnerable packages are actually running. It is built on the Ortelius open-source core and works agentlessly. It fits teams that already ship software and need to know which known vulnerabilities are live in production—not teams looking for pre-merge code scanning.

The problem it targets

The platform's own framing is that finding CVEs is no longer the hard part; determining which ones are actually running in production, and where, is. Its page cites 48,185 CVEs in one year—more than 130 new disclosures per day in 2025—as the reason manual triage does not scale.

The example it gives is a 2025 React Server Components vulnerability rated CVSS 10.0: applications could be exposed simply by supporting React Server Components, even without explicitly implementing Server Functions. The lesson DeployHub draws is that knowing a dependency exists is not enough—you need to know where the vulnerable version is running.

Core capabilities

Capability What it does
Post-deployment detection Continuously monitors already-released software rather than only pre-merge code
SBOM + deployment evidence Correlates software bills of materials with what was actually deployed
CVE-to-endpoint mapping Maps each vulnerability to the endpoint at risk
Attack surface analysis Automatically analyzes your attack surface
Threat exposure monitoring Continuously monitors exposure over time
SBOM intelligence Turns SBOMs into security tracking
Open-source package profiles Tracks security profiles of open-source packages
Production digital twin Builds a model of the production environment
DevSecOps pipeline integrations Feeds pipeline data into security workflows

The stated design goal is less noise and faster response, so teams can fix quickly before an attack.

How it differs from adjacent tools

  • Versus pre-deployment scanning: DeployHub focuses on what is already live. A scanner that runs in CI tells you a vulnerable package was in the build; DeployHub is positioned to tell you where that version is running now.
  • Versus agent-based runtime tools: It is explicitly agentless, so coverage depends on SBOM and deployment evidence rather than installed agents.
  • Versus raw CVE feeds: The value is correlation and location, not the CVE list itself.

Who it is for

Security and platform teams running production systems who need continuous threat exposure management (CTEM) and CVE attack surface visibility tied to real deployments. The site also lists government and Space Force among its audiences.

Practical notes before you evaluate it

  • The site references "Pricing," "SaaS," and "Login" in navigation, but the supplied material contains no price, plan, or login-restriction details—confirm commercial terms directly.
  • The page offers a demo request and points to free open-source resources; the Ortelius core is described as open source, but confirm which capabilities sit in the open core versus the commercial platform.
  • Success depends on having usable SBOMs and deployment records; without them, endpoint mapping will be incomplete.

For a concrete test, pick one production service with a known vulnerable dependency, confirm DeployHub surfaces it and names the endpoint, then judge noise levels against your current process.