What pricing plans does Puck offer?

Updated

Puck lists a dedicated Pricing page at puckeditor.com/pricing, which is the authoritative source for current plan names, limits, and costs. The available site data confirms that a pricing page exists but does not include the specific tiers, prices, or feature breakdowns, so any plan-level comparison below should be verified on that page before you commit.

What the site confirms

  • Puck is positioned as "the agentic visual editor for React," with the tagline "Let your users generate, review, and refine production-ready interfaces inside your application."
  • A Pricing link is present in the site navigation, indicating Puck is sold as a commercial product rather than only an open-source library.
  • No payment platforms, free-tier claims, or numeric prices appear in the available page evidence, so those details cannot be stated here.

How to evaluate the plans when you open the pricing page

Because Puck is a developer-facing React editor, plan differences usually map to how you deploy and govern it rather than to consumer-style feature gates. When you review the pricing page, check these dimensions in order:

  1. Seat or developer count — how many engineers on your team will configure and maintain Puck.
  2. End-user or editor limits — whether the plan caps the number of people who use the editor inside your app.
  3. Hosting and deployment model — self-hosted versus managed, and whether that changes the price.
  4. Support and SLA — response times and channels, which matter more for production deployments.
  5. Commercial license terms — whether your use case (internal tool, SaaS, client work) is covered.

Choosing based on your situation

Your situation What to look for on the pricing page
Solo developer prototyping Lowest tier that permits commercial or production use
Small team shipping one React app Per-seat pricing and whether editor end-users count
Agency building for multiple clients License terms covering multiple client deployments
Larger org with compliance needs Support tier, SLA, and any enterprise or custom option

If the page offers a "Contact sales" or custom tier, that typically signals volume-based or enterprise licensing, which is worth requesting when your seat count or deployment scope is uncertain.

Common sticking points

  • Assuming it's free. The presence of a Pricing page means paid plans exist; it does not confirm a free tier. Check the page directly.
  • Confusing the library with the product. Puck's editor may be usable in code while commercial features, support, or hosted services sit behind a plan.
  • Ignoring end-user counting. For an in-app editor, the number of people editing content can drive cost more than the number of developers.

For exact figures and current terms, go to puckeditor.com/pricing — that page is the only reliable source for up-to-date plan details.