Who Publishes the Richmond Journal of Law and Technology?

Updated

The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology (JOLT) is a student-edited law review associated with the University of Richmond School of Law, and it describes itself as the first exclusively online law review. If you are trying to understand the journal's academic standing, who runs it, or how it fits into legal scholarship, the key points are below.

Who produces the journal

JOLT is a law review, which in the U.S. legal academy means a scholarly periodical edited by law students rather than by a professional editorial staff. Its connection to the University of Richmond places it within a law-school environment, where student editors select, edit, and publish legal scholarship.

The journal's own site identifies it as "The first exclusively online law review," a claim that speaks to its publishing model rather than to any ranking or accreditation. Treat that phrase as the journal's self-description.

What "exclusively online" means in practice

Unlike traditional print law reviews, JOLT publishes its content online rather than in a print volume. For readers, this generally means:

  • Articles are accessible through the journal's website rather than a print subscription.
  • Issues are organized digitally, with current content featured on the homepage.
  • The publication model aligns with the journal's focus on technology and law.

The site does not state access or pricing terms, so do not assume content is free or that no login is required; check the site directly before relying on either.

What the journal publishes

JOLT publishes legal scholarship at the intersection of law and technology. Recent articles featured on its homepage illustrate the range:

Article Author Subject area
"Rethinking Federal Rule of Evidence 707: Reliability and Transparency in AI-Generated Evidence" Sara Williams Evidence law and AI-generated evidence
"Digital Judgment: Towards a Blockchain-Based Recognition System" Avaskhan Z. Asanaliyev Blockchain and legal recognition systems

These examples show the journal's pattern: doctrinal legal analysis applied to emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and blockchain.

How to use this in practice

If you are evaluating JOLT as a source or as a publication venue:

  • As a reader or researcher: cite it as a student-edited, online law review affiliated with the University of Richmond, and verify the specific article's date and issue on the site.
  • As a potential author: recognize that student-edited law reviews typically manage selection and editing, so submission expectations follow law-review conventions rather than peer-reviewed science journals.
  • For academic context: describe it as a scholarly legal publication focused on law and technology, consistent with its own description as the first exclusively online law review.

For specifics on browsing issues or the journal's topic scope, the site's homepage and issue pages are the authoritative starting points.