Does Wipperoz Serve Both Job Seekers and Hiring Teams?
Yes. Wipperoz is built around two sides of the same hiring process. Job seekers create and share a video-first Virtual CV on a link they control, and hiring teams can post a role and read applications as Virtual CVs. The site states this directly: "Orbit For hiring teams: post a role, read applications as Virtual CVs," alongside "Create your Virtual CV" and "Open a recruiter account" as separate entry points. The stated rationale is that "A Virtual CV is worth more when the person reading it is in the same system."
What job seekers get
The candidate-facing product is a Virtual CV: an online resume that combines video, structure, and evidence on one shareable link, positioned as a replacement for sending PDFs. The homepage frames it as "Your experience as a page that speaks — video, structure and evidence — on one link you control."
The example profile shown on the site (Maya Lindqvist, Senior Developer / Full-Stack Lead) illustrates the format:
- A CV score (92 in the example)
- A video or spoken introduction
- Experience and Skills tabs
- A verified work entry with a named employer and dates
- A quoted claim with third-party verification attached ("The 20% figure is accurate — I signed off on it." — Sofia Marín · verified)
The site describes setup as "Three steps. About five minutes," and offers "500 free credits · no card" as a starting point.
What hiring teams get
The recruiter-facing product is Orbit. Per the site, hiring teams can "post a role, read applications as Virtual CVs." The value proposition is structural: when a candidate's Virtual CV is read inside the same system that hosts the role, the reader sees the video, structure, and evidence as intended rather than as a parsed-down document.
The site also shows a role-matching view where the same two candidates are scored against a chosen role (Frontend Engineer, Platform Engineer, Engineering Manager). In the illustrative example, a generic two-column PDF scores 47% qualification match and is filtered out by ATS, while a clean single-column Wipperoz layout scores 92% and is shortlisted.
Where the two sides meet
The shared premise is the ATS problem. Wipperoz claims "Most rejections happen before a human sees you," because applications pass through an Applicant Tracking System before a recruiter looks, and weak structure or missing keywords cause silent filtering. The site lists "Three things a PDF structurally cannot do" as the reason for a link-based format rather than a document.
This is why the two products are presented as one system rather than two unrelated tools: a candidate's structured Virtual CV is designed to be parsed cleanly by ATS, and a recruiter reading inside Orbit sees the same structured profile.
What to verify before committing
The site's own example is labeled "Illustrative example — parsing behaviour varies by system," and Wipperoz states plainly: "Wipperoz provides tools, not guarantees: we do not promise interviews, jobs or outcomes." Treat the 47% vs. 92% comparison as a demonstration of the format difference, not a prediction of your results.
Before signing up on either side, check the current pricing page (the site links to Pricing and to an Orbit-specific pricing page) for what the 500 free credits cover and what paid tiers include. The source material does not specify recruiter-side feature limits, seat counts, or posting quotas, so confirm those on the live product pages if you are evaluating Orbit for a team.