How Is BigDevSoon Different from Tutorials or Just Using AI to Write Code?
Updated
BigDevSoon is positioned as a "vibe coding" platform for developers who learn by shipping, not by watching. Its core claim is that it replaces the "tutorial trap" — endless videos that teach syntax but not delivery — with real projects, an AI editor, and career tools in one app. It differs from plain AI code generation in one key way: the stated goal is that you can read, review, and own the AI-generated code, rather than ship something you don't understand.
The problem both alternatives share
The site's founder, Adrian Bigaj, describes two failure modes directly:
- Tutorial hell taught syntax, not shipping. Learners "ace LeetCode but can't turn a Figma file into a real app."
- Most reach for AI now — and ship slop they can't read, review, or own.
So the comparison isn't "tutorials vs. AI." It's "passive learning vs. unaccountable generation" — and BigDevSoon positions itself against both.
How BigDevSoon differs from tutorials
| Dimension | Typical tutorials | BigDevSoon |
|---|---|---|
| Unit of work | Video lessons, isolated syntax | 21+ real projects, 100 challenges, 40+ practice problems |
| Design input | Usually none | Projects come with Figma designs |
| Task structure | Follow along start to finish | Projects "already split into logical tasks" (per user @AsadullahSamo) |
| Frameworks | Often one stack | 4 frameworks |
| Output | A finished course | A shipped project you can show |
The task-splitting point matters most for the "overwhelmed" problem. As one user put it, the appeal is having "beautiful projects with Figma designs" where the work is already broken into logical steps — closer to how a ticket arrives at work than to a 10-hour video.
How it differs from just using AI to write code
The distinguishing feature is Merlin AI, described as AI that "teaches you to use AI properly." The stated intent is not to generate code for you, but to keep you in a position where you can read, review, and own what gets produced. That's the explicit contrast with shipping "slop you can't read, review, or own."
The editor itself is framed as "vibe coding" — you work inside it with AI assistance rather than pasting prompts into a separate chatbot and hoping the result holds together.
What else is bundled in
Beyond projects and the editor, the platform includes:
- 100 daily challenges and 40+ practice problems for repetition between projects
- 4 frameworks so you can try a new framework or component library with something concrete to build
- An ATS-optimized CV Builder — the "learning to landing" step, aimed at the job-search end rather than stopping at "project complete"
The founder's own framing: "21+ real projects with Figma, 100 daily challenges, 40+ practice problems, Merlin AI that teaches you to use AI properly, and an ATS-optimized CV Builder. Learning to landing — in one app."
Who this fits, and who it doesn't
Reasonable fit if:
- You can already write basic code but freeze when starting a project from scratch
- You want Figma-to-app practice, since that's the gap the founder names between LeetCode skill and real work
- You want AI assistance without losing the ability to review the output
- You're job-hunting and want project artifacts plus CV tooling in the same place
Probably not the fit if:
- You're looking for a structured computer-science curriculum or algorithm drilling
- You want to write every line yourself with no AI in the loop
- You need a specific stack that isn't among the 4 frameworks offered
Practical next step
The site offers two entry points: Start vibe coding or try the editor first. If you're unsure whether the AI-in-the-loop workflow suits you, the editor-first path lets you test that specific question — can you read and own what the AI produces? — before committing to the project track. Pricing details and free-trial terms are listed on the site's Pricing and Plans pages; check those directly for current figures.