Which Version Control Platforms Does Korbit AI Support?

Updated

Korbit AI works with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, and it runs directly inside your existing pull request workflow rather than in a separate review environment. If your team reviews code in pull requests on any of those three platforms, Korbit can be added to that flow; if you use a different version control host, the site does not list support for it.

Supported platforms

Platform Supported How it fits your workflow
GitHub Yes Korbit reviews pull requests where your team already opens them; the site describes the GitHub integration as a good fit in customer feedback.
GitLab Yes Listed alongside GitHub and Bitbucket as a supported host.
Bitbucket Yes Listed alongside GitHub and GitLab as a supported host.

The product description frames Korbit as "an AI code reviewer for GitHub and Bitbucket," while the page's main heading and body copy state it "works seamlessly in GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket." Treat all three as supported, with GitHub and Bitbucket called out most explicitly.

What "works directly in your pull request workflow" means

Korbit is not a standalone review tool you paste code into. The described flow is:

  1. A developer opens a pull request in GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket as usual.
  2. Korbit reviews the PR first, using context from the change rather than isolated snippets.
  3. It finds bugs and explains how to fix them, posting real-time, actionable feedback in the pull request.
  4. The PR then goes to team review or approval, and Korbit continues to help there.

The expected result is fewer review cycles and fewer bugs reaching production, with no separate review environment to maintain. The site reports that 47% of Korbit's suggestions get implemented and fixed, and customers describe it as catching issues that had slipped through human reviews.

Choosing based on your setup

  • You review in GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket pull requests: Korbit fits without changing where reviews happen. The main decision left is team process — for example, whether Korbit reviews every PR before a human does, or only larger changes.
  • You use a self-managed or other host not listed: the page does not state support, so confirm with Korbit before assuming it will work.
  • You want a trial first: the site advertises a 14-day free trial, which is a reasonable way to test the integration against your actual repository and review conventions. Pricing details are not specified on the page, so check them directly rather than assuming terms.

Practical checks before adopting

  • Confirm your repositories live on one of the three supported hosts, including whether you use a cloud or self-hosted variant — the page does not distinguish between them.
  • Pick one active repository and run the trial there so you can compare Korbit's PR comments against your team's review standards.
  • Watch whether suggestions are specific enough to act on; customer feedback emphasizes summaries per PR and feedback quality relative to competitors, which are the things worth judging in your own codebase.

If your team already lives in GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket pull requests, Korbit's value proposition is straightforward: an automated first reviewer inside the tool you already use. If your host isn't on that list, that's the blocking question to resolve first.