Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is Airfoil Tools?
Airfoil Tools is a free browser-based toolkit for finding, plotting and comparing airfoil sections (also called aerofoils). It is aimed at people who need the geometry of a wing or blade section rather than a full aircraft design suite: model builders, small UAV and wind-turbine experimenters, students, and anyone working from published airfoil data.
Its main parts are:
- Airfoil search — a database of 1,638 airfoils, filterable by thickness and camber, with preview images and links to the original data source.
- Airfoil plotter — draws a full-size plan at your chosen chord, with adjustable camber and thickness and a pitch setting for angle of attack, washout or blade twist. The plan can be printed full size or tiled across multiple pages.
- Airfoil comparison — overlays two or more sections on one plan and compares lift and drag polars across a range of Reynolds numbers.
- My airfoils — lets you paste your own coordinate data so it appears in the tool menus, though it is only kept for the current browser session.
- NACA generators — create standard NACA 4-digit and 5-digit sections without hunting for coordinate files.
The practical value is in the download-and-print loop. If you are cutting foam cores or building a large model wing, you can pick a section, set the chord, print a tiled template, and use the same coordinates in CAD. The comparison and polar views help you choose between candidates before committing.
A realistic example: a student comparing a Clark Y against a thinner, less cambered section for a small glider would overlay the two shapes, check the polars over the expected Reynolds number range, then print the chosen section at the actual root and tip chords.
Two trade-offs matter. First, the plots and polars come from stored data, so their accuracy depends on the source coordinates, and polar predictions are only as good as the underlying analysis. Second, custom airfoils are not saved between sessions, so export or keep your dat file somewhere else.
A useful next step is to start with the search page, filter by the thickness and camber you need, and open an airfoil's detail page to see its polars before plotting. If you want a broader reference on airfoil behaviour, NASA and UIUC host public airfoil data collections worth checking alongside it.
How do I find an airfoil for my design using Airfoil Tools?
Start with the search tools on Airfoil Tools, narrow a shortlist by thickness and camber, then check the polars before you commit to a section. The site's search page covers a database of 1,638 airfoils with preview images and filters, and each airfoil has a details page with polar diagrams across a range of Reynolds numbers.
A practical workflow
- Set your Reynolds number first. The site shows your current range (the default is 50,000 to 1,000,000), and the Reynolds number calculator helps you work out the value for your chord and speed. This matters because a section that performs well at model-aircraft Reynolds numbers can behave quite differently on a full-size wing, and the polars are only meaningful in the range they cover.
- Search by thickness and camber. If you know your structural depth budget or your lift requirement, these filters cut the list fast. Browse by letter or by family (symmetrical, NACA 4-digit, NACA 5-digit, NACA 6-series) if you already have a family in mind.
- Compare candidates side by side. The comparison tool plots two or more airfoils on the same plan, so you can see shape differences directly, and it also overlays lift and drag polars. This is where a shortlist of three or four becomes one.
- Generate a section if nothing fits. The NACA 4-digit and 5-digit generators create sections to your parameters, which you can then treat like any other airfoil.
- Add your own data. "My airfoils" accepts pasted dat-file data so custom or third-party sections appear in the dropdown menus alongside the built-in ones. Note the site's own caveat: these are stored only in your browser session, so you will need to re-add them after closing the browser. Keep a local copy of the dat file.
- Plot and print full size. The plotter takes your chord width and lets you adjust camber, thickness and pitch (useful for wing angle of attack, washout or blade angle). The SVG plan prints full size or across multiple pages for large sections — that is what you want if you are cutting ribs or templates.
Choosing between similar candidates
| Situation | What to look at |
|---|---|
| Need predictable, well-documented behaviour | Established NACA families with polars across your Reynolds range |
| Tight structural depth | Filter by thickness; check the thickness distribution, not just the percentage |
| High lift at low speed | Higher camber, but check drag rise and pitching moment |
| Tailless or flying wing | Low pitching moment matters more than peak lift |
| Model or UAV scale | Confirm the polars actually cover your low Reynolds number |
A concrete example
Suppose you are designing a 1.5 m span electric glider with a 180 mm root chord flying at roughly 12 m/s. Estimate your Reynolds number, set that range in the tool, filter for moderate thickness (so you have room for a spar) and modest camber, then compare three or four candidates on the same plot. Look at the drag bucket and where lift drops off, not just the headline numbers. Print the winner at full size for your rib templates.
Where to look next
If you want to cross-check a section against community build experience, RCGroups has long-running threads on specific airfoils, and the UIUC Airfoil Data Site at Airfoil Tools is the same coordinate collection many designers cite. For theory behind the polars, UIUC Airfoil Data Site and standard aerodynamics texts are more useful than any single tool.
How can I generate a custom airfoil shape like a NACA 4-digit section?
You can generate a NACA 4-digit section directly in the browser on Airfoil Tools, using its NACA 4 digit generator, then plot, print or compare it without installing anything.
What the site gives you
- NACA 4 digit generator and a separate NACA 5 digit generator for standard sections.
- Airfoil plotter: plots a full-size plan to your chosen chord width, with adjustable camber and thickness, plus a pitch setting for wing angle of attack, washout or wind turbine blade angle.
- Airfoil comparison: overlays two or more airfoils on one plan and compares lift and drag polars across Reynolds numbers.
- My airfoils: paste dat-file coordinates into a form to add your own section to the tool menus.
- Airfoil search: browse a large database (the page cites 1,638 airfoils) filtered by thickness and camber, with preview images and dat-file downloads.
Typical workflow
- Generate the NACA 4-digit section by entering the digits that set camber and thickness.
- Adjust chord width, camber, thickness and pitch in the plotter.
- Print the SVG plan full size, or across multiple pages for a large section.
- Compare it against a candidate section on the same plan and check the polar diagrams for your Reynolds number range.
Practical notes
- If your section is not a standard NACA shape, generate coordinates elsewhere and load them through My airfoils. The page states these are stored only in your browser session, so you will need to re-add them when the browser is reopened — keep your dat file as the master copy.
- Set your Reynolds number range before comparing polars; the page shows a default range of 50,000 to 1,000,000, and polar behaviour changes with Reynolds number.
- For a first pass, generate a 4-digit section at your target thickness, compare it with one or two database airfoils at the same Reynolds number, then refine camber if you need more lift at low speed.
Decision criterion Use the built-in generator when you want a quick, well-understood section for a model, UAV or small turbine blade. Switch to My airfoils when you need a non-NACA profile or one from another source, and rely on the comparison tool to choose between candidates rather than judging shape alone.
How do I compare the performance of different airfoils for my application?
To compare airfoil performance, work in two stages: first narrow the field by geometry, then compare the aerodynamic data at your actual operating conditions.
Stage 1: Narrow by shape Use Airfoil Tools to filter its database of airfoils by thickness and camber, with preview images of each section. Thickness affects structural depth and stall behaviour; camber strongly influences lift at a given angle. Shortlist a handful of candidates that physically suit your wing or blade.
Stage 2: Compare at your Reynolds number Set your Reynolds number range first — the site's tools work around a default range of roughly 50,000 to 1,000,000 until you change it. This matters because the same airfoil can behave quite differently at low versus high Reynolds numbers. Then use the comparison tool to plot two or more airfoils on the same plan, and compare lift and drag polar diagrams across a range of Reynolds numbers. Look for the polar that gives the lift you need with the least drag in your normal operating range, and check how sharply it degrades near stall.
A concrete scenario: someone designing a small wind turbine blade, or a model aircraft wing, would shortlist three or four sections, set the Reynolds number to match their blade chord and wind speed, then compare polars rather than relying on shape alone.
Practical points
- Download the dat file for your chosen section and reuse it in the plotter, so you can adjust camber and thickness and set pitch for angle of attack, washout or blade twist.
- Plot a full-size plan to your chord width; the SVG output can be printed on one sheet or across multiple pages for large sections.
- You can paste your own dat file data into the site so custom sections appear in the drop-down menus, but note they are stored only for your browser session and must be re-added after reopening.
Decision criterion: if two airfoils are close on the polar plot, choose the one with gentler stall behaviour and better structural depth rather than chasing a small drag difference.
How can I plot and print a full-size airfoil plan for building a model?
[Airfoil Tools](Airfoil Tools) is built for exactly that job: open the Airfoil plotter, pick or generate a section, set your chord, and export a full-size SVG plan you can print directly or tiled across several sheets.
A typical workflow
- Find a section in the airfoil search (filter by thickness and camber, with preview images) or generate one with the NACA 4-digit or 5-digit generator.
- Load it into the plotter and enter your actual chord width, so the plan prints at true size rather than scaled.
- Adjust camber, thickness and pitch if you need washout or a blade/wing angle built into the plan.
- Print the SVG full size, or split it over multiple pages for chords larger than your paper.
- Keep the same Reynolds number range set for the project (the site shows a range such as 50,000 to 1,000,000, which you can change) so the polar data you look at matches your model's speed and chord.
Choosing between plotting and comparing
| Task | Tool | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Cut ribs or templates | Airfoil plotter | Full-size plan, adjustable chord, camber, thickness, pitch |
| Decide between two sections | Airfoil comparison | Overlays shapes on one plan and puts lift/drag polars side by side |
| Check performance at your Re | Airfoil details / polars | Shows drag and lift behaviour across a Reynolds number range |
Practical points
- The comparison tool's overlaid plan is the quickest way to see how much thicker or more cambered one section is before you commit to cutting parts.
- For a hand-launched glider or small rubber model, a thin, lightly cambered section is usually easier to build straight and true; a thicker section suits slower, heavier models where stiffness matters. Use the polars at your estimated Reynolds number to check the drag penalty rather than trusting reputation alone.
- If you design your own section or download dat files from elsewhere, paste the coordinates into "My airfoils" to add it to the drop-down menus. Note that these are stored only in your browser session, so re-add them after closing the browser — save the dat files locally as your real archive.
- Printing on A4 or Letter at true scale means taping sheets together; align on a straight datum line (leading edge or chord line) and check a known chord dimension with calipers before cutting.
Next step: pick your intended chord and estimated flying speed, set the matching Reynolds number, then plot two or three candidate sections and compare their polars before printing the winner at full size.
How do I add and use my own airfoil data in the tools?
Paste your own airfoil coordinates into the My airfoils form as dat-file text, then select the saved airfoil from the drop-down menus inside the plotter, comparison and polar tools. The page describes this as the intended workflow: custom sections become available wherever airfoils are chosen, so you do not need to re-upload them for each tool.
What to expect
- Storage is session-only. The site states that added airfoils are stored in your browser session and must be added again after the browser is reopened. Keep your dat file somewhere safe so re-adding takes seconds.
- Coordinates come from you. The page points to external airfoil data sources and to its own generators (NACA 4- and 5-digit) as ways to produce sections. If you have measured or CAD-derived coordinates, format them as a standard dat file before pasting.
- Reynolds number context matters. The interface shows a working Reynolds number range (50,000 to 1,000,000 in the captured view) that you can set. Polar diagrams are plotted across a range of Reynolds numbers, so set a value close to your actual flight or test condition before judging lift and drag.
A practical first run
- Prepare a plain-text dat file: a title line, then one
x ycoordinate pair per line, leading edge to trailing edge. - Paste it into My airfoils and give it a recognisable name.
- Open Airfoil plotter, choose your section, and set chord, plus camber, thickness and pitch adjustments if you need a specific wing angle, washout or blade angle.
- Print the SVG full size, or over multiple pages for a chord too large for one sheet.
- Switch to Airfoil comparison to overlay your section against a known reference, then check the polar diagrams at your Reynolds number.
When this is worth it
Use this route when your section is not in the database (the search covers 1,638 airfoils, so check first) or when you have modified an existing section and want to see the shape change. For a quick estimate, generating a NACA 4-digit section is faster than sourcing coordinates. For real hardware — a foam-cut wing, a wind turbine blade, a model glider — the full-size printable plan is the main payoff, and the session-only storage is a minor annoyance rather than a blocker. If you need a permanent, shareable library of custom sections, plan to keep your own master copies outside the browser.
For background on section data and polar conventions, Airfoil Tools itself and NASA are reasonable starting points.
User reviews (0)