Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

allgpts.co

Up to 100 new GPTs are added daily to GPT directory. Sorted in a based on popularity so that you can find good GPTs really fast in a gpt list of 30,000+

Paid content
Visit website
Profile views 20 Outbound visits 40 Normal
AllGPTs Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Artificial Intelligence
Language
English
Paid-content signal
Paid contentObserved
Registered
2023
Hosting
Amazon.com, Inc.Inferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is AllGPTs?

AllGPTs is a directory for discovering GPTs—the custom versions of ChatGPT built for specific tasks. It organizes a large, browsable list of these tools by category and popularity, so you can find something useful without hunting through scattered links or social posts.

What you'll find there

The site groups GPTs into practical categories, including Analysis, Assistant, Audio, Coach, Converter, Design, Ecommerce, Education, Email, Guide, Hobby, Humor, Marketing, Math, Medical, News, Open Source, Product, Programming, Recipe, Research, SEO, Social, Video, Web, and Writing. Listings show a name, a short description, and a popularity count, and the most popular entries sit near the top. A weekly email highlights newly added GPTs, and creators can submit their own.

Who it's for

  • Curious users who want to see what custom GPTs exist beyond the defaults.
  • Professionals looking for a task-specific helper, such as a writing aid, a coding assistant, or an email generator.
  • Creators who want visibility for a GPT they've built.

Trade-offs to keep in mind

Popularity counts reflect attention, not quality or accuracy, so a highly ranked GPT isn't automatically the best fit for your task. Category browsing helps narrow the field, but descriptions are brief—expect to open a few before finding a match. The directory also notes that it was acquired by Chipp.ai, so the surrounding site may promote that platform alongside the listings.

A practical next step

Start with the category closest to your task—say, Programming or Writing—then skim the top few entries and compare their descriptions against what you actually need. If nothing fits, check the weekly email or browse a broader category like Assistant.

How can I submit my own GPT to the AllGPTs directory?

Submission on AllGPTs is handled through the directory's own submission flow rather than by emailing the site owner. The page shows a "Submit GPT" entry point alongside the category browsing area, and it also has a dedicated section titled "Add Your GPT to GPT list on Allgpts," which indicates the intended path is a self-serve form.

What to prepare before you start

  • The public link to your GPT (the shareable chat URL), not a screenshot or description alone.
  • A short, specific name — the listings on the page are recognizable by function, e.g. "Receipt Assistant" or "Python Pal," rather than vague branding.
  • A one-line description that says what the GPT does and for whom. The directory's own entries follow this pattern: "Python dev assistant for coding questions," "Translates corporate speak into plain English."
  • The best-fitting category. The visible categories include Analysis, Assistant, Audio, Coach, Converter, Design, Ecommerce, Education, Email, Guide, Hobby, Humor, Marketing, Math, Medical, News, Open Source, Product, Programming, Recipe, Research, SEO, Social, Video, Web and Writing.

How to think about placement AllGPTs sorts popular GPTs to the top of a list of 30,000+ entries, and the page notes that up to 100 new GPTs are added daily. That means a new submission starts near the bottom of a very crowded field. Two practical implications:

Choice Effect
Broad category (e.g. Writing, Assistant) More potential traffic, far more competition
Narrow category (e.g. Recipe, Math) Less traffic, easier to appear near the top

If your GPT solves a narrow, searchable problem, the narrow category is usually the better trade. If it is a general-purpose assistant, expect to rely on external promotion rather than directory placement.

A useful next step Open the submission form, fill in the link, name, description and category, then check back after a few days to confirm the listing appears and that the description reads the way you intended. After that, treat the directory as one channel among several — a listing does not by itself produce users, so pair it with your own distribution.

Related directories worth submitting to for comparison: OpenAI's own GPT store is the primary discovery surface, and Product Hunt can work for a launch-style push. Both have different submission rules, so read them before posting the same text.

What categories are available for browsing GPTs on AllGPTs?

AllGPTs organizes its directory into roughly twenty broad categories. Based on the site's own category menu, you can browse GPTs under:

  • Analysis and Research — for data interpretation, investigation and synthesis tasks
  • Assistant — general-purpose helpers
  • Audio and Video — media-focused tools
  • Coach — tutoring, guidance and habit-building
  • Converter — format, unit and file transformations
  • Design — visuals, graphics and layout help
  • Ecommerce — store operations, listings and merchandising
  • Education — study aids, teaching and exam prep
  • Email — drafting, replies and inbox workflows
  • Guide — step-by-step and how-to assistants
  • Hobby — leisure and interest-driven GPTs
  • Humor — entertainment and joke-oriented bots
  • Marketing and SEO — campaigns, copy and search visibility
  • Math — calculation, proofs and quantitative help
  • Medical — health-related information tools
  • News — current-events and summarization bots
  • Open Source — community or openly licensed projects
  • Product — product management and development support
  • Programming — coding, debugging and technical assistance
  • Recipe — cooking and food ideas
  • Social — social media content and engagement
  • Web — websites, browsers and web tooling
  • Writing — drafting, editing and style work

A practical next step: if you already know your task, scan the two or three categories closest to it rather than the full list, because the directory sorts popular GPTs to the top and the front page changes as new entries arrive. For example, someone preparing for a certification exam would start in Education, then check Coach and Research for study-planning or explanation-focused bots.

To decide between overlapping categories, ask what the GPT's output is: if it produces copy, Writing or Marketing fits; if it produces code, Programming fits; if it explains a subject, Education or Guide is the better entry point.

How does AllGPTs rank or sort the GPTs in its list?

AllGPTs sorts its GPT list primarily by popularity, with the most popular GPTs placed at the top. The site describes this as a way to make browsing fast across a directory of 30,000+ GPTs, and it also supports category-based browsing (for example Analysis, Assistant, Audio, Coach, Design, Ecommerce, Education, Email, Guide, Hobby, Humor, Marketing, Math, Medical, News, Open Source, Product, Programming, Recipe, Research, SEO, Social, Video, Web, Writing).

In practice, that means there are two layers of ordering:

  • Popularity ranking: A single global list where high-traffic or widely used GPTs appear first.
  • Category browsing: When you pick a category, you are still within a popularity-sorted list, but narrowed to that topic.

This is useful for a fast scan, but it has a trade-off: popularity is not the same as quality or fit. A niche GPT for, say, academic writing in a specific style may be excellent while ranking lower than a general-purpose assistant. If you are looking for a tool for a specific workflow, start with the category that matches your task, then compare the top entries by their stated purpose rather than assuming the top position is the best match.

A practical next step: Use the category filter first, then read the short description for each GPT near the top. If you want to track new additions, the site also mentions a weekly email with new GPTs. For broader context on GPT directories, you can compare with OpenAI's own GPT store, but note that AllGPTs is an independent directory and its ranking is its own editorial or popularity-based system, not an official OpenAI ranking.

What changes have occurred since Chipp.ai acquired AllGPTs?

Since Chipp.ai acquired AllGPTs, the directory has kept its core function — a searchable, popularity-ranked list of custom GPTs — while visibly tying itself to Chipp's broader platform. The page still describes itself as a GPT list of 30,000+ entries with up to 100 new GPTs added daily, sorted so the most popular appear first. What has changed is the framing: the site now says it is "Powered by → Chipp.ai" and links the acquisition to helping creators "build, measure, sell," which points to a shift from a neutral directory toward a funnel for Chipp's creator tools.

For a reader, the practical differences are:

  • Discovery stays the same. You can still browse by categories such as Analysis, Assistant, Audio, Coach, Converter, Design, Ecommerce, Education, Email, Hobby, Humor, Marketing, Math, Medical, News, Open Source, Product, Programming, Recipe, Research, SEO, Social, Video, Web and Writing.
  • Ranking is still popularity-based. The most popular GPTs sit at the top, which favors established listings over new or niche ones.
  • Submission is still open. The page includes a "Submit GPT" route, so creators can still add their own tools.
  • Monetization and measurement are now part of the pitch. The acquisition is presented alongside language about building, measuring and selling, suggesting Chipp wants creators to move from listing a GPT to using its platform.
  • The directory is no longer the only destination. Chipp.ai, ChatGPT and Character AI are listed together, so the site now acts partly as a gateway to Chipp's wider product set.

If you used AllGPTs purely to find a GPT, your experience is largely unchanged. If you are a creator deciding where to list or promote a GPT, the key question is whether you want a simple directory entry or a route into Chipp's build-and-sell tools. Start by checking whether the listing still sends traffic directly to your GPT, then compare that with what Chipp's creator platform offers before committing.

Can I get a weekly email with new GPTs added to AllGPTs?

Yes. AllGPTs offers a weekly email listing new GPTs added to its directory. The signup section is titled "Weekly Email With New GPTs on AllGpt," and it sits alongside the site's browsable category list and its "Submit GPT" option.

What to expect from the weekly email

Based on the page evidence, the directory adds up to 100 new GPTs daily and organizes them by popularity, with the most popular at the top of a list of 30,000+ entries. A weekly digest is therefore a reasonable way to skim additions without checking the site every day. The page also shows a broad category structure — Analysis, Assistant, Audio, Coach, Converter, Design, Ecommerce, Education, Email, Guide, Hobby, Humor, Marketing, Math, Medical, News, Open Source, Product, Programming, Recipe, Research, SEO, Social, Video, Web, and Writing — so expect the email to reflect that mix rather than a single niche.

How to decide if it suits you

Your situation Is the weekly email a good fit?
You want a low-effort overview of what's new Yes — one digest beats daily browsing
You need a specific tool now No — use the on-site categories and popularity ranking instead
You are a GPT creator wanting distribution The submission option matters more than the digest
You dislike inbox clutter Skip it; the site itself is already sorted for fast scanning

Practical next step

If you want the digest, look for the weekly email signup section on the AllGPTs homepage and subscribe there. While you are on the page, note which categories match your work — for example, Programming, Writing or Research — so you can judge the digest against your own needs after the first couple of issues. If the first email feels too broad, the site's popularity ordering and category filters will usually get you to a useful GPT faster than waiting for the next issue.

Related questions

More questions →
What Are Open-Source UI Element Libraries and How Do They Differ From UI Frameworks?

An open-source UI element library is a collection of individual, ready-made interface pieces—buttons, cards, inputs, toggles, loaders—that you copy into your own project and adapt. A UI framework, by contrast, is a structured system of components, conventions, and often a theming layer that governs how your whole interface is built. The practical difference: an element library gives you a snippet; a framework gives you a way of working. If you need a polished button in ten minutes, reach for the element library. If you're building a 40-screen product with a team, you probably want the framework.

What "open-source UI element library" actually means

The term gets used loosely, so it helps to separate the parts:

  • Open-source: the code is publicly available, and the license tells you what you may do with it—copy, modify, redistribute, or use commercially.
  • UI element: a single, self-contained piece of interface, usually small enough to read in one sitting. A button with hover states, a pricing card, a search field.
  • Library: a browsable, searchable collection of those elements, typically contributed by many different people.

On a site like Uiverse, elements are shared by a community and written in plain CSS or Tailwind. You find one you like, copy the markup and styles, paste them into your project, and adjust colors, spacing, and text to fit. There's no package to install and no build step required—which is exactly the appeal, and also the source of most of the confusion.

Element library vs. UI framework: the core differences

Dimension Open-source UI element library UI framework / design system
Unit of reuse A single snippet you copy A component you import or call
Installation None; paste into your code Package install, config, sometimes a provider
Consistency Depends on you; each element may look different Enforced by shared tokens and APIs
Theming Manual edits per element Central theme/config file
Updates You own the copy; no upstream updates Version bumps bring fixes and changes
Accessibility Varies per contributor; must be checked Usually tested and documented
Best for Prototypes, landing pages, small sites, one-off needs Multi-page apps, teams, long-lived products
Learning curve Low—read the CSS Higher—learn the API and conventions

The table isn't a verdict. It's a map of trade-offs. Element libraries win on speed and freedom; frameworks win on consistency and maintenance.

Licensing and attribution: what to check before you paste

This is where people get into trouble, and it's worth slowing down for.

  1. Find the license. Every element or collection should state one. Common open-source licenses include MIT, Apache-2.0, and BSD. Some projects use copyleft licenses like GPL, which can impose obligations if you redistribute your code.
  2. Understand what the license permits. MIT and Apache-2.0 are permissive: you can typically use the code in commercial and closed-source projects. Copyleft licenses may require you to release derivative source under the same terms.
  3. Check attribution requirements. Permissive licenses usually require you to keep the copyright notice and license text somewhere in your project. That's a real obligation, not a formality.
  4. Look for per-element terms. On community sites, the site's overall terms and the individual contributor's stated wishes may differ. If a contributor asks for credit, honor it.
  5. When in doubt, ask or avoid. If a snippet has no license at all, you don't have clear permission to reuse it. Treat "no license" as "not open source," even if the code is publicly visible.

This article is general information, not legal advice. For commercial products with real exposure, have someone qualified review the licenses you're relying on.

How to use a community element in your project: a practical workflow

Here's a repeatable process that avoids most of the usual mess.

1. Start from a real need, not a browsing session

Decide what you need first—"a compact primary button with a loading state"—then search. Browsing aimlessly produces a pile of pretty snippets that don't fit together.

2. Copy the smallest version that works

Take the markup and the styles. Strip anything you don't need: demo wrappers, extra animations, decorative layers. Less code means fewer surprises.

3. Convert it to your conventions

If your project uses design tokens or CSS variables, replace hard-coded values:

/* Before: hard-coded */
.button { background: #4f46e5; border-radius: 8px; }

/* After: token-based */
.button { background: var(--color-primary); border-radius: var(--radius-md); }

This one step is what keeps a copied element from looking like a foreign object in your UI.

4. Check accessibility before you ship

Community elements vary widely here. Verify at minimum:

  • Keyboard focus is visible and the element is reachable by Tab.
  • Color contrast meets WCAG AA (4.5:1 for normal text).
  • Interactive elements use semantic HTML (<button>, not a clickable <div>).
  • Form inputs have associated labels.
  • Motion respects prefers-reduced-motion.

5. Test in context

Paste it into a real page with real content. Long labels, small screens, and dark mode break more copied elements than anything else.

6. Note where it came from

Keep a short comment or an internal credits file: source, license, date. Future you—and your legal reviewer—will be grateful.

Where element libraries genuinely shine

  • Prototypes and demos: you need something clickable today, not a design system.
  • Landing pages and marketing sites: a handful of distinctive elements, each custom.
  • Filling gaps: your framework lacks one specific component, and you don't want to build it from scratch.
  • Learning: reading well-made CSS is one of the fastest ways to improve.
  • Small projects: a personal site doesn't need a theming architecture.

Where they fall short

  • Consistency at scale: ten elements from ten contributors rarely look like one product.
  • Maintenance: you own every copy. When your design changes, you edit each one.
  • Accessibility debt: you inherit whatever the contributor did or didn't do.
  • No upstream fixes: a bug fixed in the original won't reach your copy.
  • Integration friction: different naming conventions, different units, different assumptions about resets.

When to choose which

Choose an element library when the scope is small, the timeline is short, or you need a few distinctive pieces rather than a whole system.

Choose a framework or design system when multiple people build multiple screens over months, when consistency is a product requirement, or when accessibility and theming need to be guaranteed rather than checked.

A hybrid works well for many teams: adopt a framework for the structural components—forms, navigation, layout—and borrow individual elements for the places where you want personality. Just route every borrowed element through the same token and accessibility checks, so it lands as part of your system rather than beside it.

The short version: open-source UI element libraries are a fast, flexible way to get good-looking interface pieces into a project. They are not a substitute for a design system, and the license and accessibility details are the part worth reading carefully.

Website Overview

Page metadata, canonical configuration and social previews work together to provide more consistent search and sharing presentation.

Domain and Registration

Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain has about 2 years of registration history; its current configuration provides more context than age alone. The registrar is GoDaddy.com, LLC, a widely used domain service provider. The domain uses the common .co extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

Nameservers are provided by GoDaddy, indicating managed DNS hosting. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. No MX record was found. A conventional explicit inbound-mail route is not configured. TXT records include verification markers for Google. Such markers may also remain after a service stops being used. DNSSEC signatures were not detected, so this additional DNS authenticity protection is not confirmed.

TLS and Certificates

The public key uses EC with 256 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, commonly associated with automated certificate services. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

The checked browser-security headers were not detected, leaving fewer explicit browser-side safeguards. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. The via response header indicates a CDN or caching proxy in the delivery path. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. No CORS permission header was found, so browsers normally restrict cross-origin script access.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Alpine.js, Stripe without precise versions, leaving fewer clues for version-specific scanning.

Search and Social Sharing

Twitter Card metadata is configured. The title has 54 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 152 characters. The observed directives allow indexing and link following. No Generator meta tag is publicly exposed.

Hosting and Email

DNSGoDaddy
HostingAmazon.com, Inc.
EmailUnknown
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagAshburn, Virginia, United States Inferred 34.238.237.8

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarGoDaddy.com, LLC
Registered2023-11-06
Expires2026-11-06
Domain statusclientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited、clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited、clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited、clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Nameserversns75.domaincontrol.com、ns76.domaincontrol.com
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Aallgpts.co34.238.237.8600—
NSallgpts.cons75.domaincontrol.com3600—
NSallgpts.cons76.domaincontrol.com3600—
TXTallgpts.cogoogle-site-verification=OgWlNTrOGJXOfYE438pvhxNwGPQHZDsmPNfl6J-EdBk3600—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectallgpts.co
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Valid until2026-12-18T16:31 · Remaining when checked: 78 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=utf-8
cache-controlmax-age=600

Identified technologies

Alpine.jsStripe

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionUp to 100 new GPTs are added daily to GPT directory. Sorted in a based on popularity so that you can find good GPTs really fast in a gpt list of 30,000+
Canonical URLhttps://allgpts.co/
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter Cardsummary_large_image
googlebot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/.well-known/
All bots 0 allowed · 12 disallowed
  • Disallow/.well-known/
  • Disallow/*.png$
  • Disallow/*.jpg$
  • Disallow/*.css$
  • Disallow/*.js$
  • Disallow/*.php$
  • Disallow/*.gif$
  • Disallow/*.jpeg$
  • Disallow/*.bmp$
  • Disallow/*.svg$
  • Disallow/*.webp$
  • Disallow/*.ico$

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.