Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is Applied Radiology?
Applied Radiology is a professional publication for radiologists, radiology technologists, imaging administrators and others who work with medical imaging. It covers clinical practice, imaging technology and industry news, with sections such as Latest News, Featured Content and Current Issue.
What you'll find there
- Clinical and technical articles on imaging methods and their use in diagnosis, such as CT, MRI, ultrasound, PET and breast imaging.
- Industry news: product launches, regulatory clearances and company announcements from imaging vendors.
- Continuing coverage of topics like AI in radiology, spectral CT and scanner performance.
Who it suits
- Practicing radiologists and residents who want clinical updates and technology context.
- Technologists and imaging managers tracking equipment and workflow developments.
- Industry and research readers following regulatory and product news.
Practical note
The site mixes peer-style clinical content with vendor and industry announcements, so check whether a given item is an editorial article or a company release before treating it as evidence. Subscription signals appear on the site; confirm current access terms directly.
Next step: if you want clinical depth rather than news, start with the Featured Content and Current Issue sections; for quick updates, the Latest News feed is the faster route. For broader context, compare with Radiological Society of North America or American College of Radiology.
How can I subscribe to Applied Radiology and what does a subscription include?
Subscription details aren't stated on the Applied Radiology homepage, so the reliable route is to look for a "Subscribe" link on the site itself and follow its current terms.
What to do
- Open Applied Radiology and find the Subscribe link (often in the top navigation or footer). That page should list available options and what each includes.
- If no subscribe page appears, use the site's contact option to ask about individual and institutional access.
What a subscription commonly covers (general advice, not confirmed for this title)
Radiology publications of this type typically bundle:
- Current issue content — features and columns on modality trends (CT, MRI, ultrasound, PET, AI tools).
- News and industry updates — clearances, launches, acquisitions, conference data.
- Archive access — older issues and reference articles.
- Newsletters or alerts — new-content notifications.
- CME or educational material — sometimes included, sometimes a separate purchase.
Decision criteria
- If you mainly need breaking news, the free homepage feed may be enough; check before paying.
- If you need archives, CME credits, or print delivery, confirm those are explicitly listed.
- Librarians and departments should ask about institutional or multi-user rates.
As a concrete example: a radiology resident wanting CME and back issues should verify both are in the plan, while a department lead comparing AI and modality coverage can start with the free news section and subscribe only if archive depth matters.
Where can I find the current issue and latest news on Applied Radiology?
The current issue and latest news are both on the Applied Radiology homepage at Applied Radiology. The page carries a "Latest news" feed, a "Featured Content" area and a "Current issue" section, so you can move between daily industry updates and the magazine edition without leaving the front page.
What each section is for
- Latest news: short, dated items on clearances, launches, acquisitions, trial data and conference results — useful for keeping up with vendor and regulatory activity between issues.
- Featured Content: selected articles and clinical or technology pieces the editors are highlighting, a good starting point if you want depth rather than headlines.
- Current issue: the magazine edition itself, which suits reading cover to cover or browsing by topic.
A practical example: a radiology administrator tracking AI clearance announcements could scan "Latest news" weekly, then use "Current issue" for longer pieces such as the scanner-specific AI feature on MRI performance before a equipment-planning meeting.
A useful next step
If you want a specific topic rather than the front page, use the site's navigation or search to jump to sections such as MRI, CT or AI, and check "Current issue" for the archived edition once a new one is posted. For broader specialty coverage alongside it, Radiological Society of North America and AuntMinnie publish news and education in the same field.
What recent FDA clearances and regulatory approvals in medical imaging are covered on Applied Radiology?
Applied Radiology's latest-news feed covers a steady stream of FDA clearances and regulatory approvals across imaging modalities, with several recent items standing out:
- Koning Vera Breast CT received regulatory approval in Canada, an example of a breast imaging device moving into a new market rather than a U.S. FDA action.
- Coreline Soft's AVIEW Aorta Metrics secured a 13th FDA 510(k) clearance, illustrating how one vendor's software portfolio accumulates clearances over time.
- BoneEnhance, an ultrasound software module, received FDA clearance, showing that regulatory activity isn't limited to scanners—post-processing and enhancement software is a recurring category.
- An AI-powered prognostic tool for breast cancer recurrence risk received FDA clearance, representing the clinical-decision-support side of imaging AI.
How to read this coverage
The feed mixes device clearances, software 510(k)s, and non-U.S. approvals under broad labels like "Medical Imaging," so a headline alone won't tell you whether an item is a new device, an added indication, or a market expansion. If you're tracking a specific modality—say MRI or CT—scan the item text for the clearance type (510(k), De Novo, or foreign approval) and the intended clinical use before drawing conclusions about adoption.
Practical next step
For a radiologist or imaging informatics lead evaluating new tools, treat each headline as a lead rather than an endorsement: note the clearance number and indication, then check the manufacturer's documentation for intended use and evidence. Related coverage from other outlets can add context—for example Radiology Business or AuntMinnie—but confirm regulatory details against FDA's own clearance database.
How does Applied Radiology compare different imaging modalities like CT, MRI, ultrasound, and PET for clinical decision-making?
Applied Radiology does not appear to run a single head-to-head modality comparison chart. Its page evidence shows a news-and-feature mix: subsections labeled CT, MRI, Ultrasound, PET, Thoracic Imaging, and Theranostics, each carrying items such as photon-counting CTA for coronary artery stenosis, gadopiclenol in MR lymphangiography, ultrasound guidance in musculoskeletal medicine, and PSMA PET/CT biopsy for prostate cancer. Modality differences are therefore covered topic by topic rather than in one comparative framework.
What that means for clinical readers
A radiologist weighing CT against MRI for a cardiac or vascular question will find modality-specific study and clearance news, but must assemble the trade-offs themselves. The practical comparison usually turns on:
- Contrast and radiation exposure — CT and PET/CT involve ionizing radiation; MRI and ultrasound do not.
- Soft-tissue and functional detail — MRI and PET add tissue contrast or metabolic information that CT and ultrasound do not provide directly.
- Workflow and availability — ultrasound is fast and bedside-friendly; PET/CT requires tracer logistics and scheduling.
- Question type — screening and staging often favor CT or PET/CT, while musculoskeletal and soft-tissue characterization often favor MRI or ultrasound.
A useful next step
For a specific decision, such as suspected coronary stenosis, read the modality-tagged items (for example the photon-counting CTA story under CT) alongside the relevant society guideline, then check RadiologyInfo.org for patient-facing procedure comparisons and American College of Radiology for appropriateness criteria. Use Applied Radiology for current evidence and technology news, and guidelines for the formal comparison of modalities.
Which AI and software tools for radiology reporting and diagnosis are featured on Applied Radiology?
Applied Radiology's homepage mixes trade news with clinical and technology coverage, so the AI and software tools it features change with each news cycle. From the page evidence, the reporting and diagnosis tools named are:
- HOPPR's beta FS MSK whole-body narrative model, a generative-AI tool for producing radiology reports.
- An AI-powered prognostic tool for breast cancer recurrence risk, which received FDA clearance.
- Coreline Soft's AVIEW Aorta Metrics, a software module cleared for aortic measurement (the site notes this is the company's 13th FDA 510(k) clearance).
- BoneEnhance, an ultrasound software module cleared by the FDA.
- Photon-counting CTA and quantitative CT, covered as imaging techniques that improve diagnosis (coronary artery stenosis and progressive pulmonary fibrosis, respectively) rather than as standalone software products.
How to use this
Treat the homepage as a news feed, not a product directory. If you are evaluating a tool for your practice, start from the specific item—for example, the HOPPR reporting model or the AVIEW Aorta Metrics clearance—and check the vendor's own documentation for intended use, integration with your PACS or reporting system, and regulatory status in your country.
Where to look next
- For peer-reviewed evaluations of AI tools, Radiology and American College of Radiology publish studies and appropriateness guidance.
- For regulatory context on clearances, the FDA's own device database is the primary source.
- For broader industry coverage of radiology AI, Radiology Business and AuntMinnie track launches and deployments.
A practical decision rule: a homepage mention tells you a tool exists and has news value; it does not tell you how well it performs in your workflow. Match any candidate against your reporting volume, modality mix and IT environment before trialing it.
User reviews (0)