Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

best.umd.edu

No paid content found
Visit website
Profile views 0 Outbound visits 0 Normal
BEST Center Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Other
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
Unknown
Hosting
campuspress.comInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is the BEST Center?

The BEST Center is the Bridge Engineering Software & Technology Center at the University of Maryland. Established in 1986, it develops bridge-related technology and commercializes bridge engineering software originally created for the Maryland State Highway Administration, making it available to other state design agencies and private consultants.

What it does

  • Software for bridge design work: Its core function is turning bridge-oriented software built for Maryland's highway agency into tools other agencies and consultants can license and use.
  • Testing and project experience: The center describes laboratory and on-site testing on bridge projects, which informs the tools and services it provides.
  • Quality backing: The State of Maryland has funded the commercialization effort over roughly two decades, which the center presents as a way to ensure demonstrable quality and limit liability.

Who it serves

Its stated audience is public highway and transportation agencies outside Maryland and private engineering consultants who design or assess bridges. A structural engineer at a state DOT evaluating software for routine bridge analysis, or a consultant needing tools aligned with established agency practice, is the typical user.

A practical next step

If you are comparing bridge design software, treat the BEST Center as a source of agency-derived tools rather than a general-purpose vendor. Check which specific programs are offered and whether they match your agency's design standards before committing, since the value lies in that lineage. For broader context on bridge engineering practice, the Federal Highway Administration publishes related guidance.

Who can license the bridge engineering software developed by the BEST Center?

According to the BEST Center's own description, its bridge-related software is made available on a commercial basis to other state design agencies and private consultants—not exclusively to its original sponsor, the Maryland State Highway Administration. The center was set up in 1986 specifically to move software developed for that agency into wider commercial use, so the licensing audience is public highway/transportation agencies beyond Maryland plus private engineering firms.

Practical reading

  • State design agencies are the closest match to the original user: the software was built around Maryland's bridge design and analysis needs, so other DOTs and similar agencies are the natural licensees.
  • Private consultants are the second stated audience—firms doing bridge design or review work for agencies.
  • The page describes the arrangement as "commercial," which suggests licensing terms and fees rather than open-source distribution, but it does not publish a price list or license tiers.

Next step

If you represent an agency or consultancy, the practical question is which specific tools are licensable and under what terms, since the page describes the program broadly rather than listing individual products. Contact the center directly to confirm eligibility and current licensing conditions.

For context on the bridge types the center's work relates to, see the BEST Center project pages, which reference structures such as the Francis Scott Key Bridge and the Bay Bridge.

How has the BEST Center's software been tested and validated for bridge projects?

The BEST Center's validation approach combines software commercialization with hands-on bridge engineering work. According to the center's own description, its software was developed for the Maryland State Highway Administration and then made available commercially to other state design agencies and private consultants. The center states that the State of Maryland funded the commercialization process specifically to ensure the services and software are of "demonstrable quality" and to limit liability—so quality assurance is built into how the tools were brought to market, not added afterward.

What the page evidence shows

  • Real-project grounding: The center lists major bridges among its work, including the Francis Scott Key Bridge (I-695), the William Preston Lane Jr. Memorial (Bay) Bridge (US50/301), and I-83 over Gunpowder River in Baltimore County, MD. These are the kind of structures its software is meant to analyze and design.
  • Testing experience: The center says it has accumulated bridge knowledge through "laboratory and on-site testing" across bridge-related projects. That field and lab experience informs the software's development.
  • Institutional backing: Over roughly twenty years, support from the Maryland State Highway Administration and other sources funded the commercialization effort, which the center ties directly to demonstrable quality.

Practical reading for a engineer evaluating the tools

For a state DOT engineer or consultant considering BEST Center software, the relevant question is fit with your own validation workflow. The page evidence points to a provenance story—software born from a state agency's needs, backed by lab and field testing experience—rather than published benchmark or verification results. A sensible next step is to ask the center directly for its verification and validation documentation, such as comparison studies against field measurements or independent checks, and to pilot the software on a bridge type similar to your own before relying on it for design decisions.

For broader context on bridge engineering standards and software evaluation, organizations such as AASHTO publish the specifications many agencies use when judging analysis tools.

What bridge projects has the BEST Center worked on, such as the Francis Scott Key Bridge or the Bay Bridge?

The BEST Center lists the Francis Scott Key Bridge (I-695), the William Preston Lane Jr. Memorial (Bay) Bridge (US50/301), and I-83 over Gunpowder River in Baltimore County, MD, among the bridge projects named on its site. These appear as project references rather than as detailed case studies, so the page confirms the association but does not describe the Center's specific scope of work on each structure.

What the page does establish

  • The Center was founded in 1986 at the University of Maryland to develop bridge-related technology.
  • It commercializes bridge software originally developed for the Maryland State Highway Administration, making it available to other state design agencies and private consultants.
  • Its stated experience comes from bridge-related projects that include both laboratory and on-site testing.

How to use this

If you are a state agency or consultant evaluating the Center's software, treat the named bridges as evidence of a Maryland transportation background rather than as proof of a particular capability on a particular span. Before relying on that, ask the Center directly which tasks it performed on each bridge—analysis, testing, software development or review—since the page does not say. A useful next step is to request project descriptions or references tied to the structure type closest to your own work, such as a major crossing like the Bay Bridge versus a smaller river crossing like I-83 over Gunpowder River.

How can a state design agency or private consultant obtain the BEST Center's bridge software?

The BEST Center at the University of Maryland distributes its bridge-related software commercially to state design agencies and private consultants. The software was originally developed for the Maryland State Highway Administration; the Center's role is to make it available beyond Maryland on a commercial basis.

What "obtaining" it involves

  • Who can get it: state design agencies and private consultants are the stated audiences, so the path is an organizational licensing arrangement rather than a public download.
  • What to expect: a commercial agreement, since the Center describes commercialization as its mechanism for distribution.
  • Why the quality claim matters: Maryland has funded the commercialization process specifically to ensure demonstrable quality and limit liability. For a consultant bidding on a state bridge project, that backing is the practical reason to prefer this software over generic tools.

Next step

Contact the BEST Center through its site at BEST Center to ask about licensing terms, supported software titles, and any training or support included. Before you write the request, list the bridge types and design codes your agency works with—for example, the Francis Scott Key or Bay Bridge–class structures the Center cites—so the reply can be matched to your workload.

What types of bridge-related services does the BEST Center provide beyond software, such as laboratory or on-site testing?

The BEST Center combines software development with hands-on bridge engineering work. Its page describes bridge-related projects that include both laboratory testing and on-site testing, so its services go beyond selling or licensing software. That testing experience feeds back into the tools it develops and supports for state design agencies and private consultants.

What the page supports

  • Laboratory testing of bridge components and related technology.
  • On-site (field) testing on real bridges.
  • Bridge-related technology development, the center's founding purpose since 1986.
  • Commercial distribution of bridge software originally built for the Maryland State Highway Administration, with state-funded quality control behind it.
  • Accumulated engineering expertise from years of these projects, which the center presents as part of what it offers users.

Named structures on the page—the Francis Scott Key Bridge (I-695), the William Preston Lane Jr. Memorial (Bay) Bridge (US50/301), and I-83 over Gunpowder River in Baltimore County—indicate the kind of Maryland bridges its work relates to, though the page does not spell out which specific services were performed on each.

Practical reading

If you are a state agency or consultant considering the center, treat the testing capability as the differentiator: a software vendor can supply analysis tools, but a center that also runs lab and field tests can validate assumptions against measured behavior. A useful next step is to ask directly which test types (load testing, materials, instrumentation, inspection support) are currently offered, since the page describes the category of work rather than a service catalog.

Related questions

More questions →
Who Can Use the BEST Center's Bridge Software and Services?

The BEST Center's bridge software and services are intended for other state design agencies and private engineering consultants—not the general public. The center was set up to take bridge software originally developed for the Maryland State Highway Administration and make it available "on a commercial basis" to those outside users. If your organization is a state DOT or a private bridge-design firm, you are the audience the center was built to serve. The site does not publish eligibility rules, licensing terms, or an application process, so specific qualification and access questions have to be confirmed directly with the center.

Where the software comes from

The Bridge Engineering Software & Technology (BEST) Center was established in 1986 at the University of Maryland. Its founding purpose was twofold: develop bridge-related technology, and create a mechanism for commercializing software written for the Maryland State Highway Administration.

That origin matters for understanding who the software is for. The tools were not built as general-purpose commercial products from the start—they came out of a state design agency's own engineering needs. The commercialization mechanism exists specifically to move those tools beyond Maryland to other states' design agencies and to private consultants.

Who the center names as users

The site's own description identifies two external groups:

  • Other state design agencies — highway and transportation departments outside Maryland that want bridge design and analysis tools already proven in a state DOT context.
  • Private consultants — engineering firms that do bridge work and want access to the same software base.

The page also refers to an established "user base," which is consistent with the software having been distributed beyond Maryland over time.

Why the state invested in making it available

Maryland provided substantial resources—over a twenty-year period, from the State Highway Administration and numerous other sources—to support the commercialization process. The stated reasons are quality and liability: the state wanted to ensure the services and software are "of demonstrable quality" and to avoid potential liability. For a prospective user, this explains why the software carries a state-backed development pedigree rather than being an ordinary vendor product.

What the center's track record suggests

The center describes itself as operating for over ten years with a "premiere quality development team and user base." Its experience comes from bridge-related projects including laboratory and on-site testing. The page also references major structures—the Francis Scott Key Bridge (I-695), the William Preston Lane Jr. Memorial (Bay) Bridge (US50/301), and I-83 over Gunpowder River in Baltimore County, MD—as part of its working context.

What you cannot determine from the site

The public page does not state:

  • formal eligibility criteria beyond the two user groups named
  • licensing or fee structure
  • how to request access or submit an application
  • whether academic or non-U.S. organizations can participate

Because the site frames distribution as commercial, do not assume access is free or open. Treat cost and terms as unknown until confirmed.

Practical next step

If you represent a state design agency or a private bridge-engineering consultancy, the reasonable path is to contact the BEST Center at the University of Maryland directly and describe your organization and intended use. Ask specifically about eligibility, licensing terms, cost, and the onboarding process. Those details are not published on the page summarized here, and the center is the only authoritative source for them.

What Is the BEST Center at the University of Maryland?

The BEST Center is the Bridge Engineering Software & Technology Center at the University of Maryland. It was established in 1986 to develop bridge-related technology and to make bridge-oriented software—originally developed for the Maryland State Highway Administration—available on a commercial basis to other state design agencies and private consultants. It is relevant if you are a public highway agency, a bridge design firm, or a consultant looking for bridge engineering software with a long institutional track record behind it.

What the Center Does

The BEST Center's work sits at the intersection of software development and bridge engineering practice. According to the center, its core functions are:

  • Technology development — creating bridge-related technology, including software tools for design and analysis.
  • Commercialization of state-developed software — taking software built for Maryland's highway agency and licensing it to other state design agencies and private consultants.
  • Testing and field experience — accumulating knowledge through bridge-related projects that include both laboratory and on-site testing.

The center describes itself as having operated for over ten years with an established development team and user base, supported over a twenty-year period by the Maryland State Highway Administration and numerous other sources.

Who It Serves

Audience How the Center Is Relevant
State design agencies Access to bridge software originally developed for a state highway administration
Private consultants Commercial availability of the same tools used in state bridge practice
Bridge engineering researchers Laboratory and on-site testing experience and project work

The page names several Maryland structures in its scope, including the Francis Scott Key Bridge (I-695), the William Preston Lane Jr. Memorial (Bay) Bridge (US50/301), and I-83 over Gunpowder River in Baltimore County, MD—useful context for the kind of bridge infrastructure the center's work relates to.

Why the Commercial Model Matters

The excerpt explains that Maryland provided substantial resources to support the commercialization process specifically to ensure the services and software are of demonstrable quality and to avoid potential liability. In practice, this means the software is not a side project: it carries the backing of a state agency that has invested in making it reliable enough for external use. For an agency or firm evaluating bridge design tools, that institutional backing is the main selection signal the page offers.

What to Check Before Engaging

The available page material does not list specific software titles, licensing terms, prices, or login requirements. If you are considering the center's software or services, plan to confirm directly:

  1. Which software packages are currently offered and what each covers.
  2. Licensing and cost terms for state agencies versus private consultants.
  3. Support and update arrangements for commercial users.
  4. Compatibility with your agency's existing design workflows and standards.

The BEST Center is best understood as a university-based bridge software and technology group with deep ties to Maryland's highway administration—a fit for organizations that want bridge tools grounded in state-level design practice and testing experience.

What Bridge Engineering Software Does the BEST Center at the University of Maryland Make Available?

The BEST Center (Bridge Engineering Software & Technology Center) at the University of Maryland makes bridge-related software developed for the Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA) available on a commercial basis to other state design agencies and private consultants. The center does not publish a public software catalog, product names, or prices on its site, so the specific titles and licensing terms must be confirmed directly with the center.

What the Center Is

The BEST Center was established in 1986 to develop bridge-related technology and to commercialize bridge-oriented software originally built for the Maryland SHA. According to the center, the State of Maryland has funded the commercialization process over roughly a twenty-year period through the SHA and numerous other sources, with the stated goals of ensuring demonstrable quality in the services and software and avoiding potential liability.

The center describes itself as having operated for more than ten years with an established development team and user base, and as having accumulated bridge experience through projects that include laboratory and on-site testing.

Who the Software Is For

Audience Relationship to the software
Maryland State Highway Administration Original development sponsor; software was developed for the SHA
Other state design agencies Eligible to obtain the software on a commercial basis
Private consultants Eligible to obtain the software on a commercial basis

The site frames availability in terms of these institutional and professional users rather than the general public.

What the Site Does and Does Not Tell You

The page evidence supports these points:

  • The software is bridge-related and was developed for a state highway agency.
  • It is offered commercially beyond Maryland, to other state agencies and private consultants.
  • Quality assurance and liability management are explicit reasons for state investment in commercialization.

The page evidence does not include:

  • Names of individual software products or modules.
  • Pricing, licensing fees, or payment methods.
  • A download portal, trial, or online ordering process.
  • System requirements or supported design codes.

Because pricing and access terms are not stated, they should not be assumed to be free or open to anyone without login or eligibility checks.

How to Confirm What Is Available

  1. Identify your organization type. The stated eligible users are state design agencies and private consultants; confirm your status fits before inquiring.
  2. Contact the BEST Center directly. Ask for the current list of available bridge software, the platforms it runs on, and licensing terms. The site provides no self-service catalog, so this step is necessary.
  3. Ask about the Maryland SHA lineage. Since the tools were built for the SHA, ask whether documentation, design-code assumptions, or support reflect Maryland practice and how that affects use in another state.
  4. Request quality and support details. The center emphasizes demonstrable quality; ask what testing, validation, and user support accompany a license.
  5. Verify cost and delivery. Confirm fees, agreement type, and how software is delivered, since none of this appears on the public page.

Practical Context

The center's page references major Maryland crossings, including the Francis Scott Key Bridge (I-695), the William Preston Lane Jr. Memorial (Bay) Bridge (US50/301), and I-83 over Gunpowder River in Baltimore County, MD. These references indicate the kind of bridge work associated with the center, but they do not by themselves identify which software products exist or which projects used them.

For a firm outside Maryland, the key question is not only what software exists but whether tools shaped by Maryland SHA requirements fit another agency's design standards. That is best settled in direct conversation with the center before committing to a license.

What Experience and Expertise Does the BEST Center Have in Bridge Engineering?

The BEST Center (Bridge Engineering Software & Technology Center) at the University of Maryland has built its bridge engineering credentials over more than a decade of operation, combining a dedicated development team, a broad user base, and hands-on project experience that includes both laboratory and on-site testing. Its work is backed by sustained funding from the Maryland State Highway Administration and other sources, which the center describes as a deliberate investment to ensure the quality of its services and software.

What the Center Is and How It Was Set Up

The BEST Center was established in 1986 to develop bridge-related technology and to commercialize bridge software originally created for the Maryland State Highway Administration. That software is made available to other state design agencies and private consultants.

A key part of its model: the State of Maryland provided substantial resources over a twenty-year period to support the commercialization process. According to the center, this support exists to ensure its services and software are of demonstrable quality and to avoid potential liability. In practice, that means the center's offerings are tied to a state-level quality-assurance structure rather than being an independent commercial product line.

Where the Experience Comes From

The center's expertise rests on three concrete foundations:

  • A long-running development team. The center states it has been in operation for over ten years and has established what it calls a premiere quality development team and user base.
  • Real bridge projects. Its experience is drawn from bridge-related projects that include laboratory testing and on-site testing.
  • Accumulated domain knowledge. Through those projects, the center reports having accumulated years of experience and knowledge related to bridges.

The page evidence also references major structures in its project context, including the Francis Scott Key Bridge (I-695), the William Preston Lane Jr. Memorial (Bay) Bridge (US50/301), and I-83 over Gunpowder River in Baltimore County, MD. These names indicate the kind of infrastructure the center's work is associated with, though the available material does not detail the center's specific role on each.

How to Judge Whether That Experience Fits Your Needs

The center's track record is strongest as evidence of state-agency-grade software development and testing experience in bridge engineering. If you are a state design agency or private consultant evaluating bridge software, the relevant signals are:

Dimension What the evidence shows
Operating history Over ten years in operation; established 1986
Team and users A dedicated development team and an established user base
Testing experience Laboratory and on-site bridge testing
Quality backing Long-term state resources provided to support quality and limit liability
Software origin Developed for the Maryland State Highway Administration, then commercialized

What the available material does not provide: specific software titles, licensing terms, pricing, or a list of individual staff credentials. For those details, you would need to contact the center directly or review its software catalog.

Practical Takeaway

If your question is whether the BEST Center has credible bridge engineering experience, the answer is yes on the dimensions it documents: a multi-decade institutional history, a sustained development team, a user base of state agencies and consultants, and direct laboratory and field testing work. The natural next step is to ask the center which specific software packages are currently available and under what terms, since the overview page covers mission and background rather than product specifics.

Website Overview

Identifiable technologies and additional version or configuration signals make the service easier to fingerprint, which may help targeted scanners narrow their checks. Several search or sharing settings need attention. Together they may make snippets, preview images or preferred URLs less consistent across platforms.

Domain and Registration

Unknown

DNS and Email

The lowest TTL is 60 seconds, supporting rapid record changes at the cost of more frequent lookups. Nameservers are provided by ums.edu, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the iphmx.com email service. SPF and DMARC are configured. DKIM status is unknown. TXT records include verification markers for Google, Apple, Atlassian, Meta. Such markers may also remain after a service stops being used.

TLS and Certificates

The public key uses EC with 256 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, commonly associated with automated certificate services. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

The checked browser-security headers were not detected, leaving fewer explicit browser-side safeguards. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. The x-cache response header indicates a CDN or caching proxy in the delivery path. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header contains the custom value openresty.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies WordPress 7.0.7, jQuery, with exact versions exposed for 1 technologies. These details can narrow vulnerability checks, although exposure alone is not a vulnerability.

Search and Social Sharing

No homepage meta description was detected, leaving snippet selection more dependent on page text. The Generator tag identifies WordPress 7.0.7, making the publishing system easier to fingerprint. No Open Graph metadata was detected, so social previews may depend on platform inference. The title has 65 characters, within a common display range. A viewport declaration is present, providing a basis for mobile layout.

Hosting and Email

DNSums.edu
Hostingcampuspress.com
Emailiphmx.com
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagAshburn, Virginia, United States Inferred 100.24.182.117

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

Unknown

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Aus-east-1.lb.campuspress.com100.24.182.11760—
Aus-east-1.lb.campuspress.com184.72.224.8060—
Aus-east-1.lb.campuspress.com3.91.109.12260—
Aus-east-1.lb.campuspress.com34.199.202.10660—
Aus-east-1.lb.campuspress.com34.227.238.16660—
Aus-east-1.lb.campuspress.com35.172.73.10260—
MXumd.edumx1.umd.iphmx.com1440020
MXumd.edumx2.umd.iphmx.com1440020
NSumd.eduns.ums.edu14400—
NSumd.eduns1.umd.edu14400—
NSumd.eduns2.umd.edu14400—
TXTumd.edu00D70000000IZPh=1TBUY0000000001300—
TXTumd.edu4D3F845C731B0955B3B0563F393D12E2300—
TXTumd.edu5a5def2dc4b8766dcbc4d2da3349c68a1f60d470238c9ad2c43757470df5b14e300—
TXTumd.eduDynatrace-site-verification=3b9984ff-fa43-4c6c-a412-a04c9311d963__39f5p55j2q7g71po5ii8mk4374300—
TXTumd.eduFADAF9FB5B9EE2272ED1638D143C1745300—
TXTumd.eduSFMC-ChwpRSjm7UAXQ3aO2a4TE_nHOhXyfCVMMj25jtqC300—
TXTumd.eduZOOM_verify_6gxpRSmmeH1pxxUo5Higlu300—
TXTumd.eduZOOM_verify_ew6uSDNaRmmn1nu_Ts6o3A300—
TXTumd.eduadobe-idp-site-verification=0afdc0ecfe602686ab99e86db79056a241a666affe647a893924b794fbef5191300—
TXTumd.eduadobe-idp-site-verification=40a1e9b4-50fb-4c92-9399-1e76c80cdf87300—
TXTumd.eduanthropic-domain-verification-2kekyx=Izdedg0KzNFDVDh88YGHCIyHI300—
TXTumd.eduapple-domain-verification=SfiuCrELsUoPhmWU300—
TXTumd.eduasv=08dc4bff5ca1c57c4066d547cb2ede34300—
TXTumd.eduatlassian-domain-verification=hCFSb4vDaH3FZG2/DNZjaj2dLt7Yo8BAte5sP586KyW4DvPynitQEt8x7c0RvMhF300—
TXTumd.eduatlassian-domain-verification=jsp21SwhRd0VlqqwwG604raLVFkXj122oxaP875ixca1SyYNs2r4V0pW3PGacjvs300—
TXTumd.eduatlassian-sending-domain-verification=50a6f41d-d743-40ab-ba5e-e6d14af52f1b300—
TXTumd.eduatlassian-sending-domain-verification=ec03eaf2-7ed2-4d03-8333-820cad9e8a04300—
TXTumd.edubrevo-code:d3c2d63793f4dd20304af345c67a8be4300—
TXTumd.edubrevo-code:d71d84f4848e813d4acac38670ad3409300—
TXTumd.edubrevo-code:d7c5ea407d5638e935306c41b6cf0c69300—
TXTumd.educursor-domain-verification-8sk7wz=1jFulrG3zid0VtQWYhZk8wrU4300—
TXTumd.edudell-technologies-domain-verification=umd.edu_6b285755-75ed-4037-bb55-7910d997b8ba_1734885372300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=04bgb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=0cqab300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=6yzbb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=6yzbb""300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=99pab300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=aaqab300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=btfcb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=e0gfb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=ecqab300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=eeefb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=f7pab300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=ifycb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=k5reb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=kwmbb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=l5reb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=l81ab300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=m5reb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=my1ab300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=n5reb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=nabgb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=oabgb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=oc1cb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=pgteb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=rxycb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=s6ybb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=sdzcb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=sujfb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=tq1cb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=u9xfb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=vlseb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=wcqab300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=x1ffb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=xcqab300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=xqlbb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=ycqab300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=ydveb300—
TXTumd.edue2ma-verification=yxpfb300—
TXTumd.edufacebook-domain-verification=lo5wiknocnhv9rxmhcau0qu15gcjfi300—
TXTumd.edufastly-domain-delegation-m4fSIJZih88QgWH5trzI-424811-08-05-2021300—
TXTumd.edugoogle-site-verification=2ZymRq4dY9_nbGLh9HhTm3Z5oBDEKi2yHyj9buDZmqc300—
TXTumd.edugoogle-site-verification=5uAJhrJvSIc6r3VJvDq27NdcbVU729HELEEZ0NTPG64300—
TXTumd.edugoogle-site-verification=As2VzGueK-l938gHU7jCCGo0sAWM0eM7BulPwDSC0y0300—
TXTumd.edugoogle-site-verification=FrrKt3ClQUFT5i_gwQAn-uQSoRI5Y_IpFExx1CmLOII300—
TXTumd.edugoogle-site-verification=NDLPx5E7ayLh2kxzv6If6mrg3cQTXMlPNfoTjRY4KUk300—
TXTumd.edugoogle-site-verification=SVI8jDKaHI6P96SE07flUYUA2OCriIIOWiX-3a0RnEQ300—
TXTumd.edugoogle-site-verification=e9un135MdekFdfk_VicDDfCP9wi1jb8Wmkmk1DF6OfE300—
TXTumd.edujamf-site-verification=q_evM9Go1nzKC2ruEDnURA300—
TXTumd.edulogmein-verification-code=t7A67XAYgXcWS1d2nVXr7Dl6K300—
TXTumd.edulovable_verification=e690e0f7ff798a43aa2301c1783d8342908b52bf3cbdb9889dd51115f8585219300—
TXTumd.eduonetrust-domain-verification=66ba66b7aa304397ba0a1d4f6c96bc5f300—
TXTumd.eduonetrust-domain-verification=a9c54d2106ba4d8f96921e94348534c7300—
TXTumd.eduperplexity-ai-domain-verification-hnmv8k=AYYgnLHsTOBvmlPYklcBZ2fiR300—
TXTumd.edusij7qofovndodvjgjhmgmkeof300—
TXTumd.eduti2UA/gVAiO7gzONg0rdrMb6EOqcvvkfFTEbLj+egRTjB9H/rf0lfpBkf0NdaGjf9b4qrQq0xJcErwtMit+5lQ==300—
TXTumd.eduv=spf1 exists:%{ir}.%{v}._spf.umd_spf.aws.umd.edu include:_spf.salesforce.com ~exists:%{ir}.%{v}.x._spf.umd_spf.aws.umd.edu ip4:68.232.142.226 ip4:68.232.131.46 ip4:216.71.149.111 ip4:216.71.149.190 ip4:68.232.143.84 ip4:68.232.137.73 ip4:216.71.140.161 ip4:216.71.140.163 ip4:128.8.162.133 ip4:128.8.15.34 ip4:128.8.13.14 ip4:128.8.162.94 ip4:209.164.1.194 ip4:54.144.73.133 ip4:54.172.225.123 ip4:168.245.25.116 include:_spf.umd.edu include:_spf.google.com a:c.spf.service-now.com ~all300—
CNAMEbest.umd.edubest.umd.edu.c1111.campuspress.com14400—
DMARC_dmarc.umd.eduv=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:[email protected],mailto:[email protected]14249—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectcombine.umd.edu
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Valid until2027-01-13T08:03 · Remaining when checked: 87 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
cache-controlmax-age=634, must-revalidate
serveropenresty

Identified technologies

WordPress 7.0.7jQuery

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionNot detected
Canonical URLhttps://best.umd.edu/
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter CardNot detected

Unknown

All bots 1 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Allow/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php
  • Disallow/wp-admin/
  • IntervalCrawl delay 30 seconds
yandex 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
moget 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
ichiro 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
naverbot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
yeti 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
baiduspider 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
baiduspider-video 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
baiduspider-image 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
baiduspider+ 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
baiduspider+(+http://www.baidu.com/search/spider.htm) 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
baiduspider/2.0;+http://www.baidu.com/search/spider.html 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
baiduspider/2.0 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
+baiduspider 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
+baiduspider/2.0 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
+baiduspider/2.0;++http://www.baidu.com/search/spider.html 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
mozilla/5.0(compatible; baiduspider/2.0; +http://www.baidu.com/search/spider.html) 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
sogou spider 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
sogou web spider 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
youdaobot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
sosospider 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
sosospider/2.0 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
sosospider+ 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
yisouspider 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
googlebot-image 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/wp-content/mu-plugins/

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.