pallyy.com

Pallyy is a social media scheduler built around client work rather than channel work: you plan each client's posts in one place, send a shared link for sign-off, and pay per client instead of per channel. It fits agencies, freelancers, and in-house teams juggling a roster of accounts — the site names restaurants, clinics, realtors, and trades as typical client types. If you manage a handful of brands across several networks, the structure below is what you'd be evaluating. If you only run your own single-brand account, most of it is unnecessary.

Content is organized by client, not by channel

The core difference from a standard scheduler is the unit of organization. Instead of a single calendar where every network's posts are mixed together, Pallyy's dashboard is framed around a client roster. The homepage example shows a morning view reading "5 posts going out this week across 10 clients," with upcoming posts labeled by client name — Fern & Fig Brunch, The Copper Still, Hillcrest Farm Stay, Kindred Knitwear, Osteria Lume.

Each entry carries a status and a time: Approved · Scheduled · Today 9am, Scheduled · Tomorrow 5pm, and so on. That means the first thing you see is what's going out and for whom, not which platform it's on.

Supported channels listed on the site:

For an agency, the practical effect is that adding a channel to an existing client doesn't change how you plan or what you pay — the site states the Agency plan includes everything rather than selling features as add-ons.

Client approvals happen through a shared link, no account required

This is the part that removes the most back-and-forth for agencies. Clients preview, comment, and approve posts from a shared link, and the site explicitly says no account is needed on their side.

The workflow, as shown in the product's own example:

1. You schedule or draft a post for a client.
2. The client opens the shared link and sees the post.
3. They either approve it or leave a comment.
4. Their response updates the post's status in your dashboard.

Real comment examples from the site show how this reads in practice — a client at Studio Arlo writing "Can we swap the second photo for the bar shot?" and a client at Fern & Fig Brunch replying "Brunch shot is perfect, go ahead and schedule the rest of the week too."

The benefit is that approval isn't buried in email threads or a separate messaging tool. The feedback lands on the post it refers to.

The approvals page shows every post's stage in one list

Rather than hunting through a calendar for what's stuck, Pallyy has a dedicated approvals view. Every post a client still needs to sign off appears in one list with its current stage.

The statuses visible in the site's example:

• Awaiting client — sent for review, waiting on them
• Awaiting team — needs internal action before it goes out
• Changes requested — client asked for edits
• Approved — cleared to publish
• Scheduled — approved and queued with a date and time

The dashboard groups these further, showing counts like "Needs our work · 4," "Waiting on client · 4," and "Feedback · 2" over a 30-day window. For an agency, that grouping is the useful part: it tells you at a glance whether the bottleneck is on your side or the client's, across the whole roster at once.

Team members and freelancers get scoped access

The collaboration model is per-client, not all-or-nothing. The site's example shows a team list where each person is attached to specific clients with a role:

• Mia Torres — All social sets — Admin
• Jordan Lee — BeanHouse Café — Editor
• Aisha Khan — BeanHouse Café — Pending Editor

So a freelancer covering one account can be given access to that client without seeing the rest of your roster. The site describes this as giving teammates and freelancers access to the clients they work on.

Reporting is per client and exportable

Client reports are built from each client's own analytics and exported as PDFs at month end. The example metrics shown are followers (12.4k), engagement (3.2%), and reach (86.1k). If you send monthly recaps to clients, this replaces assembling screenshots by hand — though the site doesn't specify how far back the analytics data goes or which networks feed each metric, so verify that against the channels your clients actually use.

Pricing and trial: what the site states

• Priced per client, not per channel.
• A 14-day free trial is offered.
• A demo can be booked.
• The Agency plan is the tier described as including client-work features rather than selling them as add-ons.

The site does not publish specific dollar amounts in the material available here, so check the pricing page for current figures before committing. It also doesn't state whether the trial requires a payment method — confirm that at signup if it matters to you.

Where this fits and where it doesn't

Pallyy is a reasonable fit if:

• You manage multiple client brands and want them separated rather than pooled.
• Client sign-off is a recurring bottleneck and you want it on a link instead of in email.
• You use freelancers per client and need scoped access.
• You bill or budget per client and want your tool's cost to match that shape.

It's a weaker fit if:

• You run one brand and don't need approval workflows.
• You need a channel you don't see in the supported list above.
• You need analytics depth the site doesn't document — check the reporting detail against your requirements first.

The clearest way to test the fit is the 14-day trial with one real client: schedule a week of their posts, send the shared link, and see whether the approval loop actually shortens compared to how you do it now.

Pallyy supports scheduling to ten channels listed on its site: Instagram, Facebook, X (Twitter), LinkedIn, Google My Business, Pinterest, TikTok, YouTube, Threads, and Bluesky. That list is what the page states, so treat it as the supported set — if a platform isn't named there, don't assume it works.

The full channel list

The page frames this as "every channel your clients are on," which matters if you run a mixed roster — restaurants, clinics, realtors, trades — where each client lives somewhere different.

Why the list is framed around client work

Pallyy positions itself as a scheduler for agencies rather than a single-brand tool. Two details on the page follow from that:

• Priced per client, not per channel. Adding another platform for an existing client doesn't change what you pay, according to the page's pricing framing.
• Approvals from a shared link. Clients preview, comment, and approve posts without creating an account, so the platform mix doesn't add onboarding friction on their side.

If your deciding factor is whether you can consolidate a multi-platform client into one calendar without per-channel cost creep, that combination is the relevant part of the page.

What to check before committing

The channel list tells you what's supported, not how well each one behaves. Before moving a client over, confirm:

1. The specific post types you need. "Instagram" covers feed posts and Reels on the page; if you rely on a format the page doesn't name, verify it directly.
2. Whether your client mix fits the ten listed platforms. Anything outside the list has no stated support.
3. Trial terms. The site offers a 14-day free trial, so you can test your actual channels against real client workflows rather than assuming parity with your current tool.

For agencies whose clients cluster on the ten listed networks, the coverage is broad enough to run the whole roster from one place. For anyone with a client on an unlisted platform, that gap is the first thing to resolve.

Yes. Pallyy can build reports per client from that client's own social analytics and export them as PDFs, which is the format most agencies use for month-end client updates. The feature sits inside the Agency plan alongside client approvals, the shared calendar, and team collaboration, so it is not sold as a separate add-on. If you are evaluating Pallyy specifically for reporting, the practical question is whether your workflow matches how Pallyy structures reports: one client at a time, from that client's connected analytics, exported on a recurring cadence.

What the reporting feature actually does

Based on the product page, Pallyy's reporting works in three steps:

• Per-client reports. You build a report for a single client rather than one blended report across your whole roster. This matters if clients expect to see only their own numbers.
• Client's own analytics as the source. The data comes from the analytics of the accounts connected for that client, not from a generic benchmark or an aggregated agency view.
• PDF export. Reports can be exported as PDFs, which is the usual deliverable for a month-end recap you send by email or attach to a shared folder.

The page also shows the kind of metrics that appear in the reporting context: follower counts (for example, 12.4k), engagement rate (3.2%), and reach (86.1k with a 12% figure). Treat those as illustrative of the metric types rather than as guaranteed fields for every platform.

How this fits an agency workflow

Pallyy is positioned around client work rather than single-brand publishing, and reporting is one part of that loop:

1. Plan and schedule posts for each client in a shared calendar.
2. Get sign-off — clients preview, comment, and approve posts from a shared link, with no account required on their side.
3. Track status on an approvals page that lists every post still awaiting sign-off and the stage it is at (awaiting client, awaiting team, changes requested, approved).
4. Report at month end by building the per-client report from their analytics and exporting it as a PDF.

The reporting step is the natural close of that loop: the same client whose posts you scheduled and got approved is the client whose numbers you export.

What to check before relying on it

A few conditions determine whether the reporting feature is enough for your agency:

• Which platforms feed the analytics. Pallyy lists Instagram, Facebook, X (Twitter), LinkedIn, Google My Business, Pinterest, TikTok, YouTube, Threads, and Bluesky as supported channels. Reporting quality depends on what analytics each platform exposes and what Pallyy pulls from it, so verify the specific platforms your clients use.
• Which metrics your clients expect. If a client contract requires metrics beyond followers, engagement, and reach, confirm the report includes them before committing.
• How many reports you produce. Because reports are built per client, a large roster means a repeated monthly task. Pallyy's pricing model is per client rather than per channel, which affects cost as your roster grows but does not reduce the number of reports you export.
• Whether the Agency plan is required. The page states client-work features, including approvals and reporting, are included on the Agency plan rather than sold as add-ons. Confirm current plan details on the pricing page, since plan contents can change.

A realistic month-end scenario

Say you manage ten clients across restaurants, clinics, and trades. During the month you schedule posts, clients approve them through shared links, and a few request changes. At month end you open each client's report, pull their analytics, and export a PDF. You then send that PDF with the invoice or a short summary email. The value is that the numbers come from the client's own accounts, so the report reflects what actually happened on their channels rather than an agency-wide average.

If your process instead requires one combined cross-client dashboard, or automated scheduled delivery of reports without manual export, check whether Pallyy supports that before assuming it does — the page describes building and exporting reports, not automated distribution.

Bottom line

Pallyy can generate client reports from social analytics and export them as PDFs, built per client and included with the Agency plan's client-work features. It fits agencies that already schedule and collect approvals in Pallyy and want the month-end recap to come from the same place. Before adopting it for reporting alone, confirm the platforms, metrics, and export cadence match what your clients expect.

Pallyy is a social media scheduler built specifically for agencies and client work. Its core promise is to let you plan every client's posts in one place, collect sign-off through a shared link, and pay per client rather than per connected channel. That makes it a fit if you manage multiple brands and need a repeatable approval loop; it's less relevant if you only schedule your own content on one or two accounts.

What Pallyy is designed to solve

Most scheduling tools are built around a single brand. Agencies instead juggle a roster of restaurants, clinics, realtors, and trades businesses, each with its own accounts, approvers, and reporting needs. Pallyy's positioning is that this client-facing workflow — approvals, per-client organization, and per-client billing — is the default rather than an add-on.

Core capabilities

Planning across all your clients

You plan posts for every client from one calendar. The product shows a consolidated view, for example a dashboard summarizing how many posts are going out this week across a set of clients, alongside upcoming items with their status.

Client approvals via shared link

Clients preview, comment, and approve posts from a shared link, and no account is needed on their side. There is a dedicated approvals page listing every post still waiting on sign-off, with the stage each one is at. Statuses visible in the product include:

• Approved
• Scheduled
• Changes requested
• Awaiting team
• Awaiting client

This is the feature that most distinguishes it from a generic scheduler: the approval state is a first-class part of the workflow, not something you track in email.

Team collaboration

You can give teammates and freelancers access to specific clients, with roles such as Admin, Editor, and Pending Editor. That supports the common agency pattern of a small core team plus per-client contributors.

Client reporting

You can build per-client reports from their own analytics and export them as PDFs at month end. The product surfaces metrics like followers, engagement rate, and reach.

Supported channels

Instagram, Facebook, X (Twitter), LinkedIn, Google My Business, Pinterest, TikTok, YouTube, Threads, and Bluesky.

Pricing model

The key commercial difference is that Pallyy is priced per client, not per channel. So adding another network for an existing client doesn't change what you pay, while adding a new client does. Client-facing features such as approvals and reporting are included on the Agency plan rather than sold as separate add-ons. A 14-day free trial is offered, and there is a demo booking option. For current figures, check the pricing page directly, since plan details and limits are the kind of thing that changes.

Who it fits, and who it doesn't

How to evaluate it

1. Start the 14-day free trial.
2. Add one real client and connect that client's channels.
3. Schedule a few posts and send the shared approval link to the client.
4. Confirm the approval states and the month-end PDF report match how you already work.
5. Only then decide whether the per-client model is cheaper or more expensive than your current per-channel setup.

The main thing to verify during the trial is whether your clients will actually use the no-account approval link — that's the workflow the whole product is organized around.

Pallyy charges agencies per client rather than per social channel, and offers a 14-day free trial. That means adding another connected account for the same client — say a second Instagram profile or a LinkedIn page — doesn't push you into a higher tier the way per-channel tools do. The trade-off is that the exact dollar figures aren't published on the pages summarized here, so you'll need to open the pricing page to see current plan rates before committing.

The billing model: per client, not per channel

The core mechanic is simple: your bill scales with the number of clients you manage, not the number of social profiles you connect.

This matters most for agencies whose clients are spread across many networks. Pallyy lists support for Instagram, Facebook, X (Twitter), LinkedIn, Google My Business, Pinterest, TikTok, YouTube, Threads, and Bluesky. Under a per-channel model, a single restaurant client on five networks would count as five billable units. Under Pallyy's model, it counts as one client.

What this means in practice

• Adding channels is cheap. If a client expands from Instagram to Instagram plus TikTok, you're not adding a billing unit.
• Adding clients is the cost driver. Onboarding a new retainer client is the event that changes your bill.
• Budgeting is more predictable. You can estimate spend from your client roster rather than from a shifting count of connected profiles.

If your agency runs a handful of clients on many channels each, per-client pricing usually works in your favor. If you run many single-channel clients, the math is less obviously favorable — compare against your current per-channel bill before switching.

The 14-day free trial

Pallyy offers a 14-day free trial, and the site also provides a "Book a demo" option for teams that want a walkthrough first.

The trial is the practical way to test two things the marketing copy can't tell you:

1. Whether the approval workflow fits your client relationships. Clients preview, comment, and approve posts from a shared link without creating an account. Test this with one real, slightly demanding client during the trial — that's where friction shows up.
2. Whether the per-client model matches your actual roster. Count your clients and channels, then check the pricing page to see which plan tier you'd land on.

A reasonable trial sequence

• Days 1–2: Connect one client across all their channels. Confirm every network you need is actually supported for scheduling, not just listed.
• Days 3–7: Run a real approval cycle. Send a shared link to a client and see whether the comment-and-approve flow replaces your current email or spreadsheet back-and-forth.
• Days 8–12: Add a second and third client. Watch how the approvals list and calendar hold up as volume grows — the product surfaces pending items by stage ("Awaiting client," "Awaiting team," "Changes requested"), which is the part that tends to break down in spreadsheets.
• Days 13–14: Build a client report and export it as a PDF. If month-end reporting is a manual chore today, this is the feature to validate before you pay.

What's included vs. what costs extra

According to the site, features aimed at client work — approvals, calendar, client reports, and team collaboration for teammates and freelancers — are included on the Agency plan rather than sold as add-ons. That's a meaningful distinction: many schedulers gate approvals or reporting behind higher tiers or separate purchases.

The site also notes a Pallyy API is available. It doesn't specify on the summarized pages whether API access is included in every plan or priced separately, so confirm that directly if integrations matter to you.

Before you decide

Two things the available information doesn't answer, and you should check on the pricing page or with sales:

• The actual price per client and any tier thresholds. No figures are published in the material summarized here, so don't assume a rate.
• What happens at the end of the trial. Whether it converts to a paid plan automatically, and what payment methods are accepted, isn't stated.

The honest summary: per-client billing is the right structure for agencies with multi-channel clients, and the 14-day trial is long enough to run one full approval cycle and one month-end report. Use it to test those two workflows specifically — they're the reason to pick Pallyy over a generic scheduler, and the reason to walk away if they don't fit how your clients actually sign off.