Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is Process Heating magazine?
Process Heating is a trade publication for engineers and technical professionals working with industrial heating equipment and thermal processes in manufacturing. Its coverage centers on the practical side of process heating—equipment selection, operation and safety—rather than general industry news.
What it covers
Based on the site's current content, typical topics include:
- Heat transfer fluids and steam systems, including explanations of different steam types and how their properties affect applications
- Combustion and burners, alongside safety incidents and investigation findings such as the CSB report on the BP-Husky refinery fire
- Ovens, dryers and furnaces, including specialized units like cleanroom ovens for silicon wafers
- Process control, such as how standards shape distributed control system (DCS) design
- Decarbonization and energy efficiency, including thermal energy storage and electrification of industrial heat
- Equipment and market news, plus training announcements from manufacturers
It also offers continuing education courses through a CE Center and runs webinars with sponsorship options.
Who it's for
The primary audience is practicing engineers, plant and process personnel, and equipment specifiers who need applied, how-to information—for example, a thermal systems engineer comparing steam versus thermal fluid heating for a new line, or a maintenance lead reviewing safe operation of a thermal fluid heater.
How to use it
Treat it as a working reference rather than a research journal: use the steam and heat transfer fluid articles to clarify terminology before specifying equipment, and the incident coverage to benchmark your own safety reviews. For vendor-neutral standards and formal training, pair it with professional engineering bodies; for broader industrial heating news, Process Heating itself is the starting point.
A practical next step: search the site for the specific medium you use—steam, thermal fluid or direct-fired—and read the related safety and control articles together, since those decisions tend to interact.
How can engineers use Process Heating to troubleshoot steam system and heat transfer fluid problems?
Engineers use Process Heating mainly as a practical, application-oriented reference: its articles explain how specific heating equipment and media behave, so you can compare what you observe in the field against documented behavior and narrow down the cause before changing setpoints or calling in a vendor. The page evidence shows this editorial focus directly — for example, an article on the different types of steam notes that "not all steam is the same" and that understanding steam properties helps "prevent misuse in an application," while other coverage addresses heat transfer fluid selection, thermal fluid heater operation and control system design.
Where it fits a troubleshooting workflow
- Steam problems (wet steam, carryover, poor heat transfer): Use the steam-types material to confirm whether the steam quality you assume matches what the process actually receives, then check traps, separators and condensate handling accordingly.
- Heat transfer fluid problems (degradation, fouling, low delta-T): Fluid-focused articles and market/technology coverage help you frame whether the issue is fluid condition, system design or operating practice.
- Control and instrumentation issues: Content on control standards and flowmeter calibration supports checking whether measurement error, rather than the thermal system itself, is driving the symptom.
- Training and safety awareness: Coverage of thermal fluid heater training and incident investigations (such as the refinery release case) is useful for pre-shift briefings and for reviewing operating procedures.
A concrete next step
Suppose a steam-jacketed vessel heats slowly. Before adjusting the boiler, read the steam-types article to identify which steam condition your application needs, then verify steam quality at the vessel inlet and inspect the trap station. If the system uses thermal fluid instead, start with the fluid-focused and heater-operation articles to check degradation and flow assumptions.
How to decide if it is the right resource
| Need | Good fit? |
|---|---|
| Understanding equipment and media behavior, plus industry practice | Yes — technical, how-to style content for engineers |
| Learning from incident investigations and standards discussions | Yes |
| Vendor-specific fault codes or warranty procedures | No — go to the equipment maker |
| Live diagnostic data or monitoring | No — this is editorial guidance, not a tool |
Treat the articles as informed context for forming hypotheses; confirm findings against your own measurements, P&IDs and OEM documentation before making changes.
What safety lessons can process heating engineers take from the CSB investigation into the BP-Husky refinery naphtha release and fire?
The CSB timeline of the September 20, 2022 naphtha release and fire at the BP-Husky refinery in Oregon, Ohio—which killed two workers and caused major facility damage—is most useful to process heating engineers as a prompt to re-examine how flammable liquids interact with hot surfaces, ignition sources and operating procedures in their own plants. The page evidence identifies the CSB timeline as the key public artifact; the specific causal findings should be read in the CSB's own materials rather than inferred here.
Practical lessons to apply
- Treat hot surfaces as ignition sources in flammable service. Trace where naphtha or similar light hydrocarbons could contact heaters, flanges, insulation or hot piping, and check that surface temperatures stay below the relevant autoignition margin during startup, upsets and shutdown.
- Scrutinize transient states. Releases and fires often occur during startup, maintenance or abnormal conditions, not steady operation. Review procedures for those phases with the same rigor as normal running.
- Verify isolation and drain paths. Confirm that isolation, depressurization and drain steps are sequenced correctly and that operators can verify them, since a timeline investigation usually reveals where a step was skipped or misunderstood.
- Keep ignition control and detection aligned. Cross-check area classification, gas detection placement and emergency shutdown logic against the actual layout of fired heaters, ovens and thermal fluid systems.
A useful next step
Pick one process heating unit handling or adjacent to flammable liquids and walk its startup and shutdown procedure against the CSB timeline, noting every point where hot surfaces, isolation steps and operator actions intersect. For broader context on steam and heat transfer practice, Process Heating publishes technical articles on steam types, heat transfer fluids and control system standards that can support that review.
How does molten salt thermal energy storage help industrial plants decarbonize process heat?
Molten salt thermal energy storage (TES) helps industrial plants decarbonize process heat by separating when heat is generated from when it is used. The salt stores high-temperature thermal energy captured from electric heaters, and that stored heat is later released to a process stream. This lets a plant run electric heat sources when low-carbon electricity is abundant or cheap—such as during high renewable output—and draw on stored heat when the process needs it. The result is that fossil-fired process heating can be displaced without forcing the process to follow the grid's ups and downs.
Where it fits best
- High-temperature, continuous processes that need steady heat, where the storage buffer smooths out intermittent renewable supply.
- Plants with access to low-carbon electricity—on-site renewables, a decarbonized grid, or power purchase agreements—since the salt only stores energy; the carbon benefit depends on the electricity source.
- Operations that want to electrify heat but cannot tolerate supply interruptions, because stored heat acts as a thermal battery between the electric heater and the process.
Trade-offs to weigh
- Molten salts need to stay within their stable temperature range; freeze protection and careful temperature control add operational complexity.
- Storage adds capital cost and footprint, so it pays off most where heat demand is large and reasonably steady.
- Round-trip efficiency losses mean the economics depend on the price gap between charging and discharging periods.
Practical next step
Map your process heat load profile against your electricity price and carbon-intensity profile. If there is a strong daily or seasonal mismatch—cheap low-carbon power available when your process is not drawing peak heat—molten salt TES is worth a feasibility study. For background on industrial heat equipment and thermal processing topics, see Process Heating.
What should I consider when selecting an industrial dryer for my manufacturing process?
Select an industrial dryer by starting from the material and the process, not from the equipment category: drying method, throughput, target moisture and heat sensitivity will narrow the field faster than brand comparisons. Process Heating's equipment overview of industrial dryers is a reasonable orientation for the range of types Process Heating.
Decisions that matter most
- Material behavior: particle size, bulk density, stickiness, flammability and how the product reacts to heat determine whether convective, contact, infrared or other drying approaches are viable. Heat-sensitive products may need lower temperatures and longer residence times.
- Moisture targets and feed consistency: define inlet and final moisture precisely, and note how much the feed varies. A dryer sized for a steady feed can struggle with batch-to-batch swings.
- Heat source and utilities: steam, thermal fluid, electric or direct-fired air each carry different temperature limits, response times and site requirements. The choice interacts with what your plant already supplies.
- Throughput and residence time: continuous versus batch operation changes labor, footprint and how easily the line absorbs upsets.
- Controls and turndown: ask how the dryer behaves at partial load, since many plants run below nameplate capacity for much of the year.
- Safety and emissions: dust, solvent vapors and combustible material handling need to be addressed at selection, not retrofitted.
Comparing common approaches
| Consideration | Convective (hot air) | Contact (e.g., drum or paddle) | Infrared |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Granular or shaped products needing uniform air contact | Slurries, pastes and fine powders | Surface drying, thin layers, preheating |
| Heat sensitivity | Moderate; air temperature is adjustable | Can be higher at the surface | Fast, localized heating |
| Footprint and complexity | Larger air handling | Compact but mechanically intensive | Compact, easily zoned |
| Main trade-off | Energy lost in exhaust air | Product can scorch on hot surfaces | Limited penetration into thicker material |
A practical next step
Write a one-page process brief: material, feed rate, moisture in and out, allowable temperature, available utilities, floor space and cleaning needs. Send it to two or three dryer vendors and ask each to justify its proposed type against those constraints. For steam and heat-transfer decisions that feed into dryer selection, background on steam types and thermal fluids from the same publication is useful Process Heating.
How can subscribing to Process Heating or its CE Center courses support my professional development in thermal processing?
Subscribing to Process Heating gives you a steady stream of trade coverage, while its CE Center adds structured courses; together they support development in different ways—news and case studies keep you current, courses build and document specific competencies. The site is written for engineers working with industrial heating equipment, so the material assumes a technical, plant-floor context rather than general science.
What each channel offers
| Channel | Best for | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
| Magazine/news subscription | Staying current on equipment, standards and incidents | Skimming new coverage before a design review or maintenance planning meeting |
| CE Center courses | Structured learning on thermal processing topics | Filling a knowledge gap or meeting continuing-education requirements |
Concrete scenarios
- Early-career process engineer: Use the news feed to learn the vocabulary of heat transfer fluids, steam types and combustion, then take CE Center courses to consolidate that into formal knowledge. The site's coverage of steam types, for example, is framed around avoiding misapplication—useful when you are specifying equipment.
- Experienced engineer moving into a new area: If you have worked mainly with electric heating and are now responsible for a thermal fluid system, courses give a structured path, while articles on topics like safe operation of thermal fluid heaters show how practitioners apply the theory.
- Anyone tracking industry direction: Coverage of decarbonization, such as molten salt thermal energy storage, and of process control standards helps you anticipate where equipment and system design are heading before those changes reach your plant.
Trade-offs to weigh
Subscription content is broad but shallow per topic—good for awareness, less so for deep mastery. CE Center courses are more structured but cover a narrower set of subjects and require dedicated time. Neither substitutes for hands-on training from equipment manufacturers or formal engineering coursework; treat them as a complement.
As a next step, identify one gap in your current work—say, steam system fundamentals or control system standards—and choose the channel that matches it: a course for depth, the news feed for breadth. For deeper reference material on specific equipment, compare with established industry sources such as ASHRAE or ChemE-style technical references where relevant.
User reviews (0)