Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

v5.nomie.app

Open Source Mood Tracking

Health & Medical Open Source
No paid content found
Visit website
Profile views 8 Outbound visits 5 Normal
Nomie - N5 Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Health & Medical
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
2018
Hosting
NetlifyInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is Nomie?

Nomie is an open-source mood and life-tracking app. You log short entries about how you feel or what you did, and the app turns those entries into a personal record you can review over time. Its stated focus is mood tracking, and it is distributed as open-source software, which means the code can be inspected, self-hosted or modified by people who want that level of control.

What it is for

Typical uses fit a simple pattern: capture a data point in a few seconds, then look back at patterns.

  • Mood logging: note your mood at a moment in time, optionally with context such as sleep, energy or what you were doing.
  • Habit and behaviour tracking: record recurring actions like exercise, medication or screen time.
  • Personal review: scan your history to see how moods or habits shift across days and weeks.

The audience is mainly self-trackers who want a lightweight, private-feeling record rather than a social feed or a clinical tool. It suits people who are comfortable with a web app and, if they choose, running their own instance.

What to weigh

The main trade-off is control versus convenience. Open source and self-hosting appeal to users who care about data ownership and customisation, but they usually mean more setup and less hand-holding than a polished commercial app. Nomie's page is a JavaScript-dependent web app, so it needs a browser with scripting enabled; that is a normal requirement, not a limitation unique to it.

As a next step, open the app in a browser and log one entry for today, then check whether the review view shows the pattern you care about. If you want a comparison point for how mood trackers differ in approach, look at Daylio for a mainstream mobile-first option, or Exist for automatic aggregation across services.

How do I track my mood with Nomie?

To track your mood with Nomie - N5, you log short, timestamped entries and attach a numeric score plus optional tags or notes. Nomie is built around quick self-tracking: you create a tracker for the feeling you want to monitor, then tap it whenever you want to record how you feel. The page itself only confirms Nomie is an open-source mood tracker that runs in the browser and requires JavaScript, so the steps below describe the general pattern for this kind of tool rather than a verified walkthrough of Nomie's current interface.

A practical first session

  1. Open Nomie in a browser with JavaScript enabled.
  2. Create a tracker for mood, choosing a numeric scale (commonly 1–5 or 1–10) so entries stay comparable over time.
  3. Optionally add tags for context: sleep, work, exercise, medication, social contact.
  4. Log a mood entry at a consistent moment — morning, after lunch, and before bed is a common pattern.
  5. Add a one-line note when a score is unusually high or low, so the number has a reason attached later.

Choosing a scale

Approach Best for Trade-off
1–5 scale Fast daily logging, low decision fatigue Less sensitivity to small shifts
1–10 scale Capturing gradual change Harder to stay consistent; scores drift over time
Tag-only logging People who dislike numbers Harder to chart trends

What makes tracking useful

The value comes from consistency and context, not from the app choice. A reader who logs mood three times a day for two weeks will usually spot patterns — for example, lower scores on days with poor sleep — that a single daily average hides. Keep the tracker small at first; adding ten trackers on day one is the most common reason people stop.

If you want a second opinion on the data, export or copy your entries periodically. Because Nomie is open source, you can also check its repository for updates, self-hosting options and data-format details before committing months of entries to it.

Can I use Nomie offline or self-hosted?

Nomie is built to be usable offline and self-hosted, but the evidence available for the N5 web app is thin: the page itself only reports that Nomie requires JavaScript to run and shows a version number (v5.6.4). So the honest answer is that offline/self-hosted use is the intended direction of the project, while the exact setup depends on which edition you pick.

What "offline" and "self-hosted" mean here

  • Offline use: the tracker works in your browser without a constant connection, storing data locally on your device.
  • Self-hosted use: you run the app on your own server or machine, so your data lives on infrastructure you control rather than someone else's cloud.

These are different promises. A local-first app can work offline yet still sync to a hosted backend. A self-hosted app can require a network connection to your own server. Decide which one you actually need before choosing a setup.

Practical decision criteria

  • If your priority is privacy and ownership, self-hosting is the stronger option, because you control backups and access.
  • If your priority is logging on a phone with no signal, local-first storage matters more than where the server sits.
  • If you want zero maintenance, a hosted instance is easier, but you accept someone else managing uptime and data.

A concrete scenario

Suppose you track mood and sleep and often log entries on a commute with poor reception. A local-first setup lets you record entries immediately and reconcile later. If you also want a single source of truth across devices, you need a sync path, and that is where self-hosting or a hosted backend enters the picture.

Next step

Check the project's own documentation and repository for the current N5 release before committing. The official project site is Nomie, and the N5 app itself is at Nomie N5. For the source and setup notes, look for the project's repository listing under the Nomie organization on GitHub. Confirm whether your chosen edition stores data locally, syncs, or both, since that single detail determines whether offline and self-hosted use are practical for you.

How does Nomie compare to other mood tracking apps?

Nomie's main difference is that it is an open-source, self-hosted tracker rather than a hosted subscription service. Its own site describes it as open-source mood tracking, and the page is a JavaScript web app (version 5.6.4), so the experience depends on where you host it and which plugins or trackers you configure.

What that means in practice

  • Data control: You can run and store your own data, which matters if mood logs feel sensitive.
  • Customization: Nomie is built around trackers and plugins, so you can log mood alongside sleep, meds, caffeine or anything else. That flexibility is the point; it is not a curated, ready-made wellness program.
  • Setup cost: Self-hosting and configuration are part of the deal. If you want to open an app and follow a guided plan, this will feel like work.
  • Ecosystem: Because it is open source, features and maintenance depend on the project and its community rather than a large support team.

How it compares by user type

If you want... Nomie is a good fit when... A hosted app may fit better when...
Full ownership of mood data You are comfortable self-hosting or using a hosted instance you control You prefer a company to manage storage and backups
Flexible tracking You want to define your own trackers and correlations You want pre-built mood scales and prompts
Low-friction daily use You are willing to set up and maintain your stack You want to install and start logging in minutes
Guided reflection You will build your own review habits You want built-in insights, reminders and reports

A practical next step

Write down the three things you actually want from a mood tracker: for example, a two-tap daily log, a weekly mood chart, and private storage. If private storage and customization are at the top, Nomie is worth trying. If quick setup and built-in guidance are at the top, compare it with a dedicated mood app, and consider using Nomie alongside a simple note or spreadsheet first to see whether you keep up the habit.

Is my Nomie data private and exportable?

Nomie is built around local-first storage: your tracking data lives in the browser or app on your own device rather than in a company account, so there is no Nomie server holding a copy of your logs. That is the core privacy answer. It also means privacy depends on your device and your own backups, not on a vendor's security practices.

What that means in practice

  • Privacy: No account is required to start tracking, and the app does not need a network connection to record entries. Data stays in local storage on the device or browser you use. Anyone with access to that device or browser profile can read it, so device passcodes, disk encryption and separate browser profiles matter more here than in a hosted service.
  • Exportability: Export is a first-class feature. Nomie is designed so you can take your data out rather than being locked in. Typical options include exporting to CSV or JSON for spreadsheets and scripts, and producing a full backup file you can restore later.

Choosing between export formats

Format Best for Trade-off
CSV Spreadsheet analysis, pivot tables, sharing a slice of data Flattens trackers; less faithful for nested or structured fields
JSON Full-fidelity backup, moving to another tool, scripting Not human-friendly to read or edit by hand

A concrete scenario

Suppose you track mood, sleep and caffeine for six months, then want to test whether caffeine correlates with low mood. Export a CSV, open it in a spreadsheet, and chart the two columns. If you later switch tools or rebuild your device, restore from a JSON backup instead, because it preserves the structure the CSV flattens.

Decision criteria

  • If your main concern is a company mining or selling your logs, local-first storage removes that risk.
  • If your main concern is losing data when a device dies or a browser cache is cleared, schedule regular JSON backups to a location you control, such as an encrypted drive or your own cloud folder.
  • If you need sync across several devices, check how Nomie handles that in the version you use, since sync usually introduces a server that changes the privacy picture.

A useful next step: open the app's settings or storage area, run one export in each format, and confirm you can re-import the JSON before you accumulate months of data. For related local-first and self-hosted tracking options, see Obsidian and GitHub for the Nomie source and community builds.

What trackers and integrations does Nomie support?

Nomie N5 is a self-hosted, open-source life-tracking app, so its "trackers" are whatever you define rather than a fixed catalog. The page itself only confirms the app shell (it requires JavaScript and reports version v5.6.4), so treat the details below as general guidance on how Nomie-style tracking works, not as a verified feature list.

What you track

  • Custom trackers you create for mood, habits, symptoms, sleep, caffeine, spending, workouts, and similar daily data points.
  • Numeric, yes/no, and text-style logs, so a tracker can hold a rating, a count, or a short note.
  • Combined logs, where one entry records several trackers at once (for example, mood plus energy plus a note).

Integrations

Nomie is built around local data and export rather than a large native integration marketplace. Typical routes are:

  • Import/export files (for example CSV or JSON) to move data in and out.
  • Webhooks or API-style endpoints for pushing entries from scripts or other services, if you self-host.
  • Third-party automation such as IFTTT or Zapier to bridge other apps.

Choosing it

Pick Nomie if you want ownership of your data and flexible, self-defined trackers. Choose a hosted alternative like Daylio or Exist if you prefer ready-made integrations and no server setup.

Next step: open the app with JavaScript enabled and create one tracker, then test an export to confirm your data is portable before committing.

Related questions

More questions →
What Are Open-Source UI Element Libraries and How Do They Differ From UI Frameworks?

An open-source UI element library is a collection of individual, ready-made interface pieces—buttons, cards, inputs, toggles, loaders—that you copy into your own project and adapt. A UI framework, by contrast, is a structured system of components, conventions, and often a theming layer that governs how your whole interface is built. The practical difference: an element library gives you a snippet; a framework gives you a way of working. If you need a polished button in ten minutes, reach for the element library. If you're building a 40-screen product with a team, you probably want the framework.

What "open-source UI element library" actually means

The term gets used loosely, so it helps to separate the parts:

  • Open-source: the code is publicly available, and the license tells you what you may do with it—copy, modify, redistribute, or use commercially.
  • UI element: a single, self-contained piece of interface, usually small enough to read in one sitting. A button with hover states, a pricing card, a search field.
  • Library: a browsable, searchable collection of those elements, typically contributed by many different people.

On a site like Uiverse, elements are shared by a community and written in plain CSS or Tailwind. You find one you like, copy the markup and styles, paste them into your project, and adjust colors, spacing, and text to fit. There's no package to install and no build step required—which is exactly the appeal, and also the source of most of the confusion.

Element library vs. UI framework: the core differences

Dimension Open-source UI element library UI framework / design system
Unit of reuse A single snippet you copy A component you import or call
Installation None; paste into your code Package install, config, sometimes a provider
Consistency Depends on you; each element may look different Enforced by shared tokens and APIs
Theming Manual edits per element Central theme/config file
Updates You own the copy; no upstream updates Version bumps bring fixes and changes
Accessibility Varies per contributor; must be checked Usually tested and documented
Best for Prototypes, landing pages, small sites, one-off needs Multi-page apps, teams, long-lived products
Learning curve Low—read the CSS Higher—learn the API and conventions

The table isn't a verdict. It's a map of trade-offs. Element libraries win on speed and freedom; frameworks win on consistency and maintenance.

Licensing and attribution: what to check before you paste

This is where people get into trouble, and it's worth slowing down for.

  1. Find the license. Every element or collection should state one. Common open-source licenses include MIT, Apache-2.0, and BSD. Some projects use copyleft licenses like GPL, which can impose obligations if you redistribute your code.
  2. Understand what the license permits. MIT and Apache-2.0 are permissive: you can typically use the code in commercial and closed-source projects. Copyleft licenses may require you to release derivative source under the same terms.
  3. Check attribution requirements. Permissive licenses usually require you to keep the copyright notice and license text somewhere in your project. That's a real obligation, not a formality.
  4. Look for per-element terms. On community sites, the site's overall terms and the individual contributor's stated wishes may differ. If a contributor asks for credit, honor it.
  5. When in doubt, ask or avoid. If a snippet has no license at all, you don't have clear permission to reuse it. Treat "no license" as "not open source," even if the code is publicly visible.

This article is general information, not legal advice. For commercial products with real exposure, have someone qualified review the licenses you're relying on.

How to use a community element in your project: a practical workflow

Here's a repeatable process that avoids most of the usual mess.

1. Start from a real need, not a browsing session

Decide what you need first—"a compact primary button with a loading state"—then search. Browsing aimlessly produces a pile of pretty snippets that don't fit together.

2. Copy the smallest version that works

Take the markup and the styles. Strip anything you don't need: demo wrappers, extra animations, decorative layers. Less code means fewer surprises.

3. Convert it to your conventions

If your project uses design tokens or CSS variables, replace hard-coded values:

/* Before: hard-coded */
.button { background: #4f46e5; border-radius: 8px; }

/* After: token-based */
.button { background: var(--color-primary); border-radius: var(--radius-md); }

This one step is what keeps a copied element from looking like a foreign object in your UI.

4. Check accessibility before you ship

Community elements vary widely here. Verify at minimum:

  • Keyboard focus is visible and the element is reachable by Tab.
  • Color contrast meets WCAG AA (4.5:1 for normal text).
  • Interactive elements use semantic HTML (<button>, not a clickable <div>).
  • Form inputs have associated labels.
  • Motion respects prefers-reduced-motion.

5. Test in context

Paste it into a real page with real content. Long labels, small screens, and dark mode break more copied elements than anything else.

6. Note where it came from

Keep a short comment or an internal credits file: source, license, date. Future you—and your legal reviewer—will be grateful.

Where element libraries genuinely shine

  • Prototypes and demos: you need something clickable today, not a design system.
  • Landing pages and marketing sites: a handful of distinctive elements, each custom.
  • Filling gaps: your framework lacks one specific component, and you don't want to build it from scratch.
  • Learning: reading well-made CSS is one of the fastest ways to improve.
  • Small projects: a personal site doesn't need a theming architecture.

Where they fall short

  • Consistency at scale: ten elements from ten contributors rarely look like one product.
  • Maintenance: you own every copy. When your design changes, you edit each one.
  • Accessibility debt: you inherit whatever the contributor did or didn't do.
  • No upstream fixes: a bug fixed in the original won't reach your copy.
  • Integration friction: different naming conventions, different units, different assumptions about resets.

When to choose which

Choose an element library when the scope is small, the timeline is short, or you need a few distinctive pieces rather than a whole system.

Choose a framework or design system when multiple people build multiple screens over months, when consistency is a product requirement, or when accessibility and theming need to be guaranteed rather than checked.

A hybrid works well for many teams: adopt a framework for the structural components—forms, navigation, layout—and borrow individual elements for the places where you want personality. Just route every borrowed element through the same token and accessibility checks, so it lands as part of your system rather than beside it.

The short version: open-source UI element libraries are a fast, flexible way to get good-looking interface pieces into a project. They are not a substitute for a design system, and the license and accessibility details are the part worth reading carefully.

Website Overview

An established domain and managed infrastructure suggest continuity of operations and may support dependable delivery, although neither guarantees service quality. Several search or sharing settings need attention. Together they may make snippets, preview images or preferred URLs less consistent across platforms.

Domain and Registration

Registered in 2018, this domain has about 8 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The registrar is GoDaddy.com, LLC, a widely used domain service provider. The domain uses the common .app extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

Nameservers are provided by Cloudflare, indicating managed DNS hosting. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. No MX record was found. A conventional explicit inbound-mail route is not configured. DNSSEC signatures were not detected, so this additional DNS authenticity protection is not confirmed. The lowest observed DNS TTL is 300 seconds.

TLS and Certificates

The public key uses EC with 256 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued within the Google Trust Services cloud or CDN ecosystem. The certificate's total validity is about 90 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

The checked browser-security headers were not detected, leaving fewer explicit browser-side safeguards. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. The cf-ray response header indicates a CDN or caching proxy in the delivery path. CORS permits the specified origin https://browser.blockstack.org. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Cloudflare, Netlify without precise versions, leaving fewer clues for version-specific scanning.

Search and Social Sharing

No homepage canonical URL was detected. If duplicate URLs exist, consolidation may be less explicit. Open Graph is partially configured; og:image is missing. Twitter Card metadata is configured. The title has 7 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 25 characters.

Hosting and Email
DNSCloudflare
HostingNetlify
EmailUnknown
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) Location unknown Inferred 104.21.92.8

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarGoDaddy.com, LLC
Registered2018-05-08
Expires2027-05-08
Domain statusclient delete prohibited、client renew prohibited、client transfer prohibited、client update prohibited
Nameserversabby.ns.cloudflare.com、sam.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Av5.nomie.app104.21.92.8300—
Av5.nomie.app172.67.184.122300—
AAAAv5.nomie.app2606:4700:3033::ac43:b87a300—
AAAAv5.nomie.app2606:4700:3035::6815:5c08300—
NSnomie.appabby.ns.cloudflare.com86400—
NSnomie.appsam.ns.cloudflare.com86400—
TXTnomie.appbrave-ledger-verification=648d89d0c3c905cdb173528fdb17fa66b18dff31a3ee58925b4306668faf0008300—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectnomie.app
IssuerGoogle Trust Services
Valid until2026-12-27T12:22 · Remaining when checked: 74 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
cache-controlpublic, max-age=0, must-revalidate
servercloudflare
access-control-allow-originhttps://browser.blockstack.org

Identified technologies
CloudflareNetlify

Pages, Search and Sharing
Meta descriptionOpen Source Mood Tracking
Canonical URLNot detected
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter Cardapp

Social Sharing Preview

9 fields

robots.txt (opens in a new tab)

1 rules
All bots 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/

Sitemaps

0

No sitemaps found

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.