Visit website
Updated: 2026-09-23 08:38
Language: English (default)
Access: Normal
Profile views 2 
Outbound visits 0 Website Review
What is ASDIP structural engineering software?
ASDIP is a suite of structural engineering design and analysis modules for concrete, foundations, retaining walls, steel, wood and general member analysis. Engineers use it to model a member, run code checks, and optimize the design — for example, changing a footing size or rebar layout and immediately seeing the effect on utilization.
What it covers
| Product | Design scope |
|---|---|
| ASDIP Concrete | Continuous beams, biaxial columns, one-way slabs, shear walls, two-way slabs, out-of-plane bearing walls |
| ASDIP Foundation | Spread footings, combined irregular footings, strap footings, wall footings, pile caps, non-linear pile analysis |
| ASDIP Retain | Cantilever retaining walls, restrained basement walls, sheet piling, counterfort walls, gravity walls |
| ASDIP Steel | Base plates, anchor rods, shear lugs, biaxial columns, steel/composite beams, web openings, shear and moment connections |
| ASDIP Wood | Continuous beams, biaxial columns, bearing walls, multistory shear walls |
| ASDIP Analysis | Member analysis plus load generation for seismic, snow and wind loads |
The site states the software supports the latest USA and Canada codes, offers a 15-day free trial, and provides free standalone calculators for beams, concrete footings, base plates and retaining walls.
Who it fits
A structural or civil engineer in a small to mid-size firm who designs many similar members — footings, retaining walls, base plates — and wants quick "what-if" iterations without rebuilding a spreadsheet each time. It also suits architects, contractors, steel fabricators and students who need occasional member checks rather than a full building model. A bridge designer or someone doing large-frame analysis may find the module-by-module approach limiting, since this is member design rather than whole-structure modeling.
Practical next step
Pick one recurring task from your current work, such as a cantilever retaining wall or a spread footing, and run it through the free calculator first. If the output format and code checks match how you document designs, the 15-day trial will tell you quickly whether the full module saves time. Compare it with StructurePoint or RISA if you also need integrated 3D analysis, since ASDIP's strength is focused member design rather than a single unified model.
How does ASDIP compare to other structural engineering software in terms of speed and productivity?
ASDIP positions speed and productivity as its main differentiators: the page claims its tools "deliver faster results than our competitors" and frames the workflow around modeling a structure and finishing a design "in minimal time." The practical mechanism behind that claim is module structure rather than a single general-purpose solver — each product covers a narrow set of member types, so you pick the module matching the task instead of building a full model.
Where the productivity actually comes from
- Task-specific modules. ASDIP Concrete covers six items (continuous beams, biaxial columns, one-way slabs, shear walls, two-way slabs, out-of-plane bearing walls); ASDIP Foundation covers six footing and pile types; ASDIP Retain covers five wall types; ASDIP Steel covers six connection and member types; ASDIP Wood covers four; ASDIP Analysis covers four. Narrow scope usually means fewer setup decisions per design.
- Optimization and "what-if" runs. The page explicitly highlights running what-if analyses to reach an efficient design. This is the feature most likely to change your day-to-day speed, because iterating on member size or reinforcement is where time is normally lost.
- Code coverage. USA and Canada codes are supported, which matters if your projects cross those jurisdictions.
- Free standalone calculators. Beam, concrete footing, base plate and retaining wall calculators are offered free — useful for a quick check before committing to a full module.
How to judge the speed claim for your own work
Speed comparisons between structural tools are rarely universal. A program that is fast for a single footing may be slow for a whole-frame workflow, and vice versa. Test with one real project rather than a demo:
| Your situation | What to test first |
|---|---|
| Frequent isolated member checks | Whether a single module replaces your current spreadsheet or hand calc |
| Heavy iteration on sizing | How quickly you can rerun a what-if after changing one input |
| Mixed material projects | Whether you need several modules, and how they share data |
| Full-building analysis | Whether ASDIP Analysis plus modules fits, or whether you need a general frame program |
A concrete next step
Take one recent design — say a cantilever retaining wall or a biaxial column — and run it in the free 15-day trial alongside whatever you use now. Time the full cycle: input, first result, one revision, and final documentation. If the revision loop is the part that shortens, the productivity claim holds for you; if your bottleneck is model import or multi-discipline coordination, module-based tools may not address it.
For broader context on how different vendors frame their structural workflows, you can compare against CSI and Rimkus-style consulting perspectives, but the useful comparison is always your own project timing.
Which ASDIP module should I use for designing concrete footings versus retaining walls?
For concrete footings, use ASDIP FOUNDATION. For retaining walls, use ASDIP RETAIN. ASDIP separates these because the underlying design checks differ: footings are governed by soil bearing, sliding/overturning resistance, and concrete member design, while retaining walls are driven by lateral earth pressures, surcharge, and stability over height.
Quick comparison
| Task | Module | Typical scope |
|---|---|---|
| Spread, combined, strap, wall footings; pile caps; pile foundations | ASDIP FOUNDATION | 6 modules covering concrete spread footings, combined irregular footings, strap footings, wall footings, pile caps, and non-linear pile foundation analysis and design |
| Concrete/block cantilever walls, basement walls, sheet piling, counterfort and gravity walls | ASDIP RETAIN | 5 modules covering cantilever retaining walls, restrained basement walls, sheet piling, counterfort retaining walls, and gravity retaining walls |
How to decide
- If the member transfers vertical load to soil and you are checking bearing pressure and footing reinforcement, choose ASDIP FOUNDATION.
- If the member holds back soil or water and you are checking overturning, sliding, and stem or heel design, choose ASDIP RETAIN.
- If a project includes both, you will likely need both modules; ASDIP SUITE bundles the full set.
Next step
Open the free 15-day trial and run one small benchmark from your own practice — for example, a square spread footing and a cantilever wall you have already hand-checked. Comparing the output against your own numbers is the fastest way to confirm which module fits your workflow. The site also offers free standalone calculators for concrete footings and retaining walls, which are useful for a quick sanity check before committing to a full model. See ASDIP for the module lists and trial details.
Can I try ASDIP before purchasing, and what are the pricing and licensing options?
Yes. ASDIP offers a free 15-day software trial, so you can test the modules you care about before buying. The trial is the practical way to check whether its workflow fits your projects, since the suite is split into focused modules rather than one all-purpose program.
What you can evaluate during the trial
- Whether ASDIP Concrete, Foundation, Retain, Steel, Wood, or Analysis matches the members you design most often.
- How quickly you can model, run "what-if" variations, and optimize a design.
- Whether the output documentation suits your review and submittal process.
- Code coverage for your region: the site states support for the latest USA and Canada codes.
Pricing and licensing
The site signals a free trial, a "How to Buy" page, licensing options, and a maintenance plan, but it does not publish prices in the material available here. Treat pricing as something to confirm directly: check the How to Buy page or contact ASDIP for current license types (for example, individual versus multi-seat or cloud access) and maintenance terms. A cloud account is used for login, so licensing appears tied to an account-based model.
A sensible next step: pick one real project you have already completed by hand or in another tool, run it through the relevant ASDIP module during the trial, and compare results and time spent. That tells you more about value than a feature list.
For broader comparison while you evaluate, you can look at general structural design tools such as RISA or CSI America and check their trial and licensing terms alongside ASDIP's.
Does ASDIP support the latest building codes in the USA and Canada?
Yes. According to the product page, ASDIP states that it supports the latest codes in the USA and Canada. That claim is broad, so treat it as a starting point rather than a guarantee for every module and every jurisdiction.
What this means in practice
- USA and Canada coverage: The site says the software supports current U.S. and Canadian codes, which matters if your projects cross the border or your firm follows both.
- Module-specific codes: ASDIP is organized into separate modules — concrete, foundation, retaining walls, steel, wood and analysis. Code support can differ by module, so confirm the specific code edition for the member you are designing.
- Verification still matters: Even with code support, you remain responsible for checking assumptions, load combinations and results against your local building official's requirements.
A concrete reader scenario
Suppose you are a structural engineer designing a cantilever retaining wall in Ontario and a spread footing in Ohio. You would open ASDIP RETAIN and ASDIP FOUNDATION, then check the code edition and load factors each module applies before issuing calculations. If a local amendment applies, you may need to adjust inputs manually.
Practical next step
Before committing, use the free 15-day trial on a real project and compare one design against your current hand calculations or another trusted tool. Also check the module list on ASDIP to confirm the code edition for your specific member type.
How do I integrate ASDIP into my existing structural engineering workflow?
Integrate ASDIP by treating it as a set of focused member-design modules rather than a single all-in-one model. The site describes separate products for concrete, foundations, retaining walls, steel, wood and analysis, each built around specific member types. That structure suggests the smoothest path is to slot the relevant module into the stage of your workflow where you currently hand-calculate or spreadsheet a discrete component.
A practical integration path
- Map your workflow stages to modules. Identify where you do continuous beams, biaxial columns, one-way or two-way slabs, shear walls, and bearing walls (ASDIP CONCRETE); spread footings, combined or strap footings, wall footings and pile caps (ASDIP FOUNDATION); cantilever, basement, counterfort or gravity walls and sheet piling (ASDIP RETAIN); base plates, anchor rods, shear lugs, steel/composite beams, web openings and connections (ASDIP STEEL); or wood beams, columns, bearing walls and shear walls (ASDIP WOOD).
- Start with the free calculators. The site offers free tools for beams, concrete footings, base plates and retaining walls. Use these on a live project to test input habits and output format before committing to a full module.
- Use the 15-day trial on one real deliverable. Pick a current job and run one member type end-to-end, including the "what-if" optimization the site highlights, so you can compare the effort against your existing method.
- Decide on the analysis boundary. ASDIP ANALYSIS covers member analysis and load generation such as seismic, snow and wind loads. If your office already runs a global frame model, you may use ASDIP for load take-off and member checks rather than duplicating the whole structure.
- Plan the hand-off. Confirm how results move into your calculation package and drawings, and check code support for your region — the site states USA and Canada codes.
Who benefits most
| Situation | Likely fit |
|---|---|
| Small firm doing many repetitive member checks | Strong — module-per-member design with optimization |
| Engineer who wants to check hand calcs quickly | Strong — free calculators and trial lower the entry cost |
| Team needing one integrated building model | Weaker — this is member-focused, not a whole-building BIM solver |
| Work outside USA/Canada codes | Verify code coverage before adopting |
A concrete scenario
An engineer designing a retaining wall and its footing can model the wall in ASDIP RETAIN, run what-if iterations on stem thickness and reinforcement, then design the footing in ASDIP FOUNDATION. The two modules share a design philosophy, so the transition is mostly re-entering geometry and loads rather than relearning the interface.
Decision criterion
Adopt it module by module, starting with the member type you design most often. If a single module saves measurable time on one project without disrupting your existing analysis model, expand from there. For broader context on structural software categories, see ASDIP and, for general industry resources, ASCE.
Hosting and Email
Hosting
Google LLC
Microsoft 365
Location
Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Pages, Search and Sharing
All bots
Registration details 
Identified technologies
User reviews (0)