Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is Icônes?
Icônes is a browser-based icon search and browsing tool. It lets you search across many open-source icon sets at once, preview individual icons, and copy them for use in a design or development project. Rather than installing a package first, you use it as a quick lookup layer: type a concept like "arrow," "user," or "settings," see matching icons from multiple collections side by side, and grab the one that fits.
Who it suits
- Front-end developers who need to find a consistent icon and copy its markup or name without leaving the browser.
- Designers comparing visual styles across collections before committing to one icon family.
- Anyone prototyping who wants a fast visual search rather than digging through package docs.
Trade-offs to weigh
- Aggregating many sets is convenient for discovery, but mixing collections can produce inconsistent stroke weights and visual styles in one interface.
- A browser tool is great for spot checks; for a large production app you will usually still want the icon library installed locally so versions and tree-shaking are under your control.
- Icon licensing varies by collection, so check the terms of the specific set you pick, not just the aggregator.
A practical next step: search for one icon you already use, compare it across two or three collections, and check whether the chosen set has a matching package for your framework. If you want a broader directory of icon resources, Iconify and Heroicons are worth knowing as official starting points.
How do I use Icônes to find and download icons for my web project?
Open Icônes in your browser and use the search box at the top to type a concept, a product name, or part of an icon name. Results update as you type, drawn from the icon sets the site has indexed, so you can browse rather than guess which pack contains the glyph you want.
Typical workflow
- Search for a term such as "cart", "user", or "arrow".
- Filter by icon set if you want a consistent visual style across your project.
- Click an icon to see its variants, including outline, filled, and different weights where the set provides them.
- Copy the icon as SVG, or copy the framework-specific component code the site offers for that icon.
- Paste the markup into your HTML, JSX, or Vue template, or save the SVG file if you prefer local assets.
What you get and how to choose
| Need | Better choice |
|---|---|
| A few icons, quick copy-paste | Copy the SVG or component snippet directly from the site |
| Many icons, version-controlled | Install the underlying icon package (for example from npm) and import icons in code |
| Consistent look across a UI | Stick to one icon set and one weight rather than mixing packs |
| Custom sizing and color | Use SVG with currentColor and CSS so icons inherit text styles |
Practical notes
Copying SVG is fastest for a landing page or prototype. For a larger app, installing the source package keeps icons tree-shakeable and updatable, and avoids hand-managing dozens of files. Check each set's license before commercial use, since terms differ between packs.
A concrete example: a dashboard needs a sidebar with "home", "chart", "settings", and "logout". Search each term, pick one set, copy the four SVGs, and set their width and height via CSS so they align with your labels. If you later switch sets, the component-based approach makes that a one-line import change instead of four file swaps.
What icon sets and libraries are available on Icônes?
Icônes is a browsable index of open-source icon sets rather than a single library with one house style. Its value is that you can search across many collections at once, copy an icon as SVG or as framework-ready code, and compare how the same concept looks in different design languages.
What you'll find there
The collections span several broad categories:
- General UI sets such as Material Design Icons, Carbon, Fluent UI, Remix Icon, Tabler Icons, Bootstrap Icons, and Iconoir — the everyday workhorses for buttons, navigation, and forms.
- Brand and logo sets such as Simple Icons and Font Awesome Brands, useful for social links, integration lists, and "works with" sections.
- Developer and file-type sets such as Devicon, vscode-icons, and file-icon collections for language badges, repo READMEs, and file trees.
- Thematic and decorative sets — weather, emoji-style faces, medical, transportation, and other niche packs that fill gaps the big UI sets leave.
Each entry is grouped by its upstream project, so you can stay inside one set when visual consistency matters or mix sets when coverage matters more.
How to choose between them
| Need | Sensible starting point |
|---|---|
| One consistent look across an app | A single large UI set (e.g. Material, Carbon, Tabler) |
| Widest possible coverage | Search across all sets, then accept mixed stroke weights |
| Brand logos | Simple Icons or a dedicated brand pack |
| Code and file icons | Devicon or a file-type set |
| Quick copy into React/Vue/Svelte | Sets with matching framework packages |
A practical test: pick three icons you actually need — say "settings", "upload", and a brand logo — and check whether one set covers all three at a consistent weight. If it doesn't, decide whether mixing is acceptable before committing, because swapping sets later means redoing every icon in the project.
For a concrete scenario, a developer building a dashboard might search Icônes for "chart", preview the result in several sets, copy the SVG for a one-off illustration, and install the matching npm package for the icons used repeatedly in components. Browsing the site is the discovery step; the individual project's own documentation is where you confirm licensing and package names before shipping.
How can I integrate Icônes with my development workflow or code editor?
Icônes is a browser-based icon search tool that gathers many open-source icon sets into one place. The practical integration path is not a plugin inside a specific editor but a copy-and-paste loop: search the icon, copy its SVG or the icon-font markup, paste it into your project, and optionally save the source SVG into your repo so the build pipeline handles it like any other asset.
Typical ways to use it day to day
- Search in the browser, paste into the editor. Keep Icônes open in a side window and paste the copied SVG or class name directly into your markup.
- Download the SVG into your project. Commit it to an
icons/orassets/folder so your bundler, sprite generator or component library picks it up. - Copy framework-ready markup. The site exposes icons in several output formats, so you can paste code that already matches your stack instead of hand-converting an SVG.
- Match an existing icon set. If your project already depends on a package such as Iconify, Material Design Icons or Font Awesome, search for the same set in Icônes so the copied markup stays consistent with what you already ship.
Choosing between an icon-font workflow and inline SVG
| Approach | Best for | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Icon font (CSS class) | Large numbers of icons, simple colour and size control via CSS | Extra font request; icons render as glyphs, so accessibility needs care |
| Inline SVG | Precise styling, animation, per-icon accessibility labels | More markup; repeated icons bloat templates unless componentised |
| SVG sprite | Many icons reused across pages | Needs a build step or sprite file to stay manageable |
A concrete workflow
Say you are building a dashboard in VS Code. Open Icônes in your browser, filter to the icon set your project already uses, search for "chart", copy the SVG, then paste it into a small local component (for example IconChart.vue or IconChart.tsx) that accepts size and colour props. Commit the component once, and every later use is a one-line import. That keeps the icon search in the browser while the editor and version control stay the source of truth.
Decision criterion
If you use only a handful of icons, copy-paste from Icônes into a local component is the least effort and leaves no runtime dependency. If you need hundreds of icons with frequent changes, an icon package or a sprite pipeline driven by a consistent set is usually easier to maintain than manual copying. For broader icon browsing alongside this tool, Iconify and Material Design Icons cover overlapping ground, and Font Awesome is useful when you want a single commercial-friendly set with its own tooling.
Is Icônes free to use, and what are the licensing terms for the icons?
Yes—Icônes is free to browse and search, and the icons it indexes come from open-source icon sets rather than from a single proprietary library. The important nuance is that "free" applies to the browser and its search interface, while the actual licence for any given icon is set by the icon set it belongs to. Before publishing, check the licence of the specific collection you copied from.
How to verify a licence in practice
- Open the icon's detail view in Icônes; the collection name and its licence are shown alongside the icon.
- Confirm the source repository for that collection if you need the full licence text or attribution wording.
- Keep a short record (collection name, licence, source URL) for every icon you ship, so a later audit is quick.
Common licence types you will meet
| Licence type | Typical obligations | Practical effect |
|---|---|---|
| MIT / ISC | Keep the copyright notice and licence text | Safe in commercial products; attribution usually in a licences file |
| Apache 2.0 | Keep notices, state changes | Similar to MIT, with a patent grant |
| CC BY 4.0 | Credit the creator | Fine commercially, but visible credit may be required |
| CC BY-SA 4.0 | Credit, and share derivatives under the same licence | Can affect how you license modified icon files |
| CC0 / public domain | None | Most permissive; no attribution required |
| Custom or non-commercial | Varies; read the set's own terms | May rule out paid or client work entirely |
A concrete scenario
A designer building a SaaS dashboard picks an outline set for navigation and a filled set for status badges. Both are MIT, so the team adds a single THIRD-PARTY-LICENSES file listing the collections and their copyright lines, and no on-screen credit is needed. If one of those sets had been CC BY, the same project would need a visible or documentation-level credit, and a CC BY-SA set would have raised questions about how modified SVG files are distributed.
Decision criteria
- Commercial product with no visible credits: prefer MIT, ISC, Apache 2.0 or CC0.
- Blog or documentation where a credit line is easy: CC BY sets are workable.
- You plan to modify and redistribute the icon files themselves: treat share-alike licences as a red flag and check with legal.
- Brand or logo marks inside a set: trademark rules can apply independently of the icon licence, so avoid them for generic UI use.
If you want to cross-check a collection's terms, the upstream projects publish them directly—for example Feather Icons, Lucide and Tabler Icons. As a next step, pick your two or three candidate sets in Icônes, note each licence, and only then start dropping icons into your design file.
How does Icônes compare to other icon search tools like Iconify or Font Awesome?
Icônes is a search front end for Iconify's icon collections, so the honest comparison is less "Icônes vs. Iconify" and more "Icônes as one way to browse the same underlying library." Font Awesome, by contrast, is a single curated icon set with its own design language and licensing terms.
Where they actually differ
| Tool | What it is | Best for | Main trade-off |
|---|---|---|---|
| Icônes (Icônes) | A search UI over Iconify's aggregated open-source icon sets | Quickly finding an icon across many sets and copying it as SVG, a framework component, or a CSS class | You are browsing a third-party index, so the icon's original project and license still govern use |
| Iconify (Iconify) | The collection and delivery layer behind many icon browsers, including a search site and runtime APIs | Managing icons at scale: on-demand loading, consistent naming, framework integration | More setup and conceptual overhead than a plain search page |
| Font Awesome (Font Awesome) | A single branded icon family distributed as webfonts, SVG, and kits | Projects that want one cohesive visual style and a well-known icon vocabulary | Fewer stylistic choices; the full catalog and some styles sit behind paid tiers |
What this means in practice
If your goal is "find a suitable icon right now," Icônes is fast and pleasant: you search once and see matches from dozens of open sets side by side, which makes it easy to compare stroke weight and silhouette before committing. That breadth is the point — you are not locked into one designer's style.
If your goal is "keep 40 icons consistent across a React app and only ship the ones I use," the Iconify tooling is the more durable answer, because the search page is only the discovery step. Font Awesome suits teams that would rather adopt one recognizable set and stop thinking about it.
A concrete scenario: a solo developer building a settings page can search Icônes, copy four SVGs, and be done in five minutes. A team maintaining a design system should pick a naming convention and load icons through an API or build step, then use a search UI only to choose which names go into that system.
A decision criterion
Choose based on what you need after the search: a quick copy-paste asset (Icônes), a managed icon pipeline (Iconify), or a single branded family (Font Awesome). Before shipping anything, check the license of the specific set you picked — an aggregator makes that easy to overlook, since two icons sitting next to each other in the results may carry different terms.
User reviews (0)