Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

openfaas.com

Serverless Functions Made Simple with Kubernetes.

Paid content
Visit website
Profile views 8 Outbound visits 12 Normal
OpenFaaS Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Development
Language
English
Paid-content signal
Paid contentObserved
Registered
2017
Hosting
FastlyInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is OpenFaaS?

OpenFaaS is a framework for running serverless functions on Kubernetes. Instead of tying you to a single cloud provider's function service, it packages your code as portable OCI images and deploys them to any Kubernetes cluster—on-premises or in the cloud. It supports functions written in any language, and it lets you bring existing microservices into the same deployment model.

Its core pitch is control and portability: the same unified experience whether you run in your own data center or a public cloud. Functions can scale to match demand and scale down to zero when idle to reduce cost. OpenFaaS Pro, the commercial edition, adds autoscaling, event connectors, monitoring dashboards, SSO, RBAC, and direct engineering support. Event-driven invocation is available from sources such as Apache Kafka, AWS SQS/SNS, GCP Pub/Sub, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL, Cron, and MQTT.

Where it fits

  • Platform teams that want a function layer on top of Kubernetes without building scaling, queuing, retries, and event triggers themselves.
  • SaaS products that need to run customer-supplied code safely; the documented pattern is one tenant per namespace with security boundaries.
  • Data and batch work such as ETL pipelines, parallel jobs, and ML models, including long-running tasks with retries.
  • Teams avoiding cloud lock-in because the same OCI images run across environments.

Trade-offs to weigh

  • You still need Kubernetes and the operational maturity to run it; this is not a fully managed service.
  • Autoscaling, event connectors, SSO, RBAC, and dashboards sit in the commercial Pro tier, so budget for that if those matter.
  • The upside is portability and fine-grained scaling control; the cost is more infrastructure responsibility than a vendor-hosted functions platform.

If you are evaluating it, start with the templates to ship a function to a cluster, then test one real event source and the scale-to-zero behavior under your own traffic pattern. That will tell you quickly whether the operational trade-off suits your team. Learn more at OpenFaaS.

How does OpenFaaS compare to other serverless platforms like AWS Lambda?

OpenFaaS and AWS Lambda both run event-driven code without you managing servers, but they sit at different layers. OpenFaaS is a framework you install on your own Kubernetes cluster, so you keep control of the infrastructure; Lambda is a fully managed service where AWS runs the execution environment for you. The practical difference is who owns the cluster, the networking and the scaling configuration.

The comparison below reflects the general shape of each model. For OpenFaaS specifics, the supplied page evidence covers Kubernetes deployment, portable OCI images, any-language functions, scale-to-zero, and Pro features such as autoscaling, event connectors, dashboards, SSO and RBAC.

Dimension OpenFaaS AWS Lambda
Where it runs Your Kubernetes cluster, on-prem or any cloud AWS-managed infrastructure
Packaging Portable OCI images AWS-specific deployment packages/containers
Control Full control over cluster, networking, isolation Limited to AWS's runtime and limits
Lock-in Lower; images move between clusters Higher; tied to AWS services and APIs
Operational burden You run and upgrade Kubernetes AWS handles patching and capacity
Event sources Kafka, SQS/SNS, GCP Pub/Sub, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL, Cron, MQTT (per page evidence) Native AWS event sources
Cost model Your infrastructure plus any Pro subscription Per-request and compute-time billing

When each fits

  • Choose OpenFaaS when you already run Kubernetes, need portability across clouds or on-premises, must isolate tenants or untrusted code, or want to avoid tying your functions to one vendor.
  • Choose Lambda when you want zero infrastructure work, are committed to AWS, and your workloads fit its execution model and limits.

A concrete scenario: a SaaS company that lets customers upload custom code would need strong per-tenant isolation. The page evidence shows OpenFaaS addressing exactly this, running each tenant in its own namespace with security boundaries — something Lambda alone does not provide in the same way, since you would typically combine it with other AWS isolation services. Conversely, a small team shipping a nightly image-resizing job on AWS would likely find Lambda faster to start with, because there is no cluster to run.

Your next step: list your hard constraints — data residency, existing Kubernetes investment, tolerance for vendor lock-in, and whether you need to run untrusted code — and score both options against them. If portability and cluster control rank highest, evaluate OpenFaaS; if minimal operations on AWS ranks highest, evaluate Lambda. Related projects worth knowing include Knative and Apache OpenWhisk, which occupy similar self-hosted serverless territory.

Can I run OpenFaaS on my own Kubernetes cluster or on-premises?

Yes. OpenFaaS is designed to run on any Kubernetes cluster, and the project explicitly supports both on-premises and cloud deployments. You deploy it into a cluster you already operate rather than handing your workloads to a hosted function platform.

What that means in practice

  • Your functions are packaged as portable OCI images, so the same artifact can move between an on-prem cluster and a cloud one.
  • You keep control of the underlying nodes, networking and storage, which matters if data cannot leave your network.
  • The deployment model is "bring your own Kubernetes": you are responsible for the cluster, while OpenFaaS supplies the function layer, templates and scaling behaviour on top.
  • Functions can be written in any language, and existing microservices can sit alongside them.

Trade-offs to weigh

Consideration Self-managed OpenFaaS on your cluster Fully hosted function service
Data location Stays inside your network or cloud account Depends on the provider's regions
Operational load You run and upgrade Kubernetes and OpenFaaS Provider handles the platform
Portability Images move between environments Often tied to one vendor's runtime
Scaling to zero Supported, so idle functions cost little Usually supported, but on the vendor's terms

Who tends to choose this

Teams with an existing Kubernetes investment, regulated environments that need workloads on-prem, and product teams that want to run customer-supplied code inside their own security boundaries. The page describes tenant isolation via separate namespaces and cites production use in IoT, ML and data-pipeline contexts.

Next step

Check whether your cluster meets the prerequisites and whether the community edition covers your needs before looking at commercial features such as autoscaling, event connectors, SSO and RBAC. If you need event-driven invocation, confirm your message source is supported — the page lists Apache Kafka, AWS SQS/SNS, GCP Pub/Sub, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL, Cron and MQTT.

For the official deployment guidance and edition comparison, see OpenFaaS and its pricing page.

How does OpenFaaS handle scaling for event-driven workloads?

OpenFaaS scales event-driven workloads by combining its autoscaling with event connectors: functions are invoked by events from sources such as Apache Kafka, AWS SQS/SNS, GCP Pub/Sub, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL, Cron and MQTT, and Pro features scale them to meet demand — including down to zero when idle. The site also notes that functions can be fine-tuned to match the type of traffic they receive, so scaling is not one-size-fits-all.

For queue-driven work, the practical pattern is: an event lands in a queue or topic, a connector triggers the function, and the replica count follows the backlog rather than a fixed schedule. If you are designing this, start by classifying each workload as bursty, steady, or latency-sensitive; queue-based scaling suits the first, while scale-to-zero trades a cold start for cost savings on idle functions.

A useful next step is to pick one event source you already run (for example Kafka or RabbitMQ) and test how quickly a function drains a backlog under load. For general background on the serverless model, see Cloud Native Computing Foundation.

What are the key differences between the free OpenFaaS and OpenFaaS Pro?

OpenFaaS Pro is the commercial edition of the same platform, aimed at teams running production workloads on Kubernetes. The free, open-source version gives you the core serverless experience: package functions as portable OCI images, deploy them to any Kubernetes cluster, write in any language, and scale workloads. OpenFaaS Pro layers on the operational features that matter once real traffic, multiple teams, or compliance requirements arrive.

What the page says Pro adds

According to the site, OpenFaaS Pro includes:

  • Autoscaling beyond the basics, so functions scale to demand and down to zero when idle.
  • Event connectors for Apache Kafka, AWS SQS/SNS, GCP Pub/Sub, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL, Cron and MQTT.
  • Monitoring dashboards for visibility into running functions.
  • SSO and RBAC for authentication and access control across teams.
  • Direct-to-engineering support, i.e. commercial support from the people who build it.

The open-source edition is where the portability story lives: same unified experience on-premises or in the cloud, templates to get code into production quickly, and fine-tuned scaling including scale-to-zero. The page also notes that Pro features handle scaling "to meet demand," which suggests the free tier's scaling is more limited in scope.

How to decide

Consideration Free OpenFaaS OpenFaaS Pro
Core function deployment on Kubernetes Yes Yes
Event-driven invocation (Kafka, SQS, etc.) Not listed Yes
Autoscaling sophistication Basic / manual tuning Advanced, demand-based
SSO and RBAC Not listed Yes
Monitoring dashboards Not listed Yes
Commercial support Community Direct engineering support

A practical rule: if you are prototyping, learning, or running a small internal tool where you can manage scaling and access yourself, the free edition covers the fundamentals. If you are running customer-facing or multi-tenant workloads, need to react to events from a message bus, or must satisfy an auditor with SSO and role-based access, Pro is the version built for that.

A concrete scenario

Imagine a SaaS product that lets customers upload small scripts to customize their workflows. On the free edition you would build the isolation and API layer yourself. The page describes exactly this use case for Pro: each tenant runs in its own namespace with security boundaries enforced at every layer, and snippets become isolated functions deployed through a REST API. That is a meaningful difference in engineering effort, not just a feature checkbox.

For current edition boundaries and trial details, check OpenFaaS directly, since the split between free and Pro features can change between releases.

How can I try OpenFaaS before committing to a paid plan?

OpenFaaS offers a free trial for its commercial Pro tier, and the open-source project itself can be run at no cost, so you can evaluate both paths before paying. The trial is the natural starting point if you specifically want to test Pro features like autoscaling, event connectors, monitoring dashboards, SSO and RBAC; the open-source route is better if you just want to learn the core model of deploying functions to Kubernetes.

Two ways to evaluate it

  • OpenFaaS Pro free trial: Request the trial from the pricing page to test the commercial features with direct engineering support. Treat this as the way to validate production concerns — scaling behaviour, event-driven invocation, access control — rather than basic "hello world" deployment.
  • Open-source OpenFaaS: Run it on your own Kubernetes cluster to understand the fundamentals: packaging functions as portable OCI images, using templates, and invoking functions over HTTP. This is free and is where most teams start.

What to actually test during a trial

A trial is only useful if you exercise the things you'd pay for. A practical checklist:

  1. Deploy one real function in a language your team already uses, not just a sample.
  2. Trigger it from an event source you care about — Kafka, SQS/SNS, Pub/Sub, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL, Cron or MQTT are the ones the site lists.
  3. Watch scale-to-zero and scale-up behaviour under a burst of traffic.
  4. Wire up a dashboard and a single sign-on or role-based access setup if your organisation needs them.
  5. Try a long-running or retry-heavy job (batch processing, an ML model) to see how the async path behaves.

Deciding between the free tier and Pro

Need Open-source OpenFaaS OpenFaaS Pro trial
Learn the deployment model Good fit Good fit
Autoscaling, event connectors, dashboards Not included Core reason to trial
SSO and RBAC for multiple teams Not included Core reason to trial
Commercial support No Included with Pro
Cost Free to run Time-limited trial

A concrete scenario

If you're building a product where customers extend it with their own code, the sandbox pattern OpenFaaS describes — each tenant in its own namespace with enforced security boundaries, built and deployed through a REST API — is the feature to prototype first. If that works end to end in the trial, you've validated the hardest part before committing.

Next step: start the trial request from the pricing page, but run it against a workload you already have rather than a demo, and keep the open-source install as your fallback if the trial ends before your evaluation does. See OpenFaaS for the trial request and Kubernetes if you need a cluster to run it on.

Related questions

More questions →
How OpenFaaS Works with Kubernetes

OpenFaaS runs on any Kubernetes cluster and turns your code into serverless functions packaged as portable OCI images. You deploy it to a cluster you already control — on-premises or in the cloud — and get a unified experience for shipping functions, scaling them with demand, and scaling to zero when idle. It fits teams that already run Kubernetes and want a FaaS layer without rebuilding autoscaling, queuing, retries, and event triggers from scratch.

What OpenFaaS adds on top of Kubernetes

Kubernetes gives you the building blocks, but wiring up auto-scaling, queuing, retries, and event triggers yourself takes months of work. OpenFaaS packages that into a usable layer:

  • Deploy anywhere — run functions on-premises or in the cloud using portable OCI images, so the same artifact moves between environments.
  • Any code — write functions in any language, and bring existing microservices along too.
  • Any scale — scale functions to meet demand and down to zero when idle to save on costs.
  • Templates that just work — get code into production within minutes using provided templates, or create your own.

The result is one unified experience: deploy OpenFaaS to any Kubernetes cluster, write a function, and ship it to production in minutes knowing it will scale.

How a function gets to production

  1. Pick or build a template. Templates handle the packaging so you focus on code. Use a provided template for your language, or create your own.
  2. Write the function. Any language is supported, and existing microservices can be brought along rather than rewritten.
  3. Build and deploy. The function is packaged as an OCI image and deployed to your Kubernetes cluster.
  4. Scale it. Functions can be fine-tuned to match the type of traffic they receive, including scaling to zero.

The expected outcome: code that runs on the same cluster you already operate, with scaling behavior you configure rather than build.

Where the Pro tier changes the picture

The core OpenFaaS experience is described as stable, portable, and built for production. OpenFaaS Pro adds capabilities that matter once you move past a basic deployment:

  • Autoscaling
  • Event connectors
  • Monitoring dashboards
  • SSO and RBAC
  • Direct-to-engineering support

If you need single sign-on, role-based access control, or dashboards out of the box, that is a Pro consideration rather than a core one. Pricing and trial details live on the OpenFaaS pricing page — check there for current terms rather than assuming what is included.

Event-driven workloads

Functions can be invoked through events rather than only HTTP calls. Supported event sources include:

  • Apache Kafka
  • AWS SQS/SNS
  • GCP Pub/Sub
  • RabbitMQ
  • PostgreSQL
  • Cron
  • MQTT

This matters for pipelines where work arrives asynchronously — for example, a batch job or ML model that runs as a function with built-in retries, whether it takes milliseconds or hours.

How teams actually use it

A sandbox for customer code. If you want customers to extend your product with custom code, running untrusted code safely is hard to get right. With OpenFaaS, code snippets become isolated functions built and deployed through a REST API, with each tenant in its own namespace and security boundaries enforced at every layer. This pattern is used in production by Waylay (IoT), LivePerson, Cognite (ML/data-science), and RudderStack.

ETL and data pipelines. When processing large volumes of data, managing infrastructure for parallel execution, retries, and scaling is a project in itself. OpenFaaS fans out to thousands of parallel function executions that scale automatically, with batch jobs and ML models running as functions with built-in retries.

Is it a fit for your cluster?

OpenFaaS is a reasonable choice if:

  • You already run Kubernetes and want a FaaS capability without building the surrounding machinery.
  • You need portability across on-premises and cloud via OCI images.
  • You want functions that scale to zero to control cost.
  • You need event-driven invocation from Kafka, queues, databases, cron, or MQTT.

Look at OpenFaaS Pro if you need SSO, RBAC, dashboards, or vendor engineering support as part of the deployment.

OpenFaaS vs OpenFaaS Pro: What's the Difference?

OpenFaaS is an open-source serverless platform that runs on Kubernetes, letting you deploy functions written in any language as portable OCI images. OpenFaaS Pro is the commercial edition that adds production-grade features on top of the same core: autoscaling, event connectors, monitoring dashboards, SSO, RBAC, and direct engineering support. Choose the open-source version if you're evaluating the model, running small or internal workloads, or building your own operational tooling. Choose Pro if you need those specific capabilities and commercial support for production systems.

The shared foundation

Both editions run on the same platform, so the core experience doesn't change when you move between them:

  • Deploy to any Kubernetes cluster — on-premises or in the cloud, with the same unified workflow.
  • Any language — write functions in whatever language you use, and bring existing microservices along too.
  • Portable OCI images — functions are packaged as standard container images, so they aren't locked to a proprietary format.
  • Templates — get code into production within minutes using provided templates, or create your own.
  • Basic scaling — functions can scale to match traffic, including down to zero when idle to save on costs.

The website describes this as "serverless on your terms — stable, portable, built for production," and the open-source project has a substantial community (the site shows 31.1k GitHub stars).

What OpenFaaS Pro adds

The Pro edition layers commercial features onto that base. According to the site, OpenFaaS Pro adds:

Capability What it covers
Autoscaling Fine-tuned scaling to match the type of traffic your functions receive
Event connectors Invoke functions through events from Apache Kafka, AWS SQS/SNS, GCP Pub/Sub, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL, Cron, and MQTT
Monitoring dashboards Operational visibility into your functions
SSO Single sign-on for access control
RBAC Role-based access control
Direct-to-engineering support Commercial support from the engineering team

These are the differences that matter most for production decisions: the event connectors turn OpenFaaS into an event-driven workload platform rather than just an HTTP function host, and SSO/RBAC matter as soon as more than a couple of people need access.

How to decide

Stay on open source if:

  • You're learning the platform or running a proof of concept.
  • Your workloads are small, internal, or you're comfortable wiring up your own scaling, queuing, retries, and event triggers.
  • You don't need commercial support or enterprise access controls.

Move to Pro if:

  • You need autoscaling tuned to your traffic patterns, or event-driven invocation from Kafka, SQS/SNS, Pub/Sub, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL, Cron, or MQTT.
  • You need SSO and RBAC for team or tenant access.
  • You want monitoring dashboards and direct access to the engineering team when something breaks in production.

The site frames the trade-off directly: Kubernetes has the building blocks, but "wiring up auto-scaling, queuing, retries, and event triggers from scratch takes months of work." Pro is aimed at teams that would rather buy that work than build it.

Common production patterns

The site lists several ways teams use OpenFaaS, which can help you judge whether Pro's features are relevant to you:

  • A sandbox for customer code — turn code snippets into isolated functions built and deployed through a REST API, with each tenant in its own namespace and security boundaries enforced at every layer. Used in production by Waylay (IoT), LivePerson, Cognite (ML/data science), and RudderStack.
  • ETL and data pipelines — fan out to thousands of parallel function executions that scale automatically, with batch jobs and ML models running as functions with built-in retries, whether they take milliseconds or hours.
  • Kubernetes made usable — avoid building auto-scaling, queuing, retries, and event triggers from scratch.

If your use case looks like the customer-code sandbox or large-scale parallel pipelines, the Pro features (RBAC, SSO, autoscaling, event connectors) are likely the ones you'd otherwise have to build yourself.

Pricing and trial

The site links to a pricing page and offers a "Request a free trial" option for OpenFaaS Pro. Pricing details and trial terms aren't specified in the available material — check the pricing page for current figures and conditions before committing.

What event-driven workloads can OpenFaaS handle?

OpenFaaS can trigger functions from Apache Kafka, AWS SQS/SNS, GCP Pub/Sub, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL, Cron, and MQTT, and it is built for asynchronous work such as ETL and data pipelines, batch jobs, and ML model runs. The fit is strongest when you need fan-out to many parallel executions, automatic retries, and queue-based scaling — including down to zero when idle. If your workload is a simple synchronous HTTP request, you do not need the event connectors at all.

Supported event sources

The OpenFaaS event connectors let you invoke functions from the following systems:

Source Typical use
Apache Kafka Stream processing, high-throughput pipelines
AWS SQS / SNS Queue- and notification-driven work on AWS
GCP Pub/Sub Event-driven work on Google Cloud
RabbitMQ Message-queue workloads
PostgreSQL React to database changes
Cron Scheduled and recurring jobs
MQTT IoT and device telemetry

Each connector subscribes to the source and invokes your function when a message or event arrives, so you write the function logic rather than the plumbing.

Workload patterns that fit

ETL and data pipelines

The site describes processing large volumes of data where managing parallel execution, retries, and scaling is "a project in itself." With OpenFaaS you fan out to thousands of parallel function executions that scale automatically, and batch jobs run as functions with built-in retries — whether they take milliseconds or hours.

Batch and ML model runs

Long-running jobs are supported: functions can run for milliseconds or hours, with retries handled for you. This suits batch processing and ML model execution where a single run may be slow but many runs happen at once.

Multi-tenant code execution

If you want customers to extend your product with custom code, OpenFaaS turns code snippets into isolated functions built and deployed through a REST API. Each tenant runs in its own namespace with security boundaries enforced at every layer. The site names Waylay (IoT), LivePerson, Cognite (ML/data science), and RudderStack as production users.

Queue-based scaling

Surge is cited as running async jobs at scale — importing financial and government data to power background checks through Salesforce. This is the pattern to look at when you have a backlog of async jobs that must drain reliably.

What makes it work

  • Scale to zero when idle. Functions scale down when there is no traffic, which matters for cost on bursty event workloads.
  • Scale to meet demand. Pro features add autoscaling so parallel executions keep up with the event rate.
  • Built-in retries. Async jobs are retried rather than silently dropped.
  • Portable OCI images. Functions deploy on-premises or in the cloud with the same unified experience on any Kubernetes cluster.

Choosing between the free project and Pro

The event connectors and the core function model are the reason to use OpenFaaS for event-driven work. OpenFaaS Pro adds autoscaling, event connectors, monitoring dashboards, SSO, RBAC, and direct-to-engineering support. If you are running event-driven workloads in production and need autoscaling plus commercial support, evaluate Pro; the pricing page offers a free trial request. For a small internal pipeline, the open-source project may be enough — but confirm which connectors and scaling features you actually need before deciding.

When this is not the right fit

If your work is request/response with no queue, no schedule, and no event source, a plain HTTP function is simpler and the connectors add nothing. Event-driven OpenFaaS pays off when you have at least one of: a message broker or database feeding work in, a schedule, or a large fan-out of async jobs that must retry and scale.

What are common use cases for OpenFaaS and how can teams try it?

OpenFaaS is a serverless platform that runs on Kubernetes and deploys functions as portable OCI images, on-premises or in the cloud. Teams typically adopt it for three recurring jobs: letting customers run custom code inside a product, running ETL and data pipelines at scale, and making Kubernetes usable without building autoscaling, queuing, and event triggers from scratch. If your workload fits one of those shapes, the fastest way to judge fit is to deploy it to a Kubernetes cluster, ship a function, and then evaluate OpenFaaS Pro against your scaling, event, and access-control requirements.

Use case 1: A sandbox for your customer's code

The problem: you want customers to extend your product with custom code, but running untrusted code safely is hard to get right.

How OpenFaaS is used here: code snippets become isolated functions, built and deployed through a REST API. Each tenant runs in its own namespace, with security boundaries enforced at every layer. The site cites production use by Waylay (IoT), LivePerson, Cognite (ML/data science), and RudderStack.

This is the pattern to pick if your product needs a "bring your own code" extension point and you care more about tenant isolation than about raw execution speed. Two concrete entry points the site names:

  • Add a FaaS capability to your product
  • Build a function editor for your customers

Use case 2: ETL and data pipelines

The problem: you're processing large volumes of data, and managing infrastructure for parallel execution, retries, and scaling is a project in itself.

How OpenFaaS is used here: fan out to thousands of parallel function executions that scale automatically. Batch jobs and ML models run as functions with built-in retries, whether they take milliseconds or hours. The site cites Surge, which runs async jobs at scale — importing financial and government data to power background checks for customers through Salesforce.

Choose this pattern when your jobs are bursty, long-running, or need retries without you writing the orchestration layer. The relevant starting point is queue-based scaling with OpenFaaS.

Use case 3: Kubernetes, made usable

The problem: Kubernetes has the building blocks, but wiring up auto-scaling, queuing, retries, and event triggers from scratch takes months of work.

How OpenFaaS is used here: you deploy to any Kubernetes cluster and get a unified experience for running code, with functions scaling to meet demand and down to zero when idle. Templates get code into production within minutes, and you can write functions in any language while bringing existing microservices along.

This is the right framing if your team already runs Kubernetes and wants serverless behavior without assembling the control plane yourself.

What event-driven workloads can it handle?

Functions can be invoked through events from Apache Kafka, AWS SQS/SNS, GCP Pub/Sub, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL, Cron, and MQTT. If your pipeline is triggered by one of those sources, you don't need to build a custom poller — the event connector is the integration point.

OpenFaaS vs OpenFaaS Pro

The open-source project gives you the core deploy-and-run model. OpenFaaS Pro adds the operational features that usually decide a production rollout:

Capability OpenFaaS (open source) OpenFaaS Pro
Autoscaling — Included
Event connectors — Included
Monitoring dashboards — Included
SSO — Included
RBAC — Included
Direct-to-engineering support — Included

Use the table as a checklist, not a verdict: if you only need to run functions on Kubernetes and can handle scaling and access control yourself, the open-source path may be enough. If you need autoscaling, event connectors, dashboards, SSO, or RBAC, those are the specific gaps Pro fills.

How to try it

  1. Confirm the prerequisite: a Kubernetes cluster. OpenFaaS deploys to any Kubernetes cluster, on-premises or in the cloud.
  2. Deploy OpenFaaS to that cluster and write a new function. The site's claim to verify against your own setup is that you can ship it to production in minutes and it will scale to meet demand.
  3. Start from a template rather than a blank function — templates are described as working out of the box, and you can create your own.
  4. Test the scaling behavior that matters to you: scale to match your traffic type, including down to zero when idle to save on costs.
  5. Evaluate OpenFaaS Pro if steps 2–4 surface gaps in autoscaling, event connectors, monitoring, SSO, or RBAC. The site offers a free trial request for Pro; pricing details are on the pricing page, and the trial terms are not specified there, so confirm scope and duration with the vendor.

Choosing between the three patterns

  • Customer-facing extension point → prioritize namespace isolation and a REST API for build/deploy.
  • ETL and batch → prioritize parallel fan-out, retries, and queue-based scaling.
  • Kubernetes simplification → prioritize templates, scale-to-zero, and the event sources you already run.

If none of these match how your team ships code, the platform is likely a poor fit regardless of feature list.

What is OpenFaaS and what does it do?

OpenFaaS is a platform for running serverless functions on Kubernetes. It lets you package code as portable OCI images, deploy it to any Kubernetes cluster, and have it scale automatically — including down to zero when idle. It supports any programming language and can also host existing microservices alongside functions. There is an open-source edition and a commercial edition, OpenFaaS Pro, which adds autoscaling, event connectors, monitoring dashboards, SSO, RBAC, and direct engineering support.

The core idea

OpenFaaS turns code into functions that run as containers on Kubernetes. You write a function in whatever language you prefer, build it into an OCI image, and deploy it. The platform handles the rest: routing, scaling, and lifecycle.

The tagline on the site is "Serverless Functions, Made Simple," with the positioning "Serverless on your terms — stable, portable, built for production."

What it does

Anywhere

Functions deploy on-premises or in the cloud using portable OCI images. The same unified experience applies to any Kubernetes cluster, so you are not locked into a single provider.

Any code

You can write functions in any language, and bring existing microservices along too. This matters if you have services that are not functions but still need to run in the same environment.

Any scale

Pro features scale functions to meet demand and down to zero when idle. Scaling to zero is the cost-saving mechanism: when there is no traffic, there are no running instances.

Key capabilities

Capability What it means
Templates Get code into production within minutes using provided templates, or create your own
Efficient scaling Fine-tune scaling to match the type of traffic, including scaling to zero
Event-driven workloads Invoke functions through events from Apache Kafka, AWS SQS/SNS, GCP Pub/Sub, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL, Cron, and MQTT

How teams use it

The site describes three common patterns:

A sandbox for customer code. If you want customers to extend your product with custom code, OpenFaaS turns code snippets into isolated functions built and deployed through a REST API. Each tenant runs in its own namespace with security boundaries enforced at every layer. The site cites Waylay (IoT), LivePerson, Cognite (ML/data-science), and RudderStack as production users.

ETL and data pipelines. For large volumes of data, OpenFaaS fans out to thousands of parallel function executions that scale automatically. Batch jobs and ML models run as functions with built-in retries, whether they take milliseconds or hours. Surge is cited as running async jobs at scale for background checks.

Kubernetes, made usable. Kubernetes has the building blocks, but wiring up auto-scaling, queuing, retries, and event triggers from scratch takes months. OpenFaaS packages these so you do not build them yourself.

Open source vs. OpenFaaS Pro

The open-source edition gives you the core function platform. OpenFaaS Pro adds autoscaling, event connectors, monitoring dashboards, SSO, RBAC, and direct-to-engineering support. The site links to a pricing page and a free trial request, so commercial terms are available there rather than stated on the homepage.

When to look further

OpenFaaS is worth investigating if you already run Kubernetes and want to add function deployment without building the scaling, queuing, and event-triggering layer yourself. It is also a fit if you need to run untrusted or customer-supplied code in isolation, or if you want event-driven workloads triggered by Kafka, SQS/SNS, Pub/Sub, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL, Cron, or MQTT.

If you are not on Kubernetes, or you need a fully managed serverless platform with no cluster to operate, this is a different category of tool.

Website Overview

Identifiable technologies and additional version or configuration signals make the service easier to fingerprint, which may help targeted scanners narrow their checks. An established domain and managed infrastructure suggest continuity of operations and may support dependable delivery, although neither guarantees service quality.

Domain and Registration

Registered in 2017, this domain has about 9 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The registrar is NameCheap, Inc., a widely used domain service provider. The domain uses the common .com extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

The lowest TTL is 60 seconds, supporting rapid record changes at the cost of more frequent lookups. Nameservers are provided by Namecheap, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Google Workspace email service. The CNAME points to openfaas.github.io, associated with GitHub Pages. SPF and DMARC are configured. DKIM status is unknown.

TLS and Certificates

The certificate uses an RSA 2048-bit public key, offering broad client compatibility. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, commonly associated with automated certificate services. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

The checked browser-security headers were not detected, leaving fewer explicit browser-side safeguards. CORS permits any origin to read this response. This is common for public resources; sensitive responses need narrower handling. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. The x-cache, x-served-by, via response header indicates a CDN or caching proxy in the delivery path. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Jekyll 3.10.0, Google Analytics, Fastly, with exact versions exposed for 1 technologies. These details can narrow vulnerability checks, although exposure alone is not a vulnerability.

Search and Social Sharing

The Generator tag identifies Jekyll v3.10.0, making the publishing system easier to fingerprint. Twitter Card metadata is configured. JSON-LD includes Organization data, helping describe the organization as an entity. The title has 50 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 49 characters.

Hosting and Email

DNSNamecheap
HostingFastly
EmailGoogle Workspace
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagUnited States Inferred 185.199.108.153

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarNameCheap, Inc.
Registered2017-08-07
Expires2028-08-07
Domain statusclient transfer prohibited
Nameserversdns1.registrar-servers.com、dns2.registrar-servers.com
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Aopenfaas.github.io185.199.108.1533600—
Aopenfaas.github.io185.199.109.1533600—
Aopenfaas.github.io185.199.110.1533600—
Aopenfaas.github.io185.199.111.1533600—
AAAAopenfaas.github.io2606:50c0:8000::1533600—
AAAAopenfaas.github.io2606:50c0:8001::1533600—
AAAAopenfaas.github.io2606:50c0:8002::1533600—
AAAAopenfaas.github.io2606:50c0:8003::1533600—
MXopenfaas.comaspmx.l.google.com601
MXopenfaas.comalt1.aspmx.l.google.com605
MXopenfaas.comalt2.aspmx.l.google.com605
MXopenfaas.comfeedback-smtp.eu-west-1.amazonses.com6010
NSopenfaas.comdns1.registrar-servers.com1800—
NSopenfaas.comdns2.registrar-servers.com1800—
TXTopenfaas.comOSSRH-4861760—
TXTopenfaas.comgoogle-site-verification=3uosjOAXO86lntkN8l36OqHeSU5cEvxBHtmfmIsC1yo60—
TXTopenfaas.comgoogle-site-verification=nzCuLmVB1-mhC3JG6Ayce3f1Jv4iAtf29VkyUvFopoI60—
TXTopenfaas.cominlets-domain-verify=1f30efd4-950d-4ed7-9c08-da26657e9d7960—
TXTopenfaas.comv=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all60—
CNAMEwww.openfaas.comopenfaas.github.io60—
DMARC_dmarc.openfaas.comv=DMARC1; p=none;1799—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectwww.openfaas.com
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Valid until2026-11-28T23:53 · Remaining when checked: 59 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=utf-8
cache-controlmax-age=600
serverGitHub.com
access-control-allow-origin*

Identified technologies

Jekyll 3.10.0Google AnalyticsFastly

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionServerless Functions Made Simple with Kubernetes.
Canonical URLhttps://www.openfaas.com/
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter Cardsummary_large_image
All bots 0 allowed · 0 disallowed

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.