Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

opengrep.dev

No paid content found
Visit website
Profile views 11 Outbound visits 12 Normal
Opengrep Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Security & Privacy
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
2025
Hosting
FastlyInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is Opengrep?

Opengrep is an open-source static application security testing (SAST) engine — a code scanner that finds security issues by analyzing source code without running it. It was created as a fork of Semgrep CE (formerly Semgrep OSS) after the original project moved several scanning-engine features behind a commercial license. The stated goal is to keep the full engine open source and to advance static analysis as a shared, commoditized capability.

What it actually does

It scans codebases for security problems and reports findings in standard formats. According to the project, it is backward compatible and supports common JSON and SARIF outputs, so results can feed into existing CI pipelines, code-review workflows, and security dashboards that already consume SARIF.

Who it is for

  • Application security engineers who want SAST without a login gate or vendor lock-in on core engine features.
  • Developers who want scan results in CI and in the formats their tooling already reads.
  • Platform and DevSecOps teams evaluating whether to standardize on an engine whose roadmap is not controlled by one company.
  • Contributors with OCaml experience, since the engine is written in OCaml and the project says pull requests are reviewed on merit.

How it differs from Semgrep CE

Aspect Opengrep Semgrep CE (as described)
Licensing of engine features Fully open source, per the project Some engine features moved to a commercial license
Metadata and capabilities Not hidden behind a login Some capabilities gated
Governance Consortium-backed, multi-vendor Single-vendor controlled
Output compatibility JSON and SARIF JSON and SARIF

Trade-offs to weigh

A fork inherits maturity but also fragmentation. Opengrep starts from a proven engine, which lowers adoption risk, yet its long-term value depends on whether the consortium keeps contributing engineering time. The project claims a full-time developer team and a roadmap including inter-procedural and cross-file analysis, Windows support, and broader language coverage — treat those as stated plans rather than shipped guarantees until you verify them in the current release. Being new, it has a smaller plugin, rule, and community ecosystem than the original.

Next step

If you already run Semgrep CE, the lowest-risk evaluation is a side-by-side scan: run both engines on the same repository, compare findings and SARIF output, and check whether the features you rely on are present without a login. Start from the CLI repository at GitHub and confirm the current release notes before committing it to a production pipeline.

How do I install and run the Opengrep CLI?

Opengrep is distributed as a command-line scanner you install locally, then run against a codebase to produce findings in JSON or SARIF. The project's own Getting Started section points to its GitHub repository as the place to install, run, or contribute to the CLI, so that repository is the authoritative source for current install commands and flags.

GitHub

Typical workflow

  1. Install the CLI following the instructions in the project repository for your platform.
  2. Run a scan against a directory or repository, for example by pointing the tool at your project root.
  3. Choose an output format — Opengrep states it is backward compatible and supports common JSON and SARIF outputs — so results can feed into your existing pipelines or dashboards.
  4. Review findings, then integrate the same command into CI so scans run on each change.

Practical notes

  • Because Opengrep is described as a fork of Semgrep CE and as backward compatible, existing Semgrep-style rules and JSON/SARIF consumers are the natural starting point. Verify rule compatibility on a small repo before a full rollout.
  • The stated roadmap includes inter-procedural and cross-file analysis, Windows support, and extended language support. Those are forward-looking goals from the project, not guarantees for a given release; check the repository for what is available now.
  • For a concrete scenario: a small security team could install the CLI on a developer laptop, scan one service, export SARIF, upload it to its code-scanning dashboard, and only then wire the same command into CI.

Decision criterion

If you need a fully open-source static analysis engine with no login-gated metadata, start with the repository's install instructions and validate output on one repository. If you depend on Semgrep-specific commercial features, confirm those specific capabilities exist in the current Opengrep release before migrating.

How does Opengrep differ from Semgrep, and why was it forked?

Opengrep is a fork of Semgrep CE (formerly Semgrep OSS), created because Semgrep moved several scanning-engine features behind a commercial license. According to Opengrep's own description, the removed capabilities included language support, ignore tracking, fingerprinting, and meta-variables. The fork's stated goal is to keep a fully open-source static analysis engine, with no essential metadata or scanning capability hidden behind a login.

The practical differences

Area Opengrep's stated position Why it matters
Licensing Fully open-source engine, with contributions reviewed on merit rather than a single vendor's commercial interest Teams worried about future feature lock-in get a project they can rely on long term
Engine features Aims to unlock previously pro-only capabilities such as inter-procedural (cross-function) analysis, cross-file analysis, Windows support, and extended language support Deeper findings that single-file pattern matching misses
Compatibility Backward compatible, with common JSON and SARIF outputs Existing Semgrep rules and CI integrations are easier to migrate
Governance Backed by a consortium of application security organizations, with a full-time developer team Reduces dependence on one company's roadmap

Why the fork happened

The trigger was Semgrep's decision to move parts of the open-source scanning engine under a commercial license. Opengrep's founders argue this "kneecapped" community use and slowed broader progress. Their response was to pool OCaml development resources from multiple security vendors and build the most advanced static analysis engine as open source.

Who should care

  • Application security engineers already running Semgrep in CI who want to keep using an open engine without losing features.
  • Teams with strict procurement or compliance rules that rule out vendor-controlled scanning components.
  • Contributors who want their pull requests judged on technical merit rather than a company's commercial priorities.

A concrete next step

If you maintain Semgrep rules today, the low-risk move is to test Opengrep against your existing rule set and compare SARIF output in a non-blocking CI job. Backward compatibility is claimed, but your custom rules and ignore files are the real test. Start at GitHub for the Opengrep CLI repository, where install and contribution instructions live.

What features does Opengrep add compared to the open-source version of Semgrep, such as inter-procedural or cross-file analysis?

Opengrep is a fork of Semgrep CE (formerly Semgrep OSS), created after Semgrep moved several scanning-engine capabilities behind a commercial license. Its pitch is that it restores and extends those capabilities while staying fully open-source.

What it adds over Semgrep CE

According to the project, the features removed from the open-source engine and restored or advanced in Opengrep include:

  • Language support — broader coverage than the reduced CE engine.
  • Tracking ignores — the ability to suppress or track specific findings across runs.
  • Fingerprints — stable identifiers for findings, useful for triage and deduplication.
  • Meta-variables — access to matched variable bindings in rules.
  • Inter-procedural analysis — following data flow across function boundaries.
  • Cross-file analysis — tracking issues that span multiple files.
  • Windows support — native operation on Windows, not just Linux/macOS.
  • Extended language support — beyond what CE retained.

It also emphasizes that essential metadata and new scanning capabilities are not hidden behind a login, and that it remains backward compatible with common JSON and SARIF outputs.

Who benefits most

Audience Why it matters
Security engineers running SAST in CI SARIF/JSON compatibility means existing pipelines keep working
Teams with polyglot codebases Extended language support and cross-file analysis catch more
Windows-based development teams Native Windows support avoids workarounds
Contributors and tool builders Merit-based PR review, no single-vendor lock-in

Practical next step

If you are evaluating it against your current Semgrep CE setup, run both engines on the same repository and compare findings, especially for multi-file data flows and ignored-rule handling. The CLI and contribution entry point is the project's GitHub repository, linked from Opengrep. For broader context on the SAST landscape, the Open Worldwide Application Security Project publishes guidance at OWASP.

Is Opengrep backward compatible with existing Semgrep configurations and outputs like JSON or SARIF?

Yes. Opengrep is explicitly designed to be backward compatible with existing Semgrep setups and supports common output formats including JSON and SARIF. That means you can typically drop it into an existing workflow — same rule files, same CI integration, same downstream parsers — without rewriting your configuration or retooling your reporting pipeline.

What this means in practice

  • Rule/config reuse: Existing Semgrep rule files and configuration should carry over, since Opengrep is a fork of Semgrep CE (formerly Semgrep OSS).
  • Output compatibility: JSON and SARIF outputs are supported, so dashboards, ticketing integrations and code-scanning uploads that consume those formats should keep working.
  • Workflow continuity: You can adopt Opengrep incrementally rather than migrating everything at once.

A concrete reader scenario

Suppose your CI job runs Semgrep, writes SARIF, and uploads it to GitHub code scanning, while a separate script parses JSON for a custom dashboard. Because Opengrep keeps those formats, the practical migration is usually: swap the CLI invocation, keep the rule directory and output flags, then verify the findings count and severities on a sample repository before rolling out to all branches.

Where to be careful

Backward compatibility is a strong starting promise, but "compatible" is not the same as "byte-identical." Differences can appear in:

  • Newly enabled analyses (for example inter-procedural or cross-file analysis) that surface findings the older engine missed;
  • Metadata fields that were previously hidden behind a commercial license and may now appear;
  • Edge-case rule syntax or language coverage.

So treat the first run as a validation step, not a silent replacement.

Decision criterion

If your priority is avoiding lock-in and keeping essential engine metadata and capabilities out from behind a login, backward-compatible formats plus open rule reuse make Opengrep a low-friction swap. If your pipeline depends on exact output parity for compliance baselines, diff a full scan between the two engines on a representative repo first.

Next step: install the CLI from the project's GitHub repository and run it against one existing Semgrep ruleset, comparing JSON or SARIF output side by side before changing anything in production.

Which organizations are part of the Opengrep consortium, and how can I contribute to the project?

The Opengrep consortium is a group of application security companies pooling resources and OCaml development power behind a fully open-source static analysis engine. According to the project's site, the organizations named as backers include Aikido Security, Amplify, Endor Labs, Kodem, and Orca Security, with others also involved. A full-time developer team builds the engine, and each member organization contributes either resources or development effort so the engine stays free to use.

How to contribute

  • Start with the project's GitHub repository, listed on the site as github.com/opengrep/opengrep — it is the place to install and run the CLI, and to submit contributions.
  • The project states that contributions and pull requests are reviewed and accepted on merit, not based on any single company's commercial interest. That matters if you are deciding whether your work will actually land: it signals a governance model where outside contributors are not second-class.
  • Community discussion happens through the project's social channels (X, Reddit and others linked from the site), which is a reasonable first stop before writing code if you want to know what is already in progress.

A practical next step

If you are an application security engineer evaluating a move from Semgrep CE, the sensible sequence is: run Opengrep on one existing repository, compare its JSON or SARIF output against what your current pipeline already consumes, and only then decide whether to switch. The site emphasizes backward compatibility and standard output formats, so that comparison should be straightforward.

Decision criterion for contributors

If your goal is to influence the engine's direction, contributing to the core rather than only reporting issues is the path the project describes as open to everyone. If your goal is simply to adopt a scanner, you do not need to contribute at all — the engine is presented as free for all to use.

Related questions

More questions →
What Are Open-Source UI Element Libraries and How Do They Differ From UI Frameworks?

An open-source UI element library is a collection of individual, ready-made interface pieces—buttons, cards, inputs, toggles, loaders—that you copy into your own project and adapt. A UI framework, by contrast, is a structured system of components, conventions, and often a theming layer that governs how your whole interface is built. The practical difference: an element library gives you a snippet; a framework gives you a way of working. If you need a polished button in ten minutes, reach for the element library. If you're building a 40-screen product with a team, you probably want the framework.

What "open-source UI element library" actually means

The term gets used loosely, so it helps to separate the parts:

  • Open-source: the code is publicly available, and the license tells you what you may do with it—copy, modify, redistribute, or use commercially.
  • UI element: a single, self-contained piece of interface, usually small enough to read in one sitting. A button with hover states, a pricing card, a search field.
  • Library: a browsable, searchable collection of those elements, typically contributed by many different people.

On a site like Uiverse, elements are shared by a community and written in plain CSS or Tailwind. You find one you like, copy the markup and styles, paste them into your project, and adjust colors, spacing, and text to fit. There's no package to install and no build step required—which is exactly the appeal, and also the source of most of the confusion.

Element library vs. UI framework: the core differences

Dimension Open-source UI element library UI framework / design system
Unit of reuse A single snippet you copy A component you import or call
Installation None; paste into your code Package install, config, sometimes a provider
Consistency Depends on you; each element may look different Enforced by shared tokens and APIs
Theming Manual edits per element Central theme/config file
Updates You own the copy; no upstream updates Version bumps bring fixes and changes
Accessibility Varies per contributor; must be checked Usually tested and documented
Best for Prototypes, landing pages, small sites, one-off needs Multi-page apps, teams, long-lived products
Learning curve Low—read the CSS Higher—learn the API and conventions

The table isn't a verdict. It's a map of trade-offs. Element libraries win on speed and freedom; frameworks win on consistency and maintenance.

Licensing and attribution: what to check before you paste

This is where people get into trouble, and it's worth slowing down for.

  1. Find the license. Every element or collection should state one. Common open-source licenses include MIT, Apache-2.0, and BSD. Some projects use copyleft licenses like GPL, which can impose obligations if you redistribute your code.
  2. Understand what the license permits. MIT and Apache-2.0 are permissive: you can typically use the code in commercial and closed-source projects. Copyleft licenses may require you to release derivative source under the same terms.
  3. Check attribution requirements. Permissive licenses usually require you to keep the copyright notice and license text somewhere in your project. That's a real obligation, not a formality.
  4. Look for per-element terms. On community sites, the site's overall terms and the individual contributor's stated wishes may differ. If a contributor asks for credit, honor it.
  5. When in doubt, ask or avoid. If a snippet has no license at all, you don't have clear permission to reuse it. Treat "no license" as "not open source," even if the code is publicly visible.

This article is general information, not legal advice. For commercial products with real exposure, have someone qualified review the licenses you're relying on.

How to use a community element in your project: a practical workflow

Here's a repeatable process that avoids most of the usual mess.

1. Start from a real need, not a browsing session

Decide what you need first—"a compact primary button with a loading state"—then search. Browsing aimlessly produces a pile of pretty snippets that don't fit together.

2. Copy the smallest version that works

Take the markup and the styles. Strip anything you don't need: demo wrappers, extra animations, decorative layers. Less code means fewer surprises.

3. Convert it to your conventions

If your project uses design tokens or CSS variables, replace hard-coded values:

/* Before: hard-coded */
.button { background: #4f46e5; border-radius: 8px; }

/* After: token-based */
.button { background: var(--color-primary); border-radius: var(--radius-md); }

This one step is what keeps a copied element from looking like a foreign object in your UI.

4. Check accessibility before you ship

Community elements vary widely here. Verify at minimum:

  • Keyboard focus is visible and the element is reachable by Tab.
  • Color contrast meets WCAG AA (4.5:1 for normal text).
  • Interactive elements use semantic HTML (<button>, not a clickable <div>).
  • Form inputs have associated labels.
  • Motion respects prefers-reduced-motion.

5. Test in context

Paste it into a real page with real content. Long labels, small screens, and dark mode break more copied elements than anything else.

6. Note where it came from

Keep a short comment or an internal credits file: source, license, date. Future you—and your legal reviewer—will be grateful.

Where element libraries genuinely shine

  • Prototypes and demos: you need something clickable today, not a design system.
  • Landing pages and marketing sites: a handful of distinctive elements, each custom.
  • Filling gaps: your framework lacks one specific component, and you don't want to build it from scratch.
  • Learning: reading well-made CSS is one of the fastest ways to improve.
  • Small projects: a personal site doesn't need a theming architecture.

Where they fall short

  • Consistency at scale: ten elements from ten contributors rarely look like one product.
  • Maintenance: you own every copy. When your design changes, you edit each one.
  • Accessibility debt: you inherit whatever the contributor did or didn't do.
  • No upstream fixes: a bug fixed in the original won't reach your copy.
  • Integration friction: different naming conventions, different units, different assumptions about resets.

When to choose which

Choose an element library when the scope is small, the timeline is short, or you need a few distinctive pieces rather than a whole system.

Choose a framework or design system when multiple people build multiple screens over months, when consistency is a product requirement, or when accessibility and theming need to be guaranteed rather than checked.

A hybrid works well for many teams: adopt a framework for the structural components—forms, navigation, layout—and borrow individual elements for the places where you want personality. Just route every borrowed element through the same token and accessibility checks, so it lands as part of your system rather than beside it.

The short version: open-source UI element libraries are a fast, flexible way to get good-looking interface pieces into a project. They are not a substitute for a design system, and the license and accessibility details are the part worth reading carefully.

What is Opengrep?

Opengrep is an open-source static code security engine — a SAST (Static Application Security Testing) tool — created as a fork of Semgrep CE (formerly Semgrep OSS). It exists because Semgrep moved critical scanning-engine features behind a commercial license, and Opengrep's stated mission is to keep advanced static analysis fully open-source. If you currently use Semgrep CE and want to keep access to engine capabilities without a commercial license or login, Opengrep is designed as a backward-compatible replacement.

Why Opengrep exists

According to the project, recent changes by Semgrep affected its open-source nature by removing critical features of the scanning engine behind a commercial license. The features moved out of the open-source engine reportedly include:

  • Language support
  • Tracking ignores
  • Fingerprint
  • Meta-variables
  • Other engine capabilities

Opengrep's stated goal is to build "the most advanced static analysis engine — fully open-source," and to commoditize and advance SAST rather than gate it.

What you get as a user

The project describes its value to users in three main ways:

Area What Opengrep offers
Engine capability A more capable scanning engine that does not hide essential metadata and new scanning capabilities behind a login
Compatibility Backward compatible, with support for common JSON and SARIF outputs so it can be integrated into existing workflows
Advanced analysis Unlocks previously pro-only capabilities, including inter-procedural (cross-function) analysis, cross-file analysis, Windows support, and extended language support
Long-term assurance Future improvements and features won't be locked into specific vendors

Contributions and pull requests are described as being reviewed and accepted on merit, not contingent on any single company's commercial interest.

Who is behind it

Opengrep is backed by a consortium of organizations in the application security space, including Aikido Security, Amplify, Endor Labs, Kodem, and Orca Security, among others. A full-time developer team builds the engine, with each organization contributing resources or OCaml development power. The parties state they remain committed to keeping Opengrep free and open-source.

How to get started

The project points to its GitHub repository for installation, running, and contributing:

  • Repository: github.com/opengrep/opengrep — install, run, or contribute to the Opengrep CLI.

Community discussion is encouraged via X, Reddit, and other social channels listed on the site.

When Opengrep is a good fit

Opengrep is worth evaluating if you:

  • Use Semgrep CE and depend on engine features that have moved behind a commercial license.
  • Need SAST output in JSON or SARIF for CI/CD integration.
  • Want cross-function or cross-file analysis without a vendor login.
  • Prefer a tool whose roadmap and contributions are governed by a multi-vendor consortium rather than one company.

Because Opengrep is positioned as backward compatible with common output formats, the practical starting point is to install the CLI from the GitHub repository and test it against your existing rules and pipelines before committing to a migration.

What Value Does Opengrep Offer for Static Application Security Testing (SAST)?

Opengrep is a fully open-source static analysis engine, forked from Semgrep CE (formerly Semgrep OSS), built to keep advanced SAST capabilities free and accessible rather than gated behind commercial licenses or logins. It is relevant to you if you rely on Semgrep CE for code scanning and want a scanning engine that preserves essential metadata, adds deeper analysis capabilities, and won't have future features locked to a single vendor. If you only need basic pattern matching and are satisfied with your current tooling, the value proposition is less pressing.

Why Opengrep Exists

The project was launched in response to changes by Semgrep that affected its open-source nature. According to Opengrep, critical features of the scanning engine were moved behind a commercial license, including language support, tracking ignores, fingerprint, and meta-variables. Opengrep's stated mission is to build the most advanced static analysis engine as fully open-source, and to commoditize and advance SAST for the broader community.

The Value for SAST Users

Opengrep describes four concrete benefits for users:

  • No login-gated capabilities. A more capable scanning engine that does not hide essential metadata or new scanning capabilities behind a login.
  • Backward compatibility. Opengrep supports common JSON and SARIF outputs, so you can adopt and integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting your pipeline.
  • Deeper analysis. The engine unlocks previously pro-only capabilities, including inter-procedural analysis (cross-function), cross-file analysis, Windows support, and extended language support.
  • Long-term vendor independence. Assurance that future improvements and features won't be locked into specific vendors.

Who Maintains It and How It Stays Open

Opengrep is backed by a consortium of organizations in the application security space, including Aikido Security, Amplify, Endor Labs, Kodem, Orca Security, and others. A full-time developer team builds the engine, with each organization contributing resources or OCaml development power. The parties state they remain committed to keeping Opengrep free and open-source.

Contributions and pull requests are reviewed and accepted on merit, not contingent upon the commercial interest of any single company.

How to Get Started

The CLI is available at github.com/opengrep/opengrep, where you can install, run, or contribute to the engine. Community discussion happens via X, Reddit, and other social channels listed on the site.

How It Compares to Semgrep CE

Dimension Semgrep CE (as described by Opengrep) Opengrep
License posture Key engine features moved to commercial license Fully open-source
Metadata & new capabilities Some hidden behind a login Not hidden behind a login
Analysis depth Pro-only features separated out Inter-procedural, cross-file, Windows, extended languages
Output formats JSON, SARIF Backward compatible with JSON, SARIF
Governance Single vendor Multi-organization consortium

The practical takeaway: if your SAST workflow depends on features that were removed from Semgrep CE's open-source engine, Opengrep is designed as a drop-in-compatible alternative that keeps those capabilities open.

How Does Opengrep Differ from Semgrep CE?

Opengrep is a fork of Semgrep CE (formerly Semgrep OSS) created in response to Semgrep moving critical scanning-engine features behind a commercial license. If you currently run Semgrep CE and want to know whether switching is worth it, the short answer is: Opengrep aims to restore the removed engine capabilities, stay backward compatible with common JSON and SARIF outputs, and add pro-level analysis features without a login or vendor lock-in. The rest of this article breaks down the specific differences so you can decide.

Why Opengrep Exists

According to the Opengrep project, Semgrep removed critical features of its scanning engine from the open-source version and placed them behind a commercial license. The project states this "effectively kneecapped its use" and limited access and progress for the broader community.

Opengrep was launched as a fork specifically to counter that. Its stated mission is to "build the most advanced static analysis engine– fully open-source" and to commoditize and advance Static Application Security Testing (SAST).

Feature Differences at a Glance

Dimension Semgrep CE (as described by Opengrep) Opengrep
Language support Removed from the open-source engine Restored / extended
Tracking ignores Removed Restored
Fingerprint Removed Restored
Meta-variables Removed Restored
Inter-procedural (cross-function) analysis Pro-only Planned as open
Cross-file analysis Pro-only Planned as open
Windows support Not in the open engine Planned
Extended language support Limited Planned
Metadata behind login Yes (per Opengrep's description) No login required
Output formats JSON, SARIF JSON, SARIF (backward compatible)

The key point: the features Opengrep restores are engine-level capabilities, not cosmetic differences. Tracking ignores, fingerprints, and meta-variables affect how you suppress findings, deduplicate results across runs, and write rules that reference matched content.

Backward Compatibility and Integration

Opengrep states it will be backward compatible and support common JSON and SARIF outputs. In practice this means:

  • CI pipelines that parse SARIF from Semgrep CE should continue to work if you swap the binary.
  • Rule files written for Semgrep CE are intended to run without rewriting.
  • Downstream tooling (dashboards, ticketing integrations) that consume JSON output should not need changes.

If your workflow depends on a specific output schema, verify against your own pipeline before migrating — the project's compatibility claim is a design goal, not a guarantee for every edge case.

What Opengrep Plans to Add

Beyond restoring removed features, Opengrep says it will unlock capabilities previously limited to pro users:

  • Inter-procedural analysis (cross-function)
  • Cross-file analysis
  • Windows support
  • Extended language support

These are roadmap items, not shipped features. Treat them as direction rather than current capability when planning a migration.

Governance and Vendor Lock-In

Opengrep is backed by a consortium of application security organizations, including Aikido Security, Amplify, Endor Labs, Kodem, and Orca Security. The project states there is a full-time developer team, with each organization contributing resources or OCaml development power.

Two governance commitments matter for a migration decision:

  1. No feature gating behind a single vendor's commercial interest. The project says future improvements won't be locked into specific vendors.
  2. Merit-based contributions. PRs are "regularly reviewed and accepted on merit, not contingent upon the commercial interest of any single company."

This is the structural difference from Semgrep CE: the concern that drove the fork was a single company's decision to relicense engine features. Opengrep's consortium model is designed to prevent a repeat.

How to Decide

Consider migrating to Opengrep if:

  • You rely on tracking ignores, fingerprints, or meta-variables and lost them in Semgrep CE.
  • You need inter-procedural or cross-file analysis but don't want a commercial license.
  • You want Windows support in an open-source SAST engine.
  • Vendor lock-in is a concern for your security tooling.

Stay on Semgrep CE if:

  • Your current rule set and pipeline work without the removed features.
  • You depend on Semgrep's commercial support, managed platform, or a feature set Opengrep hasn't shipped yet.
  • You can't absorb migration risk on roadmap-only features.

Getting Started

The CLI is at github.com/opengrep/opengrep, where you can install, run, or contribute. Community discussion happens via X, Reddit, and other channels listed on the project site.

Before switching in production, run Opengrep against your existing rule set and diff the SARIF output against your current Semgrep CE results. That comparison will tell you more about real-world compatibility than any feature list.

How to Get Started with Opengrep

Opengrep is an open-source static analysis (SAST) engine, forked from Semgrep CE, and the way to start is through its CLI at github.com/opengrep/opengrep. You can install and run the engine locally to scan code, or contribute to the project. This guide covers what Opengrep is, how to get it running, and how to participate.

What Opengrep Is

Opengrep is a fork of Semgrep CE (formerly Semgrep OSS), created in response to changes by Semgrep that affected its open-source nature. According to the project, those changes removed critical features of the scanning engine behind a commercial license, including language support, tracking ignores, fingerprint, and meta-variables.

Opengrep's stated mission is to build the most advanced static analysis engine as fully open-source. It is backed by a consortium of application security organizations, including Aikido Security, Amplify, Endor Labs, Kodem, and Orca Security, with a full-time developer team and contributions of resources and OCaml development power.

Getting Started

The single entry point for installation, running, and contributing is the GitHub repository:

github.com/opengrep/opengrep

From there you can:

  • Install the Opengrep CLI
  • Run the engine locally against your code
  • Contribute to the project

Installing and Running

The repository is where you install and run the Opengrep CLI. Opengrep is designed to be backward compatible and supports common JSON and SARIF outputs, so you can adopt it and integrate it into existing workflows. Because it is backward compatible, teams already using Semgrep-style output formats can plug Opengrep into the same pipelines.

What the Engine Offers

Per the project, Opengrep unlocks capabilities that were previously pro-only, including:

  • Inter-procedural analysis (cross-function)
  • Cross-file analysis
  • Windows support
  • Extended language support

It also does not hide essential metadata and new scanning capabilities behind a login.

Contributing

Contributions and pull requests are regularly reviewed and accepted on merit, not contingent on the commercial interest of any single company. If you want to contribute, the GitHub repository is the place to start.

Community and Support

Community-driven conversations happen through Opengrep's social channels, including X and Reddit. These are the places to ask questions, follow development, and connect with other users and contributors.

Quick Reference

Task Where to go
Install / run the CLI github.com/opengrep/opengrep
Contribute code github.com/opengrep/opengrep (pull requests)
Community discussion X, Reddit, and other social channels

Key Takeaways

  • Opengrep is a fully open-source SAST engine forked from Semgrep CE.
  • Start at github.com/opengrep/opengrep to install, run, or contribute.
  • It is backward compatible and supports JSON and SARIF outputs for easy integration.
  • It unlocks previously pro-only capabilities like cross-function and cross-file analysis, Windows support, and extended language support.
  • Pull requests are reviewed on merit, and the community gathers on X and Reddit.

Website Overview

Identifiable technologies and additional version or configuration signals make the service easier to fingerprint, which may help targeted scanners narrow their checks. Several search or sharing settings need attention. Together they may make snippets, preview images or preferred URLs less consistent across platforms.

Domain and Registration

Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain has about 1 years of registration history; its current configuration provides more context than age alone. The registrar is Namecheap Inc., a widely used domain service provider. The domain uses the common .dev extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

MX records exist, but SPF, DKIM and DMARC were not detected. Protection against domain impersonation may be incomplete. Nameservers are provided by Amazon Route 53, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Google Workspace email service. The CNAME points to opengrep.github.io, associated with GitHub Pages. DNSSEC signatures were not detected, so this additional DNS authenticity protection is not confirmed.

TLS and Certificates

The certificate uses an RSA 2048-bit public key, offering broad client compatibility. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, commonly associated with automated certificate services. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

The checked browser-security headers were not detected, leaving fewer explicit browser-side safeguards. CORS permits any origin to read this response. This is common for public resources; sensitive responses need narrower handling. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. The x-cache, x-served-by, via response header indicates a CDN or caching proxy in the delivery path. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Jekyll 3.10.0, Fastly, with exact versions exposed for 1 technologies. These details can narrow vulnerability checks, although exposure alone is not a vulnerability.

Search and Social Sharing

No homepage meta description was detected, leaving snippet selection more dependent on page text. The Generator tag identifies Jekyll v3.10.0, making the publishing system easier to fingerprint. The canonical URL points to another host: https://github.com/opengrep/opengrep/. Search engines may consolidate indexing signals there. Open Graph is partially configured; og:description, og:image is missing. Twitter Card metadata is configured.

Hosting and Email

DNSAmazon Route 53
HostingFastly
EmailGoogle Workspace
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagUnited States Inferred 185.199.108.153

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarNamecheap Inc.
Registered2025-01-07
Expires2027-01-07
Domain statusclient transfer prohibited
Nameserversns-1405.awsdns-47.org、ns-141.awsdns-17.com、ns-1951.awsdns-51.co.uk、ns-958.awsdns-55.net
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Aopengrep.github.io185.199.108.1533600—
Aopengrep.github.io185.199.109.1533600—
Aopengrep.github.io185.199.110.1533600—
Aopengrep.github.io185.199.111.1533600—
AAAAopengrep.github.io2606:50c0:8000::1533600—
AAAAopengrep.github.io2606:50c0:8001::1533600—
AAAAopengrep.github.io2606:50c0:8002::1533600—
AAAAopengrep.github.io2606:50c0:8003::1533600—
MXopengrep.devsmtp.google.com3001
NSopengrep.devns-1405.awsdns-47.org172800—
NSopengrep.devns-141.awsdns-17.com172800—
NSopengrep.devns-1951.awsdns-51.co.uk172800—
NSopengrep.devns-958.awsdns-55.net172800—
CNAMEwww.opengrep.devopengrep.github.io300—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectwww.opengrep.dev
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Valid until2026-12-15T05:44 · Remaining when checked: 78 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=utf-8
cache-controlmax-age=600
serverGitHub.com
access-control-allow-origin*

Identified technologies

Jekyll 3.10.0Fastly

Pages, Search and Sharing

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.