Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is Agentprobe?
Agentprobe is a readiness-testing tool for "agentic commerce." You give it a seller's URL, and it runs a set of probes to judge whether an AI agent could realistically discover that seller, get a quote, and complete a purchase on its own. Instead of asking whether a site looks good to a human shopper, it asks whether a machine buyer can actually transact there.
The output is a graded verdict rather than a simple pass/fail:
| Band | Score | What it implies |
|---|---|---|
| CERTIFIED | ≥85/95 | Fully agent-legible; agents can transact end to end |
| AGENT_READY | 70–84 | Agents can transact, but need some guidance |
| PARTIAL | 40–69 | Discoverable, but not transactable |
| NOT_READY | <40 | Opaque to agents |
The scoring rests on 13 probes covering machine-readable signals and commerce steps: llms.txt, OpenAPI, ai-plugin.json, MCP, commerce.json, catalog API, quote API, checkout API, payment rails, refund/contact paths, unsupported rails, a "no fake claims" check, and fulfillment proof. In other words, it looks at both the discovery layer (can an agent find and understand the offering?) and the transaction layer (can it get a price, pay, and expect delivery?).
Who it's for. E-commerce operators, marketplaces, and developers who want to know whether their storefront is usable by AI shopping agents — and who need a concrete checklist of what's missing rather than a vague audit. A practical next step: run a probe on your own product or checkout URL, then work down from the lowest-scoring probe, since a missing checkout or payment rail blocks transactions even if discovery signals are perfect. The site also maintains a public registry of top certified sellers, useful if you want reference implementations to copy.
How do I test my seller URL for agentic commerce readiness?
Paste your seller URL into Agentprobe and run the probe. It tests whether an AI agent can discover, quote, and complete a purchase from your site, then returns a score and a readiness tier.
What the probe checks (13 signals, grouped by intent)
- Discovery:
llms.txt, OpenAPI spec,ai-plugin.json, MCP,commerce.json - Transaction: catalog API, quote API, checkout API, payment rails
- Trust and aftercare: refund/contact info, unsupported rails flag, no fake claims, fulfillment proof
How to read the score
| Tier | Score band | What it means for an agent |
|---|---|---|
| CERTIFIED | ≥85/95 | Fully agent-legible; an agent can complete a purchase unaided |
| AGENT_READY | 70–84 | Agents can transact if given guidance |
| PARTIAL | 40–69 | Discoverable, but not transactable |
| NOT_READY | <40 | Opaque to agents |
A concrete first run
If you sell a physical product, expect the probe to pass discovery quickly and fail on quote and checkout. That is the common gap: your product pages are crawlable, but there is no machine-readable way to get a price for a specific quantity or to place an order. Fix the quote endpoint first — it is the step agents need before they can commit to a cart.
Decision criteria for what to fix next
- If you score PARTIAL, work on the quote and checkout APIs before polishing discovery files.
- If you score AGENT_READY, the remaining points usually come from refund/contact clarity and fulfillment proof.
- If you score NOT_READY, start with
llms.txtand a basic catalog endpoint; those lift you fastest.
Next step after scoring
Re-run the probe after each change, since the score is a checklist rather than a single pass/fail. Compare against certified examples in the public registry to see what a complete setup looks like, such as Agentprobe itself, 8BitConcepts, or NoHumanSearch. If you want a second opinion on general agent-readiness checks, the guidance from BringYour is useful context, though it is not the same test.
What do the certification scores like CERTIFIED, AGENT_READY, PARTIAL, and NOT_READY mean?
Agentprobe grades how legible a seller's website is to an AI shopping agent — whether an agent can discover the site, read a quote, and complete a purchase without a human stepping in. The four labels are readiness tiers, and each tier is paired with a numeric score out of 110.
The four tiers
| Tier | Score band | What it means in practice |
|---|---|---|
| CERTIFIED | ≥85/95 (listed scores run to 110) | Fully agent-legible. An agent can discover, quote and transact end to end. |
| AGENT_READY | 70–84 | Agents can transact, but need guidance — some steps assume a human or extra interpretation. |
| PARTIAL | 40–69 | Discoverable but not transactable. An agent can find and read the site, then stalls before checkout. |
| NOT_READY | <40 | Opaque to agents. Little to nothing is machine-readable. |
What the score is built from
Agentprobe runs 13 probes against a seller URL, covering the surfaces an agent needs at each stage of a purchase:
- Discovery: llms.txt, OpenAPI, ai-plugin.json, MCP, commerce.json
- Quoting: catalog API, quote API
- Closing: checkout API, payment rails, refund/contact
- Trust checks: unsupported rails, no fake claims, fulfillment proof
The last group is the interesting one. A site can expose a clean checkout API and still lose points if it advertises payment rails it does not actually support, or makes claims it cannot back up. That is a deliberate design choice: an agent that transacts on a false claim creates a liability downstream, so the score penalises it rather than rewarding surface coverage alone.
Where the tiers actually matter
The distinction between CERTIFIED and AGENT_READY is mostly about failure mode, not quality. A CERTIFIED site should complete a transaction unattended. An AGENT_READY site will usually get there, but a buyer's agent may need to fall back to a human or a looser interpretation of the response — fine for a low-stakes order, riskier for anything expensive or time-sensitive.
PARTIAL is the most common trap for merchants. It looks healthy in a browser and may even rank in search, but the agent hits a wall at the quote or checkout step. If you are evaluating a vendor, PARTIAL means "agents can send you traffic but not revenue."
A practical next step
If you run a store and want to know where you sit, test your own URL first and read the probe list as a to-do list rather than a grade. The discovery files are usually quick wins; checkout, payment rails and fulfillment proof take real engineering. For comparison, you can see how the certified sites listed in the registry present themselves — for example Agentprobe itself scores 110/110, and 8BitConcepts is listed at the same level. Treat those as reference implementations for structure, not as endorsements of their products.
One caveat: a high score reflects machine legibility, not merchant reliability. Before letting an agent buy from any seller, check refund terms and fulfillment evidence separately — those are exactly the signals the "no fake claims" and "fulfillment proof" probes are trying to surface.
Which specific probes does Agentprobe run to evaluate a site?
Agentprobe runs 13 named probes that test whether an AI agent can discover, quote, and complete a purchase on a seller's site. The page groups them into four areas:
Discovery and description
llms.txt— whether the site exposes a machine-readable summary for language modelsai-plugin.json— the plugin manifest agents use to understand available actionsOpenAPI— a formal API description agents can parseMCP— Model Context Protocol support for tool-based agent access
Commerce data
commerce.json— a structured commerce declarationcatalog API— programmatic product or service listingquote API— the ability to return a price or estimate to an agent
Transaction and aftercare
checkout API— whether an agent can complete an orderpayment rails— supported payment mechanismsunsupported rails— rails the site does not support, checked so agents fail predictablyrefund/contact— refund and contact paths an agent can follow
Trust and verification
no fake claims— checks that stated capabilities are backed by real endpointsfulfillment proof— evidence that orders are actually fulfilled
The results map to a four-tier score: CERTIFIED (≥85/95), AGENT_READY (70–84), PARTIAL (40–69), and NOT_READY (<40). The registry shows example certified sites at 100–110 points, including Agentprobe itself.
A practical next step: if you sell online, run your own URL through the probe and treat the failing checks as a to-do list — discovery files first, then quote and checkout endpoints, since an agent that cannot get a price will never reach payment.
Can I see examples of sites that have been certified by Agentprobe?
Yes. Agentprobe publishes a registry of certified sites directly on its homepage, listing each domain with a score and a certification tier. The examples shown include:
- pictureperfectprojects321.com — CERTIFIED, 100/110
- agentic-evidence.fly.dev — CERTIFIED, 110/110
- 8BitConcepts — CERTIFIED, 110/110
- geo-agent.fly.dev — CERTIFIED, 105/110
- nothumansearch.ai — CERTIFIED, 110/110
- bringyour.ai — CERTIFIED, 110/110
A few of these are Agentprobe's own or closely related properties (agentprobe.fly.dev and agentic-evidence.fly.dev both appear), so treat the list as a mix of real third-party and in-house demonstrations rather than a neutral sample of the wider web.
What the certification actually tells you
Agentprobe runs 13 probes against a seller URL — things like llms.txt, OpenAPI, ai-plugin.json, MCP, commerce.json, catalog and quote APIs, checkout API, payment rails, refund/contact paths, unsupported rails, no-fake-claims, and fulfillment proof. The resulting tier indicates how far an AI agent can get on its own:
| Tier | Score | Practical meaning |
|---|---|---|
| CERTIFIED | ≥85/95 | Fully agent-legible; an agent can discover, quote and complete a purchase |
| AGENT_READY | 70–84 | Agents can transact, but need guidance |
| PARTIAL | 40–69 | Discoverable, not transactable |
| NOT_READY | <40 | Opaque to agents |
How to use this
If you are evaluating a vendor, a partner, or your own storefront, run the same probe on the URL you care about rather than relying on the published list — the registry is a starting point, not a guarantee. A high score means the machine-readable surfaces exist and respond; it does not by itself prove that real orders, payments and refunds behave correctly under load or edge cases. For a concrete check, pick one certified domain, fetch its llms.txt and commerce.json, and confirm an agent could plausibly quote and check out before you treat the badge as meaningful.
How can I integrate Agentprobe's API into my own system?
Agentprobe exposes an API alongside its registry and JSON output, so integration is mostly about calling the probe endpoint with a seller URL and consuming the returned readiness result. The page evidence names "API · Registry · JSON" as available surfaces but does not publish endpoint paths, authentication method, rate limits, or response schema — so plan to confirm those from the API reference before writing code.
What the API is actually useful for
The core unit is a single question: can an AI agent discover, quote, and complete a purchase at this URL? Agentprobe answers it with a score and a band:
| Band | Score | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| CERTIFIED | ≥85/95 | Fully agent-legible |
| AGENT_READY | 70–84 | Agents can transact with guidance |
| PARTIAL | 40–69 | Discoverable but not transactable |
| NOT_READY | <40 | Opaque to agents |
The 13 probes cover llms.txt, OpenAPI, ai-plugin.json, MCP, commerce.json, catalog API, quote API, checkout API, payment rails, refund/contact, unsupported rails, no fake claims, and fulfillment proof. That list is the real integration value: you get a per-check breakdown, not just a number, so you can tell a merchant which document or endpoint is missing.
Practical integration patterns
- Pre-flight gate in an agent workflow. Before your shopping agent attempts a purchase, probe the seller URL. If the result is PARTIAL or NOT_READY, route to a human or a fallback merchant instead of failing mid-checkout.
- Vendor onboarding. Run probes on supplier URLs at signup and store the band plus failing checks against the vendor record, then re-probe on a schedule to catch regressions.
- Directory or marketplace filtering. Use the registry and JSON output to build a browsable list of agent-ready sellers rather than maintaining your own allowlist.
- Merchant-facing reporting. Surface the individual failing probes as a to-do list for sellers who want to move from PARTIAL to CERTIFIED.
A concrete first step
Pick one seller URL you already transact with, call the probe, and read the 13 checks individually. If the response distinguishes a missing llms.txt from a broken checkout API, you have everything you need to design your schema mapping; if it returns only a score, you will need to poll the registry or request the detailed payload. Treat the band thresholds as your routing rules and the per-check flags as diagnostics.
Two caveats worth designing around. First, a high score measures agent-legibility, not business trustworthiness — fulfillment proof and "no fake claims" are checks, but they are self-reported signals, so keep your own fraud and dispute handling. Second, scores shift as sellers change their sites, so cache with a short TTL and re-probe rather than treating a stored CERTIFIED as permanent.
For background on the standards being probed, Model Context Protocol covers MCP, and the llms.txt convention is documented at llms.txt.
User reviews (0)