Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is the American University Law Review?
The American University Law Review is a student-edited legal journal published at American University Washington College of Law. It publishes scholarly articles, comments and forum pieces on a range of legal topics, and it also runs events such as an annual Federal Circuit Symposium and panels on diversity, equity and inclusion in the legal profession. Its site presents current volumes and issues, with individual article and comment entries listed by volume and issue.
For readers, its main value is as a source of legal scholarship and as a window into the journal's public programming. If you are a law student, you might use it to follow recent writing in a field you are studying or to understand what a student-edited journal publishes. If you are a practitioner or academic, the Federal Circuit Symposium materials and the published articles are the most likely draws.
Who it is for
- Law students researching or writing notes and comments.
- Academics and practitioners tracking scholarship in specific areas.
- Members of the legal community interested in the journal's symposia and panels.
A practical next step
If you want to read rather than just browse, start with a recent issue and scan the article titles for your subject area; if you are considering submitting, read several recent issues first to see the style and length the journal favors. The site also lists subscription information at American University Law Review.
How can I subscribe to the American University Law Review?
Subscriptions to the American University Law Review are handled through the journal's own site. Start at the subscription page: American University Law Review.
H3 What to expect on the subscription page
- It is the official channel for ordering the journal, separate from the free article pages on the same site.
- You will typically be asked to choose a subscription type (for example, individual or institutional) and a term, then provide mailing and payment details.
- If you only need to read specific pieces, check whether the current issue's articles are already posted on the site before paying — the homepage shows Volume 75 content with individual articles and comments.
H3 If you are unsure which option fits
- Law student or researcher: a personal subscription makes sense if you want print issues or ongoing access; otherwise the posted articles may cover your needs.
- Library or firm: an institutional subscription is the usual route, since it covers multiple readers and shelf copies.
- Practitioner following Federal Circuit work: the journal runs an Annual Federal Circuit Symposium, so a subscription is most useful if you want the published symposium material in full.
H3 A practical next step Open the subscription page and note the available terms and contact address. If the form does not answer a question about shipping, back issues or institutional rates, email the journal directly using the contact details on the site rather than guessing.
What is the Federal Circuit Symposium hosted by the American University Law Review?
The Federal Circuit Symposium is an annual event hosted by the American University Law Review that brings together judges, scholars, practitioners, and members of the legal community for a day of discussion on timely legal issues within the Federal Circuit's jurisdiction. According to the law review's own description, the symposium is organized by a Senior Federal Circuit Editor—this year, Mallory Hogan—and is positioned as one of the journal's flagship public events, alongside its broader Annual Symposium and a DEI in the Law Panel.
Who it is for
- Federal Circuit practitioners: patent, trademark, government-contract, and veterans-appeals lawyers who want focused discussion of the court's docket.
- Academics and students: scholars and law students tracking how the court's doctrine is developing.
- Judges and court staff: the format is built around dialogue among the bench, bar, and academy rather than a single lecture.
Why it matters in practice
The Federal Circuit has nationwide, exclusive jurisdiction over several areas—most notably patent appeals—so its decisions shape practice well beyond Washington. A day-long symposium is a way to get consolidated perspective on where the law is heading, rather than piecing it together from scattered opinions. It also gives the law review a channel to publish related scholarship; the site notes a Federal Circuit Symposium piece among its recent content.
A useful next step
If you are deciding whether to attend or follow the published output, check the current symposium page for the year's theme, panel topics, and speaker list, then compare it with your own practice area. If your work touches patent or Federal Circuit appeals, the panel lineup is the best signal of relevance. For the journal's broader programming, see American University Law Review.
How can I submit an article or comment to the American University Law Review?
The American University Law Review accepts submissions through its website, and the main path is a formal submission rather than an email pitch. The review publishes full-length Articles and shorter Comments, and it also runs a Forum section for online commentary, so the right track depends on what you have written.
Which track fits your piece
| Your work | Typical fit |
|---|---|
| Long-form scholarly argument with substantial analysis | Article |
| Focused argument on a single issue, often by a student or junior author | Comment |
| Timely response to a recent development or published piece | Forum submission |
What to prepare
- A manuscript formatted for anonymous review, with identifying information kept out of the body.
- A separate cover letter or title page with your name, affiliation, and contact details.
- A short abstract, plus a CV if you are an academic author.
- Consistent citation format, typically Bluebook for U.S. legal scholarship.
- Confirmation that the piece is not under consideration elsewhere.
Practical steps
- Check the current submission window and any reading-period dates on the review's site before sending.
- Use the submission portal or address listed under its submissions page rather than a general contact form.
- Note whether the review accepts expedited review requests and what it requires for them.
- Track your submission and be ready to respond quickly if an offer comes with a deadline.
A concrete scenario
Suppose you are a practitioner who has litigated Federal Circuit patent appeals and want to write about a recent jurisdictional split. A 12,000-word Article with a narrow doctrinal claim will likely fare better than a broad survey, because the review's Federal Circuit Symposium shows an established interest in that court's work. If your argument is shorter and tied to a ruling from the past few months, the Forum is the more natural home.
For submission instructions, deadlines, and portal details, go directly to American University Law Review. If you are a student at American University Washington College of Law, also check whether the review uses a separate internal writing competition or candidate process, since that route differs from general author submissions.
What are the current issues and volumes published by the American University Law Review?
The American University Law Review publishes its content in numbered volumes, each split into issues, and the homepage currently surfaces Volume 75 as the active volume. Recent issues listed there include Volume 75, Issue 6 and Volume 75, Issue 5, alongside a Volume 75 Forum piece.
What's in the current issues
Volume 75, Issue 6 (dated August 2026) includes:
- It's (not all) Personal: Civil Litigation and the Values of Rights of Action — Hanoch Dagan, Avihay Dorfman & Issi Rosen-Zvi
- The Leasehold World — Jeffrey Manns
- Lawbreaking as a Method of Competition — Sandeep Vaheesan
- The Lawyer of the Future: Ethics and Identity in the Age of AI — David Yosifon, Michael Santoro & Isaac Nikssarian
- Beyond Marriage: Challenging Marital Prerequisites in State Adoption Laws Through a Constitutional and Child-Centered Lens — Alisha Glass (Comment)
Volume 75 Forum carries shorter, timely commentary; the current example is Backsliding on the 2025 Roadmap: Why the EPA's Rollbacks of PFAS Regulations Violate the Safe Drinking Water Act by Sophia Rappazzo.
Volume 75, Issue 5 includes Federal Hiring Dysfunction and the Self-Shrinking Skew by Lindsey Barrett.
How to use this
If you're researching a specific doctrine, the Forum pieces are the fastest read for current developments, while full Articles give deeper treatment. For citation purposes, note the volume and issue number together — the site groups everything under Volume 75 with issue-level labels.
A practical next step: browse the volume archive on American University Law Review to see the complete table of contents for each issue, since the homepage only highlights selected pieces. If you need broader context on how this journal compares with peer publications, the AULR site also notes its recognition among top law journals.
What is the American University Law Review Forum and how does it differ from the main journal?
The American University Law Review Forum is the online companion to the print journal. It publishes shorter, timelier pieces—often responses to recent developments or commentary on published articles—rather than the full-length articles and student comments that fill each print volume. On the journal's site, Forum content appears alongside regular issues, as with the entry "Backsliding on the 2025 Roadmap: Why the EPA's Rollbacks of PFAS Regulations Violate the Safe Drinking Water Act," labeled as a Volume 75 Forum Comment.
How the two differ
| Main journal | Forum | |
|---|---|---|
| Format | Print-bound volumes and issues | Online companion |
| Typical length | Full articles and student comments | Shorter comments and responses |
| Focus | Sustained legal scholarship | Current, fast-moving legal questions |
| Example from the site | "The Leasehold World" (Volume 75, Issue 6) | PFAS rollback comment (Volume 75 Forum) |
What this means in practice
If you are a practitioner tracking a fast-moving regulatory issue, the Forum is usually the faster place to find analysis. If you need deep doctrinal treatment, the main journal is the better starting point. A student researching a note or comment might read the Forum to see how authors respond to one another, while a faculty member citing scholarship would generally cite the main journal.
A useful next step: browse the volume listings on American University Law Review and note which pieces are tagged as Forum items versus issue articles. That label tells you what kind of piece you are about to read before you open it.
User reviews (0)