Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is Bryan Braun?
Bryan Braun is a personal website and blog by a frontend developer of the same name, described as "making things and sharing what I learn." It is not a company, product or service; it is one developer's writing space, with a "Recent Posts" feed that mixes technical notes with personal essays.
What you'll find there
The posts fall into a few recognizable groups:
- Web development craft: pieces on JavaScript circular dependencies, unusual Git IDs, scaling code review, and configuring VSCode.
- Blogging and the open web: arguments for RSS, setting up a
/nowpage with an RSS feed, and reflections on Substack and recommendation algorithms. - AI and technology: an AI usage statement for the site, notes on AI website builders, and questions about whether people will want AI-written work.
- Personal and reflective writing: weight-loss milestones, family life, a family Minecraft server, and year-end "Made in" roundups.
- Link roundups: recurring "Links" posts collecting things the author found interesting.
Who it suits
It is most useful to frontend developers and people who run personal blogs, especially those interested in RSS, independent publishing and thoughtful takes on AI. Readers looking for tutorials or documentation will find essays and opinions rather than structured courses. The mix of technical and personal material means the archive is best browsed by topic rather than read in order.
A practical next step
If you want a sample of the site's range, start with a technical post such as "Breaking down circular dependencies in JavaScript," then a reflective one such as "Quality vs quantity in the age of AI." If the writing fits how you think, subscribe by RSS rather than checking back manually—fitting, given the site's repeated case for RSS. For comparison, other long-running developer blogs with a similar essay-plus-links format include CSS-Tricks and Josh W. Comeau.
What topics does Bryan Braun write about on his blog?
Bryan Braun's blog covers frontend development and web craft alongside personal essays on technology, habits and family life, often mixing the two. The recent-post list shows three recurring strands:
- Web development and tooling: JavaScript problems (circular dependencies), Git quirks, VSCode configuration, RSS and
/nowpages, and scaling code review. - Technology and its effects: AI usage and writing, AI website builders, rejecting recommendation algorithms, and why some technology should be invisible.
- Personal reflection and side projects: weight-loss milestones, yearly "Made in…" recaps, running a family Minecraft server, and lessons from side projects like One Million Checkboxes.
A practical way to use the blog: if you work on the frontend, start with the technical posts (the JavaScript dependency breakdown or the VSCode notes) for concrete fixes; if you're weighing whether to adopt a tool or habit, the essays give a considered personal take rather than tutorials. For a broader set of developer perspectives on similar themes, CSS-Tricks and Josh W. Comeau are useful complements.
How can I follow or subscribe to Bryan Braun's blog posts?
The site lists a "Recent Posts" feed-style archive but does not display an obvious subscribe button in the supplied page evidence. The most reliable way to follow new posts is to subscribe to the blog's RSS feed, which Bryan Braun has written about favoring ("Doubling down on RSS"). Add the site's feed URL to a feed reader such as Feedly, Inoreader or NetNewsWire; new posts then arrive without email or an account on the blog itself.
If you prefer email, check the site footer or an individual post page for a newsletter signup, since many personal blogs place it there rather than in the header. For occasional reading, bookmark the Recent Posts list and revisit monthly—posts appear roughly every few weeks, with recurring "Links" roundups and yearly "Made in" recaps.
A practical next step: open Bryan Braun in a browser, view the page source or look for an RSS icon, and paste the feed address into your reader. As general advice, RSS suits readers who want everything in one place and no inbox clutter; email suits those who rarely open a reader.
What has Bryan Braun built or made in recent years?
Bryan Braun's recent output is mainly writing and small web experiments rather than a single flagship product. His site's post titles show a steady stream of essays, link roundups and year-in-review pieces, plus a recurring "Made in [year]" series (2023, 2024, 2025) that catalogues his own projects. The one named project in the recent archive is one Million Checkboxes, discussed in an August 2024 post about viral success, alongside practical web work such as setting up a /now page with an RSS feed and breaking down circular dependencies in JavaScript.
What the titles suggest
- Essays and commentary: topics range from AI usage and website builders to code review, RSS and rejecting recommendation algorithms.
- Personal experiments: the "Made in" posts are the best entry point if you want to see what he actually built each year, since they collect projects in one place.
- Teaching-style posts: Git IDs, VSCode configuration and JavaScript dependency problems point to hands-on developer writing rather than product launches.
A useful next step is to open the most recent "Made in 2025" post first, then work backward through earlier editions to see how his projects evolved; the AI usage statement from October 2026 is worth reading alongside them for context on how he approaches new tools. For comparison, other developer-writer sites with project logs include Simon Willison and Josh W. Comeau.
What are Bryan Braun's views on AI and its role in development and writing?
Bryan Braun treats AI as a tool whose value depends on how deliberately it is used, not as an automatic improvement to development or writing. His recent posts return to this theme repeatedly: an "AI usage statement" for his own site, "Quality vs quantity in the age of AI," "AIs can write for us but will we actually want them to?," "Augmented Development with AI," and "Afraid of AI." The through-line is skepticism about output volume and enthusiasm about considered, bounded use.
Development
The "augmented development" framing suggests AI as an assistant to a developer's own judgment—useful for accelerating parts of the work while the person remains responsible for understanding the problem. That aligns with his separate post "You can't fix a problem you don't understand," which is general advice but sets a clear limit: speed tools don't substitute for comprehension. His "AI usage statement" is the most concrete signal that he prefers disclosing how AI is used rather than either embracing it uncritically or rejecting it outright.
Writing
On writing, his question—whether we'll actually want AI-written text—points to reader experience and authorship rather than capability. The "quality vs quantity" piece implies the risk he sees: AI makes producing more text cheap, while the scarce thing is writing worth reading. For someone deciding whether to use AI for drafting a blog post or documentation, his stance suggests a test: does the tool help you say something you understand and stand behind, or just increase output?
A practical next step
Read the AI usage statement first, since it states his own boundaries directly, then "Quality vs quantity in the age of AI" for the reasoning behind them. If you're weighing AI in your own workflow, use his disclosure habit as a model: decide what you'll use it for, what you won't, and say so where readers can see it. More of his writing is at Bryan Braun.
What advice does Bryan Braun share about web development and personal projects?
Bryan Braun's site reads less like a tutorial archive and more like a working journal: short essays on frontend craft, side projects, tools and the habits around them. The advice that comes through across the recent post list is practical and often contrarian toward hype—understand a problem before trying to fix it, be skeptical of AI-generated output even while using AI tools, and treat personal projects as a place to practice judgment rather than to chase scale.
Recurring themes on the site
- Diagnosis before solutions. The post "You can't fix a problem you don't understand" makes the case that debugging and refactoring start with accurate mental models, not with reaching for a framework or a rewrite.
- Standards where they matter. "Raise your standards for important things; lower them for unimportant things" is a triage rule for code review, tooling choices and personal projects alike: spend scrutiny on what carries weight.
- Small, steady contributions. "Microcontributions" and the recurring "Made in [year]" roundups suggest favoring many small shipped things over a few grand plans—echoed by "You are not your grand plans."
- Tooling that disappears. "Technology you don't have to think about" and "Capability makes your life simpler" argue for choosing tools that reduce cognitive overhead, which is a useful lens when picking a static site generator or an editor setup.
- Ownership of your publishing. Posts on RSS, rejecting the algorithm and a
/nowpage with an RSS feed point toward owning your content and distribution rather than renting reach from a platform. - AI as an assistant, not an author. "Augmented Development with AI," "Quality vs quantity in the age of AI" and "AIs can write for us but will we actually want them to?" frame AI as a productivity aid whose output still needs human standards applied.
A concrete reader scenario
If you are starting a personal site or a side project, a Braun-style approach would be: pick a small, finishable scope, choose boring tools you won't have to think about, publish an RSS feed so readers aren't dependent on an algorithm, and write up what you learned as you go. The value compounds in the writing and the shipped artifacts, not in the polish of the stack.
For adjacent perspectives on personal sites and the indie web, see Jim Nielsen's Blog and Lee Robinson.
User reviews (0)