Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

ciechanow.ski No paid content found

Categories: Other

Interactive articles about science and engineering.

Visit website

Updated: 2026-10-01 10:02 Language: English (default) Access: Normal

Profile views 0 Outbound visits 0
Bartosz Ciechanowski Full homepage screenshot
Editorial Review

Website Review

What is Bartosz Ciechanowski?

Bartosz Ciechanowski is a personal website that publishes interactive articles explaining science and engineering topics. Instead of static text with a few diagrams, each article embeds manipulable simulations: you drag, zoom, and move sliders to change a viewpoint or a moment in time, and the explanation updates as you do.

The site describes itself simply as "interactive articles about science and engineering," and the range of subjects follows that description rather than a single narrow field — physics, astronomy, mathematics and engineering mechanics all appear. The author's name is the site's name, so this is one person's body of explanatory work rather than a magazine, course platform or company publication.

What an article actually feels like

The Moon article is a useful example. It opens with the Moon as seen from space, which you can drag to change your angle, plus a slider for date and time. It then moves to a panorama of the sky from a point on Earth, where you drag to change your viewing direction and adjust sliders to watch the Moon's position shift across days and hours. A small figurine on a globe can be dragged to another location, and a button can place it at your current position if the browser permits.

That structure is the point: abstract ideas about orbital motion, illumination and apparent wobble become something you test by moving the controls yourself. The writing still carries the explanation, but the demonstration is the primary teaching device.

Who gets the most from it

  • Curious non-specialists who bounced off textbook treatments and want to build intuition by experimenting.
  • Students using an article alongside a course, particularly for spatial or mechanical topics where a static figure is hard to read.
  • Teachers and explainers looking for a reference model of how to make a technical idea explorable.
  • Programmers and designers interested in how interactive explanations are built, since the craft is as visible as the content.

The trade-off is that it suits patient, hands-on reading. If you want a quick factual summary or a structured syllabus with exercises and assessment, a conventional reference or course will serve you better. There is also no substitute for a textbook when you need formal derivations and problem sets.

How to decide whether to spend time there

Pick one article on a topic you already understand reasonably well and work through it with the controls. If the interaction teaches you something a paragraph alone would not — a relationship between variables, a change over time, a three-dimensional geometry — the site's approach is worth your attention for harder subjects too. If you find yourself only reading the prose and ignoring the sliders, the format is not adding much for you.

For comparison, Bartosz Ciechanowski sits closest to other interactive-explanation projects such as Distill for machine-learning research writing, while Explorable Explanations collects interactive work from many authors. three.js is the kind of browser technology behind many such simulations, if you are more interested in building one than reading one.

How can I use the interactive simulations to understand the Moon's orbit and phases?

The site’s Moon article is built around two linked kinds of interactive simulation: a space view where you can drag the camera around the Moon, and an Earth-based sky view where you control date, time and viewing direction. The first helps with geometry (what the orbit and lighting look like from outside), the second with observation (where the Moon actually appears in your sky and how its lit face changes over hours and days).

What each simulation is good for

  • Space view, draggable camera: Drag to orbit the Moon and see craters and mountains from different angles. Use it to build intuition for why the Moon’s appearance from Earth depends on the Sun–Earth–Moon geometry, not on the Moon changing shape.
  • Date and time slider: Move through days and hours to watch the Moon travel an arc across the sky and almost complete a loop around Earth over one day. This is the fastest way to connect “one day” with “one orbit” without waiting for real nights.
  • Sky panorama: Drag the panorama to look above and below the horizon, and use the arrow to locate the Moon. This shows how much of the Moon’s daily path is above your horizon and how that changes with time.
  • Location figurine: Drag the figurine on the globe, or let the page place it at your current location, to compare how the sky looks from different places on Earth. This is useful for understanding why the Moon’s path and phase timing are local, not universal.
  • Zoom and lock on the Moon: The article zooms in and locks the camera on the Moon so you can see its apparent rotation over a single day and a visible wobble over many days. That wobble is what occasionally exposes parts of the far-side edges, even though we normally see only one side.

A practical way to use them together

  1. Start in the space view and drag around the Moon until you can predict which side is lit.
  2. Switch to the sky view, set your location and a date, then step the time slider through one day. Note when the Moon rises, when it is highest and when it sets.
  3. Step the date forward across about a month and watch the illuminated fraction change. Try to predict the next phase before moving the slider.
  4. Return to the space view and reproduce the same date and time. Check whether your mental model of the Sun–Earth–Moon alignment matches what the simulation shows.

Trade-offs and audience

The simulations reward curiosity and repeated play; they are less useful if you want a single static diagram or a quick answer. The space view gives you freedom of motion you never have from Earth, which makes orbital geometry clearer but can make it harder to relate to what you see outside. The sky view is more directly observational, but the Moon is small and easy to lose, which is why the article zooms and locks the camera. The article is in English and assumes you are comfortable dragging sliders and reading a globe; it suits students, teachers preparing demonstrations and anyone who learns better by manipulating a model than by reading a textbook.

If you want a concrete next step, open the Moon article and try this: pick tonight’s date, set the figurine to your location, and note the Moon’s position and phase. Then move the date forward one week and try to explain the change using only the space view before checking the sky view again. For background on the author’s other interactive science and engineering articles, see Bartosz Ciechanowski.

What interactive articles about science and engineering are available on this website?

Bartosz Ciechanowski publishes long-form interactive articles that explain science and engineering topics through manipulable simulations rather than static diagrams. The site's own description frames the collection that way: "Interactive articles about science and engineering." The clearest documented example is "Moon" (December 17, 2024), which walks through the Moon's orbit and its appearance in our sky.

What the Moon article actually lets you do

  • Drag a 3D view of the Moon to change your vantage point, and use a slider to move through dates and times.
  • Pan a sky panorama above and below the horizon, with an arrow marking the Moon's position.
  • Drag a figurine on a globe to see the sky from different locations on Earth, or let the page place it at your current location if your browser permits.
  • Watch how the Moon's illumination changes over days, and see its apparent rotation across a single day and its wobble over many days.

That mix — a free camera, a time slider, a location control — is the pattern the site applies to its subjects: you build intuition by adjusting variables and watching the result, not by reading a derivation first.

Who gets the most out of it

Readers who already know some physics or math but want a spatial, hands-on feel for a concept. A student who can recite that the Moon shows one face to Earth may still be surprised by the daily rotation and multi-day wobble the article demonstrates; the simulation makes those effects visible in seconds. Teachers can use individual demos as in-class illustrations. Casual readers should expect to spend real time with each article, since the interactivity rewards experimenting rather than skimming.

How to choose what to read

If you want… Look for
A concrete worked example of the format The Moon article
Topics matched to your course or curiosity The site's archive/index of articles
Shorter, more visual pieces Shorter entries in the archive

Next step: open the Moon article first as a format sample, then browse the archive to find a topic you're currently studying. If the style clicks, similar interactive-explanation work appears at Distill and Explorable Explanations, though their coverage and depth differ from this site's.

How does the Moon's libration allow us to see more of its surface?

Libration is the slight rocking of the Moon that lets observers on Earth see a bit around its edges, so we see more than exactly half of the lunar surface over time. The Moon still keeps one face pointed generally toward us, but its orientation and our viewing angle shift enough to expose extra slivers near the limb.

Bartosz Ciechanowski's interactive article demonstrates this directly. In the page evidence, he notes that across a single day the Moon seems to rotate, and over many days it "quite visibly wobbles," allowing us to "occasionally see some hidden parts on the 'edges' of the Moon" while it still shows only one side overall. The article's sliders for date, time and viewing location let you watch that wobble change the visible edge. You can explore it at Bartosz Ciechanowski.

What causes the wobble

The effect comes from several small mismatches between the Moon's rotation and its orbit:

  • Libration in longitude: The Moon's orbital speed varies while its spin is nearly uniform, so it appears to turn slightly ahead or behind.
  • Libration in latitude: The Moon's axis is tilted relative to its orbit, so we sometimes look slightly over one pole and then the other.
  • Diurnal libration: Earth's rotation carries you from one side of the planet to the other during the night, changing your viewing angle by about the width of Earth.
  • Parallax: The Moon's distance and your position on Earth's surface shift the apparent edge slightly.

Why it matters

Libration is the reason a long-term observer can eventually map more than 50 percent of the Moon. It is also useful when planning observations: a crater or mare near the limb may be invisible on one night and clearly presented on another. For a practical next step, open the article's panorama, set the date slider to move across many days, and watch the arrow and the visible edge; then compare that with a simple Moon-phase calendar to see when a limb feature is best placed.

Can I simulate the Moon's position in the sky for my location and time?

Yes. On Bartosz Ciechanowski, the Moon article includes an interactive sky simulation where you set your viewing direction and scrub through days and hours to see where the Moon sits above or below your horizon. A figurine on a small globe can be dragged to any location on Earth, and if your browser permits it, a button places that figurine at your current location automatically. The page also lets you click or tap to follow an on-screen arrow pointing to the Moon.

What you can actually do

  • Drag a panorama to change your viewing direction, including below the horizon.
  • Move sliders for date and time to watch the Moon's position shift across days and hours in local time.
  • Relocate the figurine to see the sky from a different place on Earth.
  • Use the automatic current-location option as a shortcut to your own sky.
  • Switch to a separate space view where you can drag the Moon around and pan the camera freely to inspect craters and mountains from any angle.

How the two views differ

View Best for Trade-off
Earth-based panorama Checking where the Moon is in your sky now or at another hour Limited to the sky visible from one spot; you can't see the far side
Space-floating view Understanding the Moon's shape, surface and orientation Not what you'd see standing outside; you must mentally map it back to your sky

A practical way to use it

If you're planning to observe the Moon tonight, first set the figurine to your location, then drag the time slider forward hour by hour. Watch the arrow and note when the Moon sits comfortably above the horizon and how its illumination changes over the following days. Then switch to the space view to see why the lit portion looks the way it does from your angle. For an independent check of rise and set times at your exact coordinates, compare with a dedicated almanac or planetarium tool such as timeanddate.com or Stellarium.

How can I support Bartosz Ciechanowski's work on interactive articles?

The site itself lists a Patreon page among its links, so becoming a Patreon supporter is the most direct way to fund new interactive articles. The page also links to an email address and social accounts, which are better suited to feedback, corrections or sharing an article than to financial support.

Practical ways to help

  • Patreon: The recurring route the site points to; useful if you want to support ongoing article production rather than a one-off.
  • Share a specific article: These pieces are built to be played with, so send one to a teacher, student or colleague who would actually use it. A link to the Moon article, for example, is more persuasive than a general recommendation.
  • Send a correction or suggestion: Technical accuracy matters in this kind of work, and a concrete, well-sourced note is genuinely useful.
  • Use it in teaching: If you run a class, assigning one of the simulations gives the work a practical audience and shows what the format can do.

What not to expect

There is no evidence of paid tiers, gated content or a shop on the site, so treat support as voluntary patronage of an independent writer rather than a purchase. If recurring payments do not suit you, sharing the work and using it in your own teaching or study are the next most useful things you can do.

Start with the support link on the site's own page, then pick one article and pass it to someone who will use it.

Related questions

More questions →
What Does Engineering at Netflix Actually Look Like?

Engineering at Netflix is a decentralized, senior-heavy model built on the company's "freedom and responsibility" culture: small teams of experienced engineers own problems end to end, make their own technical decisions, and are trusted to act in the company's interest without heavy process. That model suits people who want autonomy and can operate without close direction. It is documented publicly through the Netflix TechBlog, which covers the company's engineering work, culture, and product developments. The sections below explain how the model is organized, what it looks like in practice, and where it differs from a typical tech company.

How engineering is organized

Netflix's engineering structure follows from its culture rather than from a fixed org chart. The key traits:

  • Small, empowered teams. Work is organized around problems and services rather than large functional departments. Teams own their area end to end, including design, build, and operation.
  • Decisions made close to the work. Engineers are expected to make technical calls themselves instead of routing them through layers of approval. This is the "freedom" half of freedom and responsibility.
  • High seniority density. The model assumes engineers can self-direct, so hiring skews toward experienced people who need little supervision.
  • Responsibility as the counterweight. Freedom is paired with accountability: if you make the call, you own the outcome and the consequences.

The practical effect is fewer coordination layers and more individual ownership than in companies that rely on centralized architecture boards or stage-gate approvals.

Core practices and how they shape the work

Freedom and responsibility

This is the cultural mechanism behind most engineering decisions at Netflix. Engineers are trusted to choose tools, designs, and priorities, and are expected to use good judgment about cost, risk, and impact. It replaces rules with context: instead of a policy for every case, people are given the information to decide well.

Context over control

Because decisions are decentralized, alignment comes from shared context — goals, constraints, and data — rather than from directives. Leaders set context; engineers act within it.

Ownership of outcomes

Teams are accountable for the systems they build, including reliability and cost. That pushes engineering decisions toward what actually works in production, not just what looks good in a design doc.

Candor

Direct, specific feedback is part of the culture, which matters for a model that depends on people correcting course quickly without formal escalation.

Real engineering problems Netflix solves

Netflix's engineering work clusters around a few hard, large-scale problems:

Problem area What engineering has to handle
Streaming Delivering video reliably to a very large, globally distributed audience
Personalization Recommending content that keeps members engaged
Reliability Keeping systems available and resilient at scale
Data and experimentation Measuring what works and feeding it back into product decisions

These are the kinds of problems the TechBlog documents: how systems are built, what tradeoffs were made, and what the team learned.

How the TechBlog fits in

The Netflix TechBlog is the public record of this work. It publishes posts on engineering efforts, company culture, and product developments, which makes it a useful primary source if you want to see how the culture translates into actual technical decisions rather than just reading the values statement. For anyone evaluating whether this environment fits them, the blog is the most direct evidence available of how Netflix engineers think and write about their own work.

How it differs from typical tech-company engineering

  • Less process, more judgment. Fewer approvals and gates; more reliance on individual engineers to decide well.
  • Decentralized by default. Authority sits with teams, not with central architecture or program functions.
  • Seniority as a precondition. The model works because it assumes self-direction; it is a poor fit for environments that need close guidance or highly standardized procedures.
  • Accountability is explicit. Autonomy is not license — you own the results.

Who this model suits

It fits engineers who are comfortable owning ambiguous problems, making decisions without a clear playbook, and being held accountable for outcomes. It fits less well if you prefer defined processes, close direction, or a clear separation between deciding and doing. The honest test is whether the TechBlog's posts describe the kind of work you want to do — that is the closest public proxy for what the day-to-day actually looks like.

What Is an Interactive Music Generator and How Does It Work?

An interactive music generator is software that creates music in real time from rules or algorithms, while letting you change what you hear as it plays. It differs from a fixed recording, which is identical every time, and from purely generative music, which may run on its own without your input. Blossom by Alex Bainter is a browser-based example: a "lovely interactive music generator" you open and influence rather than a track you simply press play on. Use this guide if you want to understand the mechanism before trying one, or if you are deciding whether an interactive generator fits how you want to make or explore music.

Interactive vs. fixed vs. generative music

The three categories differ mainly in who decides what happens next and when.

Type Who shapes the result When it is decided Repeatability
Fixed recording Composer/performer, in advance Before you listen Identical each play
Purely generative music The algorithm/rules While it runs Varies; you may only start/stop it
Interactive music generator You plus the algorithm In real time, as you act Varies with your input

A fixed recording is a snapshot. A purely generative piece is a process you observe. An interactive generator is a process you steer — the algorithm still supplies notes and structure, but your actions change the outcome while it is happening.

The real-time feedback loop

What makes a generator "interactive" is a loop, not just a play button:

  1. You act — adjust a control, toggle an element, or change a parameter.
  2. The system interprets — the software maps your action to a musical rule (which notes, which rhythm, which layer).
  3. Sound is produced — the browser synthesizes or schedules audio immediately.
  4. You hear the result — and respond by acting again.

Because step 4 feeds back into step 1, the music is co-authored in the moment. If a tool only lets you press start and stop, it is generative but not very interactive; the more of the middle steps you can influence, the more interactive it feels.

How the algorithm produces notes and texture

An interactive generator does not store a finished song. It stores rules, then applies them on the fly. Typical ingredients:

  • Note selection — a scale, mode, or set of pitches the system draws from, so results stay musical rather than random noise.
  • Rhythm and timing — intervals or probability that decide when the next event fires.
  • Layering — separate parts (a bass, a melody, a pad) that can be added or removed.
  • Randomness with limits — variation that keeps each pass different while staying inside the chosen rules.

The interaction is meaningful because your changes alter these rules or their weights, not just the volume. That is why the same generator can sound calm one moment and busy the next.

Blossom as a concrete example

Blossom is described as "a lovely interactive music generator" by Alex Bainter, and it runs in the browser. That combination matters:

  • Browser-based means no install step — you open the page and it plays.
  • Interactive means the point is to engage with it live, not to download a finished file.
  • Generative means the music is produced by rules rather than being a fixed recording.

Treat it as a live instrument or environment to explore. The value is in the ongoing variation and your influence over it, not in a single repeatable output.

Common limitations to expect

Interactive browser generators trade control for immediacy, so set expectations:

  • Browser audio support — playback depends on your browser handling audio correctly; if sound does not start, the browser's audio permissions or autoplay behavior is the usual cause.
  • No export by default — many such tools, including browser-based ones, focus on live listening rather than saving a file. Do not assume you can download the result unless the tool offers it.
  • Less precise control — you influence tendencies and layers rather than editing individual notes like in a DAW.
  • Session-bound results — because output is generated live, a passage you liked may not be exactly reproducible.

How to start experimenting

  1. Open the generator in a modern browser and allow audio if prompted.
  2. Start playback and listen to the default state before changing anything — learn the baseline.
  3. Change one thing at a time and listen for how the music responds. This teaches you the mapping between controls and sound.
  4. Push it to extremes — go from minimal to dense — to find the range you enjoy.
  5. Let it run and interact occasionally rather than constantly; generative systems often reward patience.
  6. Note what you like in words (calm, busy, sparse) so you can return to that state, since exact reproduction may not be possible.

If you want precise, editable, exportable tracks, a DAW is the better fit. If you want to explore evolving music and shape it as it plays, an interactive generator like Blossom is the right kind of tool.

What Is Physics and How Do You Follow Physics Research News?

Physics is the study of matter, energy, force, and motion—how the universe behaves at scales from subatomic particles to galaxies. You can follow current physics research by reading department news pages, colloquium announcements, and public science feeds, and by learning to tell observation, experiment, and theory apart. This guide explains what the field covers and how to read physics news without overinterpreting it.

What physics actually studies

Physics looks for the basic rules that govern how things move and interact. That includes:

  • Mechanics — motion, forces, momentum, and energy, from falling objects to orbital dynamics.
  • Electromagnetism — electric and magnetic fields, light, and radiation.
  • Thermodynamics and statistical mechanics — heat, entropy, and how large collections of particles behave.
  • Quantum mechanics — behavior at atomic and subatomic scales, where particles also behave like waves.
  • Relativity — space, time, and gravity at high speeds and large masses.
  • Astrophysics and astronomy — applying physics to stars, planets, and the cosmos.

Adjacent fields overlap heavily. Acoustics, for example, is applied mechanics and wave physics: it studies how sound is generated, travels, and affects structures, people, and wildlife. Astronomy is often treated as a separate department but rests on the same physical laws.

A common misconception is that physics is only math or only cosmology. In practice it spans tabletop experiments, engineering-adjacent measurement work, and observational astronomy.

How to read a physics research news item

Physics news mixes several kinds of claims. Sorting them helps you judge what is actually being reported.

Type What it means What to check
Observation Something seen or measured, often with uncertainty Was it a single event or a repeatable pattern?
Experiment A controlled test of a hypothesis What were the controls and error bars?
Theory / model A mathematical prediction, not yet confirmed Has it been tested, or is it a proposal?
Simulation A computer model of a system What assumptions went into the model?

For example, a photo showing the Sun with silhouettes of both the International Space Station and an airplane is an observation—a planned, sub-second exposure. The photographer's estimate that such an alignment is about 30 million to one is a statistical claim about that specific image, not a physical law. Reading it as "physics proves rare alignments" would be a misread.

Where to find physics talks, papers, and public resources

University department sites are a practical entry point. A typical physics and astronomy department page collects:

  • Colloquium and seminar listings — scheduled talks, often open online, with titles and abstracts.
  • Selected publications — recent papers by faculty and students.
  • News and events — awards, outreach, and department updates.
  • Public science feeds — for astronomy, NASA's APOD (Astronomy Picture of the Day) is a widely used daily image with an explanation.

When you open a colloquium listing, the abstract usually states the question, the method, and why it matters. That structure is a good template for reading any physics talk or paper summary.

Common pitfalls when following physics news

  • Treating a model as settled fact. A theory that fits data is not the same as a confirmed mechanism.
  • Ignoring scale and uncertainty. Numbers in physics come with error ranges and conditions.
  • Assuming physics equals astronomy. Acoustics, materials, and quantum information are just as central.
  • Skipping the method. The "how" often determines how much a result can be trusted.

If you want a reliable routine: pick one department news page and one public feed, read the abstract or caption first, then check whether the claim is an observation, an experiment, or a theory. That habit will let you follow physics research without needing a specialist background.

Website Overview

Identifiable technologies and additional version or configuration signals make the service easier to fingerprint, which may help targeted scanners narrow their checks. An established domain and managed infrastructure suggest continuity of operations and may support dependable delivery, although neither guarantees service quality.

Domain and Registration

Registered in 2018, this domain has about 7 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The registrar is Tucows Domains Inc., a widely used domain service provider. The domain uses the common .ski extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

Nameservers are provided by DigitalOcean, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Fastmail email service. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. SPF and DMARC are configured. DKIM status is unknown. DNSSEC signatures were not detected, so this additional DNS authenticity protection is not confirmed.

TLS and Certificates

The certificate uses an RSA 2048-bit public key, offering broad client compatibility. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, commonly associated with automated certificate services. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

The Server header exposes the software version: nginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu). This makes version-targeted checks easier, but is not proof of an exploitable vulnerability. The checked browser-security headers were not detected, leaving fewer explicit browser-side safeguards. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. No explicit CDN or WAF marker was found in the response headers.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Google Analytics, nginx 1.18.0, with exact versions exposed for 1 technologies. These details can narrow vulnerability checks, although exposure alone is not a vulnerability.

Search and Social Sharing

No homepage canonical URL was detected. If duplicate URLs exist, consolidation may be less explicit. No Open Graph metadata was detected, so social previews may depend on platform inference. The title has 20 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 51 characters. The observed directives allow indexing and link following.

Hosting and Email

DNSDigitalOcean
HostingDigitalOcean, LLC
EmailFastmail
Location United States flagSanta Clara, California, United States 143.198.60.216

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionInteractive articles about science and engineering.
Canonical URLNot detected
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter CardNot detected

Unknown

No robots.txt found

Registration details RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarTucows Domains Inc.
Registered2018-11-23
Expires2027-11-23
Domain statusclient transfer prohibited、client update prohibited
Nameserversns1.digitalocean.com、ns2.digitalocean.com、ns3.digitalocean.com
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Aciechanow.ski143.198.60.216576—
AAAAciechanow.ski2604:a880:4:1d0::574:50002615—
MXciechanow.skiin1-smtp.messagingengine.com1440010
MXciechanow.skiin2-smtp.messagingengine.com1440020
NSciechanow.skins1.digitalocean.com1800—
NSciechanow.skins2.digitalocean.com1800—
NSciechanow.skins3.digitalocean.com1800—
TXTciechanow.skiv=spf1 include:spf.messagingengine.com ?all3600—
DMARC_dmarc.ciechanow.skiv=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:[email protected]3600—

TLS and certificates

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectciechanow.ski
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Valid until2026-11-05T16:32 · Remaining when checked: 35 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html
servernginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu)

Identified technologies

Google Analyticsnginx 1.18.0