简体中文
English
Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is The Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder in Health and Disease?
The Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder in Health and Disease is the full text of a medical monograph by Dr. A. D. Keet, first published by Springer-Verlag in 1993 and later placed online in full with the publisher's agreement. It is a detailed anatomical and clinical study of the pylorus—the valve region between the stomach and duodenum—organised into 39 chapters that move from basic structure to specific diseases.
Its central argument is that the pylorus behaves less like a simple ring and more like a sphincteric cylinder: a muscular segment with length, tone and coordinated behaviour, not just a narrow gate that opens and closes. That reframing matters because it changes how you interpret what you see on imaging, at endoscopy or on motility recordings.
What the chapters cover
- Structure and physiology: stomach and duodenal walls, mucosa and submucosa, blood and lymphatic supply, nerves, regulatory peptides, and the electrical potential difference at the gastroduodenal junction.
- How the pylorus is examined: ultrasonography of normal anatomy and of motility, the pylorus at rest and at gastroscopy, manometry, myoelectric activity, radionuclide studies of gastric emptying, and radiographic examination of normal motility.
- Disorders: pylorospasm, congenital anomalies, infantile and adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, focal hypertrophy and spasm, nausea, retching and vomiting, duodenogastric reflux, gastritis and erosions, gastric and duodenal ulceration, pyloroduodenal fistula, reflux disease, pyloric carcinoma, lymphoma, polyps, diabetes mellitus, mucosal prolapse and corrosive injury.
A distinctive feature is the author's insistence that radiology (barium meal or upper gastrointestinal series) was used as an investigative tool rather than a purely diagnostic one. Keet explicitly notes that endoscopy remains the investigation of choice in upper gastrointestinal pathology, while arguing that a barium study can show motility, filling and emptying behaviour that a direct look at the surface cannot. The work is comparative throughout: findings from gastroscopy, ultrasound, manometry, scintigraphy, myoelectric recording and roentgenology are set side by side rather than ranked.
Who it suits
- Radiologists and gastroenterologists wanting a reasoned account of why the pylorus looks and behaves as it does on a barium study.
- Researchers and students in gastrointestinal anatomy, motility or emptying who need a citable, chapter-level reference on a narrow region.
- Clinicians preparing teaching material on pyloric stenosis, reflux or ulceration, who want the historical anatomical descriptions of Cunningham, Forssell and Torgersen brought together with modern investigations.
It is not a quick-reference handbook or a patient-facing guide. The prose is dense, the chapters are long, and the copyright notice restricts reuse: the full work is available to read online, but reproduction or storage in another system requires prior permission from the current publishers. The original project came out of the Department of Roentgenology at Tygerberg Hospital, the academic hospital of the University of Stellenbosch.
A practical next step
If you are preparing for a case involving delayed gastric emptying or a suspected pyloric problem, start with the chapter on the pylorus at rest and then the radiographic examination of normal motility. Reading the normal behaviour first makes the later chapters on pylorospasm and stenosis far easier to follow. For the wider clinical picture, compare with general resources such as Radiopaedia or PubMed when you need current literature beyond this 1993 text.
How does the sphincteric cylinder concept differ from the traditional sphincteric ring view of the pylorus?
The site argues that the pylorus is best understood as a sphincteric cylinder rather than a simple sphincteric ring. In the traditional ring view, the pylorus is essentially a narrow circular band that opens and closes like a valve. The cylinder concept, by contrast, treats the pyloric region as a longer muscular segment with a three-dimensional structure, so its behaviour depends on the coordinated activity of that whole segment, not just a single narrow ring.
The practical difference is what each model predicts about normal and abnormal function. A ring model focuses attention on whether the valve is open or closed at a given moment. A cylinder model draws attention to how the segment as a whole changes shape, tone and position, and how those changes relate to gastric motility, trituration, emptying of liquids and solids, and duodeno-gastric reflux. The site presents the concept as a way to reconcile findings from several investigations, including gastroscopy, ultrasonography, manometry, radionuclide scintigraphy, myoelectric activity and roentgenology, rather than relying on any single method.
For a reader trying to decide which view is more useful, the test is explanatory reach. If a ring model accounts for the clinical or physiological observation at hand, it may be sufficient. If the observation involves the behaviour of the pyloric region over time, or seems inconsistent with a simple open-or-closed valve, the cylinder concept offers a more detailed framework. The full argument, including the anatomical and pathological chapters, is available at The Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder in Health and Disease.
What role does roentgenology play in investigating pyloric function compared to endoscopy?
Roentgenology — the barium meal or upper gastrointestinal series — is positioned here as an investigative tool rather than a diagnostic one. The distinction matters: rather than producing a yes/no answer about a lesion, it is used to observe how the pyloric region behaves over time.
The site's central argument is that the pylorus should be understood as a sphincteric cylinder rather than a simple sphincteric ring. That anatomical claim shapes the imaging choice. A cylinder has length, walls and a sequence of contractions; those are dynamic, functional properties. A single endoscopic view shows surface appearance at one moment, which is well suited to detecting mucosal disease but less suited to tracking motility.
How the two approaches differ in practice
| Aspect | Roentgenology (barium meal) | Endoscopy |
|---|---|---|
| Primary strength | Observing function and motility over time | Direct visualisation and biopsy of mucosa |
| Viewpoint | Lumen and wall behaviour as contrast passes | Mucosal surface from within |
| Suited to | Motility, emptying, reflux, structural anomalies | Ulceration, gastritis, carcinoma, polyps |
| Limitation | Indirect; relies on contrast and interpretation | Snapshot in time; limited dynamic information |
The site is explicit that this is not a claim of general superiority. It states plainly that endoscopy is the investigation of choice in upper gastrointestinal pathology. The case for roentgenology is narrower and contextual: within this research programme, it offered advantages for studying function that endoscopy did not.
What the book actually examines
The chapter list shows the scope of that investigative use. Separate chapters cover radiographic examination of normal motility, the pylorus at gastroscopy, manometry, myoelectric activity, ultrasonography of pyloric motility and gastric emptying, and radionuclides in gastric emptying. The findings from these methods are discussed and compared rather than treated in isolation. Clinical chapters then apply the model to pylorospasm, infantile and adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, duodenogastric reflux, gastric and duodenal ulceration, diabetes mellitus and pyloric carcinoma.
A practical way to think about it
If your question is "what is this tissue?" — endoscopy plus biopsy answers it. If your question is "how does this junction behave, and why do symptoms occur when it behaves abnormally?" — a dynamic contrast study, sometimes alongside manometry or scintigraphy, is the more informative starting point. The two are complements, and the site's contribution is a detailed anatomical rationale for why the functional view deserves more weight than a ring-shaped model of the pylorus would suggest.
For readers who want the underlying anatomy, begin with the chapters on the walls of the stomach and duodenum, the anatomy of the pyloric ring, and whether the pylorus is open or closed at rest — those establish the cylinder concept before the clinical chapters apply it. The full text is available at The Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder in Health and Disease.
How does the pyloric sphincteric cylinder relate to conditions like gastric ulceration and diabetes mellitus?
The site treats the pyloric sphincteric cylinder as a muscular segment, not just a narrow ring, and then asks how its behaviour changes in disease. In its account, gastric ulceration and diabetes mellitus are both discussed as conditions in which pyloric function may be altered, rather than as diseases caused by the pylorus. The relevant chapters are 29–30 (gastric and duodenal ulceration) and 37 (diabetes mellitus); the site also examines gastritis, erosions, reflux and gastric emptying, which are the mechanisms that connect the pylorus to those conditions.
Gastric ulceration. The site's interest is mainly mechanical and functional: how the cylinder's contractions, resting state and emptying behaviour appear in people with ulceration, and how those findings compare across barium studies, endoscopy, manometry and myoelectric recording. A practical reader scenario: a clinician or student preparing a case discussion on a gastric ulcer wants to know whether abnormal pyloric motility is part of the picture or an incidental finding. The site is useful for framing that question; it is not a treatment guide.
Diabetes mellitus. Here the link is gastric emptying and motility. Diabetes can disturb gastric emptying, and the pyloric cylinder is one of the structures involved in regulating outflow. The site discusses diabetes alongside radionuclide and ultrasonographic studies of emptying, so it is most useful if you want the anatomical and physiological background behind delayed or erratic emptying.
How to read it. Start with chapters 11–13 and 19 for the normal anatomy and motility model, then go to 29–30 or 37 depending on your interest. Because the site is a full 1993 monograph placed online, treat it as a detailed historical reference: valuable for concepts and for how investigative methods compare, but not as current clinical guidance. For present-day management, pair it with a current gastroenterology source such as Gut or PubMed.
A quick decision rule: use this site when your question is "what does the pyloric cylinder do, and how do we observe it?" Use a current clinical source when your question is "what should be done for this patient?"
What methods are used to assess pyloric motility and gastric emptying?
The site is a full-text online edition of a 1993 medical monograph, The Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder in Health and Disease by A.D. Keet. Its central argument is that the pylorus behaves as a sphincteric cylinder rather than a simple ring, and it examines that claim through both normal physiology and disease.
Methods discussed across the work
- Roentgenology (barium meal / upper gastrointestinal series) — used here as an investigative rather than purely diagnostic tool, with the author arguing it offers advantages over endoscopy in this specific context.
- Gastroscopy — the pylorus as seen endoscopically, including whether it is open or closed at rest.
- Manometry — pressure recording at the gastroduodenal junction.
- Myoelectric activity — electrical recordings at the gastroduodenal junction.
- Ultrasonography — normal anatomy plus pyloric motility and gastric emptying.
- Radionuclide scintigraphy — radionuclides for investigating gastric emptying.
- Anatomical and histological study — stomach and duodenal walls, submucosa, mucosa, vessels, nerves, and regulatory peptides.
- Electrical potential difference — measured at the gastroduodenal mucosal junction.
How the methods compare in practice
| Method | What it shows | Main trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Barium meal / roentgenology | Motility and morphology over time | Radiation; operator-dependent; less direct mucosal detail |
| Gastroscopy | Mucosal surface and pyloric appearance | Limited dynamic/functional information |
| Manometry | Pressure events at the junction | Catheter-based; indirect picture of structure |
| Myoelectric recording | Electrical rhythm and activity | Specialised; not routine |
| Ultrasonography | Anatomy and emptying, non-invasive | Operator-dependent; limited field |
| Radionuclide scintigraphy | Quantified gastric emptying | Involves tracer; limited anatomical detail |
Reader scenario: a clinician or researcher trying to understand why a patient empties slowly would find the emptying-focused chapters most directly useful, while someone studying pyloric closure would start with the anatomy and manometry sections.
Next step: use the chapter list as a map — begin with the anatomy chapters, then move to the method-specific chapters (ultrasonography, manometry, myoelectric activity, radionuclides) before the disease chapters, since the author's interpretation of disease depends on the anatomy he establishes first. The work is also available in its original published form via Springer.
What congenital anomalies and acquired conditions affect the pyloric sphincteric cylinder?
The site is a full-text online edition of a 1993 monograph by A.D. Keet that treats the pylorus not as a simple ring but as a sphincteric cylinder — a muscular segment whose anatomy and motility explain many gastric and duodenal disorders. Congenital and acquired conditions are covered in separate chapters, which makes the table of contents itself a useful map of the topic.
Congenital anomalies appear in the chapter on congenital anomalies (Chapter 21), with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (Chapter 23) as the most familiar example. The site also discusses partial or intramural gastric diverticulum (Chapter 22), a structural variant that can be mistaken for other lesions.
Acquired conditions are more numerous and fall into rough groups:
- Motility and functional problems: pylorospasm (Chapter 20); nausea, retching and vomiting (Chapter 26); duodenogastric reflux (Chapter 27).
- Hypertrophy and spasm in adults: adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (Chapter 24); focal hypertrophy and focal spasm of the pyloric musculature (Chapter 25).
- Mucosal and ulcerative disease: gastritis and erosions in the sphincteric cylinder (Chapter 28); gastric ulceration (Chapter 29); duodenal ulceration (Chapter 30).
- Structural complications and other lesions: pyloroduodenal fistula or acquired double pylorus (Chapter 31); pyloric carcinoma (Chapter 33); malignant lymphoma (Chapter 34); sessile polyps (Chapter 36); prolapse of gastric mucosa into the duodenum (Chapter 38); acid corrosive injuries (Chapter 39).
- Systemic and adjacent-region disease: diabetes mellitus (Chapter 37); gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (Chapter 32); malignancy at the gastro-oesophageal junction (Chapter 35).
A useful next step depends on your purpose. If you are a clinician or student, start with the anatomy chapters (3–11) and the chapter on whether the pylorus is open or closed at rest (Chapter 12), because the site's argument is that many of these conditions become clearer once the cylindrical anatomy is understood. If you are researching one condition, go straight to its chapter and then read the paired investigation chapters — for example, ultrasonography of pyloric motility and gastric emptying (Chapter 17) alongside radionuclide investigation of gastric emptying (Chapter 18) — to see how the same process is assessed by different methods.
One trade-off to keep in mind: the work is a single-author treatise from 1993, and the site notes that endoscopy is now the investigation of choice in upper gastrointestinal pathology, while the book's own emphasis is on roentgenology as a research tool. Treat its diagnostic framing as historical and its anatomical reasoning as the durable contribution.
DigitalOcean, LLC
Google Workspace
Slough, United Kingdom
User reviews (0)