Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

reicon.dev

Reicon - Free open-source SVG icons. 2,700+ handcrafted icons for React, Angular, Vue, Svelte, Flutter, Figma & more.

No paid content found
Visit website
Profile views 11 Outbound visits 18 Normal
Reicon Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Icons & Fonts
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
2026
Hosting
VercelInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is Reicon?

Reicon is an open-source icon library distributed as SVG icons, aimed at both designers and developers. According to its own description, it offers more than 2,700 handcrafted icons and provides formats or integrations for React, Angular, Vue, Svelte, Flutter, Figma and other tools.

What that means in practice

  • For developers: you get icons as SVG assets plus framework-specific packages, so you can drop them into a React, Angular, Vue or Svelte project without converting files by hand. Flutter support matters if your team ships mobile apps alongside web.
  • For designers: the Figma availability means you can place and restyle icons on a canvas, then hand the same set to engineering so both sides work from one visual language.
  • For small teams: a single consistent set across web and mobile reduces the "which icon pack did we use here?" problem that shows up when projects borrow from several sources.

How to judge whether it fits

The deciding factors for an icon library are usually coverage, visual consistency and licensing, not raw icon count. Before adopting Reicon, check three things against your own project:

  1. Do the icons you actually need exist — navigation, file types, social, commerce, status?
  2. Does the stroke weight and corner style match your interface, or will it clash with icons you already use?
  3. Does the open-source license fit commercial work, and can you self-host the SVGs?

A quick test: pick ten icons from your current product, search for each in Reicon, and place them next to your existing set in a mock screen. If the mismatch is obvious at that stage, no amount of extra icons will fix it.

For comparison while you evaluate, Lucide and Tabler Icons are established open-source alternatives with similar SVG-plus-framework delivery, which makes them useful benchmarks for coverage and style.

How do I add Reicon icons to a React or Vue project?

Reicon is distributed as an open-source SVG icon library with framework-specific packages, so you install it the same way you would any other icon dependency and then import individual icons into your components.

React

Install the package with your package manager, then import the icon component you need and render it like any other React component. Because icons are imported individually, bundlers such as Vite or webpack can tree-shake unused icons out of your production build — a real advantage over sprite sheets or icon fonts, where you often ship the whole set.

import { SomeIcon } from "reicon-react";

export function SaveButton() {
  return (
    <button>
      <SomeIcon size={20} />
      Save
    </button>
  );
}

Vue

The Vue package works the same way: install it, import the icon into your single-file component, and register or use it directly in the template. If you need the icon in many components, registering it globally in your app entry point avoids repeating imports.

<script setup>
import { SomeIcon } from "reicon-vue";
</script>

<template>
  <SomeIcon :size="20" />
</template>

Choosing between framework packages and raw SVG

Approach Best for Trade-off
Framework package (React/Vue) Apps already using that framework; consistent sizing and props Adds a dependency; icon names must match the package's exports
Copying raw SVG One-off icons, static sites, or when you want zero dependencies You maintain the markup yourself; no shared props for size or color

Practical next step

Check the framework package's README for the exact import names and available props (size, color, stroke width) before wiring icons into a design system, since prop names and defaults vary between icon libraries. If you only need a handful of icons, copying the raw SVG may be simpler than adding a dependency.

For a broader set of options when Reicon doesn't cover a specific glyph, Lucide and Tabler Icons follow similar open-source, per-icon-import models for React and Vue.

Can I use Reicon icons in Figma for design mockups?

Yes. Reicon is distributed as an open-source SVG icon set with a Figma presence, and the library is described as covering Figma alongside React, Angular, Vue, Svelte, and Flutter. For mockup work, that means the icons can live directly on your Figma canvas rather than being exported and re-imported from a separate file.

How designers typically use it

  • Drag from the library: Place icons onto frames as editable vectors, then recolor, resize, or swap strokes without leaving Figma.
  • Keep one source of truth: Use the same icon in the mockup and later in the codebase, which reduces mismatches between design and build.
  • Match icon to context: With a library in the thousands, you can pick a consistent style across navigation, empty states, and settings screens instead of mixing sets.

Trade-offs to weigh

Consideration What it means in practice
Coverage vs. curation A large set gives you options, but you still need to standardize on a subset for a coherent product.
Style fit Handcrafted icons have a specific visual character; check it against your brand before committing.
Framework parity If your team ships React, Vue, or Flutter, using the same set in Figma keeps handoff cleaner.

A practical next step

Build a small Figma page with the 10–15 icons your product actually needs, grouped by function (navigation, actions, status). That gives you a reusable component set and reveals gaps before you design full screens. If you want to compare alternatives, Feather Icons and Lucide are established open-source sets with similar Figma workflows.

What icon formats are included in Reicon?

Reicon provides its icons as SVGs, and the library is packaged for direct use in several development ecosystems rather than as a single generic download. Based on the site's own description, the set covers React, Angular, Vue, Svelte and Flutter, plus a Figma library for designers. In practice, that means the same icon can arrive either as a plain SVG asset or as a framework-ready component, depending on which package you pull in.

What that means per audience

  • Designers get the Figma library, which is the practical route if you need to place, resize and recolor icons on a canvas without exporting files by hand.
  • Web developers get components for React, Angular, Vue and Svelte, so icons can be imported like any other module and styled with the surrounding CSS or component props.
  • App developers get a Flutter package, useful when the same visual language needs to carry from a web build into a mobile one.
  • Everyone else can use the raw SVG files, which is the fallback for static sites, email templates, server-rendered pages or any stack not on that list.

A quick comparison

Format Best for Trade-off
SVG files Any stack, static sites, custom pipelines You handle sizing, color and optimization yourself
Framework components (React, Angular, Vue, Svelte) Component-based web apps Tied to that framework's conventions
Flutter package Cross-platform mobile apps Dart-only usage
Figma library Design work and handoff Not a runtime asset; needs export for production

How to decide

If you are starting a React project, use the React package and skip manual SVG handling — you get tree-shaking and prop-based styling for free. If your project mixes stacks, or you are prototyping in plain HTML, take the SVG files instead; they are the most portable option and will not lock you into a framework.

A useful next step: check the package for your specific framework and confirm the icon count and naming conventions match what your team already uses, since switching icon sets later is mostly a find-and-replace problem. If you want to compare alternatives, Lucide and Heroicons cover similar ground with their own framework packages.

How does Reicon compare to other open-source icon libraries?

Reicon positions itself as a large, framework-friendly open-source SVG icon set: the site describes 2,700+ handcrafted icons with support for React, Angular, Vue, Svelte, Flutter, Figma and more. That combination—broad framework coverage plus a Figma path—is its main differentiator. Where many icon libraries are strong in one ecosystem (React-only, or design-tool-only), Reicon aims to serve designers and developers from the same source set.

How it tends to compare

Dimension Reicon (as described) Typical alternatives
Icon count 2,700+ Ranges widely; some sets are far larger, some much smaller
Style consistency "Handcrafted" set, implying a unified look Varies; some mix contributed styles
Framework support React, Angular, Vue, Svelte, Flutter Often React/Vue first, others via community ports
Design tool Figma Common in most modern libraries
Licensing Open-source (per site) Usually MIT or similar; check each project

Practical trade-offs

A larger count is not automatically better. Above roughly a few thousand icons, the harder problems become naming consistency, style coherence, and how easily you can find the right glyph. A "handcrafted" claim matters most when you need visual uniformity across an entire product.

Framework breadth helps mixed teams. If your stack includes, say, a Vue web app and a Flutter mobile app, one library covering both reduces the number of visual languages you maintain.

What to check before committing

  1. License terms — confirm the exact license permits your commercial use and modification.
  2. Style fit — preview icons at your real UI sizes (16px, 24px), not just large previews.
  3. Update cadence — an actively maintained set ages better than a frozen one.
  4. Tree-shaking — for React/Vue/Svelte, verify you can import individual icons so bundles stay small.
  5. Search and naming — test whether you can find icons by intent ("delete", "warning") quickly.

A useful next step

Pick five icons you actually need for a current screen, then pull them from Reicon and one or two alternatives at your target size and compare stroke weight, corner radius and optical balance side by side. That single test usually settles the choice faster than feature lists. For a broader baseline, established sets like Feather Icons (minimal, small count) and Lucide (large, actively maintained) are worth including in the comparison.

Is Reicon free for commercial use?

Reicon is presented as a free, open-source SVG icon library, and nothing on its page indicates a paid tier, license fee, or commercial-use restriction. That points to yes: you can use the icons in commercial projects. Still, “free to use” and “free to use however you like” are not the same thing, so check the license file in the repository before shipping.

What to verify before you rely on it

  • The actual license text. Open-source icon sets commonly use MIT, Apache 2.0, or CC0. MIT and Apache permit commercial use with attribution requirements; some Creative Commons variants restrict commercial use or require share-alike.
  • Attribution rules. Even permissive licenses may ask you to keep a copyright notice in your project or documentation.
  • Trademark and logo icons. Brand marks inside a general icon set are usually excluded from the open license and need separate permission from the brand owner.
  • Redistribution. If you repackage the icons into your own library or design system, the license terms matter more than they do for ordinary app or website use.

A practical scenario

A freelance designer building a client dashboard can typically drop Reicon icons into the UI without paying. A developer bundling the set into a commercial component library that they then sell is a different case: that is redistribution, and the license governs whether it is allowed and what notices must be included.

Next step

Open the Reicon repository and read the LICENSE file, then check whether the specific icons you plan to use are original artwork or third-party brand marks. If the license is MIT or Apache 2.0, commercial use is fine with attribution; if it is a non-commercial Creative Commons variant, you need a different set. For a comparison point, Lucide and Tabler Icons are other open-source icon libraries whose licenses are stated plainly on their sites.

Related questions

More questions →
How Designers Choose and Use Icons8 Icons, Illustrations, and 3D Assets

Icons8 is a library of icons, illustrations, and 3D assets drawn by its own designers so that styles stay consistent across formats, available for download in SVG and PNG, with an MCP server for AI agents and coding tools. It fits designers who need a matching set fast — a UI, a deck, or a landing page — and who want vector files they can still edit. It is less suited to work that requires a fully custom visual language, since ready-made assets carry the house style of whichever set you pick.

Start by matching the asset style to the project

The fastest way to waste time is to pick assets one at a time by look. Decide the style first, then filter everything to that style.

Project type Style that usually fits Why
Product UI, dashboards, dense screens Outline or filled icon set, one weight Small sizes stay legible; mixing outline and filled in one toolbar reads as an error
Marketing pages, hero sections Flat or 3D illustrations More visual weight, room to carry a concept
Slides, internal docs PNG icons and simple illustrations Fast to drop in, no vector editing needed
Brand-critical or editorial work Custom or heavily edited assets Ready-made sets are recognizable and shared across many products

The consistency claim in Icons8's own description — icons and illustrations "drawn by our own designers so every style matches" — is the practical reason to filter by one style across all three asset types rather than mixing a 3D illustration with an outline icon set.

Pick the file format by what happens next

  • SVG — editable vector. Use it when the asset will be recolored, resized without loss, animated, or handed to a developer. This is the default for UI work.
  • PNG — raster. Use it for quick mockups, slides, and anywhere you cannot paste or render vector files.

If you are unsure, download SVG. You can always export a PNG from it later; you cannot cleanly go the other way.

Keep a set consistent

  1. Choose one style (for example, a single outline weight) before searching.
  2. Filter icons, illustrations, and 3D to that same style so a page does not mix visual languages.
  3. Reuse the same icon for the same meaning across screens — a second "settings" icon in a different style is a common slip.
  4. Check the set covers your edge cases (empty states, errors, onboarding) before committing, not after you have built ten screens.

Check licensing and pricing before client work

Icons8 lists a pricing page, which is the place to confirm what a given use requires. Before shipping assets in client or commercial work, verify the license terms for the specific asset and plan rather than assuming downloads are unrestricted. Pricing and plan details are not covered here — check the site directly, since terms and prices change.

Getting assets into your workflow

  • Figma and design tools — SVG imports as editable vector layers, so you can recolor and resize inside the file.
  • Web — SVG inline or as a file keeps icons sharp at any size and lets CSS control color.
  • Presentations — PNG avoids font and vector rendering issues in slide software.

Icons8 also offers an MCP server for AI agents and coding tools, which is relevant if you are wiring asset lookup into an automated or agent-driven workflow rather than browsing manually.

Customize or download ready-made?

Download ready-made when the asset is generic — a search icon, a folder, a chart — and speed matters more than uniqueness. Customize (recolor, adjust stroke, simplify) when the asset sits in a branded context or appears at large size where its original style would clash. Build fully custom only when the visual language itself is the product, since that is where a shared library stops helping.

What Are Open-Source UI Element Libraries and How Do They Differ From UI Frameworks?

An open-source UI element library is a collection of individual, ready-made interface pieces—buttons, cards, inputs, toggles, loaders—that you copy into your own project and adapt. A UI framework, by contrast, is a structured system of components, conventions, and often a theming layer that governs how your whole interface is built. The practical difference: an element library gives you a snippet; a framework gives you a way of working. If you need a polished button in ten minutes, reach for the element library. If you're building a 40-screen product with a team, you probably want the framework.

What "open-source UI element library" actually means

The term gets used loosely, so it helps to separate the parts:

  • Open-source: the code is publicly available, and the license tells you what you may do with it—copy, modify, redistribute, or use commercially.
  • UI element: a single, self-contained piece of interface, usually small enough to read in one sitting. A button with hover states, a pricing card, a search field.
  • Library: a browsable, searchable collection of those elements, typically contributed by many different people.

On a site like Uiverse, elements are shared by a community and written in plain CSS or Tailwind. You find one you like, copy the markup and styles, paste them into your project, and adjust colors, spacing, and text to fit. There's no package to install and no build step required—which is exactly the appeal, and also the source of most of the confusion.

Element library vs. UI framework: the core differences

Dimension Open-source UI element library UI framework / design system
Unit of reuse A single snippet you copy A component you import or call
Installation None; paste into your code Package install, config, sometimes a provider
Consistency Depends on you; each element may look different Enforced by shared tokens and APIs
Theming Manual edits per element Central theme/config file
Updates You own the copy; no upstream updates Version bumps bring fixes and changes
Accessibility Varies per contributor; must be checked Usually tested and documented
Best for Prototypes, landing pages, small sites, one-off needs Multi-page apps, teams, long-lived products
Learning curve Low—read the CSS Higher—learn the API and conventions

The table isn't a verdict. It's a map of trade-offs. Element libraries win on speed and freedom; frameworks win on consistency and maintenance.

Licensing and attribution: what to check before you paste

This is where people get into trouble, and it's worth slowing down for.

  1. Find the license. Every element or collection should state one. Common open-source licenses include MIT, Apache-2.0, and BSD. Some projects use copyleft licenses like GPL, which can impose obligations if you redistribute your code.
  2. Understand what the license permits. MIT and Apache-2.0 are permissive: you can typically use the code in commercial and closed-source projects. Copyleft licenses may require you to release derivative source under the same terms.
  3. Check attribution requirements. Permissive licenses usually require you to keep the copyright notice and license text somewhere in your project. That's a real obligation, not a formality.
  4. Look for per-element terms. On community sites, the site's overall terms and the individual contributor's stated wishes may differ. If a contributor asks for credit, honor it.
  5. When in doubt, ask or avoid. If a snippet has no license at all, you don't have clear permission to reuse it. Treat "no license" as "not open source," even if the code is publicly visible.

This article is general information, not legal advice. For commercial products with real exposure, have someone qualified review the licenses you're relying on.

How to use a community element in your project: a practical workflow

Here's a repeatable process that avoids most of the usual mess.

1. Start from a real need, not a browsing session

Decide what you need first—"a compact primary button with a loading state"—then search. Browsing aimlessly produces a pile of pretty snippets that don't fit together.

2. Copy the smallest version that works

Take the markup and the styles. Strip anything you don't need: demo wrappers, extra animations, decorative layers. Less code means fewer surprises.

3. Convert it to your conventions

If your project uses design tokens or CSS variables, replace hard-coded values:

/* Before: hard-coded */
.button { background: #4f46e5; border-radius: 8px; }

/* After: token-based */
.button { background: var(--color-primary); border-radius: var(--radius-md); }

This one step is what keeps a copied element from looking like a foreign object in your UI.

4. Check accessibility before you ship

Community elements vary widely here. Verify at minimum:

  • Keyboard focus is visible and the element is reachable by Tab.
  • Color contrast meets WCAG AA (4.5:1 for normal text).
  • Interactive elements use semantic HTML (<button>, not a clickable <div>).
  • Form inputs have associated labels.
  • Motion respects prefers-reduced-motion.

5. Test in context

Paste it into a real page with real content. Long labels, small screens, and dark mode break more copied elements than anything else.

6. Note where it came from

Keep a short comment or an internal credits file: source, license, date. Future you—and your legal reviewer—will be grateful.

Where element libraries genuinely shine

  • Prototypes and demos: you need something clickable today, not a design system.
  • Landing pages and marketing sites: a handful of distinctive elements, each custom.
  • Filling gaps: your framework lacks one specific component, and you don't want to build it from scratch.
  • Learning: reading well-made CSS is one of the fastest ways to improve.
  • Small projects: a personal site doesn't need a theming architecture.

Where they fall short

  • Consistency at scale: ten elements from ten contributors rarely look like one product.
  • Maintenance: you own every copy. When your design changes, you edit each one.
  • Accessibility debt: you inherit whatever the contributor did or didn't do.
  • No upstream fixes: a bug fixed in the original won't reach your copy.
  • Integration friction: different naming conventions, different units, different assumptions about resets.

When to choose which

Choose an element library when the scope is small, the timeline is short, or you need a few distinctive pieces rather than a whole system.

Choose a framework or design system when multiple people build multiple screens over months, when consistency is a product requirement, or when accessibility and theming need to be guaranteed rather than checked.

A hybrid works well for many teams: adopt a framework for the structural components—forms, navigation, layout—and borrow individual elements for the places where you want personality. Just route every borrowed element through the same token and accessibility checks, so it lands as part of your system rather than beside it.

The short version: open-source UI element libraries are a fast, flexible way to get good-looking interface pieces into a project. They are not a substitute for a design system, and the license and accessibility details are the part worth reading carefully.

Website Overview

Page metadata, canonical configuration and social previews work together to provide more consistent search and sharing presentation. An active inbound-mail setup with incomplete authentication may leave the domain more open to impersonation. Provider hosting alone does not close that gap.

Domain and Registration

The domain was registered less than a year ago and has limited historical evidence to assess. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain uses the common .dev extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

The observed email authentication setup is incomplete: DMARC is missing. Nameservers are provided by Cloudflare, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Cloudflare Email Routing email service. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. TXT records include verification markers for Google. Such markers may also remain after a service stops being used.

TLS and Certificates

The certificate uses an RSA 2048-bit public key, offering broad client compatibility. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, commonly associated with automated certificate services. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

CORS permits any origin to read this response. This is common for public resources; sensitive responses need narrower handling. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. All six checked browser-security headers are present. Their effectiveness still depends on the policy values and application behavior. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header contains the custom value Vercel.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Google Analytics, Vercel without precise versions, leaving fewer clues for version-specific scanning.

Search and Social Sharing

Twitter Card metadata is configured. JSON-LD includes Organization data, helping describe the organization as an entity. The title has 60 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 117 characters. The observed directives allow indexing and link following.

Hosting and Email

DNSCloudflare
HostingVercel
EmailCloudflare Email Routing
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagUnited States Inferred 216.198.79.1

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarName.com, Inc.
Registered2026-05-03
Expires2027-05-03
Domain statusclient transfer prohibited
Nameserversanton.ns.cloudflare.com、bristol.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Areicon.dev216.198.79.1300—
Areicon.dev64.29.17.1300—
MXreicon.devroute1.mx.cloudflare.net30024
MXreicon.devroute2.mx.cloudflare.net30078
MXreicon.devroute3.mx.cloudflare.net30092
NSreicon.devanton.ns.cloudflare.com86400—
NSreicon.devbristol.ns.cloudflare.com86400—
TXTreicon.devgoogle-site-verification=h3gNE-ptpubeyog6G4vH0Cz6m0SURYCPGFJWEByai0U300—
TXTreicon.devgoogle-site-verification=hAr2f92lGvrxO7jAFwgnsgzjTsfYwYElJxqdAXwFuu8300—
TXTreicon.devv=spf1 include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net ~all300—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectreicon.dev
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Valid until2026-12-02T13:27 · Remaining when checked: 47 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=utf-8
cache-controlpublic, max-age=0, must-revalidate
serverVercel
strict-transport-securitymax-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policydefault-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net https://unpkg.com https://cooperfont.vercel.app https://us.i.posthog.com https://us-assets.i.posthog.com https://www.googletagmanager.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com https://cooperfont.vercel.app; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self' data: https://fonts.gstatic.com https://cooperfont.vercel.app; connect-src 'self' https://api.github.com https://cdn.reicon.dev https://us.i.posthog.com https://us-assets.i.posthog.com https://api.dodopayments.com https://test.dodopayments.com https://api.npmjs.org https://registry.npmjs.org https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://www.googletagmanager.com; frame-src 'self' https://checkout.dodopayments.com; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self';
x-frame-optionsDENY
x-content-type-optionsnosniff
referrer-policystrict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policycamera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()
access-control-allow-origin*

Identified technologies

Google AnalyticsVercel

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionReicon - Free open-source SVG icons. 2,700+ handcrafted icons for React, Angular, Vue, Svelte, Flutter, Figma & more.
Canonical URLhttps://reicon.dev/
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter Cardsummary_large_image
All bots 1 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Allow/
  • Disallow/api/
googlebot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
googlebot-image 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
bingbot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
duckduckbot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
yandexbot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
gptbot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
oai-searchbot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
chatgpt-user 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
perplexitybot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
claudebot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
claude-web 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
google-extended 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
applebot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
applebot-extended 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
bytespider 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
amazonbot 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/
cohere-ai 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.