Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

rsslookup.com

RSS Lookup is a free, open-source tool that helps you search for RSS feeds on any URL

Development Open Source

No paid content found

Visit website

Profile views 7 Outbound visits 3 Normal

At a glance

Category: Development
Language: English
Paid-content signal: No paid content foundObserved
Registered: 2022
Hosting: CloudflareInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted: PassedObserved
Last updated: 2026-10-04 01:53

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is RSS Lookup?

RSS Lookup is a free, open-source tool at RSS Lookup that finds the RSS feed for a website. You paste in a URL, and it checks whether that site has a feed you can subscribe to.

It works in two passes: it first fetches the page and looks for RSS link tags in the HTML, then, if nothing turns up, it tries a few common feed paths. That second step matters because plenty of sites still publish a working feed without advertising it properly in their page markup.

What it's useful for

You want to follow a site in an RSS reader but can't see a subscribe button.
You're checking whether an old blog or news site still maintains a feed.
You want a feed URL to paste into a reader, feed-to-email service or automation tool.

What to expect

A feed URL on its own does nothing. You need a client or service to subscribe to it. And a failed lookup doesn't always mean no feed exists — the site may simply not have one, or may have configured its RSS link tags incorrectly.

A bookmarklet is offered, so you can run a lookup while you're already on the site you're curious about rather than copying the URL elsewhere.

A practical next step

If you're evaluating a site for regular reading, paste its URL into RSS Lookup first. If a feed comes back, add it to your reader; if not, decide whether the site is worth checking manually or whether an alternative source covers the same material.

How do I find the RSS feed for a specific website using RSS Lookup?

Paste the site's URL into the search field on RSS Lookup and submit it. The tool fetches that page, looks for RSS <link> tags in the HTML, and if it finds none, checks a few common feed paths. Any feed it locates is returned as a URL you can copy into a reader.

For repeated use, drag the bookmarklet from the page to your bookmarks bar. Then, when you're on a site you want to follow, click the bookmarklet instead of switching tabs and pasting the URL manually.

If no feed is found

That usually means the site genuinely has no RSS feed, or its HTML link tags are misconfigured. RSS Lookup only reports what exists; it doesn't generate a feed for a site that lacks one. In that case your options are a site-specific newsletter or notification setting, or a third-party feed-building service — each with its own reliability trade-offs.

A practical scenario

Suppose you read a niche blog and want new posts in your feed reader rather than checking the site. Run the blog's homepage through RSS Lookup, copy the feed URL, and add it to your reader. If the search comes back empty, try the blog's /feed or /rss address directly before concluding there's no feed.

The bookmarklet is the faster habit for one-off lookups; the paste-a-URL form is better when you're checking several sites in a row.

What should I do if RSS Lookup can't find any feeds for a website?

If RSS Lookup reports nothing for a site, the most likely explanation is that the site simply does not publish an RSS feed. RSS Lookup first checks the page's HTML for feed link tags and then probes a few common feed paths; if neither turns up anything, there may be nothing to find. Before giving up, try a few quick checks.

What to try next

Test the obvious feed URLs by hand. Add /feed, /rss, /rss.xml, /feed.xml or /atom.xml to the site's root or blog section and see whether a page of XML appears. Some sites only expose feeds on section pages, so try a category or tag URL too.
Look for a feed icon or "Subscribe" link. Many publishers still show an RSS or Atom icon in the footer, header or sidebar even when their markup is incomplete.
Try the site's own search or newsletter page. If a feed genuinely does not exist, email newsletters or the site's social accounts are often the only way to follow new posts.
Check whether the content is aggregated elsewhere. If the site is a small blog or a niche publication, its posts may be syndicated on a platform that does offer feeds. For example, if the site is a Substack publication, the feed is usually at the publication's own domain with /feed appended; if it is a WordPress site, /feed at the end of the site URL is the standard location.

A concrete scenario

Suppose you want to follow a small independent magazine that has no visible RSS link. You paste its homepage into RSS Lookup and get no results. You then try example.com/feed and example.com/rss.xml manually, and still nothing. At that point the practical options are subscribing to the magazine's newsletter, following it on a social platform, or using a service that can generate a feed from a page — though generated feeds are fragile because they depend on the page's structure staying the same.

How to decide

Situation	Best move
You need the feed for a site you check daily	Spend a few minutes testing common feed paths and looking for a subscribe link
The site is a blog on a known platform	Try the platform's standard feed path first
No feed exists and you only want occasional updates	Newsletter or social follow is usually less work than maintaining a scraper
You need a feed for many sites	A feed-generation service may be worth it, but expect occasional breakage

The underlying reason feeds go missing is worth remembering: RSS is optional, and many modern sites never configured it or let their HTML link tags lapse. RSS Lookup can only find what the site exposes, so a negative result is a signal about the site, not a failure of the lookup itself.

How does the RSS Lookup bookmarklet work and how do I install it?

The bookmarklet is a browser bookmark that runs RSS Lookup on whatever page you are currently viewing, so you don't have to copy the URL and paste it into the site manually.

How it works

You install a small bookmark containing JavaScript instead of a web address.
When you click it while on any site, it sends that page's URL to RSS Lookup.
RSS Lookup then fetches the page, looks for RSS link tags in the HTML, and falls back to checking a few common feed paths if none are found.
The results appear in your browser, showing any feeds that exist for that site.

The key point: the bookmarklet doesn't scan the page in your browser itself. It hands the current URL to RSS Lookup, which does the fetching and searching server-side. That's why it works the same as pasting the URL into the site directly.

Installing it

Open RSS Lookup and find the bookmarklet link on the page.
Make sure your browser's bookmarks bar is visible (usually toggled with Ctrl+Shift+B on Windows/Linux or Cmd+Shift+B on Mac).
Drag the bookmarklet link onto the bookmarks bar. Don't click it yet — dragging is what installs it.
To test, load any site and click the new bookmark. You should land on RSS Lookup with results for that page.

If dragging doesn't work, you can create a new bookmark manually and paste the bookmarklet's JavaScript code into the URL/location field. Some mobile browsers make bookmarklet installation awkward, so this is mostly a desktop tool.

When it's worth using

The bookmarklet saves the copy-paste step, which matters if you check many sites in a row — for example, when you're deciding which blogs to follow in a feed reader and want to quickly test each one. If you only check a site occasionally, pasting the URL into the main search box is just as good.

One limitation to expect: if a site has no feed, or has one that isn't declared in its HTML and isn't at a common path, the bookmarklet will come up empty. That's a property of the site, not the tool. For a broader look at feed discovery across the web, you can compare with About Feeds, which explains the format for newcomers, or use a reader like Feedly once you have a feed URL in hand.

Can I use RSS Lookup for sites that don't have RSS feeds?

No. RSS Lookup only detects feeds that actually exist. If a site has no feed, or has one that isn't linked properly in its HTML, the tool will often return nothing.

What it actually does, based on the site's own description: it fetches the URL you paste, looks for RSS <link> tags in the HTML, and if none are found it probes a few common feed paths. So it's a finder, not a generator — it can't invent a feed for a site that doesn't publish one.

When it still helps on a "feedless" site

The site does have a feed but hasn't advertised it in its HTML — the common-path check may still surface it.
You're unsure whether a feed exists at all, and want a quick yes/no before hunting manually.
You want to check several sites in a row using the bookmarklet rather than pasting URLs one at a time.

When it can't help

The site genuinely publishes no feed (common for many modern news and social platforms).
The feed exists behind a login or is otherwise not publicly reachable.
You need the feed content — RSS Lookup finds the URL; you still need a feed reader such as Feedly or Inoreader to subscribe.

A practical next step

If RSS Lookup comes up empty, try a third-party feed-building service that watches a page for changes and outputs a feed. RSS.app and FetchRSS are established options for that; both work by scraping a page you specify rather than by reading an existing feed, so they're a different category of tool with their own reliability trade-offs. For a site you check often, that's usually a better fallback than refreshing the page by hand.

What data does RSS Lookup collect about my searches?

RSS Lookup says it does not keep track of the specific URLs you search. According to its own FAQ, the only data involved is rate-limiting information stored in Upstash Redis and anonymous analytics from Umami — not a log of the sites you look up.

That distinction matters if you're researching sensitive or internal URLs. The tool's stated design is to avoid recording your queries, but "anonymous analytics" still means aggregate usage data (such as page visits or tool usage counts) is collected by a third-party service. Rate limiting also inherently processes your request temporarily to enforce usage limits.

If you want to check it yourself, open RSS Lookup and read the linked Privacy and Terms pages before pasting any URL you'd rather not share. For a stricter setup, consider running the open-source project yourself rather than using the hosted version.

What "open-source UI element library" actually means

The term gets used loosely, so it helps to separate the parts:

Open-source: the code is publicly available, and the license tells you what you may do with it—copy, modify, redistribute, or use commercially.
UI element: a single, self-contained piece of interface, usually small enough to read in one sitting. A button with hover states, a pricing card, a search field.
Library: a browsable, searchable collection of those elements, typically contributed by many different people.

On a site like Uiverse, elements are shared by a community and written in plain CSS or Tailwind. You find one you like, copy the markup and styles, paste them into your project, and adjust colors, spacing, and text to fit. There's no package to install and no build step required—which is exactly the appeal, and also the source of most of the confusion.

Element library vs. UI framework: the core differences

Dimension	Open-source UI element library	UI framework / design system
Unit of reuse	A single snippet you copy	A component you import or call
Installation	None; paste into your code	Package install, config, sometimes a provider
Consistency	Depends on you; each element may look different	Enforced by shared tokens and APIs
Theming	Manual edits per element	Central theme/config file
Updates	You own the copy; no upstream updates	Version bumps bring fixes and changes
Accessibility	Varies per contributor; must be checked	Usually tested and documented
Best for	Prototypes, landing pages, small sites, one-off needs	Multi-page apps, teams, long-lived products
Learning curve	Low—read the CSS	Higher—learn the API and conventions

The table isn't a verdict. It's a map of trade-offs. Element libraries win on speed and freedom; frameworks win on consistency and maintenance.

Licensing and attribution: what to check before you paste

This is where people get into trouble, and it's worth slowing down for.

Find the license. Every element or collection should state one. Common open-source licenses include MIT, Apache-2.0, and BSD. Some projects use copyleft licenses like GPL, which can impose obligations if you redistribute your code.
Understand what the license permits. MIT and Apache-2.0 are permissive: you can typically use the code in commercial and closed-source projects. Copyleft licenses may require you to release derivative source under the same terms.
Check attribution requirements. Permissive licenses usually require you to keep the copyright notice and license text somewhere in your project. That's a real obligation, not a formality.
Look for per-element terms. On community sites, the site's overall terms and the individual contributor's stated wishes may differ. If a contributor asks for credit, honor it.
When in doubt, ask or avoid. If a snippet has no license at all, you don't have clear permission to reuse it. Treat "no license" as "not open source," even if the code is publicly visible.

This article is general information, not legal advice. For commercial products with real exposure, have someone qualified review the licenses you're relying on.

How to use a community element in your project: a practical workflow

Here's a repeatable process that avoids most of the usual mess.

1. Start from a real need, not a browsing session

Decide what you need first—"a compact primary button with a loading state"—then search. Browsing aimlessly produces a pile of pretty snippets that don't fit together.

2. Copy the smallest version that works

Take the markup and the styles. Strip anything you don't need: demo wrappers, extra animations, decorative layers. Less code means fewer surprises.

3. Convert it to your conventions

If your project uses design tokens or CSS variables, replace hard-coded values:

/* Before: hard-coded */
.button { background: #4f46e5; border-radius: 8px; }

/* After: token-based */
.button { background: var(--color-primary); border-radius: var(--radius-md); }

This one step is what keeps a copied element from looking like a foreign object in your UI.

4. Check accessibility before you ship

Community elements vary widely here. Verify at minimum:

Keyboard focus is visible and the element is reachable by Tab.
Color contrast meets WCAG AA (4.5:1 for normal text).
Interactive elements use semantic HTML (<button>, not a clickable <div>).
Form inputs have associated labels.
Motion respects prefers-reduced-motion.

5. Test in context

Paste it into a real page with real content. Long labels, small screens, and dark mode break more copied elements than anything else.

6. Note where it came from

Keep a short comment or an internal credits file: source, license, date. Future you—and your legal reviewer—will be grateful.

Where element libraries genuinely shine

Prototypes and demos: you need something clickable today, not a design system.
Landing pages and marketing sites: a handful of distinctive elements, each custom.
Filling gaps: your framework lacks one specific component, and you don't want to build it from scratch.
Learning: reading well-made CSS is one of the fastest ways to improve.
Small projects: a personal site doesn't need a theming architecture.

Where they fall short

Consistency at scale: ten elements from ten contributors rarely look like one product.
Maintenance: you own every copy. When your design changes, you edit each one.
Accessibility debt: you inherit whatever the contributor did or didn't do.
No upstream fixes: a bug fixed in the original won't reach your copy.
Integration friction: different naming conventions, different units, different assumptions about resets.

When to choose which

Choose an element library when the scope is small, the timeline is short, or you need a few distinctive pieces rather than a whole system.

Choose a framework or design system when multiple people build multiple screens over months, when consistency is a product requirement, or when accessibility and theming need to be guaranteed rather than checked.

A hybrid works well for many teams: adopt a framework for the structural components—forms, navigation, layout—and borrow individual elements for the places where you want personality. Just route every borrowed element through the same token and accessibility checks, so it lands as part of your system rather than beside it.

The short version: open-source UI element libraries are a fast, flexible way to get good-looking interface pieces into a project. They are not a substitute for a design system, and the license and accessibility details are the part worth reading carefully.

Website Overview

Page metadata, canonical configuration and social previews work together to provide more consistent search and sharing presentation.

Domain and Registration

Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain has about 4 years of registration history; its current configuration provides more context than age alone. The registrar is Cloudflare, Inc., a widely used domain service provider. The domain uses the common .com extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

Nameservers are provided by Cloudflare, indicating managed DNS hosting. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. No MX record was found. A conventional explicit inbound-mail route is not configured. TXT records include verification markers for Google. Such markers may also remain after a service stops being used. DNSSEC signatures were not detected, so this additional DNS authenticity protection is not confirmed.

TLS and Certificates

The public key uses EC with 256 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued within the Google Trust Services cloud or CDN ecosystem. The certificate's total validity is about 90 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. All six checked browser-security headers are present. Their effectiveness still depends on the policy values and application behavior. The cf-ray response header indicates a CDN or caching proxy in the delivery path. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header identifies cloudflare without an exact version.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Cloudflare without precise versions, leaving fewer clues for version-specific scanning.

Search and Social Sharing

Open Graph is partially configured; og:image, og:type is missing. Twitter Card metadata is configured. The title has 38 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 85 characters. The observed directives allow indexing and link following.

Hosting and Email

DNSCloudflare

HostingCloudflare

EmailUnknown

Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) Location unknown Inferred 104.21.53.54

Location unknown

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

Registrar	Cloudflare, Inc.
Registered	2022-05-22
Expires	2027-05-22
Domain status	client transfer prohibited
Nameservers	dan.ns.cloudflare.com、kara.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC	unsigned

DNS records

DNS

Type	Name	Value	TTL	Priority
A	www.rsslookup.com	104.21.53.54	300	—
A	www.rsslookup.com	172.67.209.35	300	—
AAAA	www.rsslookup.com	2606:4700:3031::ac43:d123	300	—
AAAA	www.rsslookup.com	2606:4700:3034::6815:3536	300	—
NS	rsslookup.com	dan.ns.cloudflare.com	86400	—
NS	rsslookup.com	kara.ns.cloudflare.com	86400	—
TXT	rsslookup.com	google-site-verification=Co8l52Y5Iqhxyllxd1P2mSNuN3rCJWHh-ansCv8Wugg	300	—
TXT	rsslookup.com	v=spf1 -all	300	—
DMARC	_dmarc.rsslookup.com	v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:[email protected]	300	—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

Assessment	Normal configuration
Supported protocols	TLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocol	TLSv1.3
Certificate subject	rsslookup.com
Issuer	Google Trust Services
Valid until	2026-12-28T05:46 · Remaining when checked: 85 days
Verification details	Certificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

Header	Value
content-type	text/html
cache-control	public, max-age=0, must-revalidate
server	cloudflare
strict-transport-security	max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
content-security-policy	default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.bunny.net; font-src 'self' https://fonts.bunny.net; connect-src 'self'; img-src 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self';
x-frame-options	DENY
x-content-type-options	nosniff
referrer-policy	strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy	camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

Identified technologies

Cloudflare

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta description	RSS Lookup is a free, open-source tool that helps you search for RSS feeds on any URL
Canonical URL	https://www.rsslookup.com/
Language	English (default)
Twitter Card	summary

Social Sharing Preview

3 fields

Sharing metadata

og:title	RSS Lookup - Find RSS feeds on any URL
og:description	RSS Lookup is a free, open-source tool that helps you search for RSS feeds on any URL
twitter:card	summary

robots.txt (opens in a new tab)

0 rules

No rules found

Sitemaps

No sitemaps found

User reviews (0)

No reviews yet.