Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

shakebugs.com

Get unreal data to fix real issues in your app or web. Shake is not just a bug and crash reporting tool - it brings all devs, CTOs and testers on the same page.

Paid content
Visit website
Profile views 7 Outbound visits 2 Normal
Bug and crash reporting for mobile apps and websites | Shake Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Development
Language
English
Paid-content signal
Paid contentObserved
Registered
2018
Hosting
CloudflareInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is Shake used for?

Shake is a bug and crash reporting tool for mobile apps and websites. It attaches technical context to each report automatically so developers, testers, and product managers can reproduce and fix issues faster, instead of chasing vague descriptions over chat or email.

What it does in practice

  • Mobile apps: You add the Shake SDK so testers and users can trigger a report from inside the app. Each ticket arrives with device, OS, app version, stack trace, logs, and reproduction steps already attached.
  • Websites: A free Chrome extension lets anyone file a bug report on any site without coding, capturing the page context along with it.
  • Triage and collaboration: Reports land in one place where teams can track issues, share notes, and assign crashes to teammates. Rules can auto-create and route tickets, for example flagging a billing-screen bug as high priority.
  • Integrations: Reports can be forwarded to the tools a team already uses.

Who it suits

Role Typical benefit
Developer Activity history and stack traces instead of guessing
Tester / QA 50+ data points attached without manual note-taking
Product manager Faster triage, visibility into whether a report is a first or repeat issue
Support / client-facing teams Client reports consolidated in one queue rather than scattered across channels

A useful next step is to pick one recurring annoyance — say, users reporting that login fails — and try filing a single report through the Chrome extension or a test build. If the attached context answers the questions your team normally asks by hand, the tool is earning its place.

How do I install the Shake Chrome extension to report bugs on any website?

Install the Shake Chrome extension from the Chrome Web Store: open the store listing, click Add to Chrome, confirm the permissions prompt, then pin the extension to your toolbar. On any website, click the Shake icon, describe the problem, and submit. Shake's page states the extension requires no coding and lets you send reports for any website; it also says no credit card is required to try Shake.

What happens after you submit

  • The report is captured with page context attached automatically, so you don't have to screenshot or note your browser version by hand.
  • Reports land in the Shake dashboard, where teams triage them alongside app reports.
  • The page mentions 50+ data points per ticket, with 71 unique points cited for in-app reports; treat the exact count as product-stated rather than guaranteed for the extension.

When the extension is the right tool

Use it when a bug appears on a website you don't control or can't instrument with code—client sites, competitor flows, staging URLs, or third-party checkout pages. If the issue is inside your own mobile app, the SDK route is more appropriate, since it captures crashes and stack traces directly.

Practical setup tip

Create a project in Shake first, then connect the extension to that project so reports route to the right board. If you're evaluating it for a team, check Shake pricing for seat limits and features before rolling it out, and compare with a general-purpose reporter like BugHerd if you mainly need visual feedback on web pages.

What data points does Shake automatically attach to each bug report?

Shake's own page describes the automatic context it attaches to a report as "over 50+ data points" (elsewhere "71 unique data points"). The categories it names include:

  • User activity history — a timeline of what the user did before submitting, so you're not relying on their written description.
  • Device and environment details — device model, app version, and OS version.
  • Crash diagnostics — stack trace, blackbox recording, and logs.
  • Reproduction steps — captured alongside the report rather than typed up afterwards.
  • Ticket history — whether the reporter is filing their 1st or 9th ticket.
  • Server responses — e.g. a 403 response, cited as an example of what you can check when a user can't log in.

What this is good for: a tester or support agent files a report, and the developer opens a ticket that already shows the build, the device, the failing request and the path the user took. That replaces the usual back-and-forth ("which version? what did you click? send me a screenshot").

What to check before relying on it: the exact list of 71 points isn't enumerated on the page, and some items (custom user info, extra logs) are described as things you configure in the SDK rather than defaults. Confirm the specific fields you need for your stack — for example, whether your backend request/response bodies are captured — during a trial rather than assuming.

Practical next step: install the free Chrome extension on a staging site and file one test report, then compare the resulting ticket against what your team normally has to ask for manually. That single comparison tells you whether the automatic data covers your actual debugging gaps. For a broader look at the product, see Shake.

How does Shake help teams triage and assign bugs without paying per seat?

Shake's pitch is that bug reports arrive with context already attached, so triage becomes a matter of reading a ticket rather than chasing one down. The site advertises 50+ (in one place, 71) data points captured automatically per report — device, app version, OS, activity history, stack traces, logs and repro steps. For a triager, that means most "can't reproduce" round-trips never happen: you can see whether the reporter is on an old build, whether the failure was a 403 server response, or what the user did in the moments before a crash.

How assignment works in practice

The page describes inviting the whole team to collaborate — tracking issues, sharing notes and assigning crashes to teammates — and states that seats cost $0. It also mentions Rules: for a bug filed on, say, a billing screen, you can auto-create a ticket at high priority and route it to a developer, or filter it out entirely. Combined, that's the core of the no-per-seat model: unlimited people can read and act on reports, and routing is handled by rules rather than by a coordinator manually distributing work.

A realistic scenario

A QA tester hits a login failure on a Friday build. The report lands with OS version, build number and the server response attached. A rule tags it high priority and assigns it to the on-call mobile dev, who opens the stack trace and blackbox data without asking the tester a single question. A PM can meanwhile scan the same queue to see whether a given user is filing their first ticket or their ninth — useful for judging whether a "feature request" is a pattern or a one-off.

Where the trade-off sits

The value depends on the SDK being embedded in your app, and Shake states it adds 2.5MB to app size and doesn't affect speed. For websites, there's a free Chrome extension that requires no coding — but that's a reporter-side tool for testers and staff, not a substitute for instrumenting a production web app. The $0-per-seat claim is about collaboration seats; it isn't a claim that the product as a whole is free, and the site links to a pricing page you should read before assuming anything about plan limits.

Next step

Before committing, list the five questions your team asks most often when a bug comes in (which build? which OS? what did the user do first?). Then check whether Shake's automatic data points and Rules cover those, and confirm seat and volume limits on the pricing page.

Which integrations does Shake support to auto-forward reports to other tools?

Shake says it supports 1-click integrations that auto-forward reports into the tools a team already uses. The product page does not list the individual integration names, so treat "which specific tools" as something to confirm on Shake's own integrations page rather than assume.

Shake

A practical way to decide: if your team already triages work in an issue tracker, the integration matters mainly for whether a report lands as a new ticket with its attached data intact. If your team lives in chat, auto-forwarding is more about speed of awareness than structured tracking. Check the integrations page against your current stack before committing, and confirm what data actually transfers—device, OS, app version, logs and repro steps are the kind of fields worth verifying.

How does Shake handle GDPR and CCPA compliance for user data?

Shake states that it is GDPR and CCPA compliant, and that its SDK lets you control what user data is captured. The page emphasizes privacy controls as part of SDK customization: you can capture user info, attach logs, and protect data. That means compliance is handled mainly through configuration choices on your side, not through an automatic legal guarantee.

For a practical setup, treat Shake as one processor in your data map:

  • Decide what personal data the SDK may collect (user IDs, emails, device identifiers, logs, screenshots).
  • Mask or exclude sensitive fields before reports leave the device.
  • Set retention and deletion rules that match your privacy policy.
  • Document Shake in your GDPR Article 30 records and your CCPA service-provider terms.
  • Check whether data is processed in a region that satisfies your transfer mechanism.

A concrete example: a fintech app can attach a stack trace and OS version but redact account numbers and auth tokens, then route billing-screen reports to a restricted team. That keeps debugging useful while limiting regulated data exposure.

Next step: review Shake's own privacy documentation and data processing terms, then compare them with your obligations. If you need a formal DPA or subprocessor list, request it from Shake before shipping.

Related questions

More questions →
What Can an Amazon Seller Browser Extension Actually Do for Your Listings?

An Amazon seller browser extension is a small piece of software that runs inside Chrome, Edge, or Firefox and adds information or shortcuts directly onto Amazon pages you already visit. In practice, it can overlay demand and competition data on a product page, pull quick numbers while you browse a niche, flag missing or weak listing elements, and save you from switching between tabs. What it cannot do is replace a full listing engineering or growth platform: extensions are lightweight, page-level helpers, while serious listing work — keyword architecture, AI-readiness, bulk optimization, and performance tracking over time — needs a dedicated toolset. The useful question is not "extension or platform" but "which jobs belong to each."

What a browser extension typically does well

Most seller extensions cluster around a few repeatable, on-page tasks. If your workflow involves a lot of browsing, these are where the time savings are real.

On-page data overlays

While you're on a product detail page, the extension can display estimated sales, revenue, review velocity, seller count, and price history in a panel next to the listing. This turns "open a separate research tab and paste the ASIN" into "read the number where you already are." For quick sanity checks on a competitor or a potential product, that's a genuine speed gain.

Quick product and niche research

Extensions often let you scan a search results page and see metrics for every listing at once, or export a batch of ASINs. This is useful for early filtering: you can spot which results have thin review counts, unstable pricing, or a dominant seller, and decide which few are worth deeper analysis.

Listing checks and basic audits

Some extensions highlight on-page elements — title length, bullet presence, image count, whether A+ content appears, whether key fields look empty. This is a fast visual audit, not a scoring system. It tells you what's there, not whether your listing is engineered to match how Amazon discovery works now.

Convenience features

Coupon and deal finders, price-drop alerts, review-request shortcuts, and quick links to seller tools fall into this bucket. They're small quality-of-life wins rather than strategy.

Where extensions fall short

This is the part sellers most often underestimate. An extension sees the page in front of you; it doesn't hold your catalog, your history, or your strategy.

Job Browser extension Full listing/growth platform
On-page competitor snapshot Yes, fast Yes, often deeper
Keyword architecture across a listing No Yes
AI-readiness / discovery optimization Rarely Core function
Bulk edits across many ASINs No Yes
Tracking your own listings over time Limited Yes
Historical trend and seasonality Usually shallow Yes
Team workflows and permissions No Yes

The pattern: extensions are read-and-react tools for pages you're already on. Platforms are build-and-manage tools for your own catalog. If your bottleneck is "I need to know if this niche is worth entering," an extension helps. If your bottleneck is "my listings aren't converting or aren't being surfaced the way Amazon discovery now works," an extension won't fix that — you need listing engineering, not a data overlay.

Scenarios: when an extension earns its place

  • Early product research. You're scanning dozens of search pages a day. An overlay that shows demand and competition inline saves hours of tab-switching. Worth it.
  • Competitor spot-checks. You want a fast read on a rival's pricing and review momentum before a pricing decision. An extension gives you that in seconds.
  • Quick listing sanity checks. You're about to publish and want to confirm images, bullets, and title are all present. A visual audit extension is handy.
  • Ongoing listing optimization. You need to align titles, bullets, and backend terms with how Amazon's discovery systems interpret intent, and to keep that consistent across a catalog. This is platform territory — an extension can't hold or apply that structure.
  • Scaling a catalog. Once you're managing many ASINs, bulk operations, version history, and team access matter more than any single-page overlay.

What to check before installing any extension

Extensions can read the pages you visit, and some request broad permissions. Before you install:

  1. Read the permission list. Does it need access to all sites, or only Amazon domains? Broader access than the job requires is a yellow flag.
  2. Check what data leaves your browser. Does it send your browsing or seller data to a server? Is that disclosed?
  3. Confirm the vendor. Prefer extensions from established sellers/tool providers with a real product behind them, not anonymous one-off add-ons.
  4. Test on a non-critical account first. If it touches your Seller Central session, verify behavior before relying on it.
  5. Know the exit. Can you disable it cleanly, and does uninstalling remove stored data?

How to decide if it fits your stage

Ask three questions:

  • Is my main pain "I browse a lot and want data inline"? An extension is likely worth it.
  • Is my main pain "my listings underperform and I need to engineer them properly"? Skip the extension-first mindset; look at a listing/growth platform.
  • Am I managing more than a handful of ASINs? You'll outgrow page-level tools quickly; extensions become a supplement, not the system.

A practical setup for many sellers is both: an extension for fast on-page research, and a dedicated platform for the listing work that actually moves rankings and conversion. ZonGuru, for example, positions its toolset around listing engineering and AI-readiness rather than page overlays — the kind of work an extension structurally can't do. If you want to see where a full platform picks up, its pricing page outlines the options, and there's a free trial to test the workflow before committing.

The short version: a browser extension is a fast, cheap way to see more while you browse. It is not a listing strategy. Use it for the browsing jobs, and bring in a real platform for the engineering jobs — that division is what keeps your time and your listings both working.

Website Overview

Identifiable technologies and additional version or configuration signals make the service easier to fingerprint, which may help targeted scanners narrow their checks. An established domain and managed infrastructure suggest continuity of operations and may support dependable delivery, although neither guarantees service quality.

Domain and Registration

Registered in 2018, this domain has about 7 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The registrar is GoDaddy.com, LLC, a widely used domain service provider. The domain uses the common .com extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

The lowest TTL is 60 seconds, supporting rapid record changes at the cost of more frequent lookups. Nameservers are provided by Amazon Route 53, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Google Workspace email service. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. SPF and DMARC are configured. DKIM status is unknown.

TLS and Certificates

The public key uses EC with 256 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, commonly associated with automated certificate services. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

X-Powered-By exposes backend information: WP Engine. The checked browser-security headers were not detected, leaving fewer explicit browser-side safeguards. The cf-ray, x-cache response header indicates a CDN or caching proxy in the delivery path. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header identifies cloudflare without an exact version.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.3, WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare, with exact versions exposed for 1 technologies. These details can narrow vulnerability checks, although exposure alone is not a vulnerability.

Search and Social Sharing

The Generator tag identifies All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.3, making the publishing system easier to fingerprint. Twitter Card metadata is configured. JSON-LD includes Organization data, helping describe the organization as an entity. The title has 60 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 160 characters.

Hosting and Email

DNSAmazon Route 53
HostingCloudflare
EmailGoogle Workspace
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagUnited States Inferred 141.193.213.10

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarGoDaddy.com, LLC
Registered2018-11-28
Expires2026-11-28
Domain statusclient delete prohibited、client renew prohibited、client transfer prohibited、client update prohibited
Nameserversns-1527.awsdns-62.org、ns-1828.awsdns-36.co.uk、ns-69.awsdns-08.com、ns-785.awsdns-34.net
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Awww.shakebugs.com141.193.213.10300—
Awww.shakebugs.com141.193.213.11300—
MXshakebugs.comaspmx.l.google.com180010
MXshakebugs.comalt1.aspmx.l.google.com180020
MXshakebugs.comalt2.aspmx.l.google.com180030
MXshakebugs.comaspmx2.googlemail.com180040
MXshakebugs.comaspmx3.googlemail.com180050
NSshakebugs.comns-1527.awsdns-62.org60—
NSshakebugs.comns-1828.awsdns-36.co.uk60—
NSshakebugs.comns-69.awsdns-08.com60—
NSshakebugs.comns-785.awsdns-34.net60—
TXTshakebugs.comOSSRH-65244300—
TXTshakebugs.com_globalsign-domain-verification=FsaL_lvpmjCcx7iVaqaaysEQkKTfvLP7wMFmX-kQHV300—
TXTshakebugs.comatlassian-domain-verification=su/WOkZl7XT6NxWTQfrVaRSrP0mfn05AgX9bXeMmju4tOrl5jW93N6nH5ehHYDUP300—
TXTshakebugs.comgoogle-site-verification=2CNB4fQgteKNqR5gxGSFA-wG_TgcSAHxq-bpUgWk2h8300—
TXTshakebugs.comgoogle-site-verification=5GKaRJL1jmSh8VuU566w3uh1qj5bStbODgYbemuPhpE300—
TXTshakebugs.comgoogle-site-verification=LdMllQEMpl5LDl3LLUqG7bi3mZM7THJ3StaYllJDaZE300—
TXTshakebugs.comgoogle-site-verification=SiOBfhcHijG7e3nMBuuOb4xwuTQfXjvSSTB4dHGLO6M300—
TXTshakebugs.commailerlite-domain-verification=02e5d10984991976962e5c62a7434da78138bc25300—
TXTshakebugs.comopenai-domain-verification=dv-2iWuEVVZYghHbi2xp7VUVJWe300—
TXTshakebugs.comv=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; aspf=r; rua=mailto:[email protected]; ruf=mailto:[email protected]300—
TXTshakebugs.comv=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.mlsend.com -all300—
DMARC_dmarc.shakebugs.comv=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; aspf=r; rua=mailto:[email protected]; ruf=mailto:[email protected]300—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectwww.shakebugs.com
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Valid until2026-12-01T05:47 · Remaining when checked: 60 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
cache-controlmax-age=600, must-revalidate
servercloudflare

Identified technologies

All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.3WordPressjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerCloudflare

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionGet unreal data to fix real issues in your app or web. Shake is not just a bug and crash reporting tool - it brings all devs, CTOs and testers on the same page.
Canonical URLhttps://www.shakebugs.com/
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter Cardsummary
All bots 1 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Allow/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php
  • Disallow/wp-admin/
  • IntervalCrawl delay 10 seconds

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.