Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

vsrecommendedgames.miraheze.org

Thanks to emulators and eBay, you can still play video games that are even older than some of us have been alive. All of these recommendations come from /v/ (or...

No paid content found
Visit website
Profile views 8 Outbound visits 7 Normal
/v/'s Recommended Games Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Games & Board Games
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
2015
Hosting
FastlyInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is /v/'s Recommended Games?

/v/'s Recommended Games is a community-maintained wiki of game recommendations written in the voice of 4chan's /v/ video game board. Rather than reviewing new releases in a neutral, professional tone, it collects curated lists of games worth playing, organized by platform, genre and special interest. Its own front page is upfront about the style: expect strong opinions, harsh language and "punishing standards of quality."

What you'll find there

  • Platform lists covering current and older hardware, from the PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S and Nintendo Switch to microcomputers, handhelds, discontinued consoles and even operating systems.
  • Special interest groups and guides, which group games by theme or niche rather than by release date.
  • Multiplayer recommendations, useful if you want something to play with other people rather than a solo backlog.
  • A recent-changes feed, since the wiki is volunteer-driven and updated over time.

Who it suits

It's most useful if you already have a taste for imageboard culture and want blunt, opinionated shortlists instead of long reviews. If you're new to older hardware, the platform pages can work as a starting point for what to emulate or hunt down secondhand. If you prefer measured criticism or want technical specs and purchase advice, the tone and format will likely frustrate you.

A practical way to use it

Pick the platform you actually own or can emulate, read that list, then cross-check a title against a general database or store page before buying. Treat the entries as leads from a particular community, not as a verdict; the wiki itself warns that its tastes may not match yours.

How do I find game recommendations for a specific console like the PlayStation 5 or Nintendo Switch?

Start with the platform list, not the search box. On /v/'s Recommended Games, the main page organizes entries under List of Gaming Platforms, with current systems grouped separately from discontinued ones. Find your console there first, then follow that platform's entry to its recommendation list. For a current system, look under headings like Current Consoles (PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 4) or Current Handhelds (Nintendo Switch, Switch 2, Playdate, Evercade); older machines sit in the broader platform list or the discontinued section.

H3 How the site is structured

  • By platform: the primary route — pick the console, then read its list.
  • By genre or interest: Special Interest Groups and Multiplayer games cut across platforms, useful when you care more about a type of experience than the hardware.
  • By guides: the Guides section covers broader topics rather than per-console picks.
  • Recent changes: handy if you want to see what volunteers have updated lately, since the wiki is volunteer-driven and partly under construction.

H3 Practical steps

  1. Open the main page and locate your console under the relevant current or discontinued heading.
  2. Follow the platform link and scan the list, noting that entries reflect /v/'s tastes — the wiki itself warns the tone is harsh and the standards are strict.
  3. Cross-check a title against the Multiplayer games or Special Interest Groups pages if you want a particular kind of play.
  4. If your console has no dedicated page yet, search the wiki directly or check Recent changes for work in progress.

H3 A concrete example Suppose you just bought a Nintendo Switch and want something beyond the obvious. Go to the Current Handhelds section, open the Switch entry, and treat its list as a curated shortlist rather than a review aggregate. Then, if you mainly play with others, jump to the multiplayer page to see which of those titles are recommended for group play. That two-step route — platform first, interest second — is faster than browsing the whole wiki.

H3 Trade-offs to keep in mind The site is a community wiki, so coverage is uneven: popular retro and current platforms tend to be well developed, while niche or very new hardware may be thin or missing. Recommendations are opinionated by design, so use them as a starting point and check a second source before buying. For broader editorial coverage, compare with Backloggd for user logs and lists, or HowLongToBeat if time commitment matters to your choice.

Which retro gaming platforms have the most active emulation scenes according to the wiki?

The wiki doesn't rank platforms by emulation-scene activity. Its platform lists simply note what exists, with lifespan and manufacturer data, and its recommendation pages are organized around what /v/ considers worth playing rather than which emulator communities are busiest. So any "most active" claim has to be read off the structure of the wiki itself, not quoted from it.

What the wiki does signal clearly, through its own organization:

  • Current platforms get their own sections. Consoles, handhelds, PC operating systems and mobile operating systems are listed separately, which means the platforms people are actively playing and emulating right now get the most editorial attention.
  • Recently discontinued platforms are grouped together. Stadia, BlackBerry OS, Tizen smartphones and others sit in a single "recently discontinued" block, which is where emulation interest tends to concentrate once official support ends.
  • Older hardware is treated as still playable. The front page explicitly frames emulators and secondhand markets as the reason pre-2000s games remain accessible, so the wiki assumes emulation as a normal way to play rather than a niche workaround.

In practice, the platforms with the loudest emulation communities tend to be the ones with large, well-documented libraries and awkward or expensive original hardware. That means older Nintendo and Sony consoles, plus handhelds, usually dominate discussion, while microcomputers and unusual OS platforms attract smaller but more dedicated groups. The wiki's own structure reflects this: platform entries are broad, but the recommendation lists are where the real community energy shows up.

A useful next step is to pick a platform from the wiki's list, then check whether its recommendation page has recent edits. Edit activity is a better proxy for an active scene than any ranking the wiki never provides. As a comparison point, Emulation General Wiki tracks emulator development status per platform, which answers the "active scene" question more directly than a recommendation list can.

What are the best multiplayer games recommended by /v/ for playing with friends?

/v/'s Recommended Games is a wiki of multiplayer recommendations drawn from the /v/ imageboard, so it's a starting point for finding games a small group can play together rather than a single ranked list. The site's own framing warns that tastes are narrow and the tone is harsh, so treat entries as leads to check against your group's preferences.

H3 How to use it

  • Start with the Multiplayer games section, which the main page highlights alongside reviews and recent changes.
  • Browse by platform under List of Gaming Platforms if your group is tied to one system, or by Special Interest Groups for narrower tastes.
  • Check Recent changes to see what contributors are actively adding, since the wiki is marked as under construction.

H3 What to expect

  • Recommendations skew toward older and emulated titles, not just current releases; the site explicitly assumes emulators and secondhand copies.
  • Coverage is broad across consoles, handhelds, PCs and mobile, so you can find both local and online options.
  • Quality standards are opinionated, and the writing includes hostile language, so it's better for discovery than for neutral reviews.

H3 Practical next step Pick a platform your friends already own, open that platform's list, and shortlist two or three multiplayer titles. Then verify current player counts, cross-play support and server status yourself, since a wiki entry may not reflect today's online population. If you want a second opinion, compare with a general database such as IGDB or Backloggd before committing.

How can I contribute my own game reviews or recommendations to the wiki?

Contributing to /v/'s Recommended Games means editing a wiki, not submitting a review to a magazine. The site is explicit that it runs on volunteer effort: if you want to add a game, fix an entry, or flag an unburied gem, you make the change yourself on the relevant list page.

Where contributions fit

  • Platform lists — the main index is organized by gaming platform, from current consoles and handhelds to discontinued systems and computer OSs. Each platform page is where recommendations for that system live.
  • Special interest groups and guides — these pages collect themed lists and how-to material, and they may be the better home for a recommendation that is not tied to one platform.
  • Multiplayer games — the front page links a dedicated multiplayer list, so couch and online picks belong there rather than in a general platform list.
  • Recent changes — use this to see what other editors are working on and to avoid duplicating an entry someone just added.

How to write an entry that survives

The wiki states its standards plainly: recommendations should come from /v/, and the tone is harsh, opinionated and allergic to filler. A useful contribution is short, specific and honest about trade-offs.

  1. Check the page first. Search the platform page and the recent changes feed for the game. If it is already listed, improve the existing entry instead of adding a second one.
  2. Match the local format. Look at how neighbouring entries are structured — title, platform, a line or two of justification — and follow it rather than inventing a new layout.
  3. Say why it is worth playing. Name the mechanic, the difficulty curve, the version differences or the reason to emulate it rather than buy it. "Good game" tells a reader nothing.
  4. Note the caveats. Region locks, control problems, bad ports, required patches and the difference between the original and a re-release are exactly the details that make a recommendation trustworthy.
  5. Be willing to be edited. A wiki entry is a shared draft. Expect trimming, merging and rewrites, and do not take it personally.

A concrete example

Suppose you have been playing an obscure 1990s console shooter and want it on the list. Rather than dropping a paragraph on the main page, open the page for that console, find the alphabetical or genre section it belongs in, and add a two- or three-sentence entry: what the game is, what makes it stand out against better-known contemporaries, and which version or emulator setup gives the best experience. If the game spans several systems, add it to each relevant platform page with a note on which port is superior.

Practical decision criteria

  • Is it a recommendation or a review? This wiki wants recommendations — a reason to play, not a scored critique.
  • Is it already covered? If yes, edit rather than add.
  • Does it belong on a platform page or a themed list? Platform-specific picks go on platform pages; genre, multiplayer and special-interest picks go on the themed lists.
  • Can you back up the claim? Concrete comparisons to known games in the same genre are more persuasive than adjectives.

If you are new to wiki editing, start small: fix a factual error, add a missing regional release, or expand a one-line entry into something a reader can act on. That is a lower-risk way to learn the house style before you propose a new list.

What are some hidden gem games that /v/ recommends for older systems?

/v/'s Recommended Games is a community-maintained wiki of curated game lists drawn from the /v/ imageboard, so its "hidden gems" are crowd-sourced picks with strong opinions attached rather than neutral editorial selections. The site's own framing is blunt: expect tastes that may not match your own and punishing standards of quality. That is both the appeal and the catch — the picks are passionate and well-argued, but they skew toward one community's preferences.

How to use it for older systems

Start with the List of Gaming Platforms section, which is the backbone of the wiki. It catalogs platforms by developer, manufacturer, type and lifespan, so you can jump straight to an older machine — say, an Amstrad CPC, an Apple II series machine, or an Atari console — and see what the community recommends for it. From there, the Special Interest Groups and Guides headings help you narrow down by genre, playstyle or setup rather than just by hardware.

A practical workflow:

  1. Pick your platform from the list (the lifespan column helps you confirm you have the right machine or emulator).
  2. Read the recommended titles for that platform, keeping in mind the wiki's bias toward hardcore tastes.
  3. Cross-check anything that sounds promising against a general database before you spend money on physical copies.

Reading the recommendations critically

The wiki is honest about being under construction and volunteer-driven, and the recommendations "come from /v/ (or at least should be)." Treat each entry as one community's argument for a game, not a consensus verdict. Hidden gems by definition have smaller followings, so a single enthusiastic write-up may be the main source of information — useful, but worth verifying.

If you want a second opinion on a specific title or platform, broader databases and archives can help. For general game information, Wikipedia and MobyGames cover release details and platform histories, and the Internet Archive hosts playable versions of some older software for testing before you buy.

Next step: open the platform list, choose the oldest system you actually own or can emulate, and read that platform's page end to end — then pick one title and try it before committing to a collection.

Related questions

More questions →
What is /v/'s Recommended Games?

/v/'s Recommended Games is a community-maintained wiki that collects video game recommendations sourced from the /v/ board on 4chan. It is aimed at people who want to find games worth playing — including older titles you can still access through emulators or secondhand marketplaces like eBay — and who are comfortable with /v/'s blunt, opinionated tone. The wiki is explicitly marked as "UNDER (RE)CONSTRUCTION," so treat it as a work in progress rather than a finished reference.

What the site actually is

The wiki describes itself as a volunteer effort: "This wiki, like all wikis, lives and breathes on the efforts of volunteers." Its recommendations are supposed to come from /v/, and the site warns readers upfront to expect:

  • Tastes that may not match your own
  • "A healthy serving of hateful language"
  • "Punishing standards of quality"

That framing matters. This is not a neutral review aggregator. The editorial voice is the community's, and the site says so directly: "We hate so hard because we love video games so much."

What content it covers

The main page organizes content into several areas:

Section What it contains
List of Gaming Platforms A large table of platforms with developer/manufacturer, type, lifespan, and name
Special Interest Groups Themed recommendation groupings
Guides Instructional content
Miscellaneous Other material
Contributions How to help the wiki

The platform list spans a very wide range — from the Apple I and Apple II series, through microcomputers like the Amstrad CPC and Acorn Electron, to current hardware such as the PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S, and Nintendo Switch 2. It also includes OS entries (Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux, BSD family, RISC OS) and mobile platforms (Android, iOS, KaiOS, HarmonyOS, Sailfish OS). Discontinued and unreleased platforms appear too, such as Google Stadia (2023), BlackBerry OS (2022), and the never-released Intellivision Amico.

The homepage also links to "Reviews by /v/," "Multiplayer games," and "Recent changes," which are useful entry points if you want to browse rather than read the full platform table.

Who it's for

This wiki suits you if:

  • You want game suggestions filtered through /v/'s taste rather than mainstream review outlets
  • You're interested in retro or older games and want to know what's considered worth playing
  • You want a platform-by-platform index that includes obscure and discontinued hardware
  • You're willing to read past harsh language and strong opinions to find the recommendations

It's less suited to you if you want neutral, consistently updated reviews, or if you need content that is complete and verified — the reconstruction notice and volunteer model mean gaps and stale entries are likely.

Practical caveats

  • Completeness: The site states it is under reconstruction. Sections may be unfinished.
  • Tone: The self-described "hateful language" is part of the house style, not an accident.
  • Sourcing: Recommendations "come from /v/ (or at least should be)" — the wiki itself hedges on whether every entry meets that bar.
  • Contributing: If you want to add to a list or flag a new release or overlooked game, the site invites contributions, consistent with its volunteer model.

If you want to use it, start from the platform list or the reviews index, and cross-check anything you plan to act on against another source, given the wiki's own warning that it is incomplete.

How to Contribute to /v/'s Recommended Games

/v/'s Recommended Games is a volunteer-run wiki, and its own front page says it "lives and breathes on the efforts of volunteers." You can contribute by adding or correcting entries on existing lists, by supplying material when /v/ is discussing a new release or an overlooked older game, and by following the structure the wiki already uses. One important condition: the main page currently carries an "UNDER (RE)CONSTRUCTION" notice, so check the current state of a page before you edit it, since sections may be mid-rebuild.

What the wiki expects from contributors

The site is explicit about its editorial character, and that shapes what counts as a good contribution:

  • Recommendations should come from /v/. The front page states that "all of these recommendations come from /v/ (or at least should be)." A contribution is not a general review — it reflects the board's consensus or enthusiasm.
  • Taste is expected to be opinionated. The wiki warns readers to "expect tastes that may not match your own, a healthy serving of hateful language, and punishing standards of quality." Matching that tone and standard is part of fitting in.
  • It is a wiki, not an official publication. Nothing on the site presents the recommendations as authoritative; they are community picks, which is why the lists are open to revision.

Where contributions fit

The main page is organized around a few areas, and the "Contributions" heading sits alongside them:

Area What it covers
List of Gaming Platforms Platforms by developer, manufacturer, type, lifespan, and name
Special Interest Groups Topic-focused collections
Guides How-to material
Miscellaneous Everything that doesn't fit the above
Contributions The entry point for volunteer work

The platform list is the most concrete example of the wiki's format: each row pairs a developer/manufacturer with a type, a lifespan, and a name — for instance, "Acorn Computers | Microcomputer | 1983–1985 | Acorn Electron," or "Apple Computer | Computer OS | 1984–2001 | Classic Mac OS." If you add a platform, matching those columns is the minimum bar.

A practical contribution workflow

  1. Pick a target. Choose an existing list (a platform page, a genre or special-interest page, or a guide) rather than starting a new page cold. The wiki's value comes from the lists it already maintains.
  2. Read the page's current structure first. Note how entries are ordered, what fields each entry carries, and whether the page shows signs of the reconstruction mentioned on the main page.
  3. Check whether the game is already covered. Duplicate entries are a common failure mode on recommendation wikis; a correction or an added note is often more useful than a second entry.
  4. Write the entry in the wiki's voice. Keep it short, keep it opinionated in the way the rest of the site is, and tie the recommendation to /v/ rather than to your own general impressions.
  5. Verify your facts. Platform lifespans, release years, and hardware names are the parts most likely to be wrong. The platform table format gives you a place to be precise.
  6. Save and, if the wiki offers one, leave an edit summary explaining what you changed and why — useful when someone later reviews a list that is under reconstruction.

Expected result: your addition appears in the same format as neighboring entries and reads as a continuation of the list rather than a separate review.

Common snags

  • Editing a page mid-rebuild. Because the main page announces reconstruction, a page you remember may have been reorganized. Re-read before you write.
  • Contributing a personal favorite with no /v/ connection. The site's stated sourcing rule means a game nobody on the board has discussed is a weak fit, however good it is.
  • Assuming the wiki is official. It isn't, and treating its lists as a fixed canon leads to edit conflicts with people who treat them as a working draft.
  • Ignoring tone. The front page openly warns about harsh language and strict quality standards; contributions written in a neutral review style may simply be rewritten.

If you are unsure where to start, the safest first contribution is a factual fix to the platform table or a small addition to a list you already know well — low-risk, easy to verify, and directly in line with how the wiki is built.

Are the Game Recommendations on /v/'s Recommended Games Official or Authoritative?

No. Every recommendation on /v/'s Recommended Games comes from the /v/ community, not from game publishers, developers, or any official reviewing body. The wiki describes itself as volunteer-driven and explicitly warns that its content reflects /v/'s tastes, which "may not match your own." Treat it as a community opinion archive, not an authoritative review source.

Where the recommendations actually come from

The site's own description states that "all of these recommendations come from /v/ (or at least should be)." There is no editorial board, no publisher relationship, and no claim of professional review standards. The wiki is a collection of what one imageboard community considers worth playing.

That origin shapes everything about the content:

  • Taste is the filter, not credentials. Entries reflect the preferences of people who post on /v/, not trained critics.
  • The tone is deliberately harsh. The site warns readers to expect "a healthy serving of hateful language, and punishing standards of quality."
  • The framing is self-aware. The stated rationale is "We hate so hard because we love video games so much" — an admission that the negativity is a stylistic choice, not an objective verdict.

What "authoritative" would require, and why this wiki doesn't qualify

Criterion Official/authoritative source /v/'s Recommended Games
Who writes it Staff, credentialed reviewers Anonymous community volunteers
Editorial oversight Yes None stated
Stability Published, versioned Openly "under (re)construction"
Stated bias Usually claims neutrality Openly admits strong, narrow taste
Accountability Named authors No individual attribution

The site itself flags that it is "UNDER (RE)CONSTRUCTION," which means pages can be incomplete, outdated, or in flux at any given time.

How to use it sensibly

The wiki is genuinely useful for one thing: discovering older games that a dedicated community still cares about. The site notes that "thanks to emulators and eBay, you can still play video games that are even older than some of us have been alive" — so its strength is surfacing back-catalog titles and platform history, not settling debates about quality.

Practical approach:

  1. Use it as a starting point, not a verdict. A game appearing here means /v/ likes it, not that it is good by any universal standard.
  2. Cross-check before buying or investing time. Look for other reviews or gameplay footage, especially for anything expensive or hard to find.
  3. Expect gaps and rough edges. Because it depends on volunteers, some lists will be thorough and others barely started.
  4. Read the tone as part of the source. The aggressive language is a signal about who wrote it, not evidence about the game.

If you want recommendations that carry institutional weight — publisher statements, professional reviews, or platform-holder curation — this wiki is not that. If you want a window into what one particular community values, it is exactly that, and it is honest about being nothing more.

How Can You Play the Older Games Recommended on /v/'s Recommended Games?

You can still play most of the older games recommended on /v/'s Recommended Games by running them through emulators or by buying the original hardware and cartridges/discs secondhand. The wiki itself does not host, sell, or distribute games — it is a volunteer-written collection of recommendations, so it points you toward what to play rather than how to obtain it. The practical path depends on which platform the game belongs to, and the wiki's "List of Gaming Platforms" is the best starting point for figuring that out.

What the wiki actually provides

The site describes itself as a set of recommendations "from /v/ (or at least should be)," and its own welcome text notes that "thanks to emulators and eBay, you can still play video games that are even older than some of us have been alive." That single line summarizes the two main routes:

  • Emulation — software that reproduces older hardware so you can run games on a modern PC, phone, or handheld.
  • Secondhand hardware and media — buying original consoles, computers, and physical games through marketplaces like eBay.

The wiki is explicit that it is a recommendation and organization project, not a storefront or download hub. It also warns that the writing reflects /v/'s tastes, "hateful language," and "punishing standards of quality," so treat entries as opinionated pointers rather than neutral reviews.

Step 1: Identify the platform

Before you can play anything, you need to know which system a recommended game belongs to. The wiki's List of Gaming Platforms is organized as a table with columns for Developer, Manufacturer, Type, Lifespan, and Name, covering everything from microcomputers and consoles to operating systems. Examples from the page include:

Name Type Lifespan
Acorn Electron Microcomputer 1983–1985
Amstrad CPC Computer 1984–1990
Amstrad GX4000 Console 1990–1991
Apple computer 1 Microcomputer (motherboard) 1976–1977
Apple II series Microcomputer 1977–1993
Classic Mac OS Computer OS 1984–2001
Amazon Fire TV Media player / Microconsole 2014–Current

The page also groups platforms into categories such as Current Consoles, Current Handhelds, Current PC OSs, Current Mobile OSs, Recently Discontinued Platforms, and Upcoming Experiences. Once you know the platform, you know whether you are looking for a console emulator, a computer/OS emulator, or original hardware.

Step 2: Choose an approach

Emulation

Emulation is the route the wiki's own introduction highlights first. In general terms, the process is:

  1. Identify the target system from the platform list (for example, a 1980s microcomputer or a cartridge-based console).
  2. Find an emulator for that system that runs on hardware you own — typically a modern PC, and often phones or handhelds.
  3. Obtain a game image or ROM in a format the emulator accepts.
  4. Load the image in the emulator and configure input, display, and audio.
  5. Verify it runs — check that the game boots, controls respond, and saves work.

The wiki does not supply emulators or ROMs, so those steps happen outside the site. What the wiki gives you is the target list — the specific platforms and titles worth the effort.

Original hardware and secondhand media

The other route is buying the real thing. The wiki's mention of eBay signals that secondhand marketplaces are the expected source. This approach means:

  • Acquiring a working console or computer for the platform in question.
  • Acquiring the physical game (cartridge, disc, cassette, floppy, etc.).
  • Handling region compatibility, display connections on old hardware, and wear or failure in decades-old electronics.

This tends to cost more and require more troubleshooting than emulation, but it avoids ROM-legality questions and preserves original behavior.

Step 3: Use the wiki's other sections

Beyond the platform list, the main page links to sections that help narrow down what to play:

  • Special Interest Groups — themed collections.
  • Guides — practical write-ups.
  • Miscellaneous — odds and ends.
  • Contributions — where volunteers add or fix entries.
  • Reviews by /v/, Multiplayer games, and Recent changes are also linked from the intro.

The Guides section is the most likely place to find platform-specific setup help, since the wiki's structure separates general recommendations from how-to material.

Common snags

  • The wiki is under construction. The main page carries an "UNDER (RE)CONSTRUCTION" banner, so some lists or links may be incomplete or in flux.
  • No downloads or sales. Nothing on the site provides game files or sells hardware; you handle acquisition yourself.
  • Tone and bias. Entries reflect /v/'s community standards, including harsh language, so recommendations are opinionated rather than authoritative.
  • Platform sprawl. The list spans microcomputers, consoles, media players, and operating systems, so the "right" method varies a lot from one entry to the next — always confirm the platform first.

In short: pick a game, find its platform in the list, then either emulate that platform or buy the original hardware and media secondhand. The wiki tells you what is worth playing; the how is up to you.

How /v/'s Recommended Games Is Organized

/v/'s Recommended Games is a community wiki that collects game recommendations originating from the /v/ imageboard. Its main page is a navigation hub: instead of one flat list, it groups content by platform status, platform type, and purpose, so you can jump straight to the hardware or guide you care about. The wiki describes itself as "UNDER (RE)CONSTRUCTION," and it notes that recommendations come from /v/ "or at least should be," with tastes that may not match your own.

Main page sections

The homepage is divided into these blocks:

  • Current Consoles — Atari VCS, Sony PlayStation 5, Microsoft Xbox Series X|S, Amazon Fire TV, Sony PlayStation 4
  • Current Handhelds — Nintendo Switch 2, Panic Playdate, Blaze Evercade, Nintendo Switch, Arduboy line
  • Current PC OSs — AIX, RaspBerry Pi OS, Microsoft Windows, Apple macOS, Oracle Solaris, GNU/Linux, BSD family, RISC OS
  • Current Mobile OSs — Ubuntu Touch, Huawei HarmonyOS, Google Android (TCL), KaiOS, Apple iOS, Jolla Sailfish OS
  • Recently Discontinued Platforms — HP-UX (2025), Windows Embedded Compact (2023), Google Stadia (2023), BlackBerry OS family (2022), Samsung Tizen smartphones (2021)
  • Upcoming Experiences — entries such as Daniel Puchau Ink Console (TBD) and Clydeware GameTank (2026)

Below those, the page links to broader site sections: List of Gaming Platforms, Special Interest Groups, Guides, Miscellaneous, and Contributions.

The List of Gaming Platforms

This is the master index of hardware and operating systems covered by the wiki. Each row uses the same fields, so you can scan by any column:

Field What it tells you
Developer Who created the platform
Manufacturer Who built or produced it
Type Console, computer, OS, handheld, media player, etc.
Lifespan Years the platform was active
Name The platform itself

For example, the table lists Acorn Electron (microcomputer, 1983–1985), RISC OS (computer OS, 1987–current), Amazon Fire TV (media player / microconsole, 2014–current), Amazon Luna (cloud gaming service, 2022–current), and Intellivision Amico (console, never released in 2020). Entries run from the Apple I (1976–1977) through modern systems, so the list doubles as a rough timeline of gaming hardware.

How to use the site

  1. Pick your platform type first. If you want console recommendations, start with Current Consoles or Recently Discontinued Platforms rather than scrolling the full platform list.
  2. Open the platform page. Each entry in the List of Gaming Platforms links to its own page, which is where the actual recommended-games content lives.
  3. Check the Guides and Special Interest Groups sections if you want curated lists rather than a single platform's picks.
  4. Use Contributions if you want to add to a list — the wiki states it "lives and breathes on the efforts of volunteers."

What to expect

The wiki is explicit about its editorial voice: "Expect tastes that may not match your own, a healthy serving of hateful language, and punishing standards of quality." It also links to Reviews by /v/, Multiplayer games, and Recent changes as quick entry points. Treat it as a starting point for discovery rather than a neutral database — the recommendations reflect one community's preferences, and the site is still being rebuilt.

Website Overview

Identifiable technologies and additional version or configuration signals make the service easier to fingerprint, which may help targeted scanners narrow their checks. An established domain and managed infrastructure suggest continuity of operations and may support dependable delivery, although neither guarantees service quality.

Domain and Registration

Registered in 2015, this domain has about 11 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain uses the common .org extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

Nameservers are provided by Cloudflare, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Google Workspace email service. DNSSEC is enabled, allowing validating resolvers to authenticate signed DNS data. CAA records restrict which certificate authorities are authorized to issue certificates. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses.

TLS and Certificates

The public key uses EC with 256 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued within the Google Trust Services cloud or CDN ecosystem. The certificate's total validity is about 90 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. All six checked browser-security headers are present. Their effectiveness still depends on the policy values and application behavior. The cf-ray, x-cache, x-served-by response header indicates a CDN or caching proxy in the delivery path. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header identifies cloudflare without an exact version.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies MediaWiki 1.46.2, Cloudflare, Fastly, with exact versions exposed for 1 technologies. These details can narrow vulnerability checks, although exposure alone is not a vulnerability.

Search and Social Sharing

The meta description has 164 characters and may be shortened in search results. The Generator tag identifies MediaWiki 1.46.2, making the publishing system easier to fingerprint. No homepage canonical URL was detected. If duplicate URLs exist, consolidation may be less explicit. Twitter Card metadata is configured. JSON-LD includes Organization data, helping describe the organization as an entity.

Hosting and Email

DNSCloudflare
HostingFastly
EmailGoogle Workspace
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagUnited States Inferred 2606:4700::6812:6be

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarName.com, Inc.
Registered2015-07-11
Expires2027-07-11
Domain statusclient transfer prohibited
Nameserversangela.ns.cloudflare.com、bradley.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSECsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Avsrecommendedgames.miraheze.org104.18.6.190300—
Avsrecommendedgames.miraheze.org104.18.7.190300—
AAAAvsrecommendedgames.miraheze.org2606:4700::6812:6be300—
AAAAvsrecommendedgames.miraheze.org2606:4700::6812:7be300—
MXmiraheze.orgsmtp.google.com30010
NSmiraheze.organgela.ns.cloudflare.com86400—
NSmiraheze.orgbradley.ns.cloudflare.com86400—
TXTmiraheze.org_globalsign-domain-verification=VSF3i19MYIR4UsdgiIyOqPxNXKxpfkWK0jbiKG8VnK300—
TXTmiraheze.orgatlassian-domain-verification=seLpRBEOK9uaTCZrJSqptkG8Km60/0kkJUmi4Z6kaSS8SFufgAYFfvLOyqE1FGZw300—
TXTmiraheze.orggoogle-site-verification=cLYzeroDUhCN-mD5Jqby6wK_JWUdpgg4OW8R4cZODMI300—
TXTmiraheze.orggoogle-site-verification=fVCiW2Ct9RPotFUjRb5vj5O0YLOKPQfbBGjDttn07_w300—
TXTmiraheze.orggoogle-site-verification=oom6omzwhrqzLk8qENwGqW0mTIE6pPVEQEQZMaaJF74300—
TXTmiraheze.orggoogle-site-verification=rLiYQP62CfBKGd-BlN0Mpl4wUZ4F_26__ktw2QGIz2o300—
TXTmiraheze.orgv=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all300—
CAAmiraheze.org0 issue "comodoca.com"3600—
CAAmiraheze.org0 issue "digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"3600—
CAAmiraheze.org0 issue "letsencrypt.org"3600—
CAAmiraheze.org0 issue "pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"3600—
CAAmiraheze.org0 issue "ssl.com"3600—
CAAmiraheze.org0 issuewild "comodoca.com"3600—
CAAmiraheze.org0 issuewild "digicert.com; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"3600—
CAAmiraheze.org0 issuewild "letsencrypt.org"3600—
CAAmiraheze.org0 issuewild "pki.goog; cansignhttpexchanges=yes"3600—
CAAmiraheze.org0 issuewild "ssl.com"3600—
DSmiraheze.org2371 13 2 bd48494a70638b4341f7d45e5aa7e416fa57383c8de9b5ef82496c6e449d8a0f3600—
DMARC_dmarc.miraheze.orgv=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:[email protected]; ruf=mailto:[email protected]; fo=1; adkim=r; aspf=r; pct=100; rf=afrf; ri=86400; sp=none300—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectmiraheze.org
IssuerGoogle Trust Services
Valid until2026-12-22T19:51 · Remaining when checked: 78 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
content-languageen
cache-controlprivate, s-maxage=0, max-age=0, must-revalidate, no-transform
servercloudflare
strict-transport-securitymax-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policydefault-src 'self' *.miraheze.org *.mirabeta.org *.wikitide.org *.wikitide.net; script-src blob: 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' *.miraheze.org *.mirabeta.org *.wikitide.org *.wikitide.net *.wikimedia.org *.wikipedia.org *.wikibooks.org *.wiktionary.org *.wikiquote.org *.wikisource.org *.wikiversity.org *.wikinews.org *.wikivoyage.org mediawiki.org *.mediawiki.org wikidata.org www.gstatic.com www.google.com apis.google.com platform.twitter.com ajax.cloudflare.com cdnjs.cloudflare.com cdn.jsdelivr.net fastly.jsdelivr.net cdn.syndication.twimg.com openlayers.org hcaptcha.com *.hcaptcha.com bandcamp.com challenges.cloudflare.com www.youtube.com tally.so; style-src 'self' data: 'unsafe-inline' miraheze.org wikitide.org *.miraheze.org *.mirabeta.org *.wikitide.org *.wikitide.net *.wikimedia.org *.wikipedia.org *.wikibooks.org *.wiktionary.org *.wikiquote.org *.wikisource.org *.wikiversity.org *.wikinews.org *.wikivoyage.org mediawiki.org *.mediawiki.org wikidata.org www.gstatic.com fonts.googleapis.com cdn.jsdelivr.net fastly.jsdelivr.net cdnjs.cloudflare.com platform.twitter.com ton.twimg.com hcaptcha.com *.hcaptcha.com use.typekit.net; img-src blob: 'self' data: miraheze.org wikitide.org *.miraheze.org *.mirabeta.org *.wikitide.org *.wikitide.net upload.wikimedia.org thumb.wikimedia.org wikimedia.org maps.google.com www.gstatic.com maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com *.twimg.com i.imgur.com image.tmdb.org *.googleusercontent.com *.fontawesome.com *.dropboxstatic.com *.redd.it *.redditmedia.com mirrors.creativecommons.org www.gnu.org cdn.pixabay.com docs.blender.org *.imgbox.com tile.openstreetmap.org *.tile.openstreetmap.org cdn.discordapp.com *.fastly.net minotar.net db.onlinewebfonts.com openlayers.org discordapp.com imgbb.com postimages.org platform.twitter.com syndication.twitter.com img.newspapers.com storage.googleapis.com *.fbcdn.net i.ytimg.com *.imgbb.com simgbb.com *.simgbb.com ibb.co *.ibb.co *.postimages.org postimgs.org *.postimgs.org postimg.cc *.postimg.cc *.rbxcdn.com minecraft.wiki cdn.jsdelivr.net mc-heads.net; font-src 'self' data: *.miraheze.org *.mirabeta.org *.wikitide.org *.wikitide.net fonts.gstatic.com fonts.googleapis.com cdnjs.cloudflare.com cdn.jsdelivr.net fastly.jsdelivr.net db.onlinewebfonts.com upload.wikimedia.org use.typekit.net; media-src 'self' blob: *.miraheze.org *.mirabeta.org *.wikitide.org *.wikitide.net upload.wikimedia.org embed.nicovideo.jp *.youtube.com *.youtube-nocookie.com player.twitch.tv clips.twitch.tv player.vimeo.com apis.google.com bandcamp.com cdn.jsdelivr.net; frame-src 'self' *.miraheze.org *.mirabeta.org *.wikitide.org *.wikitide.net www.google.com docs.google.com apis.google.com calendar.google.com drive.google.com web.libera.chat snap.berkeley.edu *.youtube-nocookie.com www.youtube.com player.twitch.tv platform.twitter.com discord.com discordapp.com embed.nicovideo.jp syndication.twitter.com open.spotify.com www.gofundme.com archive.org w.soundcloud.com query.wikidata.org player.vimeo.com www.bing.com lucid.app scratch.mit.edu hcaptcha.com *.hcaptcha.com bandcamp.com challenges.cloudflare.com clips.twitch.tv video.fastly.steamstatic.com shared.fastly.steamstatic.com *.instatus.com tally.so; connect-src 'self' blob: *.miraheze.org *.mirabeta.org *.wikitide.org *.wikitide.net www.wikidata.org *.wikipedia.org www.mediawiki.org *.wikimedia.org *.wikinews.org *.wiktionary.org cdn.jsdelivr.net fastly.jsdelivr.net storage.googleapis.com *.youtube-nocookie.com hcaptcha.com *.hcaptcha.com 1.1.1.1 translate.googleapis.com games.roblox.com economy.roblox.com discord.com discordapp.com api.steampowered.com *.instatus.com
x-frame-optionsSAMEORIGIN
x-content-type-optionsnosniff
referrer-policysame-origin
permissions-policyinterest-cohort=(), browsing-topics=()

Identified technologies

MediaWiki 1.46.2CloudflareFastly

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionThanks to emulators and eBay, you can still play video games that are even older than some of us have been alive. All of these recommendations come from /v/ (or...
Canonical URLNot detected
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter Cardsummary
All bots 2 allowed · 18 disallowed
  • Allow/w/api.php?action=mobileview&
  • Allow/w/load.php?
  • Disallow/w/
  • Disallow/geoip
  • Disallow/rest_v1/
  • Disallow/*?action=
  • Disallow/*?*&action=
  • Disallow/*?veaction=
  • Disallow/*?*&veaction=
  • Disallow/*?mobileaction=
  • Disallow/*?*&mobileaction=
  • Disallow/*?diff=
  • Disallow/*?*&diff=
  • Disallow/*?curid=
  • Disallow/*?*&curid=
  • Disallow/*?oldid=
  • Disallow/*?*&oldid=
  • Disallow/wiki/Special:
  • Disallow/Special:
  • Disallow/metawiki/wiki/Special:
semrushbot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
ahrefsbot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
bytespider 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
petalbot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
dotbot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
megaindex 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
serpstatbot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
barkrowler 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
seekportbot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
bingbot 2 allowed · 18 disallowed
  • Allow/w/api.php?action=mobileview&
  • Allow/w/load.php?
  • Disallow/w/
  • Disallow/geoip
  • Disallow/rest_v1/
  • Disallow/*?action=
  • Disallow/*?*&action=
  • Disallow/*?veaction=
  • Disallow/*?*&veaction=
  • Disallow/*?mobileaction=
  • Disallow/*?*&mobileaction=
  • Disallow/*?diff=
  • Disallow/*?*&diff=
  • Disallow/*?curid=
  • Disallow/*?*&curid=
  • Disallow/*?oldid=
  • Disallow/*?*&oldid=
  • Disallow/wiki/Special:
  • Disallow/Special:
  • Disallow/metawiki/wiki/Special:
  • IntervalCrawl delay 20 seconds
mj12bot 0 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • IntervalCrawl delay 10 seconds
yandexbot 0 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • IntervalCrawl delay 2.5 seconds

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.