dickey-john.com No paid content found

A grain moisture tester measures the water content of grain as a percentage of its weight, so you can decide whether it is ready to harvest, safe to store, or fairly priced at sale. The right tester for your operation depends on three things: which grains you handle, how often you test, and whether you need only moisture or also protein and other quality traits. Capacitance meters cover most farm and elevator needs; near-infrared (NIR) whole-grain analyzers make sense when you also trade on protein or need lab-grade repeatability.

What a grain moisture tester actually measures

Moisture content is the share of water in a grain sample, usually expressed on a wet-weight basis — a reading of 15% means 15% of the sample's weight is water. That single number drives several decisions:

• Harvest timing. Too wet and grain may not thresh cleanly or may spoil in the bin; too dry and you lose weight (and money) at sale.
• Storage safety. Each grain has a safe storage moisture range; above it, mold and heating risk rise.
• Sale and shrink. Buyers discount or reject loads above contract moisture, and drying costs are charged back to the seller.

Because the same grain can read differently at different temperatures, a usable tester must either compensate for temperature or require you to account for it. This is one of the most common sources of disagreement between two meters reading the same sample.

How the main measurement methods work

Capacitance (dielectric) meters

A sample sits in a cell and the instrument measures how the grain changes an electrical field. Water affects that field strongly, so the reading tracks moisture. These meters are fast (seconds), portable, and the standard tool for on-farm and elevator use. Accuracy depends on the calibration built in for each grain and on sample temperature, so most units include automatic temperature compensation.

Near-infrared (NIR) analyzers

NIR instruments shine light at specific wavelengths and read how the sample absorbs it. Because different components absorb differently, one scan can report moisture plus protein, oil, starch, and other traits. Whole-grain NIR analyzers such as the FOSS Infratec line are used where grain is traded or graded on more than moisture. They cost more and are less pocket-sized than capacitance meters, but they replace several separate tests.

Loss-on-drying (reference method)

A weighed sample is dried under controlled heat and reweighed; the weight lost is the water. This is the classic reference method used to check other instruments. It is accurate but slow (often an hour or more) and not practical for a truckload, so it is normally a lab or verification tool rather than a field meter.

Key factors when choosing a tester

• Grain types and calibrations. Confirm the meter has calibrations for every grain you handle — corn, soybeans, wheat, barley, and so on. A meter that is excellent for corn may need a separate calibration for small grains.
• Moisture range. Check the range covers your real conditions, including high-moisture grain straight from the field and dry grain going into storage.
• Sample size and cell design. Larger, well-mixed samples reduce error from variability within a load. Follow the manufacturer's fill and packing instructions exactly; under- or over-filling is a frequent cause of bad readings.
• Temperature compensation. For field and elevator use, automatic compensation saves time and reduces operator error.
• Calibration and adjustment. Look for a meter you can verify and adjust, and check how often it needs service.
• Portability vs. bench use. Handheld capacitance meters suit field checks; bench NIR analyzers suit a fixed grading or trading point.
• Protein and quality testing. If you are paid on protein or need whole-grain quality data, a moisture-only meter will not be enough — that is where a whole-grain analyzer or protein analyzer enters the picture.

UAS Service Corp. sells DICKEY-john moisture meters and FOSS whole-grain testing equipment, which covers both ends of this range: DICKEY-john meters for routine moisture checks and FOSS Infratec instruments for whole-grain and protein analysis.

How to verify accuracy and keep calibration

1. Start with a reference sample. Use grain of known moisture (from a loss-on-drying lab result or a certified check sample) and compare your meter's reading.
2. Test at a realistic temperature. Run the sample at the temperature you actually encounter; if the meter lacks automatic compensation, note the temperature and apply the correction.
3. Repeat and average. Take several readings from the same lot and compare them. Wide spread usually points to sampling or filling problems, not the instrument.
4. Check against a second method periodically. A lab loss-on-drying result is the usual benchmark.
5. Follow the maintenance schedule. Keep the cell clean, replace worn parts, and send the unit for recalibration on the manufacturer's interval.

A practical habit: keep a log of meter readings next to lab results for your main grains. Patterns — a consistent offset, or drift over a season — tell you when to recalibrate rather than guess.

When a basic tester is enough, and when you need more

A basic capacitance moisture tester is usually sufficient if you:

• Only need moisture content
• Test on the farm, in the field, or at an elevator scale
• Want fast, portable readings for harvest and storage decisions

You likely need a whole-grain analyzer or NIR instrument if you:

• Are paid or docked based on protein, oil, or other quality traits
• Grade or trade grain and need documented, repeatable results
• Want one instrument to report moisture and composition together

For a direct comparison of two common paths — a DICKEY-john moisture meter versus a FOSS Infratec analyzer — the deciding question is whether moisture alone answers your question or whether you also need protein and whole-grain quality data.

Farming technology earns its keep when it turns field conditions into decisions you can act on: how fast you're actually moving, whether a planter row is delivering seed, and whether grain is dry enough to store. DICKEY-john, an agricultural electronics company with over 50 years in the field, builds monitors, controllers, moisture testers, and ground speed sensors around exactly those jobs. This guide covers what each tool does, how the pieces connect during planting, spraying, and harvest, and where setup and calibration most often go wrong.

What Farm Sensors and Monitors Actually Do

A farm monitor is a display and a decision aid. Sensors mounted on the machine measure something physical — shaft rotation, ground speed, bin level, moisture — and the monitor converts those signals into numbers you can read from the cab while the machine is moving.

The practical value is timing. During planting, a seed sensor tells you whether each row is actually dropping seed and whether population matches your target. During spraying, flow and speed data tell you whether application rate is holding steady. At harvest, yield and moisture data tell you whether to keep going or stop and adjust.

The chain matters more than any single device:

1. Sensor — detects a physical event (seed passing a sensor, a shaft turning, ground moving under the machine).
2. Controller or module — processes the signal and, in integrated systems, can act on it automatically.
3. Display — shows the operator what's happening in real time.
4. Record — logs the data for later review, mapping, or reporting.

If any link is miscalibrated, the whole chain reports wrong numbers, and wrong numbers lead to wrong decisions — over- or under-seeding, misapplied product, or grain stored too wet.

Ground Speed and Implement Sensors: Why Accurate Speed Matters

Ground speed is the input that most other calculations depend on. Application rate, seeding population per acre, and spray coverage are all derived from how fast the machine is traveling. A radar or wheel-based ground speed sensor feeds that number to the controller.

Why this matters in practice:

• Application rate — a sprayer controller holds a target rate by adjusting flow as speed changes. If the speed signal is wrong, the controller compensates in the wrong direction.
• Seeding rate — population per acre depends on speed and meter output. An inaccurate speed reading skews the population calculation even when the meter is working correctly.
• Section control and coverage — turning sections on and off at the right moment depends on knowing position and speed accurately.

Implement sensors extend this to the tool behind the tractor: shaft monitors confirm a planter or seeder is turning, bin and level sensors report how much product remains, and row sensors confirm individual rows are functioning. The common failure mode is a sensor that has drifted, come loose, or is reading a shaft that isn't actually turning — the monitor shows a number, but the number is wrong or stale.

Grain Moisture Testing: Harvest Timing, Drying, and Storage

A grain moisture tester answers one question with money attached: is this grain dry enough to store safely, or does it need more drying? Moisture content drives both storage risk and sale weight, so the reading needs to be trustworthy.

Where moisture testing fits into the workflow:

• Before and during harvest — checking moisture tells you whether to start combining, keep going, or wait. Harvesting too wet means higher drying costs; too dry can mean shatter loss in some crops.
• At the dryer — moisture readings guide how long grain stays in the dryer and when it's ready to move.
• Before storage — grain stored above a safe moisture level for its temperature risks spoilage. Testing before binning is the check that prevents a spoiled bin.
• At sale — moisture affects weight and grade, so knowing your number before delivery helps you anticipate how the load will be evaluated.

DICKEY-john's moisture testing line includes GAC (Grain Analysis Computer) instruments, which are used for grain moisture analysis. The key operational point is that a moisture tester is only as good as its calibration and sample handling — see the troubleshooting section below.

Entry-Level Monitors vs. Integrated Controllers

When upgrading equipment, the choice usually comes down to whether you want to watch or automate.

The trade-off is straightforward: a monitor gives you information and leaves the decision to you; a controller takes the decision and executes it, which is faster and more consistent but less forgiving of bad calibration. If your operation is small or you're new to precision equipment, a monitor is often the sensible first step. If you're already managing variable rates across many acres, the automation a controller provides is where the value is — provided you invest the setup time.

Common Setup and Calibration Mistakes — and How to Troubleshoot

Most "the equipment is broken" problems are calibration or installation problems. The recurring ones:

• Speed calibration skipped or wrong. Ground speed sensors need to be calibrated to the actual machine. Symptom: application or population consistently off by a similar percentage. Fix: recalibrate speed against a measured distance.
• Sensor not reading the target. A seed or shaft sensor mounted too far from the moving part, or misaligned, reads zero or intermittent counts. Symptom: a row shows no population while seed is visibly dropping. Fix: check mounting distance and alignment against the sensor's spec.
• Loose or corroded connections. Vibration works connectors loose over a season. Symptom: readings that cut in and out. Fix: inspect and reseat harness connections.
• Moisture tester sample handling. Moisture readings depend on sample size, temperature, and how the sample is presented to the instrument. Symptom: readings that don't match expectations or vary between tests. Fix: follow the tester's procedure for sample size and handling, and verify calibration.
• Configuration drift after a change. Swapping a display, controller, or sensor without re-entering configuration leaves the system working from old assumptions. Symptom: everything reads plausibly but is subtly wrong. Fix: re-verify configuration after any component change.

A useful habit: when a reading looks wrong, verify the physical thing first (is the shaft turning? is seed dropping? is the sample correct?), then the sensor, then the calibration, then the configuration. That order catches most problems before you conclude the hardware has failed.

Where to Start

If you're new to on-farm electronics, start with ground speed and one thing you want to measure — population, application rate, or bin level — and get that reading accurate before adding more. If you're already running monitors, the highest-return work is usually recalibrating speed and moisture and checking sensor mounting, because those two inputs feed the most decisions. And if you're weighing an upgrade, decide first whether you want to watch the data or have the machine act on it; that answer determines whether a monitor or a controller is the right fit.

Ag tech, in practical farming terms, is the electronics and sensors mounted on or used alongside farm equipment to measure what is happening in the field and act on it. The main categories are monitors, controllers, ground speed sensors, and moisture testers. You need basic monitoring if you only want to see what your machine is doing; you need a control system if you want the equipment to adjust itself automatically. Moisture testing is a separate, bench- or cart-based job tied to harvest and grain marketing decisions.

The four tool categories that make up most on-farm ag tech

DICKEY-john, which has been building agricultural electronics for over 50 years, groups its product line around monitors, controllers, moisture testers, and ground speed sensors. That grouping is a useful way to think about the category as a whole.

The distinction that matters most to a buyer is monitor versus controller. A monitor tells you something. A controller changes something. Everything else in ag tech tends to be a variation on those two roles.

Monitors: seeing what the machine is doing

A monitor is the entry point. It takes signals from sensors — a shaft turning, a fan spinning, seed dropping — and puts a number or an alarm in front of the operator. The value is early warning: a plugged row, a slipping belt, or a fan that has stopped shows up on the display instead of in a yield map at the end of the season.

Choose monitoring first if your problem is that you don't know what's happening. If you already know the problem and just need the machine to fix it, skip to controllers.

Controllers: closing the loop

A controller uses the same sensor inputs but drives an output — a hydraulic valve, a metering roll, a conveyor — to hold a target rate or population. This is where ag tech stops being a dashboard and starts being automation.

The practical condition for a controller is that you have a target you want held automatically across changing conditions: varying ground speed, varying product density, varying terrain. If your application rate is already consistent because your conditions are consistent, a controller buys you less.

Ground speed sensors: the input everything else depends on

Ground speed is the quiet dependency in most rate control. Radar and other ground-speed sensors measure how fast the machine is actually moving over the ground, rather than how fast the wheels are turning. On soft or sloping ground those two numbers diverge, and any rate calculated from wheel speed will be wrong by the same amount.

If you are troubleshooting inconsistent application rates, check the speed source before you replace the controller.

Moisture testers: the harvest and marketing tool

Moisture testing is a different job from in-field monitoring. A grain moisture tester — DICKEY-john's line includes the GAC family of grain moisture testers — measures the moisture content of a sample so you can decide whether to harvest, dry, blend, or sell.

This is the category where the decision is financial as much as operational. Moisture content affects storage risk and the price you receive, so the tester needs to match the grain you actually grow and the range of moisture you actually see. When comparing testers, compare them on the same dimensions:

• Grain types and calibrations supported — does it cover your crops?
• Moisture range — does it read the wet end you see at harvest, not just dry grain?
• Sample handling — how much grain per test, and how long per test?
• Where it lives — bench unit, cart-mounted, or portable to the field?
• Repeatability — do repeated tests on the same sample agree?

How sensing data feeds planting, application, and harvest decisions

The categories connect in a chain rather than standing alone:

1. Planting. Population and seed spacing sensors feed a monitor; a controller holds population as speed changes. Ground speed is the reference input.
2. Application. Flow and pressure sensors feed the monitor; the controller adjusts valves to hold rate. Again, ground speed sets the target.
3. Harvest. Machine monitoring covers the combine's own functions, while moisture testing happens on the grain itself — either in the field or at the bin.

The practical takeaway: if you improve only one link, improve the speed and sensing inputs first. Controllers cannot correct for a bad measurement.

Basic monitoring or a full control system?

Use these conditions to decide:

Start with monitoring if:

• You don't currently have visibility into machine performance
• Your application rates are already acceptable and you mainly want alarms and records
• You are adding technology to older equipment incrementally

Move to control if:

• Rates or populations drift with speed or terrain
• You are applying expensive inputs where over- and under-application both cost money
• You want the operator to focus on the field rather than on manual adjustments

Add moisture testing regardless if:

• You make harvest timing, drying, or selling decisions on grain
• You need a number you can act on rather than an estimate

Most operations end up with a mix: monitoring on some machines, control on the ones where rate accuracy pays, and a moisture tester at the point where grain changes hands or goes into storage.

Where to go next

If you are specifying equipment, work backward from the decision you want to improve — rate accuracy, machine uptime, or grain moisture — and identify which of the four categories owns that decision. DICKEY-john's product line is organized along exactly those lines, so its monitors, controllers, ground speed sensors, and moisture testers are a reasonable reference set for comparing what each category does before you commit to a system.

Agricultural science research is best understood as a set of evidence types, not a single stream of breakthroughs. A study showing that a cover crop increased soil carbon on one farm is not the same kind of claim as a multi-year trial across dozens of sites, and neither is the same as a computer model projecting yields in 2050. If you want to know what "agriculture research shows," the first useful skill is telling those apart.

Start by identifying the study type

Most agriculture news items fall into one of four categories, and each supports a different strength of conclusion.

A headline rarely states which of these it is. The abstract or methods section almost always does.

The main areas agriculture research actually covers

Soil health and fertility

Work here examines organic matter, microbial communities, nutrient cycling, erosion, and how tillage or cover cropping changes them. Findings are often highly site-specific because soil type and climate drive results.

Crop genetics and breeding

Researchers develop varieties with traits such as drought tolerance, disease resistance, or improved nutrient use. Distinguish between results from controlled environments and multi-location field performance, which is what determines whether a variety reaches farmers.

Livestock and animal science

This includes nutrition, genetics, health, emissions, and welfare. Feed trials and herd studies typically report average effects across a population, not guarantees for an individual animal.

Climate resilience and environmental impact

Studies assess how farming systems respond to heat, drought, flooding, and pests, and how agriculture contributes to or mitigates greenhouse gas emissions. Many of these rely on models combined with field data.

Technology and precision agriculture

Sensors, remote sensing, and data-driven management are evaluated for water use, input efficiency, and yield. Adoption research examines whether these tools actually get used and under what conditions.

Why a single study is rarely the final word

One experiment is a data point, not a settled fact. Science moves through replication (other teams getting similar results), meta-analysis (combining many studies), and review. When you read about a finding, ask:

• Has it been repeated in different locations or years?
• Is there a systematic review or meta-analysis on the topic?
• Do the authors describe the result as preliminary?

A result that holds across many independent trials is far more actionable than one striking headline.

Lab and greenhouse results are not farm results

Controlled conditions remove variables—pests, weather swings, soil variability—that real farms cannot remove. A treatment that works in a greenhouse may fail in a field, and a field result from one region may not transfer to another. This is not a flaw in the research; it is a limit on how far you can generalize it. Always check where and under what conditions the work was done.

Practical questions before applying any finding

1. Sample size: How many plots, animals, or sites were studied?
2. Location and climate: Does the setting resemble yours?
3. Time frame: One season or many years? Some soil effects take years to appear.
4. Control or comparison: What was the finding compared against?
5. Effect size: How large was the change, and does it matter economically?
6. Funding and conflicts: Who supported the work, and do the authors disclose interests?
7. Peer review: Was it published in a peer-reviewed journal, or is it a preprint or press release?

Where to find the primary sources

News coverage is a summary of a summary. To go deeper, look for the original journal article, the university or agency press release it came from, and any linked data. Government agricultural agencies, university extension services, and international research organizations publish applied guidance alongside primary studies. Extension materials are often the most directly usable for on-farm decisions because they translate research into local recommendations.

A reasonable way to read agriculture news

Treat each item as one piece of an evolving picture. Note the study type, the location, the time frame, and whether it has been replicated. Then ask whether the conditions match your own. Research tells you what happened under specific circumstances; deciding what to do with that information depends on your soil, climate, budget, and goals.

Moisture testing measures the water content in grain as a percentage of its weight, and it matters because that single number drives harvest timing, safe storage life, and the price you're paid at the elevator. The practical rule: test a representative sample with a calibrated meter, correct for temperature, and compare the reading against your crop's safe-storage threshold before you bin or sell. This guide covers how the main methods work, how to run a test, and how to read the result without fooling yourself.

Why grain moisture content matters

Three decisions hinge on moisture content:

• Harvest timing. Too wet and you pay to dry it (or risk spoilage); too dry and you lose weight and yield to field shatter.
• Storage safety. Wet grain respires, heats, and molds. Each crop has a moisture ceiling above which it won't keep.
• Pricing and shrink. Buyers discount wet grain and apply "shrink" for the water weight you're not delivering. A point or two of moisture is real money across a bin.

Because the same number feeds all three, an inaccurate test compounds: you might bin grain that spoils, or sell grain you didn't need to dry.

How the main measurement methods work

The key mechanism to understand: capacitance and NIR meters don't "see" water directly — they measure a proxy (electrical behavior or light absorption) and convert it to a moisture percentage using a calibration curve built for a specific crop. That's why a meter set for corn gives wrong numbers on soybeans, and why calibration and temperature correction are not optional.

Running a representative test

1. Sample properly. Grain moisture varies within a load, bin, or field. Pull multiple subsamples from different depths/points and combine them — a single grab from the top of a truck is not representative.
2. Clean the sample. Remove fines, chaff, and foreign material, which skew readings. Follow your meter's guidance on how much to clean.
3. Fill to the correct level. Capacitance meters depend on consistent sample density. Under- or over-filling the cell changes the reading.
4. Enter the crop and, if required, the temperature. Many meters need the grain temperature so they can apply a correction; some measure it automatically.
5. Run the test and record the result along with crop, temperature, and time. Repeat on a second subsample to check consistency.
6. Verify against a reference when accuracy is critical. Periodically compare your meter to an oven/reference method or a known standard.

Expected result: a stable moisture percentage that repeats within a point or so on re-testing the same sample. If readings swing widely, the problem is usually sampling, fill level, or temperature — not the grain.

Reading and interpreting results

• Temperature correction. Grain temperature affects capacitance readings; a cold sample can read differently than a warm one. Use the meter's temperature input or automatic compensation.
• Calibration. Confirm the meter is set to the right crop and the right calibration. Different varieties and crops have different curves.
• Compare to a threshold. Match the reading to your crop's safe-storage moisture and your buyer's discount schedule, then decide: harvest, dry, aerate, or sell.
• Track over time. A single reading is a snapshot; logging readings across a bin or field shows drying trends and hotspots.

Common sources of error and troubleshooting

Choosing a tester

Match the tool to the job using the same dimensions:

• Crop type: confirm the meter supports your crops and their calibrations.
• Accuracy needs: for buying/selling or calibration work, prioritize a meter you can verify against a reference; for quick field checks, portability may matter more.
• Portability: handheld/portable units suit field and truck-side checks; bench units suit office and lab use.
• Temperature handling: prefer meters that measure or accept grain temperature for correction.
• Workflow fit: consider sample size, test time, and whether you need data logging.

DICKEY-john, which has built agricultural electronics for over 50 years, offers moisture testers among its monitoring, control, and sensing products — a relevant reference point when comparing options for on-farm grain moisture testing.