Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

accessibilityinsights.io

Solve accessibility issues before they reach your customers.

No paid content found
Visit website
Profile views 8 Outbound visits 2 Normal
Accessibility Insights Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Development
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
2019
Hosting
Microsoft CorporationInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is Accessibility Insights?

Accessibility Insights is a free set of accessibility testing tools from Microsoft, split into two editions: a browser extension for web pages and web apps, and a Windows desktop tool for Windows applications. Its stated goal is to help teams find and fix accessibility problems before users encounter them.

What each edition does

  • For Web — a browser extension for Chrome and the new Microsoft Edge. It tests webpages and web applications against WCAG 2.1 AA coverage.
  • For Windows — a desktop tool for Windows apps that consolidates trusted Windows experiences such as Inspect and Color Contrast Analyzer into one tool.

How it fits into a workflow

The product is positioned around speed for developers. Its FastPass automated check is described as catching the most common, high-impact issues in under five minutes, which makes it practical as a routine step before a pull request or release rather than a one-off audit. A Visual Helper feature highlights errors directly in the interface with guidance on fixing them, so a developer who is not an accessibility specialist can act on results without a separate research step. The Windows tool also supports verifying UI Automation properties with Live Inspect and investigating contrast ratios with Color Contrast Analyzer.

Who it suits

  • Developers who want fast, in-context feedback on common errors.
  • QA and testers adding an accessibility pass to existing checks.
  • Teams that need WCAG 2.1 AA coverage evidence for web work.

Trade-offs to weigh

Automated checks like FastPass catch common, high-impact problems, but they cannot judge everything a person experiences — meaningful alt text, logical reading and focus order, or whether a flow makes sense with a screen reader still need manual testing and, ideally, testing with people who use assistive technology. Treat the tools as a first filter, not a substitute for that. The Windows edition is also limited to Windows apps, so cross-platform teams may need different tooling elsewhere.

Next step

Decide by platform: if your work is browser-based, start with the web extension and run FastPass on your highest-traffic pages; if you ship a Windows desktop app, use the Windows tool and check UI Automation properties and contrast. The site also links to documentation, an FAQ, and open-source GitHub repositories if you want to inspect or contribute to the tools. For broader guidance, the W3C publishes the WCAG standards these tools assess against.

How do I use Accessibility Insights for Web to test a webpage?

Accessibility Insights for Web is a browser extension for Chrome and the new Microsoft Edge that tests webpages and web applications for accessibility issues. You install it from the browser's extension store, open the page you want to test, and launch the extension to run its checks.

A typical testing flow

  1. Open the page in Chrome or Edge and start the extension.
  2. Run FastPass, the quick automated check designed to catch the most common, high-impact issues in under five minutes.
  3. Review the flagged items. The Visual Helper highlights problem areas directly on the page so you can see where the issue is.
  4. Work through the guided instructions for each finding, then fix the underlying markup or component behavior.
  5. Re-run the check to confirm the fix, and use the fuller assessment mode when you need broader WCAG 2.1 AA coverage rather than a quick pass.

What it is good at, and what it is not

The tool is built for developers and QA testers who want fast feedback during a sprint rather than a one-off audit at the end. Its strengths are speed, on-page visualizations, and clear fix guidance for common errors. Like any automated checker, it cannot judge everything: meaningful alt text, logical heading order, keyboard flow, and screen reader experience still need human review. Treat FastPass as a first filter, not a substitute for manual testing.

Choosing between the Web and Windows tools

Tool Target Typical use
Accessibility Insights for Web Webpages and web apps in Chrome/Edge FastPass on a URL, visual highlighting of issues
Accessibility Insights for Windows Windows desktop applications UI Automation inspection and contrast checks

If you are testing a website, use the Web extension. If you are testing a native Windows app, use the Windows tool.

A practical next step: pick one representative page from your site—ideally a form or a page with interactive controls—and run FastPass on it today. That single run usually surfaces enough issues to show your team where to start, and the fixes tend to be reusable across the rest of the site. The project is open source on GitHub, so you can also check the repositories if you want to understand how a rule works or contribute.

What is the difference between Accessibility Insights for Web and for Windows?

Accessibility Insights for Web and Accessibility Insights for Windows are two separate tools from the same project. They share a goal—catching accessibility problems before release—but they test different kinds of software and use different workflows.

H3 What each one is for

  • Accessibility Insights for Web is a browser extension for Chrome and Microsoft Edge. You use it on webpages and web applications, and it assesses WCAG 2.1 AA coverage, according to the site. This is the one to open when your product is a site or browser-based app.
  • Accessibility Insights for Windows is a desktop tool for testing Windows applications. The site describes it as combining trusted Windows experiences such as Inspect and Color Contrast Analyzer in a single tool, so it is aimed at native Windows UI rather than web content.

H3 A quick comparison

For Web For Windows
Target Webpages and web apps Windows desktop apps
Form Browser extension (Chrome, Edge) Windows desktop tool
Standards focus WCAG 2.1 AA coverage UI Automation properties, contrast, Windows UI behavior
Typical user Web developers and testers Windows app developers and testers
FastPass Yes, for common web issues Yes, for common Windows issues

H3 Shared workflow

Both use FastPass to catch common, high-impact issues quickly—the site says this can take under five minutes. Both also offer visualizations through Visual Helper, so you can see where problems are rather than only reading a list. The practical difference is the layer being inspected: DOM and rendered web content versus Windows UI Automation properties and native controls.

H3 Which to choose

Pick based on what you are shipping, not on which tool seems more powerful. If your team builds a web front end, install the browser extension and run FastPass on key pages, then follow up on the dedicated tests. If you build a Windows desktop app, use the Windows tool so you can inspect UI Automation properties and contrast in the same place. Teams that ship both will need both.

A useful next step: open the tool on one representative screen—your most complex page or dialog—and run FastPass there first. That single run usually reveals whether your main problems are structural (missing names, roles, labels) or visual (contrast), which tells you where to spend the next hour.

How does FastPass help me find accessibility issues quickly?

FastPass is Accessibility Insights' quick-scan mode: it runs an automated pass that catches the most common, high-impact accessibility problems in roughly five minutes, which the site frames as easy for developers to act on. Instead of auditing everything at once, it gives you a short list of failures worth fixing first — missing alternative text, insufficient contrast, unlabeled form controls, and similar issues that block many users.

It exists in both builds of the tool:

  • For Web — a browser extension for Chrome and Microsoft Edge that tests webpages and web apps against WCAG 2.1 AA coverage. FastPass runs in the browser while you inspect the page.
  • For Windows — a desktop tool for Windows applications, where FastPass is paired with Live Inspect for UI Automation properties and the Color Contrast Analyzer for contrast ratios.

How to use it in practice. A developer finishing a feature can run FastPass before opening a pull request, fix what it flags, then move to deeper manual checks. FastPass is a triage step, not a complete audit — automated rules can't judge whether alt text is meaningful, whether focus order makes sense, or whether a custom widget works with a screen reader, so treat a clean FastPass as "no obvious blockers" rather than "accessible."

Choosing between the two builds: pick Web for anything rendered in a browser, and Windows for native desktop UI. If your product spans both, you'll need both tools; they share the same FastPass concept but target different platforms.

A useful next step: install the build matching your platform, run FastPass on your most-used page or screen, and log the failures as tickets before starting a broader audit. The project is open source, so you can also check the GitHub repositories if you want to see what each rule checks.

How can I integrate Accessibility Insights into my development workflow?

Integrate Accessibility Insights by treating it as a two-part toolkit: a browser extension for web pages and a Windows desktop tool for native apps. The main hook for a workflow is FastPass, which the site describes as catching common accessibility issues in under five minutes. That makes it suited to a pre-commit or pull-request check rather than a full audit.

For web work

  • Install the extension in Chrome or the new Microsoft Edge.
  • Run FastPass on the page or flow you changed, then fix the flagged items before opening a pull request.
  • Use Visual Helper to see errors overlaid on the page and read the guidance for each issue.
  • Keep a scheduled deeper pass for WCAG 2.1 AA coverage, since FastPass targets common, high-impact problems rather than everything.

For Windows apps

  • Use the desktop tool to verify UI Automation properties with Live Inspect and check contrast ratios with Color Contrast Analyzer in one place.
  • Run it against the screens affected by your change, especially custom controls, which are where automation properties most often drift.

A practical team pattern: one developer runs FastPass locally, a reviewer re-runs it on the built artifact, and a broader manual or screen-reader pass happens less often. The trade-off is speed versus depth — FastPass is fast by design, so it will not replace testing with real assistive technology or expert review.

A concrete scenario: you change a form's error messaging. Run FastPass on the form, use Visual Helper to confirm the error text is programmatically associated and contrast is sufficient, then note the check in the pull request. For a broader program, the site points to open-source GitHub repos and a telemetry option that feeds community tooling; review the telemetry details before enabling it in an enterprise setting.

Next step: pick the platform you ship most and wire FastPass into your definition of done. For cross-checking other tools, see W3C Web Accessibility Initiative for WCAG guidance and MDN Web Docs for implementation details.

Is Accessibility Insights free and open source?

Yes. Accessibility Insights is free to download and use, and its tools are open source, with the project's source code hosted on GitHub.

That combination matters if you're choosing an accessibility testing tool for a team. Free access removes budget approval as a blocker, and open source means your developers can inspect how checks are implemented, file issues, and in some cases contribute fixes rather than waiting on a vendor roadmap.

H3 What the page confirms

  • Free: The site presents the tools as downloads with no pricing or paid-tier information, and describes them as developed by Microsoft with community collaboration.
  • Open source: The page states the tools are "now open source in GitHub" and links to GitHub repositories.
  • Two platforms: Accessibility Insights for Web is a browser extension for Chrome and Microsoft Edge; Accessibility Insights for Windows is a desktop tool for testing Windows applications.
  • Practical orientation: FastPass is framed as catching common, high-impact issues in under five minutes, while Visual Helper shows errors visually with guidance on fixing them. The Windows tool bundles capabilities such as Live Inspect for UI Automation properties and a Color Contrast Analyzer.

H3 What "free and open source" does and doesn't tell you Free and open source are licensing and cost facts, not quality guarantees. The page claims WCAG 2.1 AA coverage for web testing, but automated checks always catch only part of real accessibility problems. Manual review and testing with assistive technology remain necessary.

A concrete scenario: a small product team with no accessibility specialist could install the web extension, run FastPass on their main user flows before each release, and fix the flagged contrast, labeling, and structure issues. That's a realistic low-cost starting point. It won't replace keyboard-only testing or screen reader checks on critical journeys, and the Windows tool only helps if you ship a Windows desktop app.

If you want to compare, other free options include Deque's axe DevTools and WebAIM's WAVE. Your decision criterion should be platform fit first: browser-based web testing, Windows desktop apps, or both.

Next step: open the Downloads section of Accessibility Insights, install the tool that matches your platform, and run FastPass on one high-traffic page or screen to see how the results fit your workflow.

Related questions

More questions →
What Is Accessibility Insights?

Accessibility Insights is a free set of tools from Microsoft for finding and fixing accessibility issues before they reach your customers. It comes in two main forms: a browser extension for Chrome and the new Microsoft Edge that tests webpages and web applications, and a Windows desktop tool that tests Windows applications. If you are a developer, tester, or designer who needs to catch common accessibility errors quickly, this is the toolset to look at first.

What the tools actually do

The site organizes the offering around two platforms:

Platform What it is What it tests
For Web Browser extension for Chrome and the new Microsoft Edge Webpages and web applications
For Windows Windows desktop tool Windows applications

Both share the same goal: ship accessible products to your customers. The Windows tool also brings together trusted Windows experiences such as Inspect and Color Contrast Analyzer in a single tool, so you are not juggling separate utilities.

Key capabilities

Visual Helper

Visual Helper helps you quickly spot accessibility errors through visualizations, and it pairs each issue with simple guidance on how to fix it. This matters when you are scanning a page or app and need to know not just that something is wrong, but where and why.

Dedicated Tests

Dedicated Tests cover the deeper, more specific checks:

  • FastPass — runs a quick pass to catch the most common accessibility issues in under five minutes.
  • Live Inspect — verifies UI Automation properties.
  • Color Contrast Analyzer — investigates contrast ratios.

FastPass is the natural starting point: find common, high-impact issues first, then move to the more targeted tests.

Who it is for

The site frames the value around developers specifically: it is "easy for developers to address most common accessibility errors in under 5 minutes." That speed claim is the core pitch. If your team needs to fold accessibility checks into an agile workflow without a long ramp-up, FastPass is designed for exactly that.

It is also positioned as up-to-date: you can assess your websites for WCAG 2.1 AA coverage.

Open source and community

Accessibility Insights is open source on GitHub, and the project describes collaboration with the broader accessibility community as part of its approach. If you opt into telemetry, the site says you help the community develop inclusive software. That means you can inspect the code, file issues, and contribute rather than treating the tool as a black box.

How to get started

  1. Choose your platform — Web or Windows — from the downloads page.
  2. Install the browser extension or the Windows desktop tool.
  3. Run FastPass to surface common, high-impact issues.
  4. Use Visual Helper to locate and understand each issue.
  5. Move to Dedicated Tests (Live Inspect, Color Contrast Analyzer) for deeper verification.

The site also provides Docs, Updates, and an FAQ, so you can check current guidance and release notes as you go.

When this is the right choice

Reach for Accessibility Insights when you want a fast, guided first pass at accessibility on web or Windows targets, and when you value an open-source tool backed by Microsoft's Windows accessibility experience. If your target is neither web nor Windows, or you need a fully automated CI-only pipeline with no manual testing step, check the documentation before committing — the site's own framing centers on interactive testing with FastPass and Visual Helper.

How Accessibility Insights Helps with WCAG 2.1 AA Compliance

Accessibility Insights helps teams assess websites for WCAG 2.1 AA coverage and test Windows applications for accessibility, with the stated goal of catching issues before they reach customers. It does this through two platform-specific tools — a browser extension for Chrome and Microsoft Edge, and a Windows desktop tool — plus guided checks like FastPass and visualizations that point to common, high-impact problems. It is positioned as a developer-facing aid for finding and fixing accessibility errors, not as a certification or a guarantee of full conformance.

What the tool actually covers

The site describes two separate products, each aimed at a different target:

Tool Platform What it tests
Accessibility Insights for Web Browser extension for Chrome and the new Microsoft Edge Accessibility of webpages and web applications
Accessibility Insights for Windows Windows desktop tool Accessibility of Windows applications

For web work, the stated coverage is WCAG 2.1 AA. That matters because WCAG 2.1 AA is the level most accessibility policies and procurement requirements reference, so a tool that maps its checks to that standard gives you a starting point that matches the language of those requirements.

For Windows apps, the tool consolidates trusted Windows experiences — Inspect and Color Contrast Analyzer — into a single tool, so you can verify UI Automation properties and investigate contrast ratios without switching between utilities.

How it fits into a WCAG 2.1 AA workflow

FastPass: the fast first pass

FastPass is described as running in under 5 minutes to catch the most common accessibility issues. Treat it as a triage step, not a final audit:

  1. Run FastPass on the page or app you're working on.
  2. Review the flagged issues — these are the common, high-impact errors.
  3. Fix them and re-run to confirm the change.

The value is speed and repeatability: you can run it during development rather than waiting for a formal review.

Visual Helper: seeing the problem

Visual Helper surfaces accessibility errors through visualizations and pairs them with simple guidance on how to fix them. This is useful when a rule name alone doesn't tell you what's wrong on the page — the visualization shows you where the issue lives.

Dedicated tests: going deeper

Beyond the fast pass, the tool provides dedicated checks. For Windows, that means verifying UI Automation properties with Live Inspect and investigating contrast ratios with the Color Contrast Analyzer. These are the checks you reach for when you need to confirm a specific property rather than scan for common errors.

What it does not do for you

Automated checks — including FastPass — cannot establish full WCAG 2.1 AA conformance on their own. The site frames the tools as helping you "assess" coverage and "solve accessibility issues before they reach your customers," and describes FastPass as catching common issues. Plan for manual testing of things automation handles poorly, such as meaningful reading order, sensible focus behavior, and whether alternative text actually conveys the right information.

Also note the scope split: the web extension covers web content, and the Windows tool covers Windows apps. If your product spans both, you'll use both tools.

Practical conditions for adopting it

  • If you build for the web on Chrome or Edge: the browser extension is the relevant entry point, and its stated WCAG 2.1 AA coverage lines up with common compliance language.
  • If you ship a Windows desktop app: the Windows tool gives you Inspect and Color Contrast Analyzer capabilities in one place.
  • If you want fast feedback in development: FastPass's sub-5-minute runs fit an iterative loop better than a periodic audit.
  • If you need an audit trail or formal conformance claim: use these tools as evidence-gathering aids alongside manual review, not as a substitute for it.

The tools are open source on GitHub, and the site notes that opting into telemetry helps the community develop inclusive software — relevant if your organization has restrictions on telemetry in development tooling.

Is Accessibility Insights Open Source and Community-Driven?

Yes. Accessibility Insights is open source on GitHub, and its own site describes the project as embracing collaboration with the broader accessibility community. Two practical signals back that up: the tools are published as open-source repositories you can visit, and the product includes an opt-in telemetry option that the site says helps the community develop inclusive software.

What "open source" means for this tool

The site states plainly that the tools are "now open source in GitHub" and links to its GitHub repos. In practice, that gives you two things beyond using the tool:

  • You can inspect how the accessibility checks are implemented rather than treating results as a black box.
  • You can file issues, follow changes, and contribute fixes or rules through the repositories.

The site frames this as a step in an ongoing journey of collaboration with the greater accessibility community, not a one-time release.

How the community angle shows up in the product

Community involvement isn't only about code contributions. The site describes telemetry as opt-in and explains that by opting in, you help the community develop inclusive software. That's a deliberate design choice: data collection is your decision, and the stated purpose is improving inclusive software rather than tracking individuals.

The tools themselves are also positioned around shared, public standards rather than a proprietary checklist — the site says you can assess your websites for WCAG 2.1 AA coverage, which keeps results comparable across teams and organizations.

Who this matters to

If you are… The open-source and community model gives you…
A developer A way to see why a rule fires and to raise or fix issues in the repos
An accessibility lead A tool aligned to public standards (WCAG 2.1 AA) rather than a vendor-specific score
A privacy-conscious team Control over telemetry, since participation is opt-in
A contributor Public repositories to work against

What to check before relying on it

  • Confirm current repository activity and licensing on the GitHub repos linked from the site, since those details can change.
  • Treat the "under 5 minutes" and "less than 5 minutes" FastPass claims as the vendor's own description of typical use, not a guarantee for your codebase.
  • The site does not state pricing terms on the pages referenced here, so don't assume free or paid access from this description alone — check the download and support pages.

Where to start

Go to the site's Get Started section, choose your platform (Web or Windows), and follow the GitHub link if you want to review or contribute to the source. If you want to support the community effort without writing code, the telemetry opt-in described on the site is the documented path.

What platforms and testing capabilities does Accessibility Insights support?

Accessibility Insights supports two platforms: Web and Windows. For Web, it is a browser extension for Chrome and the new Microsoft Edge, used to test webpages and web applications. For Windows, it is a desktop tool used to test Windows applications. Both are built to help you find and fix accessibility issues before they reach your customers.

Accessibility Insights for Web

  • What it is: A browser extension for Chrome and the new Microsoft Edge.
  • What it tests: Accessibility of webpages and web applications.
  • Coverage: Assess your websites for WCAG 2.1 AA coverage.

Accessibility Insights for Windows

  • What it is: A Windows desktop tool.
  • What it tests: Accessibility of Windows applications.
  • Integrated experiences: Test your Windows app with trusted Windows experiences such as Inspect and Color Contrast Analyzer in a single tool.

Testing capabilities

FastPass

FastPass is a quick check that catches the most common accessibility issues in under 5 minutes. It is available for both Web and Windows, and is described as easy for developers to address most common accessibility errors quickly.

Visual Helper

Visual Helper helps you quickly spot accessibility errors with visualizations and learn how to fix issues with simple guidance.

Dedicated Tests

  • Live Inspect: Verify UI Automation properties.
  • Color Contrast Analyzer: Investigate contrast ratios.

Platform and capability summary

Platform Form factor Primary use Key capabilities
Web Browser extension (Chrome, new Microsoft Edge) Test webpages and web applications FastPass, Visual Helper, WCAG 2.1 AA coverage
Windows Desktop tool Test Windows applications FastPass, Live Inspect, Color Contrast Analyzer, Inspect integration

Additional notes

  • The tools are open source on GitHub, and the project states a commitment to collaboration with the greater accessibility community.
  • Telemetry is optional; opting in helps the community develop inclusive software.
  • To get started, choose a platform (Web or Windows) and download Accessibility Insights.
How FastPass in Accessibility Insights Finds Accessibility Issues Quickly

FastPass is a guided test mode in Accessibility Insights that runs an automated scan for common, high-impact accessibility issues and returns results in under five minutes. It is available in both Accessibility Insights for Web (a Chrome and Microsoft Edge browser extension) and Accessibility Insights for Windows (a desktop tool). It is the right starting point if you want to catch frequent errors early in development rather than run a full manual audit.

What FastPass actually does

FastPass combines automated checks with visualizations and fix guidance. According to the site, it is designed to "swiftly catch most common accessibility issues in less than 5 minutes," and the Visual Helper feature lets you "quickly spot accessibility errors with visualizations and learn how to fix issues with simple guidance."

So the speed comes from two things working together:

  • Automated rules that flag common failures without you inspecting every element by hand.
  • On-screen visualizations that point to the failing element in context, so you spend time fixing rather than searching.

How to run it

The exact menu labels differ between the Web extension and the Windows app, but the flow is the same:

  1. Install the tool for your platform. For Web, add the browser extension for Chrome or the new Microsoft Edge. For Windows, install the desktop application.
  2. Open the target. Load the webpage or web app in the browser, or open the Windows application you want to test.
  3. Launch FastPass from the tool's test options.
  4. Run the automated checks and wait for the scan to complete — the site positions this as under five minutes for common issues.
  5. Review each flagged result. Use the Visual Helper overlay to locate the element on the page or in the UI.
  6. Apply the suggested fix, then re-run FastPass to confirm the issue is resolved.

Expected result: a list of common accessibility errors tied to specific elements, each with guidance on how to correct it.

What FastPass covers — and what it does not

Dimension FastPass
Speed Under 5 minutes for common issues
Coverage Most common, high-impact accessibility errors
Standard alignment The site states Accessibility Insights assesses websites for WCAG 2.1 AA coverage
Output Flagged issues with visualizations and fix guidance
Platforms Web (Chrome, Microsoft Edge) and Windows

The important caveat: FastPass is a fast first pass, not a complete conformance audit. Automated checks cannot catch every WCAG 2.1 AA criterion — things like meaningful reading order, sensible focus behavior, and whether alt text is actually accurate still need human judgment. Treat FastPass as the step that clears the obvious errors before you invest time in manual testing.

Where it fits in a development workflow

The site frames the tool around shipping accessible products, and FastPass is the entry point for that. A practical sequence:

  • Run FastPass as soon as a page or screen is functional, to catch common errors while the code is still fresh.
  • Fix what it flags, using the built-in guidance.
  • Move to deeper manual checks for the criteria automation cannot verify.
  • For Windows apps, the same tool also exposes Live Inspect for verifying UI Automation properties and a Color Contrast Analyzer for investigating contrast ratios, so you can dig into specific issues without switching tools.

Common sticking points

  • Assuming a clean FastPass means accessible. It means no common automated failures were detected. Manual testing is still required for full WCAG 2.1 AA coverage.
  • Skipping the re-run. After fixing, run FastPass again — a change that resolves one issue can introduce another.
  • Testing only one platform. Web and Windows are separate tools with separate results; a passing web scan says nothing about your desktop app.
  • Ignoring the visualization step. The overlay exists to shorten the fix loop. Reading raw results without it usually takes longer.

Accessibility Insights is open source on GitHub, and the site notes that opting into telemetry helps the community develop inclusive software — relevant if your team has questions about data collection before rolling it out.

Website Overview

Software versions and possible internal network details are exposed together, potentially making targeted reconnaissance easier. Identifiable technologies and additional version or configuration signals make the service easier to fingerprint, which may help targeted scanners narrow their checks.

Domain and Registration

Registered in 2019, this domain has about 7 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. The registrar, Nom-iq Ltd. dba COM LAUDE, specializes in corporate domain and brand management, suggesting attention to domain asset protection. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain uses the common .io extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

Nameservers are provided by Azure DNS, indicating managed DNS hosting. CAA records restrict which certificate authorities are authorized to issue certificates. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. No MX record was found. A conventional explicit inbound-mail route is not configured. TXT records include verification markers for Google. Such markers may also remain after a service stops being used.

TLS and Certificates

The certificate includes the organization field Microsoft Corporation. The certificate uses an RSA 2048-bit public key, offering broad client compatibility. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. The certificate is valid for about 180 days in total, with 142 days remaining. The certificate covers the main domain and its usual www hostname.

HTTP and Browser Security

The Server header exposes the software version: Microsoft-IIS/10.0. This makes version-targeted checks easier, but is not proof of an exploitable vulnerability. X-Powered-By exposes backend information: ASP.NET. The response lacks these common security headers: Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, clickjacking protection. The headers contain possible internal network information: Microsoft-IIS/10.0. No explicit CDN or WAF marker was found in the response headers.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Next.js, Microsoft IIS 10.0, with exact versions exposed for 1 technologies. These details can narrow vulnerability checks, although exposure alone is not a vulnerability.

Search and Social Sharing

No homepage canonical URL was detected. If duplicate URLs exist, consolidation may be less explicit. Twitter Card metadata is configured. The title has 22 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 60 characters. The observed directives allow indexing and link following.

Hosting and Email

DNSAzure DNS
HostingMicrosoft Corporation
EmailUnknown
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagDes Moines, Iowa, United States Inferred 13.89.172.10

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarNom-iq Ltd. dba COM LAUDE
Registered2019-02-20
Expires2027-02-20
Domain statusclientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited、clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited、clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Nameserversns1-06.azure-dns.com、ns2-06.azure-dns.net、ns3-06.azure-dns.org、ns4-06.azure-dns.info
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Aaccessibilityinsights.io13.89.172.103600—
NSaccessibilityinsights.ions1-06.azure-dns.com172800—
NSaccessibilityinsights.ions2-06.azure-dns.net172800—
NSaccessibilityinsights.ions3-06.azure-dns.org172800—
NSaccessibilityinsights.ions4-06.azure-dns.info172800—
TXTaccessibilityinsights.iogoogle-site-verification=1bAzwU6y23q00TR7koPRBJ6jaGFvuJuo9G4daOXIcjU3600—
TXTaccessibilityinsights.iov=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; rua=mailto:[email protected]; ruf=mailto:[email protected]; fo=13600—
CAAaccessibilityinsights.io0 contactemail "[email protected]"3600—
CAAaccessibilityinsights.io0 iodef "mailto:[email protected]"3600—
DMARC_dmarc.accessibilityinsights.iov=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:[email protected];ruf=mailto:[email protected];fo=1:s:d3600—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectaccessibilityinsights.io
IssuerMicrosoft Corporation
Valid until2027-02-24T20:35 · Remaining when checked: 142 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html
serverMicrosoft-IIS/10.0
strict-transport-securitymax-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
content-security-policydefault-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; font-src 'self' https://static2.sharepointonline.com https://*.cdn.office.net; img-src 'self' https://accessibilityinsights.io;
x-content-type-optionsnosniff

Identified technologies

Next.jsMicrosoft IIS 10.0

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionSolve accessibility issues before they reach your customers.
Canonical URLNot detected
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter Cardsummary

No robots.txt found

No sitemaps found

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.