langfuse.com Paid content

What is Langfuse?

Langfuse is an open-source platform for tracing, evaluating and improving AI agents and LLM applications. Its core idea is a continuous loop: instrument your app so every LLM call, tool invocation and retrieval step is captured as a trace, then use that production data to run evaluations, test prompt changes in experiments, and ship improvements with evidence instead of guesswork.

Its main pieces, per the product page:

• Observability — hierarchical traces of LLM calls, tools and retrieval, filterable by user, session, cost, latency or custom metadata.
• Evaluation — LLM-as-a-judge, heuristic functions or human review, run on production data or inside experiments.
• Prompt management — prompts kept outside code with one-click deploys and rollbacks.
• Playground — test prompts against real production inputs and compare models side by side.
• Experiments and human annotation — define test cases, compare results, and build golden datasets from reviewed traces.
• Cost and latency monitoring — dashboards and automated alerts.

Who it suits, and the trade-off. It fits teams that already have an LLM feature in production and need to debug it or measure quality changes — the page cites Canva's AI team tracing generative design features, and claims use by 21 of the Fortune 50 with 100,000+ engineers building on it. The page also states it works with any language or framework supporting OpenTelemetry, with native Python and TypeScript SDKs, plus integrations for frameworks like LangChain, Vercel AI SDK and LiteLLM and providers including OpenAI, Anthropic and Amazon Bedrock — so you are not locked into one vendor. The trade-off is that value depends on instrumenting your app properly; a team unwilling to add tracing and define evaluations will mostly get dashboards, not improvement.

Next step: if you want to judge fit quickly, pick one production LLM feature, add tracing to it, and run a single evaluation or prompt experiment on real traffic. If that loop feels useful, compare self-hosting against the hosted option on Langfuse.

How does Langfuse help debug and improve AI agents in production?

Langfuse is built for exactly that loop: capture what your agent actually does in production, then use those traces to test and ship improvements. Its page_evidence describes one integrated platform covering observability, evaluation, prompt management, a playground, experiments, human annotation, and cost/latency monitoring.

The debugging side

Hierarchical traces record every LLM call, tool invocation, and retrieval step, and you can filter by user, session, cost, latency, or custom metadata. In practice, that means when a user reports a bad answer, you can pull the session, see which retrieval step returned the wrong document, and check whether the tool call or the prompt was at fault — rather than guessing from logs. Cost and latency dashboards with automated alerts catch regressions that only show up under real traffic.

The improvement side

Production traces become test material. You can run LLM-as-a-judge, heuristic functions, or human review on live data; define test cases and run experiments comparing results side by side; and test prompts on real production inputs in the playground before deploying. Prompt management separates prompts from code with one-click deploys and rollbacks, so prompt changes don't require a release.

A concrete workflow: filter traces for high-latency sessions, annotate the failing ones into a golden dataset, run an experiment with a revised prompt, compare quality and cost against the current version, then roll out via prompt management and watch the dashboards.

Fit and trade-offs

The page_evidence states it works with any language or framework supporting OTel instrumentation, with native Python and TypeScript SDKs and 100+ integrations, plus agent frameworks like LangChain, Vercel AI SDK, and CrewAI — so there's no framework lock-in. It's open source, which matters if you need to self-host or inspect the internals. The trade-off is scope: it's an observability and evaluation platform, not an agent builder, so you still need your own orchestration and deployment. It's aimed at developers and AI engineering teams; smaller teams may find the full evaluation and experiment workflow more than they need at the start.

If you're evaluating it, start by instrumenting one production agent and tracing a week of real traffic before investing in datasets and evaluators — the traces usually reveal which evaluation approach is worth building. Langfuse's own documentation and Academy are the natural next step; for the broader category, OpenTelemetry explains the instrumentation standard it builds on.

How do I set up Langfuse with my existing AI stack or framework?

Langfuse is designed to slot into an existing stack rather than replace it. There are two integration paths, and which one you pick depends on how much instrumentation control you want.

Path 1: OpenTelemetry (framework-agnostic)

Langfuse accepts OTel-instrumented traces, so any language or framework that emits OTel spans can send data to it. This is the route to take if your stack already has OTel instrumentation or if you want to avoid tying your tracing code to a specific vendor. You point your OTel exporter at Langfuse and traces land in the platform.

Path 2: Native SDKs

For Python and TypeScript, Langfuse provides native SDKs. These give you the most direct control over trace structure — you can nest spans for LLM calls, tool invocations, and retrieval steps yourself, and attach metadata like user ID, session ID, or custom tags for later filtering.

Framework integrations

If you use an agent framework, there is likely a prebuilt integration that handles instrumentation for you, covering frameworks such as LangChain, the Vercel AI SDK, LiteLLM, Pydantic AI, Google ADK, CrewAI, and LiveKit, among others. Model providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Amazon Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Mistral AI, and Google are also covered. The practical benefit: you add the integration and get traces without hand-writing span code.

A concrete first step

Start with one non-critical path in production — say, a single generation endpoint — and instrument only that. Confirm the trace shows the hierarchy you expect (LLM call nested under the request, tool calls visible as child spans), then expand. Once traces are flowing, the same data feeds evaluation, prompt management, and experiments, so you do not need to re-instrument later.

For setup specifics and current integration docs, see Langfuse. If you are evaluating alternatives alongside it, OpenTelemetry documents the underlying instrumentation standard, and LangChain covers one of the supported frameworks.

How does Langfuse's pricing work for different team sizes?

Langfuse's pricing page is the authoritative source for current tiers and limits, so treat the structure below as a way to think about fit rather than a quote. Langfuse

The main axis is not really team headcount — it is usage volume (observations/traces ingested per month) plus whether you self-host or use the managed cloud. A five-person team generating heavy agent traffic can cost more than a fifty-person team running light prototypes, so plan around event volume first and seats second.

H3 What typically changes across tiers

• Cloud vs. self-hosted: The open-source core can be self-hosted, which shifts cost to your own infrastructure and ops time. Managed cloud trades that for a subscription based on usage.
• Usage metering: Observation/trace volume, retention window, and number of projects or environments are the usual levers.
• Collaboration features: Prompt management, annotation workflows and role-based access tend to matter more as teams grow, not as usage grows.
• Support and compliance: Larger organizations usually need SSO, audit trails, SLAs or a self-hosted enterprise arrangement.

H3 Matching tier to team shape

H3 A concrete way to decide Estimate your monthly observations (LLM calls, tool calls, retrieval steps per request × requests), then check that number against the published tier limits and retention. If you are near a boundary, self-hosting often wins on cost but costs engineering time; if your team is small and lacks infra capacity, managed cloud is usually the faster path.

Next step: open the pricing page, plug in your projected monthly observation volume, and compare the cloud figure against an honest estimate of the hours your team would spend running a self-hosted deployment. For related tooling context, see Langfuse and, if you are comparing observability options, OpenTelemetry.

How can I run evaluations and experiments on my AI agents with Langfuse?

Langfuse runs evaluations and experiments on the same production data you already trace, so the loop is: observe real traces, turn interesting ones into test cases, run evaluators, then compare results side by side.

The evaluation path

Langfuse supports three evaluator styles, and you can run them either on live production data or inside an experiment:

• LLM-as-a-judge — a model scores outputs against your criteria (relevance, correctness, tone).
• Heuristic functions — deterministic checks such as format validation, keyword presence, or length.
• Human review — people annotate traces and build "golden" datasets from real cases.

A practical scenario: your agent answers billing questions. You trace every conversation, notice a cluster of traces where retrieval returned nothing, and attach an LLM judge for answer groundedness. Running it over production traces tells you how often that failure actually happens — not just whether the code path executes.

The experiment path

Experiments let you define test cases, run a prompt or model variant against them, and compare results side by side. Combined with prompt management, you can version a prompt, deploy or roll back with one click, and test candidate prompts in the playground against real production inputs before shipping.

A useful decision rule: use production evaluation when you want to know how the current system behaves at scale and catch regressions; use experiments when you have a specific change in mind and need a controlled comparison. Most teams need both, and the value comes from feeding experiment findings back into production monitoring.

What makes this workable

Because tracing, prompts, evals, experiments, and human feedback live in one platform, the artifacts connect: a flagged production trace becomes a dataset item, that item becomes an experiment case, and the experiment result informs the next prompt version. Hierarchical traces capture each LLM call, tool invocation, and retrieval step, filterable by user, session, cost, latency, or custom metadata — which is what makes targeted evaluation possible rather than scoring everything blindly.

Langfuse states it works with any language or framework supporting OpenTelemetry instrumentation, with native SDKs for Python and TypeScript, and integrations across agent frameworks and model providers such as LangChain, the Vercel AI SDK, LiteLLM, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Amazon Bedrock. That matters if you don't want evaluation tied to one framework.

One trade-off worth naming: LLM-as-a-judge evaluators add their own cost and latency, and judge quality depends on how well you write the criteria. Heuristic checks are cheap and stable but shallow. Human annotation is the most trustworthy and the least scalable — reserve it for building golden datasets and resolving disagreements between automated evaluators.

Next step

Start with one high-volume agent behavior, trace it in production for a few days, then write a single LLM judge for the failure mode you see most. Turn the worst traces into a small dataset, run one experiment comparing your current prompt to a revised version, and only then expand to more evaluators. Langfuse's own documentation and Academy cover the setup, and the pricing page is the place to check what fits your volume if you move beyond self-hosting.

What security and data privacy measures does Langfuse provide for production LLM traces?

Langfuse treats security and privacy as a deployment and data-handling question rather than a single feature. Its page presents an open-source observability platform for tracing, evaluating and improving AI agents, with no framework lock-in and support for any language or stack that emits OpenTelemetry data. That architecture matters for privacy: you can choose where traces live and what gets sent.

What the product page supports

• Self-hosting and open source. The page describes Langfuse as an "open platform, open source." For teams with strict data-residency or internal-network requirements, self-hosting keeps production traces inside your own infrastructure.
• Data minimisation by design. Tracing captures LLM calls, tool invocations and retrieval steps, and lets you filter by user, session, cost, latency or custom metadata. You decide which fields enter a trace, so sensitive payloads can be redacted or omitted before ingestion.
• Access control for human review. Human annotation and collaborative review workflows imply role-based access to traces and datasets. Restrict who can read production traces, especially when they contain user conversations.
• Prompt and dataset governance. Prompt management with one-click deployments and rollbacks keeps prompts versioned and auditable; golden datasets built from reviewed traces should be scrubbed of personal data before reuse.

Practical decision criteria

A concrete scenario

A fintech team instruments its support agent with OpenTelemetry and sends traces to a self-hosted Langfuse instance. They strip account numbers at the instrumentation layer, tag traces with a hashed user ID instead of an email, and give only two engineers annotation access. The trade-off is operational overhead: self-hosting means you own upgrades, storage and backups, while a managed option shifts that burden but requires reviewing the vendor's data-processing terms.

Next step

Map your trace payloads field by field, mark which are personal or regulated, and decide self-hosted versus managed before you instrument production. For deployment and security specifics, start with the official documentation at Langfuse.