Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

readingscan.com

Upload your radiology report or scan photos. Each finding comes back in plain English, with what the scan ruled out and questions for your doctor. Free preview.

Paid content
Visit website
Profile views 9 Outbound visits 2 Normal
ReadingScan Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Artificial Intelligence
Language
English
Paid-content signal
Paid contentObserved
Registered
2026
Hosting
VercelInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is ReadingScan?

ReadingScan is a web tool that translates radiology reports into plain English. You upload a written report (PDF or patient-portal screenshot) or up to five photos from the same exam — MRI, CT, X-ray, ultrasound or PET — and each finding comes back as a short sentence, with an urgency label and suggested questions for your doctor. It also shows what the scan ruled out. A free first analysis is available without a credit card; the site states data is encrypted in transit and at rest and can be deleted.

Who it suits

  • Someone who has just downloaded a report from a patient portal and wants to walk into an appointment understanding the vocabulary.
  • A caregiver helping a relative interpret findings across several scans.
  • Anyone preparing a question list before a specialist visit.

What it does not do

It is not a diagnosis and not for emergencies. The plain-English layer sits on top of the radiologist's words — it does not re-read the images themselves, so its accuracy depends on the report you supply. A written report gives a more complete reading than photos alone; the site says report plus photos works best.

How it compares to alternatives

Option Strength Trade-off
ReadingScan Structured plain-English per finding, urgency, doctor questions Depends on report quality; not a diagnosis
Radiologist or GP Clinical judgement, context, next steps Requires an appointment
General-purpose AI chatbots Free-form explanation No fixed structure; may miss ruled-out findings

Practical next step

Gather the full report text first, not just the impression line, then use the output as a question list rather than a conclusion. If a finding is flagged as urgent, contact your clinician directly instead of waiting. For background on the imaging terms themselves, RadiologyInfo.org and MedlinePlus are useful neutral references.

How do I upload my MRI, CT, or X-ray report to ReadingScan?

Upload your report through the box on the ReadingScan homepage: drag in a file, or click to browse. You can also photograph printed images and add them alongside the report. A few minutes later you get each finding restated in plain English with an urgency note and questions to ask your doctor.

What to have ready

  • Your written report as a PDF, or a screenshot from your patient portal — this gives the most complete reading.
  • Up to 5 photos from the same exam, ideally the slices your doctor pointed to.
  • Report and photos together work best.

Accepted formats and limits

  • PDF, JPG, PNG, or WebP
  • Up to 20 MB per file
  • If you only have a CD, convert DICOM files to JPG first.

Practical notes

  • No credit card is needed for the first analysis, and you can delete your data afterward.
  • This is a reading aid, not medical advice or an emergency service. For urgent symptoms, contact a clinician directly.

A useful next step: gather the report and the specific images your doctor flagged before you start, so the output lines up with the questions you actually want answered.

What does ReadingScan tell me about my scan findings in plain English?

ReadingScan turns each finding in a radiology report into a short, plain-English sentence and tags it with a rough urgency level, so you can see what matters before your next appointment.

What it produces for each finding

  • A one-line summary of the finding in everyday words.
  • An urgency-style label, such as "Worth monitoring" or "No concern."
  • A short explanation of what the finding means and how it is usually handled.
  • What the scan ruled out, so you know which worries are not supported.
  • Suggested questions to bring to your doctor.

The sample knee MRI on the page shows this pattern: an 8 mm meniscus tear is described as a small tear in the inner knee cushion, labelled "Worth monitoring," and explained as something usually treated with physical therapy first. A small joint effusion gets "No concern" and is framed as a normal reaction to the other findings. Reports for X-ray, CT, ultrasound and PET scans follow the same layout.

Inputs and limits

You can upload the written report (PDF or patient-portal screenshot), up to five photos from the same exam, or both. Report plus photos gives the most complete reading. Files can be PDF, JPG, PNG or WebP, up to 20 MB each; DICOM files from a CD need converting to JPG first.

How to use it

Treat the output as a translation layer, not a diagnosis. Before your appointment, upload the report, then read the urgency labels first and the explanations second. Write down the questions it suggests and add your own symptoms and history, since the tool reads the report, not you. If anything is marked urgent or you have severe or worsening symptoms, contact a clinician rather than waiting on the app.

For a second opinion on what a report means in general, the American College of Radiology's patient resources at American College of Radiology and RadiologyInfo.org explain common imaging findings and procedures.

How much does ReadingScan cost after the free preview?

ReadingScan does not publish a specific price on its main page. The page states that your first analysis requires no credit card, and it links to a separate pricing page for the cost of the full report — so the exact figure after the free preview is only available at ReadingScan's pricing page.

What "free" and "full" appear to mean

Based on the page evidence, the free preview is an entry point rather than the complete product:

  • You upload a written radiology report (PDF or patient-portal screenshot), up to five photos from the same exam, or both.
  • The free tier covers your first analysis without a credit card.
  • The full report is a paid product, priced on a separate page, and includes the plain-English breakdown of each finding, an urgency-style label (for example "Worth monitoring" or "No concern"), and suggested questions for your doctor.

Decision criterion

If you are weighing whether to pay, look at the sample knee MRI report first. It shows the format you would receive: each finding restated in one plain sentence, a short severity note, and a doctor question. If that level of detail matches what you need — understanding a report you already have, before an appointment — the paid tier is the relevant comparison. If you mainly want a quick sense of whether anything looks urgent, the preview may be enough.

Practical next step

Open the pricing page on ReadingScan to see the current cost, then compare it against what your own radiology department or patient portal already offers. Many hospitals provide reports in plain language at no charge, and your ordering physician can explain findings during a visit. ReadingScan is positioned as a preparation tool, not a diagnosis — the page itself notes it is not medical advice and not for emergencies.

Is my medical data safe and private on ReadingScan?

ReadingScan states that data is encrypted in transit and at rest, that you can delete your data at any time, and that it never sells health data. Those are the commitments it makes on its own site, and they are the relevant ones for a radiology report, which is sensitive because it often contains your name, date of birth, provider, and details about your body.

What that means in practice:

  • Encryption in transit and at rest protects the file while it is being uploaded and while it sits on the service's servers. It does not control what happens after you download or share the result.
  • Deletion on demand matters more than encryption for most people. If you want the report gone, use that option rather than leaving it in the account indefinitely.
  • No sale of health data is a promise about commercial use. It is not the same as a promise that nothing is ever reviewed by a human or used to improve the product, so read the privacy policy itself for those details.

A realistic scenario: you photograph a knee MRI report from your patient portal and upload it. The sensible habits are to crop or cover anything the analysis does not need, avoid uploading images that show your face or identifying tattoos, and delete the upload once you have the plain-English summary you wanted. If you plan to share the result with a family member or your doctor, download it and send it yourself rather than forwarding account access.

One trade-off to weigh: convenience versus exposure. A tool that returns a plain-language reading in minutes is useful before an appointment, but any upload creates a copy outside your control until you delete it. If a report contains especially sensitive findings, ask your clinician's office for an explanation first, since they already hold the record under medical privacy rules.

For a second opinion on how a service handles health information generally, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services publishes guidance on health privacy rights, and Federal Trade Commission covers consumer data practices for health apps not covered by medical privacy law. ReadingScan's own privacy details are the place to confirm retention periods and who can access your uploads before you send anything.

What questions should I ask my doctor after using ReadingScan?

ReadingScan is built to hand you better questions, not to replace the conversation. The most useful approach is to treat its plain-English output as a draft agenda: sort the findings by the urgency labels it assigns, then ask about anything marked "worth monitoring" or left unexplained.

Questions to bring to the appointment

  • On the main finding: "ReadingScan flagged [finding] as worth monitoring. How significant is it in my case, and does it change what we do next?"
  • On urgency: "Which of these findings actually needs action now, and which can we safely watch over time?"
  • On ruled-out concerns: "The report doesn't mention [what you were worried about]. Does that mean it's been ruled out, or was it simply not assessed?"
  • On next steps: "What would you recommend first — physical therapy, further imaging, or waiting? What would make you change that plan?"
  • On red flags: "What symptoms should send me back to you before the next scheduled visit?"
  • On the images: "I uploaded the slices you pointed out. Is there anything on the images that isn't captured in the written report?"

Use the sample report as a rehearsal

The knee MRI example on the site shows the pattern to imitate. A meniscus tear is described as "usually treated with physical therapy first," with surgery raised only if the knee locks or rehab fails. That is exactly the kind of claim to verify rather than assume: ask your doctor whether your tear's size, location, and your age and activity level point the same way. The report also labels a small joint effusion as "no concern" and explains it as a reaction to the other findings — a good prompt to ask which findings are causes and which are just consequences.

A few practical cautions

The site states plainly that this is not medical advice and not for emergencies, so urgent symptoms go to a clinician or emergency service, not an upload. ReadingScan works from your written report, up to five photos from one exam, or both; a PDF or patient-portal screenshot gives the most complete reading, and you can convert a DICOM CD to JPG if that is all you have. A free preview and first analysis without a credit card let you test the output before paying; current prices are on its Pricing page.

Next step

Before the visit, write your top three questions on one page, with the exact wording from the report next to each. Then ask the doctor to correct any term ReadingScan explained differently — that mismatch is often where the most useful conversation starts.

Related questions

More questions →
How to Compress Images for the Web Without Losing Visible Quality

You can cut most images to a fraction of their original file size without any visible quality loss by doing three things in the right order: resize the image to the dimensions it will actually display at, pick the right format for the content, then apply compression at a quality level that survives a side-by-side check. The single biggest mistake is skipping step one — an oversized image compressed at maximum quality is still far heavier than a correctly sized one.

Why file size and quality are a trade-off, not a fixed setting

Every compressed image is a negotiation between three variables: how many pixels you keep, how precisely each pixel is described, and how much the format is allowed to guess.

  • Dimensions decide how many pixels exist at all. Halving width and height removes 75% of the pixel data before any compression happens.
  • Quality level decides how aggressively the encoder discards detail it thinks you won't notice.
  • Format decides the kind of discarding allowed — some formats throw away color precision, others only remove redundancy.

Because these interact, "quality 80" means something different on a 4000px photo than on a 600px thumbnail. Tune dimensions first, then quality.

Pick the format before you touch the quality slider

Format Best for Compression type Transparency Notes
JPEG Photographs, gradients, complex scenes Lossy No Smallest for photos; artifacts appear around sharp edges and text
PNG Logos, icons, screenshots, flat color, anything needing transparency Lossless (or lossy via quantization) Yes Often 5–10× larger than JPEG for photos; excellent for flat graphics
WEBP Almost everything, as a modern default Both lossy and lossless Yes Typically 25–35% smaller than JPEG at comparable quality; broad browser support
SVG Logos, icons, diagrams, charts Vector (resolution-independent) Yes Stays crisp at any size; not suitable for photos
GIF Short simple animations only Lossless, 256 colors Yes (1-bit) Superseded by WEBP/MP4 for animation in nearly all cases

Practical rule: photos → JPEG or lossy WEBP; flat graphics and transparency → PNG or lossless WEBP; anything vector → SVG.

The four levers, in the order you should pull them

1. Resize to display size (biggest win, zero quality cost)

If your layout renders an image at 800px wide, serving a 2400px original wastes roughly 89% of the pixels. Resize to the largest size it will ever be displayed at, and add a 2× version only if you need retina sharpness.

2. Choose the format

Match the format to the content type using the table above. Converting a photographic PNG to JPEG or WEBP alone can shrink it by 80% or more.

3. Set the quality level

For JPEG and lossy WEBP, most photographs hold up well between quality 70 and 85. Below ~60, banding appears in skies and blur around text. Above ~90, file size climbs steeply for gains nobody can see.

4. Strip metadata

EXIF data, camera info, and embedded thumbnails can add tens of kilobytes. Remove them unless you specifically need copyright or orientation data — and note that stripping orientation can rotate an image, so verify after export.

When lossy compression is fine, and when it isn't

Lossy is acceptable when:

  • The image is a photograph or has natural texture.
  • It's decorative or below the fold.
  • Slight softening won't be noticed at final display size.

Use lossless or vector instead when:

  • The image contains text, UI elements, or thin lines (lossy creates ringing artifacts).
  • It's a logo, icon, or diagram — SVG or PNG keeps edges clean.
  • It will be edited again later; repeated lossy saves compound degradation.
  • It's a screenshot of code or a chart where color accuracy matters.

Compressing vs. resizing: don't confuse them

Compressing reduces the bytes needed to describe the same pixels. Resizing reduces the number of pixels. They're independent, and resizing usually delivers the larger saving. A 3000×2000 photo at quality 95 might be 2 MB; the same photo resized to 1200×800 at quality 80 might be 180 KB. Doing only the quality reduction gets you maybe 40% off; doing both gets you over 90%.

A repeatable workflow

  1. Determine the maximum display width in your layout (inspect the element or check your CSS).
  2. Export at that width (plus a 2× variant if needed).
  3. Convert to the right format — WEBP as a modern default, JPEG as a fallback, PNG/SVG for graphics.
  4. Apply quality 75–85 for lossy formats and compare against the original.
  5. Strip metadata and re-check orientation.
  6. Verify before publishing (see below).
  7. Serve the right file with srcset so small screens don't download the large variant.

How to verify quality before you publish

  • View at 100% at final display size, not zoomed in — artifacts you can't see at real size don't matter.
  • Toggle between original and compressed in a viewer or an online compressor's before/after preview.
  • Check the worst-case areas: skies, smooth gradients, sharp edges, and any text.
  • Compare file sizes and ask whether the extra kilobytes buy visible improvement. If not, go smaller.
  • Test on a mid-range phone, where banding and blur are often more obvious than on a desktop monitor.

Common mistakes

  • Compressing a full-resolution image and calling it optimized.
  • Using PNG for photographs.
  • Setting quality to 100 "to be safe" — it inflates size with no visible benefit.
  • Re-saving a JPEG repeatedly, stacking artifacts each time.
  • Forgetting that GIF animations are usually better as WEBP or video.
  • Ignoring metadata, which can silently add weight.

Quick reference

Goal Do this
Photo on a webpage Resize to display width → WEBP (fallback JPEG) → quality 75–85
Logo or icon SVG; fall back to PNG if vector isn't possible
Screenshot with text PNG or lossless WEBP
Transparent photo cutout Lossy WEBP or PNG
Short animation WEBP or MP4, not GIF

The order matters more than any single setting: resize, then choose format, then tune quality, then strip metadata, then verify at real display size. Follow that sequence and you'll routinely land at 10–20% of the original file size with no quality your visitors can detect.

How much does ReadingScan cost and is it private?

ReadingScan's first analysis is free and requires no credit card, so you can see a preview of your report before paying anything. Full reports cost money, but the exact price is only listed on the site's pricing page — it isn't stated in the material available here. On privacy, the site says data is encrypted in transit and at rest, you can delete your data at any time, and your health data is never sold.

What you get for free

The free preview is a real analysis, not just a demo. According to the site, you upload your report, images, or both, and a few minutes later each finding comes back as a plain-English sentence with an urgency label and suggested questions for your doctor.

The sample knee MRI report shows how this is structured:

Section What it contains
What did they find? Each finding in plain English, with a label like "Worth monitoring" or "No concern"
Detailed findings The original findings listed together
About your concern An answer to the question you were worried about

The free preview lets you judge whether the plain-English output is useful for your situation before committing to the full report. No credit card is required for that first analysis.

What costs money

The full report is the paid part. The site has a pricing page, but the amount isn't included in the material here, so check that page directly for current pricing. What the material does confirm is the boundary: first analysis free, full report paid.

If cost is the deciding factor, the practical sequence is to run the free preview first, read the plain-English findings, and then decide whether the full report adds enough to be worth paying for.

Privacy and data handling

The site makes four specific claims:

  • Encrypted in transit and at rest — your upload and stored data are protected at both stages.
  • Delete your data anytime — you control removal, not just at account closure.
  • Never sells health data — the site states this explicitly.
  • No credit card for the first analysis — you can try it without entering payment details.

These are the site's own statements. If your concern is whether a specific tool meets a legal or institutional standard (for example, a workplace or insurer requirement), verify that separately rather than relying on a general privacy claim.

What you can upload

This matters for both cost and privacy, since fewer uploads means less data shared:

  • Your written report as a PDF or patient-portal screenshot — the site says this gives the most complete reading.
  • Up to 5 photos from the same exam, choosing the slices your doctor pointed out.
  • Report and photos together work best.
  • File types: PDF, JPG, PNG, or WebP, up to 20 MB each.
  • If you only have a CD, the site suggests converting DICOM to JPG for free.

Practical checklist before you upload

  1. Decide what to send — the written report alone, images alone, or both. The report gives the most complete reading.
  2. Run the free preview and read the plain-English findings.
  3. Check the pricing page for the current full-report cost.
  4. If you decide not to continue, use the delete option to remove your data.

One limit worth noting: the site states it is not medical advice and not for emergencies. Cost and privacy are separate from that — for anything urgent, contact a clinician rather than relying on a report reader.

What Is ReadingScan and What Does It Do?

ReadingScan is a web tool that turns a radiology report — MRI, CT, X-ray, ultrasound, or PET — into plain-English explanations of each finding. You upload your written report, up to five photos from the same exam, or both, and get back a per-finding breakdown with an urgency label and suggested questions for your doctor. It fits people who already have a report in hand and want to understand it before (or between) appointments. It is explicitly not medical advice and not for emergencies.

What you can upload

Input Notes
Written report PDF or a patient-portal screenshot — described as giving the most complete reading
Scan photos Up to 5 images from the same exam; pick the slices your doctor pointed out
Both together Stated as working best
File formats PDF, JPG, PNG, WebP · up to 20 MB each
Only have a CD? The site suggests converting DICOM to JPG for free

What comes back

Each finding is rewritten as a plain sentence, tagged with how urgent it is, and paired with what to ask your doctor. The site's knee MRI sample shows the shape of the output:

  • Radiologist wrote: "Oblique tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus… approximately 8 mm."
  • ReadingScan says: "Small tear in the inner knee cushion" — labeled Worth monitoring, with the note that tears like this usually come with age rather than one injury, and are usually treated with physical therapy first.
  • "Grade 2 chondromalacia patellae" becomes "Early cartilage softening behind the kneecap" — Worth monitoring.
  • "Small joint effusion" becomes "Small amount of fluid in the joint" — No concern, described as a normal reaction to the two findings above.

The report also answers the worry behind the question — for example, "Will I need surgery for this?" gets a "probably not" with the reasoning that physical therapy comes first, and surgery comes up if the knee locks or rehab stalls.

How the reading is structured

The sample report is laid out in two parts:

  1. What did they find? — urgency label, plain-English sentence, and the detailed findings list.
  2. What you were worried about — a direct answer to a common concern tied to those findings.

Reports for X-rays, CT, ultrasound, and PET are described as following the same layout.

Privacy and access

  • Data is encrypted in transit and at rest.
  • You can delete your data anytime.
  • The site states it never sells health data.
  • No credit card is required for your first analysis, and there is a free preview.
  • A pricing page exists, but the amount is not stated in the material available here — check the pricing page directly for current cost.

When it's a good fit — and when it isn't

Good fit: you have a finished report and want a plain-language first pass, a sense of which findings are routine versus worth raising, and a list of questions to bring to your appointment.

Not a fit: anything urgent. The site states it is not for emergencies — if you have acute symptoms, contact a clinician or emergency services rather than uploading a report. It also does not replace your doctor's interpretation; treat the output as preparation for that conversation, not a substitute for it.

What a ReadingScan Report Looks Like

A ReadingScan report turns each finding in your radiology report into a plain-English sentence, tags it with an urgency level (for example, "Worth monitoring" or "No concern"), and adds questions you can bring to your doctor. The same layout is used for MRI, CT, X-ray, ultrasound, and PET reports. You get a free first analysis without a credit card, and the full report is a paid product — the site lists pricing at readingscan.com/pricing.

The structure of a finished report

The sample on the site is a knee MRI. It shows how each radiologist finding is unpacked:

Radiologist wrote ReadingScan says Urgency
Oblique tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus Small tear in the inner knee cushion, about 8 mm, at the back Worth monitoring
Grade 2 chondromalacia patellae Early cartilage softening behind the kneecap; cartilage is thinner than it should be but still covering the bone Worth monitoring
Small joint effusion A little extra fluid in the joint — a normal reaction to the two findings above No concern

Each entry does three things: it restates the finding in everyday words, explains what that kind of finding usually means, and tells you whether it needs attention soon or can wait.

What else is in the report

Beyond the finding-by-finding breakdown, the sample shows two more sections:

  • What you were worried about. The report addresses a specific question directly. In the sample, the question is "Will I need surgery for this?" and the answer is "Probably not. For a small tear that came with age, physical therapy comes first. Surgery comes up if the knee locks or a few months of rehab leave you still limited."
  • Questions for your doctor. Each finding comes with suggested questions, so you walk into the appointment with something concrete to ask rather than a vague sense of worry.

The report also notes what the scan ruled out — the site describes this as part of what each finding comes back with.

What you upload

You can send a written report, images, or both:

  • The written report (PDF or a patient-portal screenshot) gives the most complete reading.
  • Up to 5 photos from the same exam — pick the slices your doctor pointed out.
  • Report plus photos together works best.

Accepted formats are PDF, JPG, PNG, and WebP, up to 20 MB each. If you only have a CD, the site says you can convert DICOM to JPG for free.

How to read the output

  1. Start with the urgency tags. They sort the findings into what needs a conversation soon and what is a normal or expected result.
  2. Read the plain-English sentence for each finding before the detailed one — it tells you what the structure is and roughly how big or advanced the change is.
  3. Check the "what you were worried about" section, since it answers the question you probably typed in.
  4. Bring the question list to your appointment. The report is not medical advice and is not for emergencies, so the questions are meant to start a conversation with your clinician, not replace it.

Privacy and access

The site states that data is encrypted in transit and at rest, that you can delete your data at any time, and that it never sells health data. Your first analysis does not require a credit card.

How to Upload Your MRI, CT, or X-ray Report to ReadingScan

Upload your written radiology report (PDF or patient-portal screenshot) if you have it — that gives the most complete reading. If you also have images from the same exam, add up to 5 photos. ReadingScan accepts PDF, JPG, PNG, and WebP files up to 20 MB each, and the first analysis needs no credit card.

What to upload

What you have What to upload Why
A written report (PDF or patient-portal screenshot) The report file Gives the most complete reading
Images from the exam Up to 5 photos from the same exam Best used alongside the report
Both report and images Both together Report and photos together work best
Only a CD Convert DICOM to JPG first, then upload the JPGs ReadingScan doesn't take DICOM directly

If you're choosing which image slices to send, pick the ones your doctor pointed out.

Step-by-step

  1. Get your report. Download the PDF from your patient portal, or take a screenshot of the report page. A written report is the highest-value input.
  2. Prepare images (optional). If you only have a CD, convert the DICOM files to JPG for free, then select up to 5 photos from the same exam.
  3. Upload. Drop your report or scan into the upload area, or browse your files. You can upload the report, the images, or both.
  4. Submit and wait. Click Get My Report. A few minutes later, each finding comes back as a plain sentence, with how urgent it is and what to ask your doctor.
  5. Review the output. For each finding you get a plain-English explanation, an urgency signal (for example, "Worth monitoring" or "No concern"), and suggested questions for your doctor.

File requirements

  • Formats: PDF, JPG, PNG, WebP
  • Size: up to 20 MB per file
  • Images: up to 5 photos from the same exam
  • Report types supported: MRI, CT, X-ray, ultrasound, and PET (all laid out the same way)

What you'll get back

Using the sample knee MRI on the site: the radiologist's finding "Oblique tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus" comes back as "Small tear in the inner knee cushion — Worth monitoring," with a plain-English explanation (an 8 mm tear, usually treated with physical therapy first) and an answer to a common worry ("Will I need surgery for this? Probably not..."). Each finding is handled the same way.

Common snags

  • You only have a CD. Convert DICOM to JPG first — ReadingScan doesn't read DICOM files directly.
  • Your file is over 20 MB. Compress or resize it before uploading.
  • You have more than 5 images. Pick the slices your doctor pointed out; the report carries most of the detail anyway.
  • You're unsure what to send. The written report alone is enough to start; adding images improves the result.

Privacy and cost notes

ReadingScan states that data is encrypted in transit and at rest, you can delete your data anytime, and it never sells health data. The first analysis requires no credit card. Pricing for the full report is listed on the site's pricing page — check there for current cost, since the free preview and the full report are separate.

ReadingScan is not medical advice and is not for emergencies. Use the output to prepare questions for your doctor, not to replace them.

Website Overview

Page metadata, canonical configuration and social previews work together to provide more consistent search and sharing presentation. An active inbound-mail setup with incomplete authentication may leave the domain more open to impersonation. Provider hosting alone does not close that gap.

Domain and Registration

The domain was registered less than a year ago and has limited historical evidence to assess. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain uses the common .com extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

The observed email authentication setup is incomplete: DMARC is missing. Nameservers are provided by spaceship.net, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the spaceship.net email service. DNSSEC is enabled, allowing validating resolvers to authenticate signed DNS data. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses.

TLS and Certificates

The certificate uses an RSA 2048-bit public key, offering broad client compatibility. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, commonly associated with automated certificate services. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

X-Powered-By exposes backend information: Next.js. The response lacks these common security headers: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, clickjacking protection. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header contains the custom value Vercel. Cookie security attributes are unknown.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Next.js, Vercel without precise versions, leaving fewer clues for version-specific scanning.

Search and Social Sharing

Twitter Card metadata is configured. JSON-LD includes Organization data, helping describe the organization as an entity. The title has 61 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 160 characters. The observed directives allow indexing and link following.

Hosting and Email

DNSspaceship.net
HostingVercel
Emailspaceship.net
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagUnited States Inferred 216.198.79.1

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarSpaceship, Inc.
Registered2026-04-07
Expires2027-04-07
Domain statusclient transfer prohibited
Nameserverslaunch1.spaceship.net、launch2.spaceship.net
DNSSECsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Areadingscan.com216.198.79.11800—
MXreadingscan.commx1.efwd.spaceship.net12000
MXreadingscan.commx2.efwd.spaceship.net12000
NSreadingscan.comlaunch1.spaceship.net1800—
NSreadingscan.comlaunch2.spaceship.net1800—
TXTreadingscan.comgoogle-site-verification=lyHEVO3_8vScN1tl78-Q_AEvkvdh0f5z7Hsb7vB4ZZs1800—
TXTreadingscan.comv=spf1 include:spf.efwd.spaceship.net ~all1200—
DSreadingscan.com3807 13 2 206b00a27b2573a3ef9ad8706317913f066d1f1e83492d91be27843ae6182a3b86400—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectreadingscan.com
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Valid until2026-11-11T05:05 · Remaining when checked: 37 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=utf-8
cache-controlprivate, no-cache, no-store, max-age=0, must-revalidate
serverVercel
strict-transport-securitymax-age=63072000
set-cookieRedacted

Identified technologies

Next.jsVercel

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionUpload your radiology report or scan photos. Each finding comes back in plain English, with what the scan ruled out and questions for your doctor. Free preview.
Canonical URLhttps://readingscan.com
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter Cardsummary_large_image
All bots 1 allowed · 12 disallowed
  • Allow/
  • Disallow/api/*
  • Disallow/_next/*
  • Disallow/settings/*
  • Disallow/dashboard/*
  • Disallow/admin/*
  • Disallow/share/*
  • Disallow/*/share/*
  • Disallow/waitlist
  • Disallow/roadmap
  • Disallow/changelog
  • Disallow/manifest.webmanifest
  • Disallow/favicon.ico

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.