Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is Skalar?
Skalar is a Dutch manufacturer of automated analyzers for laboratory and process-industry chemistry, founded in 1965. Its equipment automates routine tests—water, soil, nutrients, and similar parameters—for environmental, pharmaceutical, agricultural, chemical, detergent, and food-and-beverage laboratories. The company sells worldwide through subsidiaries (most of Europe, North America, India) and a large representative network, and positions itself around servicing and application support as much as the instruments themselves.
Its lineup centers on two automation approaches. Continuous flow analysis (the SAN++ Compact, Classic and Advanced) handles colorimetric chemistry in sequence; discrete analysis (the BLUVISION) processes samples individually in separate reaction vessels, which the company presents as reducing contamination risk and adding flexibility across water, soil and environmental work. Skalar also publishes an analyzer selector that matches an application and parameter to a suitable instrument, and offers resources such as a discrete-analysis eBook and webinars on seawater analysis, PFAS and TOC/TNb measurement.
Choosing between the two approaches
| Consideration | Continuous flow (SAN++ series) | Discrete analysis (BLUVISION) |
|---|---|---|
| Sample handling | Samples flow through shared tubing in sequence | Each sample handled in its own vessel |
| Typical fit | High-volume, well-established colorimetric routines | Labs wanting flexibility and reduced carryover risk |
| Trade-off to weigh | Carryover management and method changeovers | Throughput and cost profile versus a flow system |
If you are evaluating Skalar, start with the analyzer selector using your actual application and parameters, then confirm method performance and local service coverage with the regional subsidiary before committing—support responsiveness matters as much as the instrument for a routine lab. For context on alternatives, see Seal Analytical and Metrohm.
How do I choose the right Skalar analyzer for my laboratory application?
Choose by application and sample volume first, then by technology. Skalar organizes its range around continuous flow analysis (the SAN++® Compact, Classic and Advanced series) and discrete analysis (the BLUVISION® analyzer), with an analyzer selector on Skalar that matches an instrument to your application, parameter or preferred technology. That selector is the fastest first step, because it turns "which analyzer" into "which measurement."
A practical way to narrow it down
- Name the matrix and parameters. Decide whether you are testing water, soil and nutrients, seawater, or samples from pharmaceutical, food and beverage, agricultural or detergent work. Skalar frames its automation around routine colorimetric and related analyses in these fields, so a clear parameter list matters more than a broad industry label.
- Estimate throughput and batch structure. High sample counts with long, stable runs suit continuous flow systems; labs that need flexible, contamination-free testing across changing test menus should look at discrete analysis. Skalar's BLUVISION® eBook is written as an introduction to discrete analysis for water, soil and environmental work.
- Check whether you are replacing existing equipment. Skalar explicitly addresses FIA or Lachat replacements, so if you already run flow methods, ask about method transfer and comparable chemistry rather than starting from scratch.
- Confirm local support. With subsidiaries across most of Europe, North America and India, plus a worldwide representative network, service and application support availability should be part of the decision, not an afterthought.
Continuous flow vs. discrete analysis
| Consideration | Continuous flow (SAN++® series) | Discrete analysis (BLUVISION®) |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | High-volume, routine colorimetric runs with consistent methods | Labs needing flexible test menus and contamination-free handling |
| Typical users | Environmental, agricultural and industrial routine labs | Water, soil and environmental labs with varied workloads |
| Trade-off | Efficient for stable, repeated assays; less suited to frequently changing menus | More adaptable across applications; evaluate throughput against your peak batch sizes |
A concrete example
A contract water lab running hundreds of nutrient samples per week with fixed methods would typically shortlist a continuous flow system and ask about method transfer from its current FIA setup. A smaller environmental lab testing a mix of soil and water parameters in modest batches would more likely start with the discrete analysis eBook and then use the analyzer selector.
Next step
Write down your matrices, parameters, expected samples per day and any existing methods, then run them through the analyzer selector and discuss the result with Skalar's application team through their contact page.
Can Skalar analyzers replace my existing FIA or Lachat system?
Yes—Skalar explicitly positions its continuous flow analyzers as an option for labs replacing FIA or Lachat systems. The site has a dedicated "Need a Fia or Lachat Replacement?" section, and its SAN++® series (Compact, Classic and Advanced) is described as a continuous flow analyzer range for fully automatic colorimetric analysis. That is the closest match if your current work is segmented-flow/continuous-flow colorimetry.
What to check before assuming a swap works
Replacement is usually about method compatibility, not just hardware. Practical criteria:
- Method equivalence: Confirm the Skalar application notes cover your exact parameters (e.g., water, soil and nutrient testing, which the site highlights) and matrices. Ask for a side-by-side comparison against your current method.
- Throughput and automation level: The SAN++® line comes in three tiers; match the tier to your sample volume and how much walk-away automation you need.
- Reagent and consumable continuity: Ask whether existing methods can be transferred with minimal revalidation, and what revalidation the vendor recommends.
- Support footprint: Skalar states subsidiaries in most European countries, North America and India, plus over eighty representatives worldwide—useful to verify local service response for your site.
If your "FIA" work is actually discrete analysis
Don't assume continuous flow is the right replacement. Skalar also offers the BLUVISION® discrete analyzer, aimed at water, soil and environmental testing with contamination-free, flexible operation. If your lab runs many different parameters on modest sample numbers, discrete analysis may fit better than flow analysis; if you run high volumes of a few routine parameters, continuous flow often wins on cost per test.
Next step
Use the site's analyzer selector: enter your application and parameters, and it will suggest a matching analyzer. Then request method documentation for your specific tests before committing—that comparison, not the product name, is what determines whether the switch is straightforward or requires full revalidation.
For broader context on continuous flow analysis, Skalar is the relevant source here.
What industries and routine tests are Skalar automated analyzers designed for?
Skalar's automated analyzers are built for high-throughput routine chemistry in environmental, pharmaceutical, agricultural, detergent, chemical, and food and beverage laboratories. The page explicitly names water, soil, and nutrient testing as core routine applications, with colorimetric analysis (continuous flow) and discrete analysis as the two main technology routes.
Typical industry-to-test fit
| Industry | Routine work the analyzers target |
|---|---|
| Environmental / water | Water, soil, and nutrient testing; seawater analysis and PFAS analysis are featured applications |
| Agricultural | Soil and nutrient testing for fertilizer and crop programs |
| Pharmaceutical | Routine chemistry automation in QC-style laboratories |
| Food and beverage | Repetitive colorimetric assays |
| Detergent / chemical | Routine process and product chemistry |
Choosing between the two platforms
The SAN++® continuous flow series (Compact, Classic, Advanced) suits labs running large batches of the same colorimetric methods, such as nutrient or water testing. The BLUVISION® discrete analyzer is positioned for flexible, contamination-free testing across water, soil, and environmental samples where methods change often. Skalar's analyzer selector, which matches application and parameter to a technology, is the practical starting point for a lab unsure which fits.
A useful next step: list your three highest-volume methods and their sample counts per week, then check whether they map to continuous flow or discrete analysis before requesting a demonstration. For general context on automated wet-chemistry approaches, see Skalar.
How does continuous flow analysis differ from discrete analysis for water, soil, and environmental testing?
Continuous flow analysis (CFA) and discrete analysis are two different ways to automate wet-chemistry tests for water, soil and environmental samples. In CFA, samples are pumped through narrow tubing as a continuous stream, separated by air bubbles or wash segments, and reagents are added as the stream moves toward a detector. In discrete analysis, each sample is handled as a separate, self-contained reaction in its own cuvette or well, and the analyzer moves from one sample to the next. Skalar's Skalar positions its SAN++® series as continuous flow analyzers and its BLUVISION® instrument as discrete analysis, so the choice between the two technologies is a real product decision on that site, not just a textbook distinction.
Where the two approaches diverge in practice
| Aspect | Continuous flow analysis | Discrete analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Sample handling | Samples flow in a shared stream, separated by bubbles or wash | Each sample reacts in its own cuvette or well |
| Throughput model | Strong for long runs of the same test | Strong for varied test menus across samples |
| Method changes | Often tied to a configured manifold or channel | Typically selected per sample from a menu |
| Carryover risk | Managed through wash segments between samples | Reduced by keeping reactions physically separate |
| Best fit | High-volume routine monitoring of a fixed parameter set | Labs running mixed batches, multiple parameters, or changing workloads |
Which suits which testing job
For water and wastewater monitoring, a lab that runs the same nutrient tests—nitrate, ammonia, phosphate—on hundreds of samples a day will usually find CFA efficient, because the continuous stream keeps a steady cadence once the method is set up. Soil testing labs, which often process large batches of extracts for a defined suite of parameters, can benefit from the same rhythm.
Discrete analysis tends to appeal more when the test menu varies between samples, when batches are smaller or irregular, or when a lab wants to add parameters without reconfiguring plumbing. Skalar describes its BLUVISION® material as covering water, soil and environmental applications with contamination-free, flexible testing, which points to exactly that mixed-workload scenario.
A practical next step
List your three most common sample types, the parameters you run on each, and your typical batch size. If one parameter dominates and batches are large, CFA is the natural starting point; if your menu shifts from batch to batch, discrete analysis is likely the better fit. Skalar's analyzer selector, which matches an application and parameter to a technology, is a sensible way to test that reasoning against the actual product line before requesting a quote.
How can I get application support, service, or a quote from Skalar?
Contact Skalar through the form on its contact page to request application support, service, or a quote; the site says the team replies as soon as possible. It does not publish direct email addresses, phone numbers, or prices, so the form is the documented starting point.
What to include in your request
- Application support: the parameter or method you run, your sample type (for example water, soil, or food), expected sample volume, and the problem you are trying to solve.
- Service: your instrument model and series (such as SAN++® or BLUVISION®), serial number if available, and a short description of the fault or maintenance need.
- Quote: the analyzer or technology you are considering, the applications it must cover, and any throughput or regulatory requirements.
The site's analyzer selector can help you identify a matching instrument before you write; naming that model in the form gives the team a concrete starting point. For an FIA or Lachat replacement enquiry, say so explicitly, since the site addresses that case directly.
Choosing the right route
If you are unsure which analyzer fits, start with the selector and ask for application support rather than a quote; that conversation usually clarifies the configuration before pricing is discussed. Existing users needing repairs or upkeep should describe the instrument and symptoms in the service request. Buyers with a defined method and budget can go straight to a quote request.
Skalar is a Dutch manufacturer founded in 1965, with subsidiaries in most European countries, North America, and India, plus representatives worldwide, so local support may be available depending on your region. Mention your location in the form so your enquiry reaches the right office. For context on comparable automation approaches, the sites of Seal Analytical and Hicos may be useful, but Skalar's own contact form remains the direct channel for support and quotes.
User reviews (0)