Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is YobiYoba?
YobiYoba is a speech recognition service that converts audio and video recordings into text. You upload files, specify the language, and receive time-coded transcripts you can verify, edit, and download. According to its site, it handles any format from any source and exports to formats such as PDF, DOC, RTF, CSV, SRT, and VTT.
How it works
The site describes a four-step process:
- Upload your audio or video files.
- Specify the language and process them; you can also supply textual information about your data to aid automatic processing.
- Verify and edit transcripts, synchronized with the audio.
- Download in your chosen transcript format.
What the output includes
YobiYoba identifies speech segments, recognizes the spoken language when it is not specified in advance, and converts speech to time-coded text. The result is an annotated document with speech and non-speech segments, speaker labels, words with time codes, confidence scores, and punctuation.
Pricing model
The site advertises pay-as-you-go pricing from 0.01 € per minute excluding tax, with rates decreasing as you buy more time. It states there is no minimum fee per file, credits do not expire, and you pay only for transcribed speech rather than total file duration. Payment options listed include PayPal, credit card, and coupons. All prices are said to include EU VAT.
Practical fit
This suits podcasters, researchers, journalists, or video creators who need subtitles or searchable text without running their own speech recognition. The editing step matters: the site notes that speech transcription cannot be error-free, so budget time to review names, technical terms, and overlapping speech.
A useful next step is to test one short, representative file with several speakers and background noise, then check the exported SRT or PDF against your needs before committing to a larger purchase.
How much does YobiYoba's speech-to-text transcription service cost per minute?
YobiYoba uses a pay-as-you-go model, and its published rate ranges from 0.08 € to 0.01 € per minute (excluding tax), depending on how much transcription time you buy. The lowest advertised rate is from 0.01 € per minute, and the pricing is described as degressive — meaning the more minutes you purchase, the lower your per-minute rate.
A few details matter for real budgeting:
- You pay for transcribed speech, not file length. Silence, music and non-speech segments are not billed as speech, so a long recording with sparse talking can cost less than its duration suggests.
- No minimum fee per file. You are not penalized for uploading short clips.
- Credits do not expire, and there is no extra charge to manage, edit or convert transcripts into formats such as PDF, DOC, RTF, CSV, SRT or VTT.
- Payment can be made by PayPal, credit card or coupon, and prices are stated to include EU VAT.
As a practical example: one hour of continuous speech at the top rate of 0.08 €/minute is roughly 4.80 €, while at the lowest rate of 0.01 €/minute it is about 0.60 €. If your recordings contain long pauses or only occasional speech, your actual charge will be lower than those figures because billing follows detected speech.
To decide whether it fits, estimate your monthly volume of speech minutes rather than total recording hours, then check the current rate tiers on the site before committing. If you mostly handle short, occasional files, the absence of a per-file minimum makes the entry cost low; if you transcribe large volumes regularly, the degressive tiers are where the savings appear. Note that the page does not publish a full tier table, so the exact rate for your volume is best confirmed at sign-up.
What audio and video file formats does YobiYoba accept for transcription?
YobiYoba accepts audio and video files "in any format from any source," according to its own description of the upload step. In practice, that means you are not required to pre-convert a recording to a specific container or codec before submitting it — the service is positioned around simply uploading the file and choosing the spoken language.
What this means for you
- No format-shopping beforehand. If you have a phone recording, a screen capture, a podcast export or a camera file, the stated policy is to upload it as-is.
- Language selection is the real input decision. The process asks you to specify the language and optionally supply textual context to improve automatic processing, so the meaningful preparation is informational rather than technical.
- Outputs are where formats matter. YobiYoba converts its transcription result into text and subtitling formats such as PDF, DOC, RTF, CSV, SRT and VTT. So while input is described as format-agnostic, your choice of output format should match what you will do next.
A practical scenario
Suppose you record a 40-minute interview on a phone and also have a separate camera video of the same session. Under the stated policy you can upload either file directly. If the transcript will go to a video editor, request SRT or VTT; if it will go to a client or a report, PDF, DOC or RTF is more useful. The editing step lets you verify the transcript synchronized with the audio before downloading, which is the point at which you would fix names, jargon or misheard words.
Decision criterion
If your workflow depends on a specific legacy or proprietary format, test one short file first and confirm the upload succeeds and the transcript aligns correctly. The "any format" claim is broad, but verifying with your own material is the reliable way to know before committing a long recording.
For comparison, dedicated transcription tools such as Otter.ai and Descript also accept common audio and video files, though their supported-format lists are documented individually.
Can I edit or correct the automatic transcripts before downloading them?
Yes. YobiYoba's four-step workflow ends with verification and editing before download, so you can clean up the automatic transcripts rather than accepting the raw output.
What the editing step includes
The page describes the process as: upload files, specify the language and process, verify and edit the transcripts, then download. During verification, the transcript is shown synchronized with the audio, which is the practical part. You can listen to a passage and fix the text in the same place instead of hunting through a separate player.
The automatic output is already annotated with speech and non-speech segments, speaker labels, word-level time codes, confidence scores and punctuation. Those confidence scores are useful for deciding where to spend your time: low-confidence words are the ones most likely to need correction, so a quick pass over those beats re-reading everything.
A realistic scenario
Suppose you have a 40-minute interview with two speakers and background noise. Rather than proofreading from the top, scan for low-confidence words and speaker-label switches first, correct proper nouns and technical terms, then read straight through once for flow. Because the transcript is time-coded, your edits stay aligned to the audio, so exported subtitles don't drift.
Trade-offs to weigh
- Editing inside the tool costs time but keeps timing intact.
- Correcting later in a word processor is familiar, but you lose the audio synchronization and may break subtitle timings if you add or delete lines carelessly.
- Automatic transcription is pattern recognition and is not error-free, as the site itself notes, so budget editing time for any recording with accents, overlapping speech or specialized vocabulary.
Choosing an export format
Since you can export to PDF, DOC, RTF, CSV, SRT, VTT and similar formats, pick based on the destination: SRT or VTT for video platforms, DOC or RTF for written reports, CSV if you need the time codes in a spreadsheet. Edit before exporting, not after, so every format inherits the corrected text.
If you want a second opinion on transcription quality for a specific accent or language, it's worth comparing against Otter.ai or Descript, both of which publish their own editing workflows.
How accurate is YobiYoba's speech recognition, and what causes transcription errors?
YobiYoba does not publish a single accuracy percentage. Its own description is candid that, like any pattern-recognition technology, speech transcription "cannot be error free." So the honest answer is that accuracy is variable, and the practical question is not "how accurate is it?" but "how much cleanup will my recordings need?"
What the service actually produces
The page describes a pipeline rather than a single black box: it first finds the audio segments containing speech, then detects the spoken language if you have not specified it, then converts those segments into time-coded text. The output is an annotated document with speech and non-speech segments, speaker labels, word-level time codes, confidence scores, and punctuation. Those confidence scores are the most useful accuracy signal — they flag which words the system itself is unsure about, so you can direct your editing time rather than re-listening to everything.
What typically drives errors
- Audio quality. Background noise, music, crosstalk, phone or meeting-room echo, and low bitrate all degrade recognition before any language modelling happens.
- Overlapping speakers. Speaker labels help, but simultaneous speech is genuinely hard; expect muddled stretches when people talk over each other.
- Accents, dialects and code-switching. A speaker moving between two languages mid-sentence, or a strong regional accent, raises the error rate.
- Domain vocabulary. Names, product terms, acronyms, clinical or legal jargon and numbers are common failure points, which is why the page notes you can supply textual information about your data to help automatic processing.
- Language choice. Letting the system auto-detect the language is convenient, but specifying it up front removes one source of mistakes.
A realistic workflow
If you are transcribing a clean, single-speaker interview or a well-recorded lecture, expect light editing — mostly punctuation, proper nouns and the occasional dropped word. If you are working with multi-speaker meetings, field recordings or heavy accents, budget for a genuine review pass. Either way, the intended flow is upload, specify language and any helpful context, then verify and edit the transcript alongside synchronized audio, then export to SRT, VTT, PDF, RTF, CSV and similar formats.
For comparison, other services publish their own accuracy claims and error profiles: Otter.ai and Rev are common reference points, with Rev notably offering a human transcription option for material where machine output is not good enough.
Next step: before committing a large batch, run one representative recording through YobiYoba and measure the real edit time per minute of audio. That number, not a headline accuracy figure, is what determines whether it fits your project.
What export formats are available for downloading my YobiYoba transcripts?
YobiYoba lets you download transcripts in a range of text and subtitling formats. The site names PDF, DOC, RTF, CSV, SRT and VTT, and also refers more generally to XML and "a wide selection" of formats, so the exact list may include a few more than those examples.
Which one you pick depends on what you plan to do next:
- SRT / VTT — subtitles and captions for video players, YouTube-style platforms and web players.
- PDF / DOC / RTF — readable or editable documents for clients, colleagues or reports.
- CSV — structured text for spreadsheets, databases or further processing.
- XML — the underlying annotated output, useful if you want the fuller detail such as time codes, speaker labels and confidence scores.
A practical next step: decide first whether the transcript is for reading, editing or captioning, then choose the format that matches. If you need speaker labels, word-level time codes or confidence scores, check whether those survive the conversion to your chosen format, since a plain PDF or RTF export will not carry the same structure as the XML.
User reviews (0)