Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

arx.pt

ARX Portugal is an architecture studio in Lisbon, founded in 1991 by Nuno Mateus and José Mateus. Housing, public buildings, renovation and public space.

No paid content found
Visit website
Profile views 0 Outbound visits 1 Normal
ARX Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Other
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
Unknown
Hosting
Dominios, S.A.Inferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Related questions

More questions →
How to Choose Mobile Surveying Software for Housing Stock Condition Surveys

Choose mobile surveying software for housing stock condition work when you need to record property condition, repair standards, and compliance data across a portfolio of social housing or managed properties — and you need that data to be consistent, reportable, and usable for planned maintenance. PocketSurvey is one option built specifically around this use case, with modules for Housing Stock Condition, Schedule of Condition Surveys, Planned Maintenance, Fire Safety inspection, and CMMS/CAFM asset data collection. The right choice depends on how well the software matches your survey types, your need for customisation, and how your team works in the field.

What housing stock condition surveys actually require

Social housing associations need to know the condition of their housing stock to maintain the portfolio to a good repair standard. That data also supports compliance with current quality standards, regulations, guidance, and codes of practice.

In practice, a stock condition survey captures:

  • Property condition — the physical state of building elements (structure, roof, windows, services, etc.)
  • Repair and maintenance needs — what needs fixing, replacing, or monitoring, and when
  • Compliance data — information tied to regulatory and code-of-practice requirements
  • Asset data — component-level records that feed into planned maintenance and asset management systems

If your software can't structure data this way, you'll spend more time cleaning spreadsheets than acting on findings.

Why paper, dictation, and spreadsheets fall short

PocketSurvey's own framing is direct: doing housing stock condition surveys is inefficient with pen and paper, dictation, or even spreadsheets. The reasons are practical rather than promotional:

Method Main problem
Pen and paper Data must be re-typed; handwriting errors; no validation at point of capture
Dictation Transcription lag; inconsistent terminology; hard to structure
Spreadsheets No field validation; version control issues; weak photo/location capture
Dedicated mobile app Structured input, validation at source, faster reporting

The core gain from a dedicated app is data quality at the point of capture — you validate and structure information while the surveyor is still on site, rather than fixing it later.

Match the software to your survey types

Before comparing products, list the survey types your team actually runs. PocketSurvey, for example, covers these distinct areas:

  • Housing Stock Condition — portfolio-level condition and repair data
  • Schedule of Condition Surveys — structured condition recording
  • Planned Maintenance — feeding condition findings into maintenance programmes
  • Fire Safety inspection — compliance-focused inspection workflows
  • CMMS/CAFM Asset Data Collection — collecting asset data that feeds maintenance management systems

If your work spans several of these, a single platform that handles them together reduces the number of tools and data formats your team juggles. If you only need one narrow survey type, a broader platform may be more than you need.

Check customisability, offline use, and reporting

These three factors usually decide whether a tool survives contact with real fieldwork.

Customisability

Survey questions, data fields, and scoring logic vary between housing providers. PocketSurvey describes itself as "highly customisable," and its pricing page references a "custom data collection system" option. Ask any vendor how far customisation goes: can you add or change fields yourself, or does it require their team?

Offline use

Surveyors often work in basements, plant rooms, and properties with no signal. Confirm the app captures data offline and syncs later. This is a functional requirement, not a nice-to-have.

Reporting and export

Your condition data usually needs to reach other systems — asset management, planned maintenance, or compliance reporting. Check what export formats are supported and whether reports can be generated directly from the app.

Weigh pricing and deployment against your team size

PocketSurvey's site links to a pricing page that includes a bespoke/custom data collection option, but the input material does not state specific prices, licence terms, or whether a free tier exists. Treat pricing as something to confirm directly with the vendor rather than assume.

When you request pricing, ask:

  • Is it per surveyor, per project, or a site licence?
  • What's included in the standard product versus the bespoke option?
  • Are there setup or customisation fees?
  • What are the terms for offline sync and data storage?

For a social housing association or property management team, the total cost of ownership also includes training time and any integration work — factor those in alongside the licence fee.

A practical selection checklist

Use this to compare PocketSurvey against alternatives on equal terms:

  1. Survey type coverage — does it handle your specific survey types (stock condition, fire safety, asset data)?
  2. Customisation depth — can you adapt fields and logic to your standards?
  3. Offline capability — does it work without signal and sync reliably?
  4. Reporting and export — can data reach your existing systems?
  5. Team collaboration — can multiple surveyors work consistently and share data?
  6. Pricing model — per-user, per-project, or bespoke, and what's included?
  7. Proven track record — PocketSurvey cites over 20 years of experience; ask for references in social housing specifically.

Where PocketSurvey fits

PocketSurvey is aimed at teams that want something well-proven, fast, highly customisable, and easy to use, with dedicated modules for the housing and compliance survey types described above. It's a reasonable candidate if you run multiple survey types across a property portfolio and want one platform rather than several.

It may be less suitable if you need only a single, simple survey form, or if you require a specific integration that isn't supported. In that case, confirm integration capability before committing, since the available material doesn't detail specific system connectors.

Website Overview

An active inbound-mail setup with incomplete authentication may leave the domain more open to impersonation. Provider hosting alone does not close that gap.

Domain and Registration

Unknown

DNS and Email

The observed email authentication setup is incomplete: DMARC is missing. Nameservers are provided by dnscpanel.com, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Microsoft 365 email service. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. TXT records include verification markers for Microsoft. Such markers may also remain after a service stops being used.

TLS and Certificates

The certificate uses an RSA 2048-bit public key, offering broad client compatibility. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, commonly associated with automated certificate services. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

X-Powered-By exposes backend information: PHP/8.4.27. The response lacks these common security headers: HSTS, CSP, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, clickjacking protection. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header identifies nginx without an exact version. No explicit CDN or WAF marker was found in the response headers.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies nginx, PHP without precise versions, leaving fewer clues for version-specific scanning.

Search and Social Sharing

No homepage canonical URL was detected. If duplicate URLs exist, consolidation may be less explicit. Twitter Card metadata is configured. The title has 3 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 153 characters. The observed directives allow indexing and link following.

Hosting and Email

DNSdnscpanel.com
HostingDominios, S.A.
EmailMicrosoft 365
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) Portugal flagPortugal Inferred 185.12.116.36

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

Unknown

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Aarx.pt185.12.116.3614400—
MXarx.ptarx-pt.mail.protection.outlook.com144000
NSarx.ptns1.dnscpanel.com86400—
NSarx.ptns2.dnscpanel.com86400—
NSarx.ptns3.dnscpanel.com86400—
TXTarx.ptMS=ms2680503014400—
TXTarx.ptv=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:185.12.116.205 +include:spf.mailbox.pt ~all14400—
TXTarx.ptv=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all14400—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjectwww.arx.pt
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Valid until2026-12-14T10:56 · Remaining when checked: 38 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
cache-controlmax-age=2592000
servernginx
x-content-type-optionsnosniff

Identified technologies

nginxPHP

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionARX Portugal is an architecture studio in Lisbon, founded in 1991 by Nuno Mateus and José Mateus. Housing, public buildings, renovation and public space.
Canonical URLNot detected
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter Cardsummary_large_image

No robots.txt found

No sitemaps found

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.