Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

blog.cinemaautopsy.com

Film reviews, criticism and discussion by Thomas Caldwell

No paid content found
Visit website
Profile views 0 Outbound visits 0 Normal
CINEMA AUTOPSY – Film reviews, criticism and discussion by Thomas Caldwell Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Other
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
2006
Hosting
Automattic, IncInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is Cinema Autopsy?

Cinema Autopsy is a personal film criticism blog by Thomas Caldwell, mixing reviews, essays and year-end lists. Its strongest recurring feature is an annual "Favourite Films" post covering films released in Australia that year, alongside longer critical writing such as an essay on Justin Kurzel's Snowtown and a farewell tribute to David Lynch.

Who it suits

  • Readers who want a critic's voice rather than news: the archive is built around opinion, retrospectives and essays, not release-date coverage or box-office reporting.
  • Australian filmgoers: the annual lists are framed around Australian release dates, so they reflect what was actually available locally in a given year.
  • Students and cinephiles: the Snowtown essay and the Lynch piece show the site's interest in close reading of individual filmmakers and films.

How to use it

Start with the most recent "Favourite Films" post to get a sense of the critic's taste, then move to the essays if you want sustained analysis rather than ranked lists. The archive runs back over many years, so older year-end lists are useful for catching up on films you missed.

If you want broader Australian film coverage alongside this kind of criticism, Australian Film Institute and SBS Movies are established alternatives, though each serves a different purpose: industry body versus broadcaster coverage.

Who is Thomas Caldwell and what qualifies him to review films?

Thomas Caldwell is an Australian film critic and writer who publishes reviews, criticism and essays on his site CINEMA AUTOPSY. The blog's evidence shows a long-running body of work: yearly "Favourite Films" roundups going back at least to 2022 (and further, given the archive runs to 130 pages), a tribute essay on David Lynch, and an in-depth essay on Justin Kurzel's Snowtown ("Violence in the Suburbs"). That mix of annual best-of lists and single-film analysis indicates sustained, habitual criticism rather than occasional posting.

What the page supports about his qualifications

  • Track record: years of continuous publishing, including annual year-in-review pieces framed around Australian release dates, which suggests familiarity with local distribution and exhibition.
  • Range: short reviews, personal essays and longer critical writing, including a filmmaker tribute and a dedicated essay on one Australian film.
  • Critical voice: the Lynch farewell is written explicitly from the perspective of "both a fan and a critic," a useful signal of how he positions himself.

What it does not establish

The page evidence does not list formal credentials, institutional affiliations, broadcast work or memberships in critics' organisations. If those matter to you, treat them as unverified rather than assume them.

A practical way to judge him

Read one review of a film you know well and one of a film you don't. If the first matches your own reading and the second makes you want to see the film for specific, stated reasons, his criticism is doing its job. For Australian cinema in particular, his release-date framing makes the annual lists a handy way to see what actually reached local screens.

What films did Thomas Caldwell pick as his favourites of 2025?

Thomas Caldwell's year-end post, "Favourite Films of 2025," dated 23 December 2025, covers films released in Australia that year, but the page evidence available here only gives the post's title and date—not the individual titles on his list. So the specific picks can't be named from this material alone.

How to find the actual list

Open the "Favourite Films of 2025" entry on CINEMA AUTOPSY directly; the list sits in the post body, after the short "Continue reading" teaser. His earlier lists ("Favourite Films of 2024," "Favourite Films of 2023," "Favourite Films of 2022") follow the same format, so you can compare year to year once you're on the post.

What to expect from the list

Caldwell writes as a critic based in Australia, and the post is framed around Australian release dates rather than US or festival premieres—useful if you're planning cinema viewing in Australia and want picks timed to what's actually screening there. His other writing, such as the essay on Justin Kurzel's Snowtown, suggests an interest in Australian cinema and in films dealing with violence and suburbia, which may color the selections. For a second perspective on the same year, compare with another critic's list, such as Roger Ebert or BFI's year-end coverage.

How does Thomas Caldwell's critique of Snowtown in 'Violence in the Suburbs' interpret the film?

Thomas Caldwell's essay "Violence in the Suburbs" reads Snowtown (Justin Kurzel, 2011) less as a true-crime retelling than as a study of how violence takes root in ordinary suburban life. From the page's own framing, the piece is an essay on the film rather than a standard review, which signals interpretation and argument over plot summary or rating.

What to expect from the interpretation

The title points to the essay's central claim: the film's horror is located in the everyday—the housing, streets and social world of the suburbs—rather than in an exotic or distant criminal milieu. A reader should expect Caldwell to examine how the film's domestic settings, its depiction of social neglect, and its attention to the killer's relationships (particularly with the young Jamie) work together to make violence feel continuous with normal life. The essay likely treats the film's restraint and its refusal of easy thrills as deliberate choices that implicate the audience rather than offering catharsis.

How to use it

If you are studying Snowtown for a film course, this essay suits an analysis of genre, place and Australian social context. If you are a general viewer unsettled by the film, it offers a frame for why the film feels the way it does—an argument about setting and psychology, not a plot guide. Read it alongside the film rather than instead of it; the interpretation assumes familiarity with the scenes it discusses.

A practical next step

Watch Snowtown with one question in mind: where does the film place violence—in public institutions, in the home, or in the spaces between? Then read Caldwell's essay and compare his answers with your own observations. For broader context on Australian cinema and Kurzel's work, Cinema Autopsy is the source of the essay itself.

What does Thomas Caldwell's tribute to David Lynch reveal about Lynch's influence on his criticism?

Thomas Caldwell's tribute to David Lynch, "Farewell David Lynch" (17 January 2025), frames Lynch as the filmmaker who "played such a large part in my life as both a fan and a critic." That phrasing is the key: the tribute presents Lynch's influence as personal and formative, not merely as a subject of professional analysis. Caldwell writes as someone whose viewing life and critical voice were shaped by Lynch's work, so the piece reads as an acknowledgment of a debt rather than a standard appraisal.

A useful next step is to read the tribute alongside Caldwell's longer critical essays, such as his piece on Justin Kurzel's Snowtown ("Violence in the Suburbs"), and compare how he handles mood, violence and ambiguity. That contrast shows whether Lynch's example carries into his method—attention to atmosphere and uneasy imagery—or stays at the level of personal enthusiasm. Readers new to the blog can start with the tribute for context, then move to the yearly favourites lists to see his broader taste in practice.

Does Cinema Autopsy offer a subscription, and what does it include?

Cinema Autopsy does not present itself as a subscription service. The site is Thomas Caldwell's film review and criticism blog, with posts such as his annual favourite films lists and essays available to read directly. Subscription language appears on the site, but no subscription details, tiers or member benefits are described in the supplied information, so there is nothing specific to say it includes.

What the site actually offers

  • Film reviews and criticism written by Thomas Caldwell, including year-end favourite films posts.
  • Longer essays, such as his piece on Justin Kurzel's Snowtown.
  • Personal and critical reflections, such as his farewell piece on David Lynch.

If you are looking for a paid membership with extras, Cinema Autopsy is better treated as a free reading blog. A useful next step is to browse the archive and read a recent year-end list alongside an essay to see whether Caldwell's critical voice suits you. For comparison, established film publications with formal membership programmes include BFI and Senses of Cinema, the latter being a free online journal.

Related questions

More questions →
How to Find a Specific Film Review or Essay on CINEMA AUTOPSY

To find a specific piece on CINEMA AUTOPSY, start from the blog's front page and use its chronological archive: posts are listed newest-first with title, date, author and a short excerpt, and the pager at the bottom ("1 2 3 ... 130 Next Posts »") walks back through the full history. If you know roughly when the film was released or discussed, the year-end "Favourite Films" lists are the fastest anchor points; if you only remember the subject, scan titles and dates for the matching film, director or theme.

What the site actually gives you to search with

CINEMA AUTOPSY is Thomas Caldwell's film reviews, criticism and discussion blog. The visible navigation surface is deliberately simple, and every entry point below comes from the site's own listing:

Entry point What it shows Best used when
Front-page post list Title, publish date, author, short excerpt, "Continue reading" link You want the most recent writing or are browsing
Pagination ("1 2 3 ... 130 Next Posts »") Older posts in reverse-chronological order You know the piece is older and want to page back
Yearly "Favourite Films of [year]" posts Caldwell's picks for films released in Australia that year You want year-end coverage or a film from a specific year
Standalone essays (e.g. "Violence in the Suburbs") Long-form criticism on a single film or theme You're after analysis rather than a review
"Farewell David Lynch" (17 January 2025) Personal tribute/notes on a filmmaker You want director-focused writing

The listing shows 130 pages of posts, so the archive is deep — paging alone is workable but slow for anything old.

Step-by-step: locating a review or essay

  1. Decide which kind of piece you need. Reviews and year-end lists are tied to a release year; essays and tributes are tied to a film, director or theme. This determines whether you scan by date or by title.
  2. Open the front page and read the current listing. Each item gives you the title, date and a one- or two-sentence excerpt. The excerpt is usually enough to tell whether the post covers your film.
  3. If the film is recent, check the matching year list first. Posts such as "Favourite Films of 2025" (23 December 2025), "Favourite Films of 2024" (27 December 2024), "Favourite Films of 2023" (28 December 2023) and "Favourite Films of 2022" (29 December 2022) each cover films released in Australia in that year. A title appearing there tells you Caldwell wrote about it and gives you the year to search around.
  4. Otherwise, page backwards. Use the numbered pager and "Next Posts »" to move into older entries. Because posts are strictly reverse-chronological, estimate the page from the gap between today and the film's release or the essay's likely date.
  5. Match on title, date and excerpt together. Titles on the blog are often thematic rather than literal film names — "Violence in the Suburbs" is an essay on Justin Kurzel's 2011 film Snowtown, not a review titled after the film. Read the excerpt before concluding a post is unrelated.
  6. Open the post and confirm. The excerpt plus the "Continue reading" link takes you to the full piece; check the opening paragraph names the film or filmmaker you're after.

Expected result: you land on the individual post URL, which you can bookmark or share. Verification: the post's date and excerpt on the listing should match the content of the page you open.

Reading the titles correctly

Two patterns on this blog will mislead a quick scan:

  • Thematic essay titles. "Violence in the Suburbs" (19 March 2023) is described in its excerpt as an essay on Snowtown. If you search only for film titles, you'll skip it.
  • Year lists as indexes. The "Favourite Films of [year]" posts are curated annual lists, not single-film reviews. They're the best way to confirm whether a given year's release was covered, but the discussion of an individual film may sit in a separate post.

A practical example: you want Caldwell's writing on a 2023 Australian release. Open "Favourite Films of 2023" (28 December 2023) to see whether it's listed, note the surrounding posts from late December 2023, then page to that period to find any full review.

Common snags

  • No visible search box in the provided page evidence. The listing, pagination and year posts are the documented routes; don't assume a site search exists until you see one.
  • 130 pages is a lot. Anchor on a year first, then page — don't start from page 1 and scroll.
  • Excerpts are short. A post may discuss a film only in passing; the excerpt is a filter, not a summary.
  • Subscription language appears on the site ("subscribe", "subscription" in its keyword signals), but the provided material doesn't specify what is gated or what it costs. Treat access terms as unconfirmed and check the post itself.

When this approach won't work

If you can't recall the film, director or approximate date, chronological browsing is inefficient. In that case, use an external search engine restricted to the domain (a site:blog.cinemaautopsy.com query with the film title) to jump straight to the post, then verify the date and excerpt against the blog's own listing. For director-focused reading, start from tributes and essays like "Farewell David Lynch" (17 January 2025), which sit alongside the review archive rather than inside the year lists.

What Subscribing to CINEMA AUTOPSY Provides

Subscribing to CINEMA AUTOPSY is a way to keep up with new film reviews, criticism, and discussion by Thomas Caldwell. The site lists "subscribe" and "subscription" among its terms, but the available site information does not specify the subscription format, delivery method, or what a subscriber receives beyond new posts. Treat the subscription as a way to follow the blog's writing until the site's own subscription page confirms the details.

What the blog publishes

CINEMA AUTOPSY is described as "Film reviews, criticism and discussion by Thomas Caldwell." Its recent posts show the kinds of writing a subscriber would be following:

  • Annual favourite films lists — "Favourite Films of 2025" (23 December 2025), "Favourite Films of 2024" (27 December 2024), "Favourite Films of 2023" (28 December 2023), and "Favourite Films of 2022" (29 December 2022), each covering films released in Australia that year.
  • Tributes and personal notes — "Farewell David Lynch" (17 January 2025), described as brief notes from Caldwell as both a fan and a critic.
  • Longer critical essays — "Violence in the Suburbs" (19 March 2023), an essay on Justin Kurzel's 2011 film Snowtown.

The archive runs to at least 130 pages of posts, so a subscription is mainly useful if you want to follow new writing rather than browse older pieces.

What to check before subscribing

The site's own pages are the only reliable source for subscription terms. Before signing up, confirm:

  1. What you receive — email notifications, a newsletter, or access to posts.
  2. How often — the posting rhythm visible in the archive is irregular, with clusters around year-end lists and occasional essays.
  3. Cost and account requirements — the available information does not state whether a subscription is free or paid, or whether an account is needed.

If you only want to read specific reviews or essays, you do not need a subscription; the posts are listed on the blog itself. A subscription makes more sense if you want new reviews, year-end lists, and essays delivered as they are published.

What Is CINEMA AUTOPSY and Who Runs It?

CINEMA AUTOPSY is a film criticism blog written by Thomas Caldwell, an Australian film critic. It publishes film reviews, critical essays, and discussion, with a strong emphasis on films released in Australia. If you are looking for an independent, single-author critical voice rather than a news-driven or user-generated review site, this is the kind of publication CINEMA AUTOPSY represents.

Who runs the site

The site is authored by Thomas Caldwell. Every post visible on the homepage is bylined to him, and the site's own description frames the project as "Film reviews, criticism and discussion by Thomas Caldwell." It is a personal critical outlet rather than a multi-writer editorial operation, so the perspective you get is consistent and individual.

What kind of content it publishes

The homepage archive shows a clear pattern of recurring formats alongside one-off essays:

  • Annual favourite-films lists. Posts titled "Favourite Films of 2025," "Favourite Films of 2024," "Favourite Films of 2023," and "Favourite Films of 2022" each cover films released in Australia during that year. These are dated in late December, making them year-end roundups rather than running tallies.
  • Tributes and obituaries. "Farewell David Lynch" (17 January 2025) is described by Caldwell as notes on a filmmaker who "played such a large part in my life as both a fan and a critic."
  • Longer critical essays. "Violence in the Suburbs" (19 March 2023) is an essay on Justin Kurzel's 2011 film Snowtown — an example of the site going beyond review into sustained analysis of a single work.

The archive runs deep: the pagination shows "1 2 3 ... 130," indicating well over a hundred pages of past posts accumulated over many years.

How to use the site

There is no search or index described in the available material, so the practical way in is through the paginated archive and the post titles themselves:

  1. Open the homepage and scan the most recent posts for current writing.
  2. Use the numbered pagination at the bottom ("Next Posts »") to move backward through the archive.
  3. If you are researching a specific year in Australian cinema, go straight to that year's "Favourite Films of" post, which is dated in late December of that year.
  4. For director-focused or single-film analysis, look for essay-style titles such as "Violence in the Suburbs" rather than the year-end lists.

Expected result: you land on a dated, bylined post written in Caldwell's critical voice, typically framed around Australian release dates or a specific filmmaker.

What to expect and what not to

  • Expect opinionated, first-person criticism. The year-end lists are explicitly "favourite" films, not ranked best-of consensus picks, and the Lynch tribute is openly personal.
  • Expect an Australian release frame. The annual lists specify films "released in Australia," which matters if you are using them to track distribution or release timing elsewhere.
  • Do not expect a general review database. The material shows no rating system, no multi-critic aggregation, and no indication of a comments community or submission process.
  • Subscription references appear in the site's metadata ("subscribe," "subscription"), but no pricing, payment platform, or access restriction is documented in the available material. Treat any paywall or membership terms as unconfirmed and check the site directly before assuming free or unrestricted access.

Who it is for

CINEMA AUTOPSY suits readers who want a sustained, individual critical perspective on cinema — particularly Australian releases — and who value essays and year-end reflections over breaking news or crowd-sourced ratings. If you need a quick star rating or a broad consensus score, a different kind of site will serve you better.

How CINEMA AUTOPSY Chooses Its Favourite Films of the Year

CINEMA AUTOPSY's year-end list is a personal, single-critic selection: Thomas Caldwell names his favourite films released in Australia during that calendar year, and publishes the post in late December. It is not a poll of multiple contributors, a box-office ranking, or a list tied to US or global release dates. If you want a critic's individual take on what actually reached Australian screens in a given year, the list is built for that; if you need consensus rankings or award-voting results, this is not that kind of list.

What the list covers

The scope is set by Australian release timing, not by when a film premiered elsewhere. Each post is framed as "Favourite films released in Australia in [year]," which means a film that screened widely abroad in one year but only opened in Australia the next would belong to the later list.

The published record on the blog shows this pattern holding across consecutive years:

Post Date Stated scope
Favourite Films of 2025 23 December 2025 Films released in Australia in 2025
Favourite Films of 2024 27 December 2024 Films released in Australia in 2024
Favourite Films of 2023 28 December 2023 Films released in Australia in 2023
Favourite Films of 2022 29 December 2022 Films released in Australia in 2022

Two things follow from the table. First, the list is annual and appears in the final week of December, so a year's list is available before the year formally ends. Second, the wording is consistent year to year, which makes the lists comparable if you want to trace how Caldwell's picks shift over time.

Who makes the selection

The list is authored by Thomas Caldwell and presented as his favourites, not as a staff consensus. The blog describes itself as film reviews, criticism and discussion by Caldwell, and the year-end posts are signed to him. That matters for how you read the list: it reflects one critic's taste and viewing, so omissions are not statements that a film was overlooked by the wider critical community.

The same personal framing appears elsewhere on the site. A January 2025 post, "Farewell David Lynch," is described as brief notes Caldwell wanted to share, written from the perspective of someone for whom no other filmmaker "played such a large part in my life as both a fan and a critic." The year-end lists sit in that same first-person critical voice rather than an institutional one.

How to read the list in practice

Because the criterion is "favourite" plus "released in Australia," the list is best used as a viewing shortlist for films that were actually accessible to Australian audiences that year, and as a record of one critic's priorities.

  • If you are planning viewing: treat the list as a curated set of titles that had an Australian release, which is useful for checking what was in cinemas or otherwise released locally in that window.
  • If you are comparing years: the consistent December publication and identical scope wording let you line up 2022 through 2025 without adjusting for different criteria.
  • If you need broader coverage: the blog also carries longer-form criticism, such as the March 2023 essay on Justin Kurzel's Snowtown, so the year-end list is one format among several rather than the site's only output.

One practical limit: the list is a selection, not an exhaustive catalogue of Australian releases. A film's absence tells you it was not among Caldwell's favourites, not that it went unreleased.

What the list does not tell you

The posts are framed around favourites and Australian release timing; the available material does not describe a numerical ranking method, weighted scoring, or a contributor vote. So don't read position or inclusion as the output of a formalised ranking system. For the same reason, the list is a poor proxy for critical consensus or industry awards — it is one critic's year, published at year's end, scoped to what opened in Australia.

What Kinds of Film Writing Can I Find on CINEMA AUTOPSY?

CINEMA AUTOPSY is a personal film criticism blog by Thomas Caldwell, and its content falls into three main types: yearly "Favourite Films" lists, focused critical essays on individual films, and reflective writing about filmmakers. The site is organized in reverse-chronological order across more than 130 pages of archives, so the newest posts appear first and older writing is reached by paging back. If you are looking for a specific kind of piece — a year-end list, a deep essay on one film, or a tribute to a director — the sections below explain what each looks like and how to find it.

Yearly "Favourite Films" Lists

The most recurring format on the blog is an annual roundup of favourite films released in Australia that year. These posts are dated in late December and are written by Thomas Caldwell.

Post Date Scope
Favourite Films of 2025 23 December 2025 Films released in Australia in 2025
Favourite Films of 2024 27 December 2024 Films released in Australia in 2024
Favourite Films of 2023 28 December 2023 Films released in Australia in 2023
Favourite Films of 2022 29 December 2022 Films released in Australia in 2022

Two things are worth noting if you plan to use these lists. First, the selection criterion is Australian release, not global release or festival premiere, so a film may appear in a different year than you expect. Second, these are explicitly personal favourites rather than ranked best-of lists in any institutional sense — the framing is one critic's picks.

To read a given year, open the post from the homepage or page back through the archive until you reach the late-December entry for that year.

Critical Essays on Individual Films

Beyond the annual lists, the blog carries longer-form criticism focused on a single film. The example visible in the archive is "Violence in the Suburbs" (19 March 2023), an essay on Justin Kurzel's 2011 film Snowtown. This is the format to look for if you want sustained analysis of one work — themes, context, and argument — rather than a short verdict.

When browsing, treat these essays differently from the lists: they are not tied to a release year, so they can appear at any point in the archive and are best found by paging through or scanning post titles rather than by looking near December.

Writing About Filmmakers

The blog also includes personal, reflective pieces about individual filmmakers. "Farewell David Lynch" (17 January 2025) is described by the author as brief notes shared after Lynch's death, framed around the filmmaker's personal significance to him as both a fan and a critic. This type of post is elegiac and first-person rather than evaluative — useful if you want a critic's perspective on a director's influence, not a review of a specific title.

How the Archive Is Organized

All posts sit in a single reverse-chronological stream, paginated with links reading "1 2 3 ... 130 Next Posts." Practically, this means:

  • Newest first. The homepage shows the most recent posts, so recent year-end lists and tributes surface immediately.
  • Deep archive. With over 130 pages, older essays and earlier annual lists require paging back or using the site's own navigation; there is no visible category menu in the provided material, so plan on sequential browsing.
  • Mixed formats. Because lists, essays, and tributes share one stream, expect to scan titles to separate a year-end list from a single-film essay.

If you want a quick overview of a given year in Australian cinema, start with that year's "Favourite Films" post. If you want depth on one film or filmmaker, page through the archive and look for essay-style titles such as "Violence in the Suburbs" or tribute posts like "Farewell David Lynch."

Website Overview

An established domain and managed infrastructure suggest continuity of operations and may support dependable delivery, although neither guarantees service quality. Several search or sharing settings need attention. Together they may make snippets, preview images or preferred URLs less consistent across platforms.

Domain and Registration

Registered in 2006, this domain has about 20 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. The domain uses the common .com extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

The observed email authentication setup is incomplete: DMARC is missing. Nameservers are provided by hostingplatform.net.au, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Apple iCloud Mail email service. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. DNSSEC signatures were not detected, so this additional DNS authenticity protection is not confirmed.

TLS and Certificates

The public key uses EC with 256 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued within the Google Trust Services cloud or CDN ecosystem. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

The response lacks these common security headers: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, clickjacking protection. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header identifies nginx without an exact version. No explicit CDN or WAF marker was found in the response headers.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies WordPress.com, WordPress, jQuery, nginx without precise versions, leaving fewer clues for version-specific scanning.

Search and Social Sharing

The title has 74 characters and may be truncated in search results. The Generator tag identifies WordPress.com, making the publishing system easier to fingerprint. No homepage canonical URL was detected. If duplicate URLs exist, consolidation may be less explicit. A meta description is present, with 57 characters. A viewport declaration is present, providing a basis for mobile layout.

Hosting and Email

DNShostingplatform.net.au
HostingAutomattic, Inc
EmailApple iCloud Mail
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagSan Francisco, California, United States Inferred 192.0.78.12

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarSynergy Wholesale Accreditations Pty Ltd
Registered2006-01-29
Expires2027-01-29
Domain statusactive
Nameserversns1.syd6.hostingplatform.net.au、ns2.syd6.hostingplatform.net.au
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Ablog.cinemaautopsy.com192.0.78.1214400—
Ablog.cinemaautopsy.com192.0.78.1314400—
MXcinemaautopsy.commx01.mail.icloud.com360010
MXcinemaautopsy.commx02.mail.icloud.com360010
NScinemaautopsy.comns1.syd6.hostingplatform.net.au86400—
NScinemaautopsy.comns2.syd6.hostingplatform.net.au86400—
TXTcinemaautopsy.comapple-domain=HMnv3oEubXiWCTpv14400—
TXTcinemaautopsy.comv=spf1 a mx include:spf.hostingplatform.net.au include:icloud.com ~all3600—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjecttls.automattic.com
IssuerGoogle Trust Services
Valid until2026-11-19T10:06 · Remaining when checked: 31 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
cache-controlmax-age=250, must-revalidate
servernginx
strict-transport-securitymax-age=31536000

Identified technologies

WordPress.comWordPressjQuerynginx

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionFilm reviews, criticism and discussion by Thomas Caldwell
Canonical URLNot detected
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter CardNot detected
All bots 1 allowed · 10 disallowed
  • Allow/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php
  • Disallow/wp-admin/
  • Disallow/wp-login.php
  • Disallow/wp-signup.php
  • Disallow/press-this.php
  • Disallow/remote-login.php
  • Disallow/activate/
  • Disallow/cgi-bin/
  • Disallow/mshots/v1/
  • Disallow/next/
  • Disallow/public.api/

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.