Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is Dr. Link Check?
Dr. Link Check is a website link-checking service. You give it a starting URL, and its bot crawls your site's HTML and CSS to examine every link it can find: internal pages, outbound links to other sites, and resource links to images, stylesheets and other files. It then reports which links need attention, so you don't have to click through the site by hand.
Its checks go beyond a simple 404 scan. Each link passes through several stages:
- Broken link check: URL formatting, server response time, SSL certificate validity, and error codes such as 404 or 500.
- Blacklist check: whether the destination appears on lists for hosting malicious content such as malware or phishing.
- Soft error check: whether a server returns a 200 OK while the page content itself signals a problem.
Reports range from a high-level summary down to the exact location of each link in the code, and results can be sorted, filtered and exported to CSV for work in Excel. Checks can also be scheduled daily, weekly or monthly, with email status reports, which suits site owners who want to catch link rot between manual audits.
Who it fits
The tool is most useful for webmasters, content teams and small site owners who maintain a site over time and want a repeatable audit rather than a one-off scan. The malware and phishing angle matters if you accept user-submitted links or link out widely, since a broken link is a nuisance but a link to a harmful site is a liability. The scheduling and email reports are the main draw for ongoing maintenance; the CSV export helps if you need to hand a fix list to a developer or track progress in a spreadsheet.
A practical next step: run a check on your homepage, then compare what the crawl finds in your navigation and footer against your sitemap. Those two areas tend to carry the oldest links, and they are the ones visitors and search engines hit first. If you want a second opinion on a specific page, W3C publishes link checker tooling of its own.
How do I schedule automatic link checks to catch link rot before visitors do?
Use Dr. Link Check's scheduled checks: after crawling your site once, set the check to run monthly, weekly or daily and have status reports emailed to you, so link rot is caught between manual reviews. The page describes exactly this workflow—automatic recurring checks plus email reports—as a way to "detect link rot early, before your visitors do."
A practical setup
- Run a full check first. Start from your homepage URL so the bot crawls HTML and CSS across the site, including internal pages, outbound links, images and stylesheets. Fix what it finds before automating.
- Pick a cadence by how often content changes. Daily suits news sites, large catalogs or pages with many outbound links; weekly fits most business sites; monthly is enough for small, rarely edited sites.
- Send reports to a shared inbox (a team alias rather than one person's address), so a single departure doesn't silence alerts.
- Act on the categories separately. Broken links (bad formatting, timeouts, invalid SSL, 404/500) are quick fixes; blacklist hits (malware or phishing destinations) are urgent; soft errors—a 200 OK page whose content signals a problem—need a human look.
Deciding what to schedule
| Situation | Suggested cadence | Why |
|---|---|---|
| News or frequently updated blog | Daily | New outbound links appear constantly |
| E-commerce or large site | Weekly | Many product and resource links, higher rot risk |
| Small brochure site | Monthly | Few changes; low effort to review |
| Site with many external partners | Weekly, filter to outbound links | Third-party pages disappear without notice |
Scheduled checks only help if someone reads the reports. Assign an owner and a short review slot each cycle; export results to CSV if you want to track fixes in a spreadsheet. For a second opinion or cross-checking, W3C publishes link-checking guidance, and Google documents how broken links and poor link quality affect search visibility.
How does Dr. Link Check detect malicious or blacklisted links compared to just broken ones?
Dr. Link Check separates the two jobs. Broken-link detection is about whether a URL resolves correctly: proper formatting, a server response within a reasonable time, a valid SSL certificate, and an error code such as 404 or 500. The blacklist check is a distinct pass that asks whether the destination appears on lists of sites hosting malicious content, such as malware or phishing pages. A link can pass the first test and fail the second, which is the point of running both.
A third check catches the gap between them. The soft-error check looks for a server returning 200 OK while the page content itself signals a problem, so a link that technically "works" but leads somewhere broken or misleading still gets flagged. All three run on each link the crawler finds, including internal pages, outbound links, and resources like images and stylesheets.
What this means in practice
| Situation | Broken check | Blacklist check | Soft-error check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Page deleted, returns 404 | Flags it | — | — |
| Expired SSL certificate | Flags it | — | — |
| Link points to a malware or phishing host | May pass | Flags it | — |
| Server returns 200 but content is an error page | Passes | — | Flags it |
For a site owner, the practical difference is what you do next. A broken link usually means updating or removing a URL. A blacklisted destination is a security and reputation issue: an outbound link to a harmful site can expose visitors and undermine trust, so it warrants removal or replacement rather than a simple URL fix.
If you are choosing a checker, decide which failure mode matters most to you. Sites with many outbound links to third parties benefit most from blacklist coverage; content-heavy sites that change often benefit from soft-error detection and scheduled re-checks that catch link rot early. Dr. Link Check offers monthly, weekly, or daily automated runs with email reports, and results can be filtered and exported to CSV for review in a spreadsheet.
As a next step, run a check starting from your homepage, then sort the report by issue type so broken, blacklisted, and soft-error links are handled separately.
Can I export link check results to CSV for further analysis in Excel?
Yes. Dr. Link Check's page states that results can be sorted, filtered, and exported to CSV for further processing in Microsoft Excel. That makes it practical to pull the full link inventory into a spreadsheet and work on it outside the tool.
What the CSV export is good for
- Prioritizing fixes: sort by error type or return code to handle 404s and 500s first, then SSL and blacklist flags.
- Assigning work: add an owner column and filter by page section so different people fix different areas.
- Tracking over time: compare exports from scheduled checks (daily, weekly, or monthly) to see whether link rot is shrinking.
Practical example
A content manager runs a weekly check, exports the CSV, and filters to rows with error codes. They group by the page where each link appears, fix the highest-traffic pages first, then re-run the check to confirm the rows are gone. The CSV becomes a simple to-do list rather than a report to read.
Decision criterion
If your main need is a one-off audit you'll act on in a spreadsheet, CSV export is the deciding feature. If you need ongoing monitoring without manual exports, the scheduled checks with email status reports matter more—the page describes both. For a second opinion on link-health issues, Google Search Central covers how broken links and crawl errors affect indexing.
How does the soft error check work when a server returns 200 OK but the page content is wrong?
Dr. Link Check's soft error check is aimed at a specific trap: the server answers with a 200 OK success code, but the page behind the link no longer contains what the link promises. According to the site's own description, the check looks at the content of the returned page rather than trusting the status code alone, and flags the link when that content indicates something is wrong. In other words, it treats "the request succeeded" and "the destination is still correct" as two separate questions.
That distinction matters because a 200 response only confirms the server delivered something. A page that has been replaced by a generic "sorry, this item is no longer available" notice, an empty template, or a soft 404 can still return 200. A standard broken-link check that only reads return codes would pass it; the soft error check is designed to catch it.
What this means in practice
- Broken link check covers URL formatting, server response time, SSL certificate validity and error codes such as 404 or 500.
- Blacklist check covers whether the destination appears on lists for malicious content.
- Soft error check covers the case where the code is fine but the content is not.
For a site owner, the practical value is in content-heavy sites with frequent edits: product pages that get retired, event pages that expire, or documentation that moves. Those are the places where a link can keep returning 200 while quietly disappointing the visitor.
A useful next step
Pick a handful of links you know have changed destination—an old product page, a past event, a renamed article—and see whether the soft error check flags them alongside the plain 404s. That tells you how sensitive the content check is for your site, which is the deciding factor between relying on it for routine monitoring and treating it as a supplement to manual spot checks. Scheduled daily, weekly or monthly runs, with email reports, are the natural way to use it for link rot over time.
What does Dr. Link Check's pricing cost and which plan fits a small website?
Dr. Link Check's page doesn't list prices, so I can't tell you what it costs. What the page does show is that pricing exists as a separate page at Dr. Link Check (linked in its navigation), and that's where the actual figures and plan limits would live. Without those numbers, any "which plan fits a small site" answer would be a guess.
What to weigh when you see the prices
The product's own description points to features that usually drive plan tiers, so check each against your site:
- Crawl size. The bot starts from a start URL and crawls the HTML and CSS of the whole site, including internal pages, outbound links, images and stylesheets. A small brochure site with a few dozen pages needs far less capacity than a blog with years of archives.
- Scheduled checks. Monthly, weekly or daily runs with email reports are described on the page. If you only need an occasional audit, a lower tier may be enough; if link rot matters continuously (e.g., an e-commerce site), recurring checks are the feature to pay for.
- Check depth. Each link goes through broken-link, blacklist and soft-error checks. If you mainly care about 404s, you may not need the fullest configuration options.
A practical next step
Estimate your page count and how often you want checks to run, then compare that against the plans on the pricing page. For a small site checked monthly, the cheapest tier that covers your crawl size is usually the right call; upgrade only when you need frequent automated runs or a larger crawl.
Quick comparison of what each check catches
| Check | What it flags | Who cares most |
|---|---|---|
| Broken link | Bad URL format, slow server, invalid SSL, 404/500 errors | Anyone with public pages |
| Blacklist | Links to sites hosting malicious content | Sites linking out widely |
| Soft error | A 200 OK page whose content signals a problem | Sites with many outbound links |
If you want a second opinion on pricing, compare with another checker's published plans before committing.
User reviews (0)