ffmpeg.org
No paid content found
Categories: Development
Related questions
More questions →What Does a Postal Code API Return? Fields, Formats, and Common Use Cases
A postal code API returns structured location data for a given ZIP Code or Canadian postal code. A typical response includes the code itself, city, state or province, county, latitude/longitude, and — where available — ZIP+4 detail. More complete services add time zone, area codes, boundary geometry, and demographic fields. You send a code (or an address), and the API sends back a machine-readable record you can store, validate, or display.
This article explains what those responses contain, how requests are usually shaped, and where postal code data fits into real applications.
First, clear up the word "code"
The keyword "code" is overloaded, and that causes real confusion for developers:
- Postal code — the ZIP Code (U.S.) or postal code (Canada) that identifies a delivery area.
- API key — the credential you use to authenticate your requests. It is not postal data.
- Source code — the program you write to call the API.
When someone searches for "postal code API code," they usually want example request/response code for a postal code service. The rest of this article treats it that way.
What a postal code API actually returns
Response fields vary by provider and endpoint, but the core set is fairly consistent. A single-code lookup commonly returns:
| Field | Example | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Postal code | 90210 |
The code you queried |
| City | Beverly Hills |
May be one of several acceptable place names |
| State / Province | CA |
Two-letter abbreviation |
| County | Los Angeles |
Useful for tax, territory, and reporting logic |
| Latitude / Longitude | 34.0901, -118.4065 |
Usually the centroid of the area |
| ZIP+4 | 90210-1234 |
Present only when a specific delivery segment is known |
| Time zone | America/Los_Angeles |
Helps with scheduling and display |
| Area codes | 310, 424 |
Regional phone context |
Richer datasets add 90+ fields: boundaries, population, income, elevation, and more. You rarely need all of them — request only what your application uses.
A representative JSON response
{
"postal_code": "90210",
"city": "Beverly Hills",
"state": "CA",
"county": "Los Angeles",
"latitude": 34.0901,
"longitude": -118.4065,
"timezone": "America/Los_Angeles",
"area_codes": ["310", "424"]
}
XML responses carry the same information in tag form. Choose based on what your stack parses most easily; JSON is the common default.
Common request patterns
Most postal code APIs support four patterns. Knowing which one you need prevents wasted calls.
1. Lookup by code
You have a code and want its details. This is the simplest and fastest call.
GET /lookup?code=90210
2. Reverse lookup by address
You have a street address and want to confirm or complete the code. This is the pattern behind checkout address validation.
GET /validate?street=...&city=...&state=...
3. Radius search
You have a center point and want all codes within a distance. Useful for store locators and delivery zones.
GET /radius?code=90210&miles=10
4. Batch validation
You have a file of addresses and want them cleaned in bulk. Batch endpoints trade latency for throughput and usually have their own limits.
Handling missing and ambiguous matches
Real data is messy. Plan for these cases:
- No match — the code doesn't exist or the address is malformed. Return a clear error rather than a silent empty object.
- Multiple matches — a city name may map to several codes, or a code may span several acceptable city names. Decide whether to pick the primary or return a list.
- Partial match — the street is valid but the ZIP+4 isn't. Fall back to the 5-digit code.
- Stale data — codes are added, retired, and reassigned. Refresh your dataset on a regular schedule.
A practical rule: validate at the point of entry, store the normalized result, and never re-derive it later from raw user input.
Practical use cases
- Checkout address validation — catch typos before shipping, reduce failed deliveries.
- Shipping zone lookup — map a code to a zone, carrier route, or rate table.
- Data enrichment — append county, coordinates, or demographics to existing records.
- Store and service locators — radius search to find nearby branches or coverage areas.
- Territory and tax logic — county and boundary data drive jurisdiction rules.
Licensing and data-source considerations
Postal code data originates with national authorities — USPS in the United States and Canada Post in Canada. Providers license and repackage it, which is why accuracy, update frequency, and field coverage differ between services. Before committing:
- Confirm the data source and how often it refreshes.
- Check whether ZIP+4 and boundary data are included or sold separately.
- Review usage limits and whether batch processing is allowed.
- Read the license terms for redistribution and storage.
Pricing and plan details change, so check the provider's current documentation rather than relying on secondhand figures.
Getting started
- Decide which request pattern you need (lookup, reverse, radius, or batch).
- Pick the fields you'll actually store.
- Write a small test call and inspect the raw response.
- Add error handling for no-match and ambiguous cases.
- Cache results where the same codes repeat.
A postal code API is ultimately a translation layer: you give it a code or an address, and it gives back structured location facts. Understand the fields, match them to your use case, and handle the messy edges — that's most of the work.
Website Overview
Identifiable technologies and additional version or configuration signals make the service easier to fingerprint, which may help targeted scanners narrow their checks. An established domain and managed infrastructure suggest continuity of operations and may support dependable delivery, although neither guarantees service quality.
Domain and Registration
Registered in 2002, this domain has about 24 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain uses the common .org extension, which is not an independent safety signal.
DNS and Email
Nameservers are provided by avcodec.org, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the ffmpeg.org email service. CAA records restrict which certificate authorities are authorized to issue certificates. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. SPF and DMARC are configured. DKIM status is unknown.
TLS and Certificates
The public key uses EC with 384 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, commonly associated with automated certificate services. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.
HTTP and Browser Security
The Server header exposes the software version: Apache/2.4.63 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) OpenSSL/3.5.8 mod_fcgid/2.3.9. This makes version-targeted checks easier, but is not proof of an exploitable vulnerability. The response lacks these common security headers: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, clickjacking protection. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. No explicit CDN or WAF marker was found in the response headers.
Technology Stack Analysis
The public page identifies jQuery, Bootstrap, Apache 2.4.63, with exact versions exposed for 1 technologies. These details can narrow vulnerability checks, although exposure alone is not a vulnerability.
Search and Social Sharing
No homepage meta description was detected, leaving snippet selection more dependent on page text. No homepage canonical URL was detected. If duplicate URLs exist, consolidation may be less explicit. No Open Graph metadata was detected, so social previews may depend on platform inference. The title has 6 characters, within a common display range. The observed directives allow indexing and link following.
Hosting and Email
Pages, Search and Sharing
| Meta description | Not detected |
|---|---|
| Canonical URL | Not detected |
| Language | English (default) |
| Twitter Card | Not detected |
Unknown
robots.txt (opens in a new tab)
11 rulesAll bots 0 allowed · 11 disallowed
/gitweb//*a=search*/*/search/*/*a=blobdiff*/*/blobdiff/*/*a=commitdiff*/*/commitdiff/*/*a=snapshot*/*/snapshot/*/*a=blame*/*/blame/*- Interval
Crawl delay 10 seconds
No matching rules.
Sitemaps
0No sitemaps found
Registration details RDAP / WHOIS
| Registrar | OVH sas |
|---|---|
| Registered | 2002-04-26 |
| Expires | 2027-04-26 |
| Domain status | client delete prohibited、client transfer prohibited |
| Nameservers | ns1.avcodec.org、ns2.avcodec.org、ns3.avcodec.org |
| DNSSEC | unsigned |
DNS records
| Type | Name | Value | TTL | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | ffmpeg.org | 79.124.17.100 | 569 | — |
| MX | ffmpeg.org | ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org | 600 | 10 |
| NS | ffmpeg.org | ns1.avcodec.org | 1800 | — |
| NS | ffmpeg.org | ns2.avcodec.org | 1800 | — |
| NS | ffmpeg.org | ns3.avcodec.org | 1800 | — |
| TXT | ffmpeg.org | v=spf1 ip4:217.138.67.134 ip4:178.63.43.86 ip4:79.124.17.100 ip4:79.124.17.101 ip6:2a01:4f8:120:506c::2/64 mx ~all | 1800 | — |
| CAA | ffmpeg.org | 0 issue "letsencrypt.org" | 1800 | — |
| DMARC | _dmarc.ffmpeg.org | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=quarantine | 1800 | — |
TLS and certificates
| Assessment | Normal configuration |
|---|---|
| Supported protocols | TLSv1.2、TLSv1.3 |
| Negotiated protocol | TLSv1.3 |
| Certificate subject | ffmpeg.org |
| Issuer | Let's Encrypt |
| Valid until | 2026-11-14T00:16 · Remaining when checked: 49 days |
| Verification details | Certificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed |
HTTP response headers
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| content-type | text/html; charset=UTF-8 |
| server | Apache/2.4.63 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) OpenSSL/3.5.8 mod_fcgid/2.3.9 |
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains |
User reviews (0)