Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

keebfolio.netlify.app

A curated list of open-source mechanical keyboard projects

No paid content found
Visit website
Profile views 8 Outbound visits 4 Normal
Keebfolio Full homepage screenshot

At a glance

Category
Development
Language
English
Paid-content signal
No paid content foundObserved
Registered
2018
Hosting
NetlifyInferred
HTTPS certificate trusted
PassedObserved
Last updated

Website review

This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.

What is Keebfolio?

Keebfolio is a curated directory of open-source mechanical keyboard projects, hosted at Keebfolio. It collects 204 projects in one place and organizes them by category rather than by vendor or store, so it works as a starting point for research instead of a shop.

What it covers

  • Keyboards — grouped by layout type: staggered (52 traditional layouts), ortholinear (26 grid layouts), split (71 ergonomic split keyboards), and other (55 macropads, numpads and similar).
  • Resources — firmware options such as QMK and ZMK, plus tools like PCB generators, layout editors and utilities, and tutorials including build guides.
  • Miscellaneous — 3D prints, keycaps, controllers and related parts.
  • Recent updates — a dated commit-style log of additions and site changes, useful for spotting what is new since your last visit.

Who it suits

  • First-time builders choosing a layout: browse the split and ortholinear sections to see how many established designs exist before committing to a shape.
  • Experienced builders looking for firmware or tooling: the resources section is the fastest route to options beyond the mainstream.
  • Designers and tinkerers wanting prior art: seeing 204 projects grouped by type makes gaps and recurring patterns easier to spot.

Trade-offs to expect

A curated list is not a buying guide. Entries point to open-source projects, so you still need to check each project's own documentation, parts availability, group-buy status and build difficulty. Categories overlap too — a split ortholinear board could reasonably sit in either section, so search across categories rather than trusting one label.

Next step: if you already know your layout preference, open that category first and shortlist two or three projects; then compare their firmware support and part sourcing before picking one.

How do I choose between a staggered, ortholinear, or split keyboard for my first build?

Start by matching the layout to the problem you actually want solved. For a first build, staggered is the lowest-risk option, ortholinear is the cheapest way to test whether column alignment suits you, and split is the most involved but the only one that directly addresses shoulder and wrist posture.

What each layout is good for

  • Staggered (52 projects on Keebfolio): the familiar row-offset layout found on almost every laptop and office keyboard. Choose it if your main goal is learning to solder, flash firmware and assemble a case without also relearning typing. Your existing muscle memory transfers immediately, and troubleshooting advice is easiest to find.
  • Ortholinear (26 projects): keys sit in a straight grid rather than offset rows. Choose it if you suspect your fingers travel further than necessary on a staggered board, or you want a compact 40–50% footprint. Expect an adjustment period of days to weeks; numbers and punctuation often move to layers.
  • Split (71 projects): two independent halves, usually with tenting or angled placement. Choose it if you have shoulder, wrist or forearm discomfort, or you want your hands at shoulder width. It is also the most demanding first build: two controllers, two cases, and often a TRRS or similar interconnect to get right.

A quick comparison

Layout Build difficulty Typing adjustment Main payoff
Staggered Lowest None Skills and confidence
Ortholinear Low–medium Moderate Less finger travel, compact size
Split Highest Moderate–high Posture and comfort

How to decide

Pick staggered if this is your first time soldering or flashing firmware and you want a finished keyboard rather than a project. Pick ortholinear if you already build electronics confidently and want to test a different typing geometry cheaply. Pick split if comfort is the reason you are here at all — a staggered build will not fix shoulder width.

A practical middle path: build a small macropad or numpad first. Keebfolio groups these under "Other" (55 projects), and the soldering and firmware steps are nearly identical to a full board at a fraction of the cost and time.

To browse candidates, filter by your chosen layout on Keebfolio, then check the firmware and tutorial sections before committing — a board with a well-documented build guide matters more for a first attempt than any spec.

Which open-source firmware should I use for a custom keyboard, and how do QMK, ZMK, and alternatives differ?

Start with the constraint that matters most: whether your keyboard is wired or wireless. That single choice usually decides between QMK and ZMK before you compare features.

QMK is the default for wired custom keyboards. It runs on AVR and ARM controllers, supports the widest range of boards and community keymaps, and is the firmware most group-buy kits assume. Choose it if you want maximum hardware compatibility, mature tooling, and a large pool of existing configurations to adapt.

ZMK is the natural choice for wireless split keyboards, especially those built on nice!nano-style controllers. It is designed around Bluetooth and low power, with a configuration approach that many users find cleaner than editing C files. The trade-off is narrower hardware support and a smaller, though active, ecosystem.

Alternatives fill gaps rather than replace both. KMK runs on CircuitPython, which suits people who prefer Python and quick iteration over compiling firmware. QMK and ZMK remain the mainstream options; other projects tend to be board-specific or experimental.

Practical comparison

Firmware Best for Main trade-off
QMK Wired boards, broad hardware support Wireless is not its focus
ZMK Wireless splits, low power Fewer supported controllers
KMK Python users, fast prototyping Smaller community and board list

Keebfolio is useful here because it groups projects by layout and links firmware, tools and tutorials in one place, so you can check what a specific board actually uses before committing. Browse Keebfolio by layout type, then open the firmware section to see which options appear alongside the boards you like.

A sensible next step: pick two or three keyboards from the list that match your layout preference, note the controller each one specifies, and let that determine the firmware. If you are undecided on hardware, ZMK keeps wireless options open; if you already own a wired kit, QMK is the safer path. For official documentation, check QMK and ZMK.

What tools do I need to design a custom PCB or keymap for a mechanical keyboard?

You need two separate toolchains: one for the circuit board (schematic capture, PCB layout, and often a keyboard-specific generator), and one for the keymap (firmware plus a configurator or code editor). Keebfolio is a curated index of 204 open-source mechanical keyboard projects, and its Resources section is organised into exactly these categories — Firmware, Tools, Tutorials — which makes it a reasonable starting point for finding candidates rather than a tool itself. See Keebfolio.

PCB design: pick one path

Path What it's good for Trade-off
Keyboard-specific PCB generator Fast results for common layouts; handles matrix wiring, diode placement and switch footprints for you Limited to the layouts and options the generator supports; unusual shapes need manual work
General EDA suite Full control over any shape, split half, or integrated controller You wire the matrix and footprints yourself; steeper learning curve
Hand-wired / no PCB One-off builds, prototyping a layout before committing Not a manufacturable board; more soldering, less tidy

Keebfolio lists PCB generators, layout editors and utilities together under Tools, so it's worth browsing that list before defaulting to a general EDA package. For a first board, a generator plus a simple ortholinear or staggered layout is the lowest-risk route; save full EDA work for a split ergonomic board with custom geometry.

Keymap: firmware first, then an editor

Firmware choices in the index include QMK, ZMK and others, with a separate firmware list and a Smart Keymap entry among the updates. The practical split:

  • Wired boards — QMK is the common default, configured either by editing keymap files in code or through a graphical configurator.
  • Wireless/split boards — ZMK is the usual choice, with keymaps written in a devicetree-style file and built in the cloud.
  • Visual editing — layout editors and keymap tools let you drag keys and export a keymap, which suits anyone who doesn't want to learn the firmware's config language.

A concrete scenario: you want a 4x12 ortholinear board with a rotary encoder. Use a generator to produce the matrix and encoder footprint, order the board, then write a QMK keymap with the encoder mapped to volume and layer switching. If you later go wireless, expect to rewrite the keymap for ZMK rather than port it directly.

Decision criteria

Choose a generator if your layout is close to a standard row-staggered, ortholinear or common split design. Choose full EDA if you need a novel shape or integrated MCU. Choose a visual keymap editor if you'll iterate on layers often and don't want to rebuild firmware by hand; choose code-based keymaps if you need advanced features like tap-hold tuning or custom C.

A useful next step is to open Keebfolio's Firmware and Tools lists side by side and note which entries support your intended controller and connection type before you start drawing anything.

Where can I find beginner-friendly tutorials and build guides for a DIY mechanical keyboard?

Keebfolio collects open-source mechanical keyboard projects and also links out to build guides and learning resources. Its own "Tutorials" section is described as build guides and learning resources, so it is a reasonable starting point when you want a guided path rather than just a parts list. Because Keebfolio is a curated index, expect it to point you toward external guides rather than host a full step-by-step course itself.

A practical way to use it: pick your layout first, then follow the matching resource.

  • Staggered (52 projects) — the familiar row-offset layout. Best if you want the widest choice of beginner kits and guides.
  • Ortholinear (26) — grid layout. Fewer projects, but often simpler to hand-wire because keys line up.
  • Split (71) — ergonomic two-half builds. More wiring and firmware decisions, so treat these as a second build unless you already solder.
  • Other (55) — macropads, numpads and similar. Often the cheapest and least risky first soldering project.

Keebfolio also separates Firmware (QMK, ZMK and others), Tools (PCB generators, layout editors, utilities) and Miscellaneous (3D prints, keycaps, controllers), which maps neatly onto the three skills a first build tests: soldering, flashing firmware, and case/plate sourcing.

For broader beginner material, compare a few established sources:

Source Best for Trade-off
Keebfolio Finding a specific open-source project and its linked guide An index, not a single linear course
QMK Firmware setup and keymap basics Documentation-style, assumes some comfort with tooling
ZMK Wireless and split keyboard firmware Narrower hardware support than QMK

A concrete first step: open Keebfolio, choose Other or Staggered, pick one project with a linked build guide, and read that guide end to end before buying anything. If the guide assumes tools you do not own — a soldering iron, a multimeter, a 3D printer — that is your signal to start with a macropad instead of a full split ergonomic board.

How can I contribute a new keyboard project or tool to the Keebfolio list?

Contribute through the project's GitHub repository, since Keebfolio is a curated static list rather than a submission form. The maintainer adds entries by commit, and the update log shows a steady pattern of individual keyboards, firmware, tools and guides being merged over time.

What to prepare before you submit

  • The project's public repository or official page, so the maintainer can verify it exists and is open source.
  • Its keyboard category: staggered, ortholinear, split, or "other" for macropads and numpads. Tools, firmware and tutorials have their own sections.
  • A short, factual description. Keebfolio's schema includes a description field, so a one- or two-line summary of what the board or tool does is appropriate.
  • A representative image, if the project has one. Recent updates mention image optimization and ortho image updates, so images are expected and get processed.

A practical submission scenario

Suppose you designed a split ergonomic board with an open-source PCB and firmware. You would open a pull request or issue on the repository, placing it under split keyboards, adding your description and image, and linking the source files. If you built a layout editor instead, it belongs in the tools list, as happened with Capistry and Snakeskin.

Decision criteria

  • If your project is a physical keyboard, pick the layout category that matches how the keys are arranged, not how it feels to type on.
  • If it is software, choose firmware or tools depending on whether it runs on the keyboard or helps you design one.
  • If it is documentation, it goes under tutorials.

Next step

Read the repository's README and contribution workflow before opening a request, then check recent commits to match the current entry format. Keebfolio itself is at Keebfolio, and the wider open-source keyboard community around GitHub is where these lists are typically maintained.

Related questions

More questions →
How to Use Ahrefs for Your First SEO Audit: A Step-by-Step Tutorial

If you're new to Ahrefs and want to run your first SEO audit, the fastest path is: open Site Explorer, enter your target URL, review the Overview for a health snapshot, then dig into Organic Keywords, Top Pages, and Site Audit to find specific problems. From there, build a short prioritized to-do list instead of trying to fix everything at once.

This tutorial walks through that workflow using a realistic starting scenario, explains what the numbers mean, and shows how to turn findings into actions.

Before You Start: Pick a Narrow Scope

A common beginner mistake is auditing an entire large website on day one. The reports become overwhelming, and you can't tell which issues matter.

Instead, choose one of these starting points:

  • A single important page (your homepage or a key product/service page)
  • A small site (under ~50 pages, e.g., a personal blog or small business site)
  • One section of a bigger site (e.g., /blog/)

For this tutorial, assume you're auditing a small business site with about 30 pages. The same steps scale up later.

You'll need an Ahrefs account to follow along. Ahrefs offers paid plans, and pricing and feature limits change over time, so check the current Pricing page for what's included in each tier before committing.

Step 1: Enter Your Target in Site Explorer

Site Explorer is Ahrefs' core tool for analyzing any website or URL.

  1. Open Site Explorer from the top navigation.
  2. In the search box, paste your domain (e.g., example.com).
  3. Choose the Exact URL or Domain mode depending on scope. For a full-site view, use Domain or Prefix; for a single page, use Exact URL.
  4. Press Enter.

You'll land on the Overview report. Don't try to absorb everything — focus on four numbers first.

Reading the Overview Snapshot

Metric What it tells you How to use it
Ahrefs Rank (AR) Relative strength of the site's backlink profile vs. others in the database Useful for comparing against competitors, not as a standalone goal
Organic traffic Estimated monthly visits from search A rough trend indicator, not exact analytics
Organic keywords Estimated number of keywords the site ranks for Shows breadth of visibility
Backlinks / Referring domains Total links and unique sites linking to you Referring domains matter more than raw backlink count

Important caveat: Ahrefs' traffic and keyword numbers are estimates based on its own data. They won't match Google Search Console or your analytics exactly. Treat them as directional, not absolute.

Step 2: See What You Already Rank For

Go to Organic Keywords in the left sidebar. This shows queries where your site appears in search results.

Sort by Traffic (descending) to see which pages bring the most estimated visitors. Then look for:

  • Keywords ranking in positions 4–15 — these are often the easiest wins. A small content or on-page improvement can push them onto page one.
  • Keywords with high volume but low position — potential opportunities if the topic is relevant.
  • Irrelevant keywords — if you rank for something off-topic, it may signal thin or mismatched content.

Write down 5–10 of the position 4–15 keywords. These become your first optimization targets.

Step 3: Find Your Best and Weakest Pages

Open Top Pages. This ranks your URLs by estimated organic traffic.

Look for two things:

  1. Your top performers — understand what topics and formats work. Can you create more content like this?
  2. Pages with traffic but poor rankings — these may need on-page fixes (title, headings, internal links).

If a page gets zero traffic and targets a topic you care about, it's a candidate for a rewrite or consolidation.

Step 4: Run a Technical Site Audit

Now move to Site Audit. This crawls your site and flags technical and on-page issues.

  1. Click Site Audit → New project.
  2. Enter your domain and set crawl settings (default is usually fine for a small site).
  3. Start the crawl and wait for it to finish.

Once complete, you'll see a Health Score and a list of issues grouped by category.

Which Issues to Fix First

Not all issues are equal. Prioritize in this order:

Priority Issue type Why it matters
1 Broken links (404s) Bad for users and crawl efficiency
2 Pages blocked from indexing They can't rank at all
3 Missing or duplicate title tags Directly affects click-through and relevance
4 Slow-loading pages Affects experience and rankings
5 Thin content Low value to users and search engines

Ignore low-impact warnings (like minor meta description length) until the big items are handled.

Step 5: Turn Findings Into a To-Do List

You now have raw data. Convert it into a short, actionable list. Example:

  1. Fix 3 broken links found in Site Audit.
  2. Rewrite title tags on 5 pages with duplicate titles.
  3. Improve 4 pages ranking in positions 6–12 by adding missing subtopics and internal links.
  4. Remove or update 2 thin pages with no traffic.

Keep the list to 5–10 items max for your first audit. Finishing a short list beats starting a long one.

Common Beginner Mistakes

  • Chasing every red flag. Site Audit flags many minor issues. Fix what affects rankings and users first.
  • Trusting estimates as exact numbers. Ahrefs data is modeled, not measured from your analytics.
  • Auditing a huge site too early. Start small to learn the interface.
  • Ignoring search intent. A page can be technically perfect but still fail if it doesn't match what searchers want.
  • Forgetting to re-crawl. After fixes, run Site Audit again to confirm improvements.

Where to Go Next

Once your first audit is done:

  • Compare with competitors using Site Explorer's Competing Domains and Content Gap reports.
  • Track keyword rankings over time with Rank Tracker.
  • Explore backlink opportunities in the Backlinks and Link Intersect reports.
  • Set up recurring Site Audit crawls so new issues surface automatically.

Your first audit isn't about perfection — it's about building a repeatable habit: enter a target, read the key reports, pick the highest-impact fixes, and act. Do that once a month and your site's health compounds.

What Are Open-Source UI Element Libraries and How Do They Differ From UI Frameworks?

An open-source UI element library is a collection of individual, ready-made interface pieces—buttons, cards, inputs, toggles, loaders—that you copy into your own project and adapt. A UI framework, by contrast, is a structured system of components, conventions, and often a theming layer that governs how your whole interface is built. The practical difference: an element library gives you a snippet; a framework gives you a way of working. If you need a polished button in ten minutes, reach for the element library. If you're building a 40-screen product with a team, you probably want the framework.

What "open-source UI element library" actually means

The term gets used loosely, so it helps to separate the parts:

  • Open-source: the code is publicly available, and the license tells you what you may do with it—copy, modify, redistribute, or use commercially.
  • UI element: a single, self-contained piece of interface, usually small enough to read in one sitting. A button with hover states, a pricing card, a search field.
  • Library: a browsable, searchable collection of those elements, typically contributed by many different people.

On a site like Uiverse, elements are shared by a community and written in plain CSS or Tailwind. You find one you like, copy the markup and styles, paste them into your project, and adjust colors, spacing, and text to fit. There's no package to install and no build step required—which is exactly the appeal, and also the source of most of the confusion.

Element library vs. UI framework: the core differences

Dimension Open-source UI element library UI framework / design system
Unit of reuse A single snippet you copy A component you import or call
Installation None; paste into your code Package install, config, sometimes a provider
Consistency Depends on you; each element may look different Enforced by shared tokens and APIs
Theming Manual edits per element Central theme/config file
Updates You own the copy; no upstream updates Version bumps bring fixes and changes
Accessibility Varies per contributor; must be checked Usually tested and documented
Best for Prototypes, landing pages, small sites, one-off needs Multi-page apps, teams, long-lived products
Learning curve Low—read the CSS Higher—learn the API and conventions

The table isn't a verdict. It's a map of trade-offs. Element libraries win on speed and freedom; frameworks win on consistency and maintenance.

Licensing and attribution: what to check before you paste

This is where people get into trouble, and it's worth slowing down for.

  1. Find the license. Every element or collection should state one. Common open-source licenses include MIT, Apache-2.0, and BSD. Some projects use copyleft licenses like GPL, which can impose obligations if you redistribute your code.
  2. Understand what the license permits. MIT and Apache-2.0 are permissive: you can typically use the code in commercial and closed-source projects. Copyleft licenses may require you to release derivative source under the same terms.
  3. Check attribution requirements. Permissive licenses usually require you to keep the copyright notice and license text somewhere in your project. That's a real obligation, not a formality.
  4. Look for per-element terms. On community sites, the site's overall terms and the individual contributor's stated wishes may differ. If a contributor asks for credit, honor it.
  5. When in doubt, ask or avoid. If a snippet has no license at all, you don't have clear permission to reuse it. Treat "no license" as "not open source," even if the code is publicly visible.

This article is general information, not legal advice. For commercial products with real exposure, have someone qualified review the licenses you're relying on.

How to use a community element in your project: a practical workflow

Here's a repeatable process that avoids most of the usual mess.

1. Start from a real need, not a browsing session

Decide what you need first—"a compact primary button with a loading state"—then search. Browsing aimlessly produces a pile of pretty snippets that don't fit together.

2. Copy the smallest version that works

Take the markup and the styles. Strip anything you don't need: demo wrappers, extra animations, decorative layers. Less code means fewer surprises.

3. Convert it to your conventions

If your project uses design tokens or CSS variables, replace hard-coded values:

/* Before: hard-coded */
.button { background: #4f46e5; border-radius: 8px; }

/* After: token-based */
.button { background: var(--color-primary); border-radius: var(--radius-md); }

This one step is what keeps a copied element from looking like a foreign object in your UI.

4. Check accessibility before you ship

Community elements vary widely here. Verify at minimum:

  • Keyboard focus is visible and the element is reachable by Tab.
  • Color contrast meets WCAG AA (4.5:1 for normal text).
  • Interactive elements use semantic HTML (<button>, not a clickable <div>).
  • Form inputs have associated labels.
  • Motion respects prefers-reduced-motion.

5. Test in context

Paste it into a real page with real content. Long labels, small screens, and dark mode break more copied elements than anything else.

6. Note where it came from

Keep a short comment or an internal credits file: source, license, date. Future you—and your legal reviewer—will be grateful.

Where element libraries genuinely shine

  • Prototypes and demos: you need something clickable today, not a design system.
  • Landing pages and marketing sites: a handful of distinctive elements, each custom.
  • Filling gaps: your framework lacks one specific component, and you don't want to build it from scratch.
  • Learning: reading well-made CSS is one of the fastest ways to improve.
  • Small projects: a personal site doesn't need a theming architecture.

Where they fall short

  • Consistency at scale: ten elements from ten contributors rarely look like one product.
  • Maintenance: you own every copy. When your design changes, you edit each one.
  • Accessibility debt: you inherit whatever the contributor did or didn't do.
  • No upstream fixes: a bug fixed in the original won't reach your copy.
  • Integration friction: different naming conventions, different units, different assumptions about resets.

When to choose which

Choose an element library when the scope is small, the timeline is short, or you need a few distinctive pieces rather than a whole system.

Choose a framework or design system when multiple people build multiple screens over months, when consistency is a product requirement, or when accessibility and theming need to be guaranteed rather than checked.

A hybrid works well for many teams: adopt a framework for the structural components—forms, navigation, layout—and borrow individual elements for the places where you want personality. Just route every borrowed element through the same token and accessibility checks, so it lands as part of your system rather than beside it.

The short version: open-source UI element libraries are a fast, flexible way to get good-looking interface pieces into a project. They are not a substitute for a design system, and the license and accessibility details are the part worth reading carefully.

Website Overview

An advisory match combined with missing browser safeguards may increase exposure if the affected component is active. Deployment-specific verification and remediation deserve priority. Identifiable technologies and additional version or configuration signals make the service easier to fingerprint, which may help targeted scanners narrow their checks.

Domain and Registration

Registered in 2018, this domain has about 8 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain uses the common .app extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

Nameservers are provided by NS1, indicating managed DNS hosting. CAA records restrict which certificate authorities are authorized to issue certificates. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. No MX record was found. A conventional explicit inbound-mail route is not configured. TXT records include verification markers for Google. Such markers may also remain after a service stops being used.

TLS and Certificates

The certificate includes the organization field Netlify, Inc. The certificate issuer is DigiCert Inc, a commercial certificate authority. The public key uses EC with 256 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. The certificate is valid for about 396 days in total, with 168 days remaining.

HTTP and Browser Security

The response lacks these common security headers: CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, clickjacking protection. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header contains the custom value Netlify. No explicit CDN or WAF marker was found in the response headers.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Astro 5.16.6, Netlify, with exact versions exposed for 1 technologies. These details can narrow vulnerability checks, although exposure alone is not a vulnerability. The advisory source OSV places Astro 5.16.6 in the affected range of GHSA-26w7-cxv4-gfx2, GHSA-2pvr-wf23-7pc7, GHSA-376h-93r7-7g6f, GHSA-4g3v-8h47-v7g6, GHSA-7pw4-f3q4-r2p2 等 10 项. Verify the deployed version and relevant configuration before drawing conclusions about exploitability. Updating affected components should be a priority.

Search and Social Sharing

The Generator tag identifies Astro v5.16.6, making the publishing system easier to fingerprint. Twitter Card metadata is configured. The title has 16 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 58 characters. The observed directives allow indexing and link following.

Hosting and Email

DNSNS1
HostingNetlify
EmailUnknown
Approximate IP geolocation (inferred; a CDN or proxy may differ from the origin server) United States flagAshburn, Virginia, United States Inferred 18.208.88.157

Registration details

RDAP / WHOIS

RegistrarName.com, Inc.
Registered2018-05-08
Expires2031-05-08
Domain statusclient transfer prohibited
Nameserversdns1.p01.nsone.net、dns2.p01.nsone.net、dns3.p01.nsone.net、dns4.p01.nsone.net
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

DNS

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Akeebfolio.netlify.app18.208.88.157120—
Akeebfolio.netlify.app98.84.224.111120—
AAAAkeebfolio.netlify.app2600:1f18:16e:df01::258311—
AAAAkeebfolio.netlify.app2600:1f18:16e:df01::259311—
NSnetlify.appdns1.p01.nsone.net1842—
NSnetlify.appdns2.p01.nsone.net1842—
NSnetlify.appdns3.p01.nsone.net1842—
NSnetlify.appdns4.p01.nsone.net1842—
TXTnetlify.app_kvz3va36b5cudpl46gbej22cfyyw9081800—
TXTnetlify.appgoogle-site-verification=0KCpoJchrixypEMvtkzLtj6VMqMXKcuWS7j2jjjDcys1800—
TXTnetlify.appv=spf1 -all1800—
CAAnetlify.app128 iodef "mailto:[email protected]"1800—
CAAnetlify.app128 issue "digicert.com;account=2d83e9ac9b6776c3f215150f6ebceea8cefe3bc2e1fb5efffb1d71e200575226"1800—
DMARC_dmarc.netlify.appv=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:[email protected]; ruf=mailto:[email protected]; fo=1300—

TLS and certificates

TLS / SSL

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subject*.netlify.app
IssuerDigiCert Inc
Valid until2027-03-19T23:59 · Remaining when checked: 168 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HTTP

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
cache-controlpublic,max-age=0,must-revalidate
serverNetlify
strict-transport-securitymax-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

Identified technologies

Astro 5.16.6Netlify

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionA curated list of open-source mechanical keyboard projects
Canonical URLhttps://keebfolio.netlify.app/
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter Cardsummary_large_image
All bots 1 allowed · 0 disallowed
  • Allow/

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.