Website profiles · Technology insights · Alternatives

tapology.com No paid content found

Categories: Other

The site for serious fans of the UFC, MMA, Boxing, and other combat sports.

Visit website

Updated: 2026-09-23 18:27 Language: English (default) Access: Normal

Profile views 6 Outbound visits 1
Tapology Full homepage screenshot
Editorial Review

Website Review

What is Tapology?

Tapology is a combat-sports database and community site covering MMA, UFC, boxing and regional promotions. It combines reference material — fighter profiles, event and bout pages, gym listings — with a live feed of announcements, plus rankings, news and a busy forum.

What you can actually do there

  • Look up fighters, events and bouts. Search any name or card to see records, results and scheduled matchups. Useful when a broadcast mentions an unfamiliar undercard fighter.
  • Check rankings. Tapology publishes its own rankings across UFC men's and women's divisions, and states these use a proprietary scoring system rather than fan votes — so treat them as one editorial model, not an official UFC list.
  • Follow the feed. New event announcements, confirmed bouts and community predictions stream in with timestamps, which makes it a reasonable way to track smaller shows that mainstream outlets skip.
  • Predict fights and talk. Members post predictions per event and discuss them in forum threads, including dedicated threads for individual cards.
  • Browse by gym. Gym pages help when you want to know where a fighter trains or which teams a regional scene revolves around.

Who it suits

Reader Why it fits
Hardcore MMA/boxing fan Deep coverage of regional and non-UFC cards, not just headline events
Fantasy or prediction player Per-event prediction tools and community picks
Journalist or researcher Structured fighter/event/bout records and a dated news feed
Casual viewer Works, but the volume of minor promotions can be overwhelming

Trade-offs to expect

Rankings reflect Tapology's own scoring, so they will differ from official promotional rankings and from other databases. The site also notes an ad-free browsing option, which tells you the free experience carries advertising. Community predictions are fan opinion, not analysis.

A practical next step: if you follow a specific division, open the rankings page for that weight class and compare it against the official UFC rankings — the gaps tell you quickly whether Tapology's model matches how you already think about the division. For background on the sport's largest promoter, UFC is the primary source, while BoxRec is the equivalent record-keeping reference for boxing.

How does Tapology's proprietary ranking system work?

Tapology's rankings are a closed, algorithm-based system rather than a poll. The site states plainly that its rankings use a proprietary scoring system with no fan votes or opinions included — so the ordering reflects past results and the quality of opposition as the model weighs them, not popularity or media consensus.

What that means in practice

  • Results-driven, not narrative-driven. A fighter's position moves in response to wins, losses, and who those came against. In the UFC bantamweight list shown on the site, a loss dropped Charles Jourdain three spots to #12, with several fighters shifting by one place around him. That kind of immediate, mechanical adjustment is the signature of an automated model.
  • Division-by-division scope. Rankings are published per weight class, split into men's and women's divisions across the standard UFC weight ranges (125 through 265 for men, 115 through 135 for women).
  • The exact formula is not public. Tapology does not disclose the weights, recency adjustments, or opponent-strength calculations behind the numbers. Treat it as a consistent internal index, not a transparent equation you can audit.

How it compares to other ranking sources

Source type Basis Best used for
Tapology Proprietary algorithm, results-based Tracking movement over time, cross-checking a fighter's standing
Promotion's own rankings Panel or committee vote The official title-contender picture
Media and fan polls Subjective votes Gauging public narrative and hype

A practical way to use it

If you follow a specific division, check the rankings page after each event and note the deltas rather than the absolute numbers. A fighter sliding two or three places after a loss tells you the model is reacting quickly; a fighter holding steady after a close win tells you the model valued the opponent. For the official contender order that actually governs matchmaking, compare against the promotion's own list, since an algorithmic index and a committee vote can diverge.

Start with Tapology's rankings section, then open an individual fighter's page to see the bout history the score is built from — that record is what makes the placement legible.

Can I make fight predictions on Tapology?

Yes. Tapology is built around fan participation, and fight predictions are one of its core features. The site's activity feed shows users submitting predictions for events large and small — UFC cards, OKTAGON, regional shows and boxing events — so this is normal, expected use rather than a hidden extra.

What predicting looks like in practice

  • Each event gets its own prediction page, where you pick winners bout by bout.
  • Picks are tied to your account, so you can track how you've done over time and compare against other users.
  • Events also get dedicated forum threads, so you can argue your reasoning with people picking the other side.
  • Tapology runs its own rankings, which it states are based on a proprietary scoring system rather than fan votes — so your picks don't feed into the rankings. They're a separate, social layer.

Why people bother

For a casual viewer, predictions turn a card you'd half-watch into something with stakes. For a serious fan, it's a way to test your read on fighters you follow closely, especially on regional shows where you might know more than the average viewer. The downside is that predictions reward confident guessing; a good record says you follow the sport, not that you understand it deeply.

A useful next step

Pick one upcoming event you already plan to watch, make your picks before the first fight, then revisit them afterwards. If you find yourself consistently wrong on a particular division, that's a signal to read more about those fighters rather than just the headlines.

If you want a second opinion on a card, general MMA news and analysis sites such as MMA Fighting or Sherdog can complement what you find on Tapology.

What combat sports and events does Tapology cover?

Tapology covers MMA and boxing, with a strong emphasis on UFC and the wider professional MMA circuit. Its core database spans fighters, events, bouts and gyms, so you can look up a specific athlete, check a card, or browse an organization's history in one place.

What you'll find covered

  • MMA organizations: The UFC is the most prominent, alongside promotions such as PFL, KSW and the Dana White Contender Series, plus regional and international shows.
  • Boxing: Boxing events and bouts appear alongside MMA, including cards promoted under boxing-specific banners.
  • Fighter and event records: Individual fighter pages, bout histories, event pages and gym listings.
  • Rankings: Division-by-division UFC rankings (men's 125–265 lbs, women's 115–135 lbs) generated by Tapology's own scoring system rather than fan voting.
  • Community layers: A forum, news feed, user fight predictions and event discussion threads.

Who it suits

Reader Why it fits
Serious MMA fan tracking rankings and cards Structured rankings, event pages and bout histories in one database
Fantasy/prediction player User predictions and event threads for upcoming cards
Boxing follower Boxing coverage sits alongside MMA rather than in a separate product
Casual viewer Useful for looking up a fighter, but the volume of data can feel dense

A practical scenario: if a fighter's ranking shifts after a loss, you can open their profile, see the bout result and then jump to the division rankings to see who moved around them — useful context that a single news article rarely provides.

Trade-off to know: the breadth of coverage is the main strength, but it also means smaller regional events and boxing get less depth than major UFC cards. If you mainly follow one big promotion, the extra noise may not be worth it; if you follow several, the consolidated view is the point.

Next step: start from the rankings page to gauge how current the data is for the divisions you follow, then check an upcoming event page to see whether bout announcements and predictions are being updated at the pace you need. The site also offers an ad-free browsing option for supporters, which is worth considering if you use it regularly.

How can I browse Tapology without ads?

Tapology offers an ad-free browsing option directly on the site: a paid "Go Ad-Free" tier that the page describes as starting at $2.99/month. You can reach it from the "Support Tapology" prompt in the site's menu area.

What to expect

  • The ad-free option is a paid subscription, not a browser setting or a free account perk.
  • It is presented as a way to support the site, so the trade-off is straightforward: you pay a small monthly amount and browse without ads.
  • Everything else on Tapology — schedules, rankings, the forum, fightcenter, fighter/event/bout pages — remains the same; only the advertising is removed.

Practical next step

If you mainly use Tapology for occasional fight-night lookups, a free ad blocker in your browser may be enough. If you're a regular visitor who checks rankings, event pages and the forum most days, the paid tier is the cleaner route and directly funds the site. You can find the option via Tapology under the "Support Tapology" link.

Where can I discuss MMA fights with other fans on Tapology?

The main place to talk with other fans on Tapology is the Forum. It hosts event-specific discussion threads, so you can find a thread for a card you're watching and post alongside people following the same fights. The page evidence shows a forum thread tied to a specific event, with the description "The official Tapology discussion thread for the event!"

Two other Tapology features are social even though they aren't traditional chat:

  • Predictions — users post picks for individual bouts and events. It's a low-pressure way to compare your read on a matchup with other fans, and the activity feed shows predictions being added for UFC cards, regional shows and boxing events.
  • Rankings — Tapology's rankings use a proprietary scoring system rather than fan votes, so they're a reference point for debate rather than a discussion space themselves. Use them as material to argue about in the forum.

If you want broader MMA conversation beyond one site, these are established communities:

  • Reddit — subreddits like r/MMA host live event threads and daily discussion.
  • Sherdog — long-running forums with a traditional message-board format.
  • MMA Junkie — news site with an active comments section.

Next step: open the Forum, search for the event name you're watching, and if no thread exists, start one. A concrete scenario: you disagree with a ranking drop after a loss — post the fight and your reasoning in the forum thread for that event, and you'll get replies from people who watched the same bout.

Related questions

More questions →
MMA vs Traditional Martial Arts: Which Should You Start With?

MMA (mixed martial arts) is not a single traditional style — it is a ruleset and a training format that combines striking, clinch work, and grappling. Traditional arts such as karate, judo, BJJ, boxing, and muay thai each specialize in one or two ranges. If your goal is to compete in MMA, starting with one strong base discipline and adding others later is usually the most efficient path. If your goal is fitness, self-defense, or cultural interest, a single traditional art may suit you better. There is no universally correct answer; the right choice depends on your goal, your schedule, and the quality of coaching near you.

What MMA Actually Is

MMA is best understood as a sport with a rule set rather than a style with a fixed curriculum. Fights take place with rounds, weight classes, and rules about what strikes and holds are legal. Because the rules allow both striking and grappling, fighters must be competent in several ranges:

  • Striking at distance — boxing, muay thai, kickboxing, karate, and Taekwondo contribute footwork, punches, kicks, and timing.
  • Clinch — muay thai, judo, and wrestling contribute control, knees, elbows, and takedown entries.
  • Grappling on the ground — BJJ and judo contribute positional control, submissions, and escapes.

A traditional art typically goes deep into one area. MMA training deliberately spreads your time across all of them. That breadth is the point, but it is also why beginners can feel overwhelmed.

How Traditional Arts Map onto MMA

Art Primary contribution Typical beginner focus
Boxing Punching, head movement, footwork Stance, jab, defense
Muay thai Kicks, knees, elbows, clinch Basic strikes, pad work
Karate Striking, distance management, discipline Forms, basic techniques
Taekwondo Kicks, flexibility, speed Kicking mechanics, patterns
Judo Throws, grips, takedowns Breakfalls, basic throws
BJJ Ground control, submissions, escapes Positions, escapes, safety
Krav Maga Self-defense scenarios Awareness, simple defenses

Notice that no single row covers everything. This is why MMA gyms often teach a blend and why many fighters cross-train.

Starting with One Discipline vs Starting with MMA

Learning one discipline first

You build a strong foundation in one range. Progress is easier to measure, and beginner classes are usually well structured. You may develop habits specific to that art that later need adjusting for MMA rules — for example, a boxing stance that leaves you open to kicks, or a judo grip that exposes you to strikes.

Starting directly with MMA

You learn all ranges from the beginning, which mirrors how the sport actually works. The trade-off is that early progress in any single area can feel slow, and some gyms mix beginners into advanced classes too quickly. A good beginner MMA program separates fundamentals and introduces sparring gradually.

A common middle path: train one discipline for six to twelve months to build confidence and fitness, then add a second discipline, and only later join MMA-specific classes.

Match the Choice to Your Goal

  • Competing in MMA: Start with a strong base — wrestling, BJJ, muay thai, or boxing — then add the others. Ask whether the gym has active competitors and a structured pathway.
  • Self-defense: Prioritize arts that practice realistic scenarios, distance management, and groundwork. BJJ, judo, boxing, muay thai, and Krav Maga all contribute, but none is complete alone.
  • Fitness and stress relief: Any consistent art works. Choose the one you will actually attend three times a week.
  • Cultural or traditional interest: A traditional art such as karate, judo, or Taekwondo may be more rewarding than a sport-focused MMA program.

How to Evaluate a Local Gym

  1. Ask about the beginner pathway. Is there a dedicated introductory course, or are beginners placed directly into mixed classes?
  2. Watch a class. Look at how sparring is introduced, whether safety gear is required, and whether coaching is specific or generic.
  3. Check the schedule. Can you attend the ranges you want — striking, clinch, grappling — at times that fit your week?
  4. Ask about sparring policy. Good programs introduce contact gradually and match partners by experience and size.
  5. Confirm costs and commitments. Ask about trial classes, membership terms, and any equipment you must buy. Do not assume prices; get them in writing.
  6. Meet the instructor. Ask about their background and whether they coach beginners regularly.

A Practical First Step

If you are unsure, try a single trial class in one striking art and one grappling art within the same month. Compare how each feels and how the gym treats beginners. Then decide whether to go deep in one art or join an MMA fundamentals program. Either path can work — the deciding factor is usually the quality of coaching and whether you keep showing up.

This article provides general information about martial arts training options and is not a substitute for advice from a qualified instructor at your chosen gym.

What Is the MESON Chess Problem Database and How Do You Use It?

MESON is a free, online database of chess problems and endgame studies hosted on the BDS Website (bstephen.me.uk), run by Brian Stephenson. According to the site, it has been free and online since 2006 and currently contains more than 256,000 items. It is the right resource if you want to look up composed problems, search for a specific composer's work, or study endgame studies — rather than browse casual tactics puzzles.

What MESON actually contains

MESON is a chess problem database, not a game database. That distinction matters:

  • Chess problems are composed positions with a stipulated task (for example, "mate in 2" or "mate in 3"), usually with a unique solution the composer designed.
  • Endgame studies are composed endgame positions where the task is normally to win or draw, again with a constructed, often surprising solution.

The site describes MESON as containing "more than 256,000 items," covering this kind of composed material. It does not claim to be a record of played games, so don't expect opening statistics or tournament results here.

How to access it

Access is through the BDS Website's navigation menu:

  1. Go to the BDS Website (bstephen.me.uk).
  2. Select the MESON menu item.
  3. You land in the database itself, where you can search and browse.

The site states MESON has been free and online since 2006. No pricing, account, or login requirement is mentioned in the available site information, so treat access as open browsing unless the site itself tells you otherwise when you arrive.

How to search for problems and studies

The site's own description does not spell out the search fields, so the practical approach is to work from what a problem database of this kind is built to answer. Typical ways to use it:

  • By composer — if you already know whose problems you want (for example, work by a specific problemist), a composer search is the fastest route.
  • By problem type or stipulation — mate-in-2, mate-in-3, helpmate, selfmate, study, and similar categories let you narrow to the genre you care about.
  • By position — entering the pieces or a diagram position lets you find whether a given setting already exists, which is useful if you are checking a composition or studying a theme.

Because the exact field names and menu labels are not documented in the source material, verify them on the MESON search page itself rather than assuming a fixed layout. The database is implemented with MySQL and Perl (with CGI::Simple, HTML::Template and XML::LibXML) and a jQuery/Bootstrap/DataTables front end, which is consistent with a searchable, table-driven interface.

What else is on the BDS Website

MESON is one part of a larger site, and the surrounding sections are useful if you want context or related material:

Section What it offers
Chess Problems Brian Stephenson's own compositions, published since 1977 and being added gradually
Endgame Studies His articles on endgame studies, written in Chess since 2006 and, with Roland Ott, in Schweizerische Schachzeitung since 2014
MESON The main problem database (256,000+ items)
BDS Ladder A former problem-solving competition, now closed, but the problems used are still available to try
IT Notes on the software and tools used to build the site
Blog, Audio Drama, Photos Non-chess personal content

If your interest is specifically endgame studies, the Endgame Studies menu and MESON together cover both the articles and the underlying positions.

Practical tips

  • Start narrow. With 256,000+ items, searching by composer or stipulation first will get you to relevant material faster than browsing.
  • Use the Ladder problems for practice. The BDS Ladder is closed as a competition, but the site keeps its problems available if you want solving practice.
  • Check the composer's own page for context. Stephenson has composed and published problems since 1977, and his Chess Problems section is a small, curated complement to the much larger MESON collection.
  • Contact route. The site points to the BCPS Website contact page, where Stephenson is listed as magazine curator, if you need to reach him.

MESON is best understood as a specialist reference for composed chess problems and studies: free, long-running, and large enough that targeted searching beats casual browsing.

What Is Jiu-Jitsu and How Do the Main Styles Differ?

Jiu-jitsu is a grappling martial art built around leverage, positional control, and submissions rather than striking. The two styles most people encounter are Japanese jiu-jitsu (often spelled jujutsu) and Brazilian jiu-jitsu (BJJ). They share roots, but they differ in origin, rules, and training emphasis: Japanese jiu-jitsu is a broader self-defense system that includes strikes, throws, joint locks, and some groundwork, while BJJ specializes in ground fighting and is practiced both as a self-defense method and as a sport governed by organizations such as the IBJJF.

What jiu-jitsu actually is

At its core, jiu-jitsu assumes that a smaller, weaker person can control or submit a larger opponent by using timing, leverage, and body mechanics instead of size and strength. The main tools are:

  • Takedowns and throws — bringing the opponent to the ground.
  • Positional control — pinning or advancing through dominant positions.
  • Submissions — joint locks (e.g., armbars) and chokes (e.g., rear naked choke) that force an opponent to submit.

Because striking is limited or absent in the sport forms, the emphasis falls on grips, weight distribution, hip movement, and the ability to stay calm under pressure.

Japanese jiu-jitsu vs. Brazilian jiu-jitsu

Dimension Japanese jiu-jitsu (jujutsu) Brazilian jiu-jitsu (BJJ)
Origin Traditional Japanese martial arts, developed for battlefield and self-defense use Derived from Japanese judo and jiu-jitsu, developed and refined in Brazil
Scope Broad: strikes, throws, joint locks, chokes, standing and ground work Narrower: primarily grappling, ground control, and submissions
Training emphasis Self-defense scenarios, forms, and a wide technical syllabus Live sparring (rolling), positional sparring, and competition
Sport structure Less standardized as a single global sport Organized sport with rules, divisions, and governing bodies like the IBJJF
Typical uniform Traditional gi Gi and no-gi (rash guard and shorts)

The practical takeaway: if you want a broad self-defense system with striking and standing techniques, Japanese jiu-jitsu may fit. If you want a deep, sport-tested ground game with frequent live sparring, BJJ is the more direct path.

Core positions and techniques in BJJ

BJJ organizes ground fighting around a set of recognizable positions. Knowing them helps you follow any class or match:

  • Guard — you are on your back or seated, using your legs to control the opponent's upper body. It is an offensive position, not a passive one.
  • Mount — you are on top, chest-to-chest, with high control.
  • Side control — you are on top, perpendicular to the opponent, pinning the torso.
  • Back control — you are behind the opponent with hooks in, the strongest position for finishing.
  • Half guard, knee-on-belly, and turtle — transitional positions that appear constantly in sparring.

From these positions come submissions such as armbars, triangle chokes, kimuras, and rear naked chokes. Beginners typically spend their first weeks learning to escape bad positions and hold good ones before chasing submissions.

The belt system

BJJ uses a belt system to mark progress, generally progressing through white, blue, purple, brown, and black. Adult belts after black (e.g., red-and-black) represent further time and contribution to the art. Requirements and promotion timelines vary by school and are not fixed by a single global standard, though competition divisions are organized by belt, age, and weight.

How sport BJJ competitions are structured

Sport BJJ matches are typically organized by belt, age division, and weight class. A governing body sets the rules, weight categories, uniform requirements, and referee standards. The IBJJF (International Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Federation) is one such governing body; its site describes it as the International Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Federation and it is widely referenced for competition rules and event organization. If you plan to compete, check the specific rule set for your event, because legal techniques often differ by belt level and age division.

Gi vs. no-gi training

  • Gi training uses a traditional uniform. Grips on the jacket and pants create a slower, more control-oriented game with many collar and sleeve chokes.
  • No-gi training uses a rash guard and shorts. Without fabric grips, the game becomes faster and more reliant on body locks, wrestling-style control, and different choke entries.

Many schools offer both, and skills transfer between them, but the pacing and techniques differ enough that most practitioners train both deliberately.

What beginners should expect in a first class

A typical first class includes a warm-up, technique instruction, and live sparring or drilling. You do not need prior experience, but a few practical points help:

  • Wear comfortable athletic clothing or a loaner gi if the school provides one.
  • Expect close physical contact and to tap early when a submission is applied — tapping is a normal safety signal, not a failure.
  • Focus on breathing and basic positions rather than winning rounds.
  • Ask about the school's rules on hygiene, footwear off the mat, and uniform requirements.

The fastest way to understand jiu-jitsu is to try a class and feel how leverage changes what is possible against a larger opponent. From there, choose gi, no-gi, or both based on your goals — self-defense, fitness, or competition.

Website Overview

An established domain and managed infrastructure suggest continuity of operations and may support dependable delivery, although neither guarantees service quality. Page metadata, canonical configuration and social previews work together to provide more consistent search and sharing presentation.

Domain and Registration

Registered in 2005, this domain has about 21 years of history. That suggests continuity, although ownership and purpose may have changed. Transfer-protection status is present, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The domain uses the common .com extension, which is not an independent safety signal.

DNS and Email

Nameservers are provided by Cloudflare, indicating managed DNS hosting. MX records point to the Google Workspace email service. No CNAME was found; the observed records resolve directly to addresses. SPF and DMARC are configured. DKIM status is unknown. TXT records include verification markers for Google. Such markers may also remain after a service stops being used.

TLS and Certificates

The public key uses EC with 256 bits. The server supplied a complete certificate chain. No organization name is present in the certificate; the available fields are consistent with domain validation. The certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, commonly associated with automated certificate services. The certificate's total validity is about 89 days, consistent with a short renewal cycle.

HTTP and Browser Security

The response lacks these common security headers: Permissions-Policy. No X-Powered-By header was found, reducing one common source of backend fingerprinting information. The cf-ray response header indicates a CDN or caching proxy in the delivery path. No obvious internal addresses or debug information were found in the headers. The Server header identifies cloudflare without an exact version.

Technology Stack Analysis

The public page identifies Google Analytics, Cloudflare without precise versions, leaving fewer clues for version-specific scanning.

Search and Social Sharing

The title has 30 characters, within a common display range. A meta description is present, with 75 characters. No Generator meta tag is publicly exposed. A viewport declaration is present, providing a basis for mobile layout. A canonical URL is set and points to the current website.

Hosting and Email

DNSCloudflare
HostingCloudflare
EmailGoogle Workspace
Location Location unknown 104.20.24.227

User reviews (0)

  • No reviews yet.

Pages, Search and Sharing

Meta descriptionThe site for serious fans of the UFC, MMA, Boxing, and other combat sports.
Canonical URLhttps://www.tapology.com/
LanguageEnglish (default)
Twitter CardNot detected
gptbot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
google-extended 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
anthropic-ai 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
claude-web 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
claudebot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
ccbot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
facebookbot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
meta-externalagent 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
meta-externalfetcher 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
perplexitybot 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/
omgili 0 allowed · 1 disallowed
  • Disallow/

Registration details RDAP / WHOIS

Registrar1API GmbH
Registered2005-02-08
Expires2027-02-08
Domain statusclient transfer prohibited
Nameserversarely.ns.cloudflare.com、vasilii.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSECunsigned

DNS records

TypeNameValueTTLPriority
Awww.tapology.com104.20.24.227172—
Awww.tapology.com172.66.152.246172—
AAAAwww.tapology.com2606:4700:10::6814:18e3300—
AAAAwww.tapology.com2606:4700:10::ac42:98f6300—
MXtapology.comaspmx.l.google.com30010
MXtapology.comalt1.aspmx.l.google.com30020
MXtapology.comalt2.aspmx.l.google.com30020
MXtapology.comaspmx2.googlemail.com30030
MXtapology.comaspmx3.googlemail.com30030
MXtapology.comaspmx4.googlemail.com30030
MXtapology.comaspmx5.googlemail.com30030
NStapology.comarely.ns.cloudflare.com86400—
NStapology.comvasilii.ns.cloudflare.com86400—
TXTtapology.comgoogle-site-verification=qzJQ0Gzm83tm5WEb1rAVDGaTwNMk7zrY7OZGwpjdrDQ300—
TXTtapology.comv=spf1 a include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com ~all300—
DMARC_dmarc.tapology.comv=DMARC1; p=none;300—

TLS and certificates

AssessmentNormal configuration
Supported protocolsTLSv1.2、TLSv1.3
Negotiated protocolTLSv1.3
Certificate subjecttapology.com
IssuerLet's Encrypt
Valid until2026-11-19T18:12 · Remaining when checked: 56 days
Verification detailsCertificate trust: Passed · Hostname match: Passed

HTTP response headers

HeaderValue
content-typetext/html; charset=utf-8
cache-controlmax-age=0, private, must-revalidate
servercloudflare
strict-transport-securitymax-age=63072000; includeSubDomains
content-security-policyfont-src 'self' https: data:; img-src 'self' https: data: http://s3.amazonaws.com https://s3.amazonaws.com https://images.tapology.com https://www.google-analytics.com; object-src 'none'; style-src 'self' https: 'unsafe-inline' https://a.pub.network; script-src 'self' https: 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://consentcdn.cookiebot.com https://a.pub.network https://b.pub.network https://c.pub.network https://d.pub.network https://btloader.com https://api.btloader.com https://cdn.confiant-integrations.net https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com; default-src 'self' https: https://www.tapology.com https://api.tapology.com; connect-src 'self' https: https://api.tapology.com https://www.google-analytics.com http://e.deployads.com/e/dfp.tapology.com
x-frame-optionsSAMEORIGIN
x-content-type-optionsnosniff
referrer-policystrict-origin-when-cross-origin
set-cookieRedacted

Identified technologies

Google AnalyticsCloudflare