Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is Coiled Tubing Drilling?
Coiled Tubing Drilling (CTD) is a method of drilling wells using a continuous, flexible steel pipe — coiled tubing — instead of conventional jointed drill pipe. The tubing is run from a reel, so the drill string does not have to be broken into sections and reconnected each time it is moved. That makes CTD well suited to re-entering existing wells, drilling sidetracks and laterals, and drilling underbalanced (with the well flowing while drilling, rather than overbalanced with heavy fluid).
Coiled Tubing Drilling Service describes a directional CTD service built around proprietary bottom hole assemblies: COLT and POLARIS. The company positions the service around directional and horizontal wells drilled underbalanced, and says it can plan a project, liaise with rig and fluid-handling providers, and supply tools and crew. Its stated aims are accessing existing reserves and improving reservoir productivity. It also lists project management, casing exit solutions, modelling software and drilling optimisation among its related services, and notes geothermal, critical minerals, hydrogen and carbon capture and storage as applications.
Where CTD is typically used
- Mature fields: re-entering old wells to reach bypassed reserves without drilling a new well from surface.
- Sidetracks and laterals: exiting existing casing and drilling a new directional leg.
- Underbalanced drilling: keeping the well flowing while drilling, which can reduce formation damage in some reservoirs.
- Unconventional applications: geothermal, mining for critical minerals, hydrogen storage and carbon capture and storage, as listed on the site.
How it compares with conventional drilling
| Aspect | Coiled Tubing Drilling | Conventional jointed-pipe drilling |
|---|---|---|
| Drill string | Continuous tubing from a reel | Jointed pipe, added in stands |
| Tripping | Faster, no making/breaking connections | Slower, connection by connection |
| Directional control | Requires specialised bottom hole assemblies | Standard rotary steerable or motor systems |
| Typical fit | Re-entries, sidetracks, underbalanced work | New wells, long and complex trajectories |
| Reach and torque | More limited than jointed pipe | Greater reach and torque capacity |
Who it's for
Operators with existing wellstock who want to add drainage points without a full new well; coiled tubing rig companies considering adding a drilling capability; and project teams in geothermal or storage projects where the technique's suitability is being assessed. The site addresses operators, CT rig operators and companies wanting to convert a CT unit to e-line.
Practical next step
Before committing, check three things: whether your well's casing and completion allow a casing exit, whether the reservoir behaves well underbalanced, and whether a CT unit and crew are available in your region. If you are an operator, start by asking a CTD provider to review your well data and outline a candidate well; if you are a CT rig company, ask what tooling and training a conversion would require.
How does Coiled Tubing Drilling compare to conventional drilling in terms of cost and efficiency?
Coiled tubing drilling (CTD) usually wins on cost and efficiency in specific jobs, not as a blanket replacement for conventional rotary drilling. It is most competitive when the goal is to re-enter existing wells, drill sidetracks, or add laterals in mature fields, especially when drilling underbalanced (a stated capability of the AnTech service on Coiled Tubing Drilling Service). Conventional rigs remain the default for long, large-diameter, or high-complexity wells.
Where the cost and efficiency differences come from
| Factor | Coiled tubing drilling | Conventional drilling |
|---|---|---|
| Typical use | Re-entries, sidetracks, laterals, underbalanced drilling | New vertical or long horizontal wells |
| Mobilisation and rig-up | Smaller footprint, faster to move and rig up | Larger rig, longer mobilisation |
| Tripping | Continuous tubing; no making/breaking pipe connections | Pipe joints must be tripped in and out |
| Well control and pressure | Well-suited to underbalanced and live-well work | Often requires killing the well or heavier fluids |
| Reach and hole size | Limited by tubing stiffness and diameter | Handles larger holes and longer, more complex trajectories |
| Daily spread cost | Generally lower | Generally higher |
| Cost risk | Lower for short, repeatable jobs; less efficient on long intervals | Higher day rate, but more efficient on large jobs |
The efficiency gain is mostly mechanical: because the tubing is continuous, you avoid repeated connection-making, which shortens trips and reduces the time the well is exposed to drilling fluids. Underbalanced drilling can also reduce formation damage, which may improve productivity — a stated benefit of the service — but it adds surface equipment and planning complexity.
A practical decision rule
Choose CTD when the well already exists, the target is reachable with a coiled tubing bottom-hole assembly, and the interval is short enough that fast rig-up and tripping outweigh the limited reach. Choose conventional drilling when you need a large-diameter hole, a long or highly complex trajectory, or when the job is big enough that a conventional rig's higher day rate is offset by faster gross drilling.
A useful next step: for a specific candidate well, compare total job time (mobilisation + drilling + tripping + demobilisation) and total cost per metre, not just the day rate. The AnTech site's case studies and "Information for Operators" section are the right place to look for real job examples.
What are the key benefits of using Coiled Tubing Drilling for mature oil and gas fields?
Coiled Tubing Drilling (CTD) helps mature fields mainly by making it economic to drill sidetracks and laterals that would not justify a full rotary rig. The site describes a complete directional CTD service built around proprietary COLT and POLARIS bottom hole assemblies, with support for underbalanced drilling, project planning, and liaison with rig and fluid-handling providers. For a mature asset, that combination is the core benefit: you can re-enter existing wellbores, drill directionally or horizontally, and target reserves that are hard to reach with conventional methods.
H3 Practical benefits for mature fields
- Access to untapped reserves. The service is positioned around tapping existing reserves and improving reservoir productivity, which fits fields where the easy oil or gas is already produced.
- Underbalanced drilling. Drilling with the reservoir pressure balanced differently can reduce formation damage in depleted or pressure-sensitive zones, a common issue in mature fields.
- Re-entry rather than new wells. CTD is suited to working through existing completions and wellbores, so you avoid the surface footprint and much of the cost of a new well.
- Directional and horizontal reach. The COLT and POLARIS assemblies are designed for directional and horizontal work, letting you steer toward bypassed pockets rather than drilling straight ahead.
- Integrated project management. AnTech plans the project and coordinates with rig and fluid-handling providers, and supplies tools and crew. That matters on mature fields where several contractors and legacy well data must be stitched together.
- Adjacent applications. The same technology is presented as suitable for geothermal, critical minerals, hydrogen, and carbon capture and storage, so a mature-field campaign can share equipment and expertise with energy-transition work.
H3 How to decide
Ask three questions before committing: Is there a clear bypassed target reachable by a sidetrack from an existing well? Is the reservoir pressure low enough, or the formation damage risk high enough, that underbalanced drilling is worth the added surface equipment? And does the wellbore condition allow re-entry without a workover that erases the cost advantage?
If the answers point to a marginal target, CTD is usually the stronger option; if the target is large and the wellbore is in poor condition, a conventional rig may still win.
A useful next step is to read the operator-facing material and case studies, then compare them with your own well files. Coiled Tubing Drilling Service
In which applications, such as geothermal or carbon capture, is Coiled Tubing Drilling most suitable?
Coiled Tubing Drilling (CTD) is most suitable where you need to drill or extend wells with a small footprint, precise directional control, and the ability to drill underbalanced in mature or pressure-sensitive reservoirs. AnTech's Directional CTD service is built around its COLT and POLARIS bottom hole assemblies, and the company explicitly positions CTD for geothermal, critical minerals, hydrogen, and carbon capture and storage (CCS), alongside accessing untapped reserves in mature oil and gas fields.
Where CTD fits best
- Geothermal: Ideal for sidetracking or deepening existing wells to reach hotter zones, and for drilling in hard rock where conventional rigs may be costly to mobilise. Underbalanced drilling can help protect permeable geothermal formations.
- Carbon capture and storage (CCS): Suited to drilling injection and monitoring wells where you need accurate well placement into target storage formations, often from existing pads or brownfield sites.
- Hydrogen storage: Useful for solution-mined cavern and storage well work where directional control and a compact surface footprint matter.
- Critical minerals and mining: Appropriate for subsurface exploration and resource definition drilling where access is limited and conventional rigs are hard to move.
- Mature oil and gas fields: Strong fit for re-entry, sidetracking, and horizontal extensions to tap bypassed reserves, especially when drilling underbalanced to reduce formation damage.
- Brownfield and restricted-access sites: CTD's continuous tubing and smaller equipment set make it practical where a conventional rig would be uneconomic or physically difficult to place.
How to decide
Ask three questions: Is the target reachable by a slimhole directional well from an existing or nearby well? Would underbalanced drilling reduce damage or improve rates? And is mobilising a conventional rig the main cost barrier? If the answer to two or more is yes, CTD is worth evaluating. AnTech's service includes project planning and liaison with rig and fluid-handling providers, so the practical next step is to bring them a candidate well and reservoir description for a feasibility review.
For broader context on CTD applications, Coiled Tubing Drilling Service is the most directly relevant source, and AnTech covers the wider tooling and project-management side.
What steps are involved in planning and executing a Coiled Tubing Drilling project?
A Coiled Tubing Drilling (CTD) project moves through four broad phases: feasibility and candidate selection, engineering and permitting, mobilisation and drilling, then completion and evaluation. The site describes a complete directional CTD service built around proprietary COLT and POLARIS bottom hole assemblies, with project planning, liaison with rig and fluid-handling providers, and provision of tools and crew. That tells you the service model is integrated rather than tool-rental only, which matters most when you lack in-house CTD experience.
Phase 1 — Feasibility and candidate selection
- Screen wells for remaining reserves, reservoir pressure, and whether underbalanced drilling is acceptable.
- Decide directional or horizontal trajectory based on target access rather than default preference.
- Check surface constraints: coil unit footprint, fluid handling capacity, and rig interface.
- Confirm the objective is measurable — added production, accessing bypassed reserves, or enabling geothermal, hydrogen, carbon storage or critical-minerals work.
Phase 2 — Engineering and project management
- Design the bottom hole assembly and trajectory; here the choice between COLT and POLARIS type assemblies, plus casing exit solutions, drives the plan.
- Plan the casing exit if drilling from an existing wellbore.
- Model drilling dynamics, vibration and optimisation before committing to the programme.
- Agree interfaces with the rig and fluid-handling contractors — a common source of delay when each party assumes the other covers a scope.
Phase 3 — Mobilisation and execution
- Convert or prepare the coil unit, including e-line conversion where wireline work is needed.
- Deploy tools and crew, with monitoring and support during drilling.
- Manage underbalanced conditions continuously; this is where planning quality shows up as either stable drilling or repeated interruptions.
Phase 4 — Completion and evaluation
- Run completion or perforating work as required.
- Compare actual against predicted performance and feed results into the next candidate.
For a practical next step, start with the candidate well rather than the technology. Ask: does this well have a target the drill bit can reach, and can I handle the returns? If both answers are yes, then approach a service provider with the well data and let them scope the BHA and casing exit. If either is uncertain, run a feasibility study first — it is far cheaper than a failed mobilisation.
The main trade-off is integration versus control. A single provider handling planning, tools and crew reduces interface risk but concentrates dependency; splitting scopes can lower cost but demands strong in-house project management. Operators with little CTD history usually benefit from the integrated route; those with experienced drilling teams may prefer to retain more direct control.
For background on directional CTD applications, Coiled Tubing Drilling Service sets out the service and operator-facing information.
How can coiled tubing rig operators partner with AnTech to offer drilling services?
Coiled tubing rig operators can partner with AnTech by converting an existing CT unit and adding AnTech's directional drilling tools, project management and crew. AnTech states that it provides a complete Directional Coiled Tubing Drilling (DCTD) service using its proprietary COLT and POLARIS bottom hole assemblies, and that it can plan the project and liaise with rig and fluid handling providers. Its site also includes a dedicated "Information for CT Rig Operators" section and a "Convert Your CT Unit To E-Line" item, which points to unit conversion as a route into offering drilling services.
In practice, partnership usually means the rig operator supplies the coiled tubing unit, crew and wellsite logistics, while AnTech supplies the directional BHA, drilling optimisation and project management. This lets a CT operator offer underbalanced directional and horizontal drilling to its customers without developing downhole tooling itself.
H3 Practical steps
- Review your CT unit's suitability for conversion, including e-line capability for downhole tools.
- Contact AnTech through its enquiry route to discuss project scope and roles.
- Agree who handles fluid handling, rig interface and well control.
- Start with a defined candidate well or field to test the working relationship.
H3 Deciding whether to partner
- If your customers are asking for access to untapped reserves in mature fields, a drilling-capable offering is a natural extension.
- If you lack downhole directional tools and drilling engineers, partnering is faster than building that capability internally.
- If your units are already committed to conventional well intervention, the conversion and crew demands may not pay off.
AnTech also positions CTD for geothermal, critical minerals, hydrogen and carbon capture and storage, so operators serving those markets may find a drilling service adds value beyond oil and gas.
Next step: read the "Information for CT Rig Operators" page on Coiled Tubing Drilling Service and use its enquiry form to ask about conversion requirements and partnership models.
User reviews (0)