Website review
This review may include AI-generated content and is not individually verified. Domain, certificate and other facts come from the observed data on this page.
What is Delphax Inkjet?
Delphax Inkjet is a Toronto-based designer and manufacturer of digital inkjet presses, aimed at commercial printers and mail operations that need high-speed color output. Its site centers on the Elan 170, an envelope and printer system built for production environments.
What the company offers
- Digital inkjet presses for envelopes, direct mail, packaging and similar work
- The Elan 170, rated at 150 ft/min, or about 18,000 #10 envelopes per hour
- Pigment inkjet technology with water-fast CMYK inks and 1600 x 1600 dpi resolution
- A stated 2.1 picoliter drop size for image quality
- Pre-sale help including print samples, ink cost analysis and TCO/ROI assessment
Who it suits
The clearest fit is a mail shop or commercial printer replacing slow or unreliable tabletop envelope systems. The site describes one direct mail customer that replaced two tabletop units with an Elan 170, doubled output and cut running costs to roughly one-tenth of the old setup, which the company frames as $130,000 in ink savings over five years. That is the vendor's account of a customer outcome, not an independently verified figure, so treat it as a claim to test against your own volumes.
Next step
Before shortlisting, gather one month of production data: labor hours, setup time, waste and ink spend per envelope. Then request print samples and an ink cost analysis so the comparison uses your real numbers rather than a generic benchmark. If your work is mostly envelopes at high volume, the Elan 170 is the obvious starting point; if you need broader sheet-fed or packaging capability, ask how the press handles those jobs before committing.
How does the Elan 170 compare to traditional tabletop inkjet envelope systems?
The Elan 170 is positioned as a production replacement for tabletop inkjet envelope systems, not a like-for-like upgrade. Delphax's own customer story describes a direct mail operation running two unreliable tabletop units that broke down often and consumed expensive ink and printheads; after switching to the Elan 170, output doubled and running costs fell to roughly one-tenth of the old setup — reported as about $130,000 in ink savings over five years. That is a vendor-supplied customer account, so treat the figures as a directional claim rather than an audited benchmark.
H3 Where the difference actually shows up
| Dimension | Typical tabletop envelope inkjet | Delphax Elan 170 |
|---|---|---|
| Throughput | Limited; often run in pairs to keep up | 150 ft/min, equivalent to 18,000 #10 envelopes/hour |
| Duty cycle | Light production; frequent breakdowns reported in the cited case | Designed for continuous high-volume envelope and mail work |
| Ink and consumable cost | High per-unit ink and printhead spend | Vendor reports running costs at ~1/10th of the prior setup |
| Substrate range | Usually envelopes only | Envelopes, direct mail, packaging and more |
| Image quality | Adequate for addressing and basic imprinting | Pigment CMYK, 1600 x 1600 dpi, 2.1 picoliter drop size, water-fast and smudge-resistant |
| Footprint and operation | Desktop, minimal site prep | Floor-standing press; requires production space and operator workflow |
H3 Who should care
If your shop runs envelopes as a sideline and volumes are modest, a tabletop unit remains cheap and simple. The Elan 170 makes sense when envelope and direct mail work is a core revenue line, when you are already running two or more tabletop machines to keep up, or when ink and printhead replacement is eating your margin. Mail shops and commercial printers handling mixed work — envelopes plus direct mail plus light packaging — get the most from the versatility angle.
H3 A practical next step
Before committing, run the numbers on your own data rather than the case study. Delphax offers free print samples, an ink cost analysis and a TCO/ROI assessment, and its stated method is to compare labor, setup and waste against your current device. Ask for the ink cost analysis to be expressed as cost per thousand envelopes at your actual coverage and volume — that is the figure that determines whether the tenfold saving claim holds in your operation. Pair it with a real duty-cycle test on your own stock, since water-fast pigment inks behave differently across coated and uncoated envelope papers. For wider context on production inkjet, Delphax Inkjet is the starting point.
What types of materials can the Elan 170 print on?
The Elan 170 is positioned for envelopes first, but Delphax describes it as handling a wider mix of substrates: envelopes, direct mail, packaging, and "more" beyond those categories. So the practical answer is that it is not limited to #10 envelopes — it is a color inkjet press for commercial printers and mail shops that need one device to cover several jobs.
What that means in practice
- Envelopes — the core application, including high-volume #10 production.
- Direct mail — mailpieces that combine addressing, messaging and color graphics.
- Packaging — short-run or variable packaging work, which often means heavier or coated stocks.
- Other commercial print — the "and more" wording suggests job variety is part of the pitch, but Delphax's page does not list every supported stock.
A realistic reader scenario
A mail shop running two tabletop envelope printers might want to consolidate onto one press and also take on direct mail and light packaging work. The Elan 170's claimed versatility is aimed at exactly that situation — one device instead of several narrow ones.
What to verify before assuming a material will run
The page gives speed, resolution and ink details but does not publish a full substrate list. Before committing, ask Delphax for:
- A free print sample on your actual stock, not a generic demo sheet.
- Confirmation of supported thickness, coating and finish for each material you plan to run.
- Ink cost analysis per job type, since cost per piece changes with coverage and substrate.
- A TCO/ROI assessment that includes setup, labor and waste, not just ink price.
Those three steps — print samples, ink cost analysis, and TCO/ROI analysis — are the ones Delphax itself offers as the starting path, so they are the natural next move. If your work is mostly envelopes, the material question is straightforward; if you plan to mix packaging and coated stocks into the same press, test those first, because substrate behavior is where inkjet versatility claims are most often tested.
How can I request a free print sample from Delphax Inkjet?
Request a free print sample through the three-step path Delphax describes on its site: Print Samples, Ink Cost Analysis, and TCO & ROI Analysis. The print sample is the entry point; the other two are the follow-on evaluations.
Delphax Inkjet presents this as a low-commitment way to see output quality before deciding. The three options appear as request buttons alongside the Elan 170 press information, so the practical route is to use the site's sample-request option and then tell the team what you want to test.
What to prepare before you ask
A useful sample request is specific. Have these details ready:
- Your substrate or stock — envelopes, direct mail, packaging, or other material you actually run.
- The job type — for example, #10 envelopes or a direct mail piece.
- Your current setup — the device you are comparing against, since Delphax says it helps compare labor, setup, and waste data to your current device.
- Volume expectations — how much you print, and how often.
- What you want judged — image quality, water-fastness and smudge resistance, or throughput.
A concrete scenario
Suppose you run a mail shop with two tabletop envelope systems that break down often and consume expensive ink. Rather than asking for "a sample," send a request that says: "We print roughly X #10 envelopes per month on two tabletop systems. Please send a sample on our envelope stock showing color coverage typical of our direct mail work, and include the ink cost comparison for our volume." That gives Delphax enough to produce a sample relevant to your production, not a generic demo sheet.
What the sample does and does not tell you
A print sample shows image quality, color, and how the ink behaves on your stock — Delphax highlights water-fast CMYK inks that resist smudging under water or handling, and high resolution at 1600 x 1600 dpi with a 2.1 picoliter drop size. It does not by itself prove throughput, uptime, or cost per piece at your volumes. Those are what the ink cost and TCO/ROI steps are for.
Decision criterion
Ask for a sample when print quality or substrate compatibility is your open question. Ask for the ink cost and TCO/ROI analysis when your real question is running cost — the site cites a customer case where replacing two tabletop systems with an Elan 170 doubled output and cut running costs, with $130,000 in ink savings over five years. That figure is a customer outcome reported by Delphax, not a guarantee for your operation; treat it as a reason to run your own numbers.
As a next step, use the sample-request option on the site and state your stock, volume, and current device in one short message.
What is the total cost of ownership for a Delphax inkjet press?
Delphax does not publish a single total-cost-of-ownership figure for its presses, and no credible one exists in the abstract: TCO depends on your duty cycle, ink coverage, substrate mix and labor rates. What the site does offer is a process for building your own number — free print samples, an ink cost analysis, and a TCO/ROI assessment based on your production data — plus one worked example that shows where the money usually sits.
What the site actually quantifies
The only concrete figures on the page come from a customer story, not a price list:
- A direct mail operation replaced two unreliable tabletop inkjet envelope systems with an Elan 170.
- Output reportedly doubled versus the dual tabletop setup.
- Running costs fell to roughly one-tenth of the old configuration.
- The stated saving was about $130,000 in ink over five years.
Treat that as a single customer's reported outcome under their own volumes and ink coverage, not as a general estimate. The pattern it illustrates is the useful part: on high-volume envelope work, ink and printhead consumption — not the press itself — is often the dominant recurring cost.
The cost buckets that matter
| Cost category | What drives it | Why it usually dominates |
|---|---|---|
| Ink and consumables | Coverage, ink type, substrate absorbency | Largest recurring line for most production inkjet |
| Printheads and maintenance | Duty cycle, ink formulation, operator care | Unpredictable failures hit uptime, not just parts budget |
| Labor and setup | Job changeover frequency, run length | Short runs punish slow make-ready |
| Substrate and waste | Stock choice, calibration, spoilage rate | Waste scales with volume, not with press price |
| Capital and service | Configuration, contract terms | Amortized, but rarely the deciding factor |
How to get a real number for your shop
Use the vendor's own framework as a checklist rather than accepting a headline figure. Ask for the ink cost analysis and TCO/ROI assessment run against your current device, with labor, setup and waste included — that is exactly what Delphax says it does. Then sanity-check the output: if ink savings dominate the case, ask what coverage and envelope mix the model assumes, because that is the assumption most likely to move the answer.
If you are comparing options, it also helps to see how adjacent vendors frame the same decision, such as Xerox or Canon, and to review the press's stated specs directly at Delphax Inkjet — the Elan 170 is described there as running 150 ft/min, or about 18,000 #10 envelopes per hour, at 1600 x 1600 dpi with a 2.1 picoliter drop size. Those throughput and resolution numbers are what let you convert a quoted cost-per-print into an hourly cost for your own workload.
How does Delphax Inkjet support commercial printers and mail shops?
Delphax Inkjet supports commercial printers and mail shops by selling digital inkjet presses and by helping those buyers justify the purchase with production data rather than brochure claims. Its site targets operations that run envelopes, direct mail and similar high-volume work, and it positions the Elan 170 as a color inkjet press for exactly that audience.
What the support actually looks like
- A press built for mail production. The Elan 170 is described as an envelope and printer solution rated at 150 ft/min, or roughly 18,000 #10 envelopes per hour, using pigment CMYK inks that resist smudging when handled or exposed to water. The stated resolution is 1600 x 1600 dpi with a 2.1 picoliter drop size. For a mail shop, speed and smudge resistance matter more than fine-art color, so this is a sensible fit.
- A three-step evaluation path. Delphax offers free print samples, an ink cost analysis, and a TCO/ROI assessment. This is the most useful part for a buyer: you can test your own artwork and envelope stock, then compare labor, setup and waste against your current device.
- A comparison service, not just a quote. The site says the team helps compare real production data — labor, setup and waste — to your existing equipment. That is a concrete way to decide whether a press pays for itself.
A customer example worth reading carefully
The page describes a direct mail operation that replaced two unreliable tabletop inkjet envelope systems. According to Delphax's account, the Elan 170 doubled output versus the dual tabletop setup and cut running costs to one-tenth, which the company translates to $130,000 in ink savings over five years. That is Delphax's own customer story, so treat the figures as vendor-reported. Still, the pattern is realistic: tabletop systems often look cheap up front and become expensive through ink and printhead replacement, so the savings claim is plausible if your volumes are genuinely high.
How to decide whether to engage
If you run envelopes or direct mail at volume and your current setup breaks down often or consumes costly ink, ask for a print sample on your own stock and an ink cost analysis using your monthly volume. If you print short runs across varied substrates, ask specifically how the press handles those jobs before assuming the "versatility" language applies to your mix. For a broader view of the segment, Xerox and Canon also publish production inkjet information, which can help you frame comparison questions.
User reviews (0)